National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Behavioral Health (4)
- Care Management (1)
- Children/Adolescents (2)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (1)
- (-) Depression (6)
- Evidence-Based Practice (1)
- Guidelines (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (2)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) (1)
- Patient Safety (1)
- Prevention (1)
- Primary Care (2)
- Primary Care: Models of Care (1)
- Risk (1)
- (-) Screening (6)
- Shared Decision Making (2)
- Social Determinants of Health (1)
- Surgery (1)
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 6 of 6 Research Studies DisplayedO'Connor EA, Perdue LA, Coppola EL
Depression and suicide risk screening: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
The objectives of this article were to review the benefits and harms of depression and suicide risk screening and treatment and the accuracy of instruments to detect these conditions in primary care patients. Evidence gathered from the literature search supported screening for depression in primary care settings, including during pregnancy and postpartum. The authors noted, however, that there were numerous important gaps in the evidence for suicide risk screening.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500011I; 75Q80120D00004.
Citation: O'Connor EA, Perdue LA, Coppola EL .
Depression and suicide risk screening: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2023 Jun 20; 329(23):2068-85. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.7787..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Screening, Depression, Behavioral Health, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Risk
Franco MI, Staab EM, Zhu M
Pragmatic clinical trial of population health, portal-based depression screening: the PORTAL-Depression study.
Utilizing patient portals in a population health framework for depression screening presents a potentially effective method for proactively engaging and identifying individuals with depression. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a population health-based depression screening compared to in-clinic screening alone in detecting patients with depression. A practical clinical trial conducted at an urban, academic, tertiary care center's adult internal medicine outpatient clinic included a total of 2713 eligible adult patients due for depression screening with active portal accounts. Patients with known depression or bipolar disorder, and those who had been screened within the previous year were excluded. Participants were randomly allocated to receive either usual care (n = 1372) or population health care (n = 1341). In the usual care group, medical assistants screened patients during clinic visits. In the population health care group, patients were sent portal-based letters inviting them to complete an online screener, irrespective of appointment status. The Computerized Adaptive Test for Mental Health (CAT-MH™) was used for both in-clinic and portal-based screenings. The study found that the population health care group displayed a higher depression screening rate compared to the usual care group (43% (n = 578) vs. 33% (n = 459), p < 0.0001). Additionally, the rate of positive screens was greater in the population health care group than in the usual care group (10% (n = 58) vs. 4% (n = 17), p < 0.001).
AHRQ-funded; HS26151
Citation: Franco MI, Staab EM, Zhu M .
Pragmatic clinical trial of population health, portal-based depression screening: the PORTAL-Depression study.
J Gen Intern Med 2023 Mar;38(4):857-64. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07779-9.
Keywords: Depression, Behavioral Health, Screening, Health Information Technology (HIT)
Srivatsan S, Guduguntla V, Young KZ
Clinical versus patient-reported measures of depression in bariatric surgery.
This study examined the relationship between traditional clinical screening tools and a novel patient-reported depression screening survey, Patient Health Questionnaire 8 (PHQ-8), in the setting of the bariatric surgery preoperative assessment. The researchers found a higher rate of clinically diagnosed depression in their cohort compared to the general population. However, when using the validated PHQ-8 survey, the rate of depression more closely approximated the national incidence.
AHRQ-funded; HS023621; HS024403.
Citation: Srivatsan S, Guduguntla V, Young KZ .
Clinical versus patient-reported measures of depression in bariatric surgery.
Surg Endosc 2018 Aug;32(8):3683-90. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6101-8..
Keywords: Depression, Patient Safety, Screening, Surgery
Kato E, Borsky AE, Zuvekas SH
AHRQ Author: Kato E, Borsky AE, Zuvekas SH, Soni A, Ngo-Metzger Q
Missed opportunities for depression screening and treatment in the United States.
This study estimates the prevalence of depression assessment in adults age 35 and older and how prevalence varies by sociodemographic characteristics and depressive symptoms. It found that approximately 50 percent of US adults aged 35+ were being assessed for depression in 2014-2015. Certain populations were more likely to be missed, including men, people over 75 years old, minorities, and the uninsured.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Kato E, Borsky AE, Zuvekas SH .
Missed opportunities for depression screening and treatment in the United States.
J Am Board Fam Med 2018 May-Jun;31(3):389-97. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170406.
.
.
Keywords: Depression, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), Prevention, Screening, Social Determinants of Health
Aalsma MC, Zerr AM, Etter DJ
Physician intervention to positive depression screens among adolescents in primary care.
The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of computer-based screening and physician feedback to guide adolescent depression management within primary care. The investigators found that when a computer-based decision support system algorithm focused on adolescent depression and was implemented in two primary care clinics, a majority of physicians utilized screening results to guide clinical care.
AHRQ-funded; HS022681.
Citation: Aalsma MC, Zerr AM, Etter DJ .
Physician intervention to positive depression screens among adolescents in primary care.
J Adolesc Health 2018 Feb;62(2):212-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.08.023..
Keywords: Care Management, Children/Adolescents, Shared Decision Making, Depression, Health Information Technology (HIT), Behavioral Health, Primary Care, Primary Care: Models of Care, Screening
Etter DJ, McCord A, Ouyang F
Suicide screening in primary care: use of an electronic screener to assess suicidality and improve provider follow-up for adolescents.
The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of using an existing computer decision support system to screen adolescent patients for suicidality and provide follow-up guidance to clinicians in a primary care setting. The authors concluded that incorporating adolescent suicide screening and provider follow-up guidance into an existing computer decision support system in primary care was feasible and well utilized by providers.
AHRQ-funded; HS022681.
Citation: Etter DJ, McCord A, Ouyang F .
Suicide screening in primary care: use of an electronic screener to assess suicidality and improve provider follow-up for adolescents.
J Adolesc Health 2018 Feb;62(2):191-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.08.026..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Depression, Behavioral Health, Primary Care, Screening