National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Cancer (3)
- Cancer: Breast Cancer (1)
- (-) Cancer: Cervical Cancer (6)
- Cancer: Colorectal Cancer (1)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (1)
- Disparities (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (2)
- Infectious Diseases (1)
- Prevention (3)
- Primary Care (1)
- Rural/Inner-City Residents (1)
- Screening (5)
- Sexual Health (1)
- Shared Decision Making (1)
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) (3)
- Urban Health (1)
- Women (2)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 6 of 6 Research Studies DisplayedDanan ER, Than C, Chawla N
Abnormal cervical cancer screening results among US veteran and non-veteran participants in the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS).
Researchers tested whether Veterans with a recent cervical cancer screening test were more likely than non-Veterans to have received an abnormal result. Data was taken from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). An adjusted regression model of the date indicated that a previously observed association between Veteran status and abnormal screening result was explained by differences in sociodemographic and health factors between Veterans and non-Veterans. The researchers concluded that clinicians should address modifiable risk factors and provide evidence-based follow-up for abnormal results.
AHRQ-funded; HS026379.
Citation: Danan ER, Than C, Chawla N .
Abnormal cervical cancer screening results among US veteran and non-veteran participants in the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS).
Prev Med Rep 2023 Dec; 36:102472. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102472..
Keywords: Cancer: Cervical Cancer, Cancer, Screening, Women, Prevention
McGee-Avila JK, Richmond J, Henry KA
Disparities in geospatial patterns of cancer care within urban counties and structural inequities in access to oncology care.
This study examined geospatial patterns of cancer care utilization across diverse populations in New Jersey-a state where most residents live in urban areas. The authors used data from the New Jersey State Cancer Registry. They examined the location of cancer treatment among patients 20-65 years of age diagnosed with breast, colorectal, or invasive cervical cancer and investigated differences in geospatial patterns of care by individual and area-level (e.g., census tract-level) characteristics. They observed significant differences in geospatial patterns of cancer treatment by race/ethnicity, insurance type, and area-level factors. They found that Black patients had a 5.6% higher likelihood of receiving care within their own residential county compared to non-Hispanic White patients. Patients living in census tracts with the highest quintile of social vulnerability were 4.6% more likely to receive treatment within their residential county and were 2.7% less likely to seek out-of-state care.
AHRQ-funded; HS026122.
Citation: McGee-Avila JK, Richmond J, Henry KA .
Disparities in geospatial patterns of cancer care within urban counties and structural inequities in access to oncology care.
Health Serv Res 2023 Aug; 58(Suppl 2):152-64. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14182..
Keywords: Disparities, Urban Health, Rural/Inner-City Residents, Cancer, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer: Cervical Cancer
Estenson L, Kim N, Jacobson M
Do age-based discontinuation recommendations influence cervical cancer screening rates? Evidence from the United States' Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2016 and 2018.
The purpose of this study was to determine how the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation of discontinuing routine cervical cancer screening for certain women after age 65 affects Papanicolaou (Pap) test rates among women at age 66 in the United States. The researchers utilized nationally representative 2016 and 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data for 226,031 women ages 56-76 to calculate changes in annual Pap test rates at age 66. Among women 66-76, 22.5% indicated they had received a Pap test within the past year. At age 66, annual Pap rates decreased by 5.9 percentage points (p.p.) off a pre-66 rate of 39 percent. The change differed by race/ethnicity, education, and marital status. Pap rates did not change discretely for non-Hispanic Black women but did change for women from other racial/ethnic groups. The decrease was larger for women who graduated college than for women without a college degree and for women who were never married than for women who were married/partnered or divorced/separated. The USPSTF recommendation to stop cervical cancer screening after the age of 65 resulted in a substantial decrease in the rate of Pap tests at age 66 but disparately affects women based on marital status, education and race.
AHRQ-funded; HS026488.
Citation: Estenson L, Kim N, Jacobson M .
Do age-based discontinuation recommendations influence cervical cancer screening rates? Evidence from the United States' Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2016 and 2018.
Prev Med 2023 Jul; 172:107543. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107543..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Cancer: Cervical Cancer, Cancer, Screening, Prevention, Evidence-Based Practice, Women, Sexual Health
Kim JJ, Burger EA, Regan C
Screening for cervical cancer in primary care: a decision analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
The purpose of this study was to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force by modeling the benefits and harms of various cervical cancer screening strategies. In this microsimulation modeling study, it was estimated that primary hrHPV screening may represent a reasonable balance of harms and benefits when performed every 5 years. Switching from cytology to hrHPV testing at age 30 years yielded the most efficient harm to benefit ratio when using colposcopy as a proxy for harms.
AHRQ-funded; 290-2012-00015-I.
Citation: Kim JJ, Burger EA, Regan C .
Screening for cervical cancer in primary care: a decision analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2018 Aug 21;320(7):706-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19872..
Keywords: Cancer: Cervical Cancer, Shared Decision Making, Primary Care, Screening, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
Melnikow J, Henderson JT, Burda BU J, Henderson JT, Burda BU
Screening for cervical cancer with high-risk human papillomavirus testing: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Cervical cancer can be prevented with detection and treatment of precancerous cell changes caused primarily by high-risk types of human papillomavirus (hrHPV), the causative agents in more than 90% of cervical cancers. The objective of this study was to systematically review benefits and harms of cervical cancer screening for hrHPV to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force.
AHRQ-funded; 290201200015I.
Citation: Melnikow J, Henderson JT, Burda BU J, Henderson JT, Burda BU .
Screening for cervical cancer with high-risk human papillomavirus testing: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2018 Aug 21;320(7):687-705. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.10400..
Keywords: Cancer: Cervical Cancer, Evidence-Based Practice, Infectious Diseases, Screening, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
Ravikumar KE, MacLaughlin KL, Scheitel MR
Improving the accuracy of a clinical decision support system for cervical cancer screening and surveillance.
Researchers sought to enhance a clinical decision support system (CDSS) by improving its accuracy and incorporating changes to reflect the latest revision of the guidelines. The recommendation accuracy of the enhanced CDSS improved to 93 percent, which is a substantial improvement over the 84 percent reported previously. A detailed analysis of errors is presented in this article.
AHRQ-funded; HS022911.
Citation: Ravikumar KE, MacLaughlin KL, Scheitel MR .
Improving the accuracy of a clinical decision support system for cervical cancer screening and surveillance.
Appl Clin Inform 2018 Jan;9(1):62-71. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1617451.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer: Cervical Cancer, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Prevention, Screening