National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 4 of 4 Research Studies DisplayedShafer G, Singh H, Suresh G
Diagnostic errors in the neonatal intensive care unit: state of the science and new directions.
In this narrative review, the authors discuss how the concept of diagnostic errors framed as missed opportunities can be applied to the non-linear nature of diagnosis in a critical care environment such as the NICU. They then explore how the etiology of an error in diagnosis can be related to both individual cognitive factors as well as organizational and systemic factors - all of which often contribute to the error.
AHRQ-funded; HS022087.
Citation: Shafer G, Singh H, Suresh G .
Diagnostic errors in the neonatal intensive care unit: state of the science and new directions.
Semin Perinatol 2019 Dec;43(8):151175. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2019.08.004..
Keywords: Newborns/Infants, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Patient Safety
Singh H, Graber ML, Hofer TP
Measures to improve diagnostic safety in clinical practice.
In this paper, the investigators discuss how the need to develop measures to improve diagnostic performance could move forward at a time when the scientific foundation needed to inform measurement is still evolving. They highlight challenges and opportunities for developing potential measures of "diagnostic safety" related to clinical diagnostic errors and associated preventable diagnostic harm. In doing so, they propose a starter set of measurement concepts for initial consideration that seem reasonably related to diagnostic safety and call for these to be studied and further refined.
AHRQ-funded; HS022087.
Citation: Singh H, Graber ML, Hofer TP .
Measures to improve diagnostic safety in clinical practice.
J Patient Saf 2019 Dec;15(4):311-16. doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000338.
.
.
Keywords: Patient Safety, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Healthcare Delivery, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Medical Errors, Adverse Events
Bundy DG, Singh H, Stein RE
The design and conduct of Project RedDE: a cluster-randomized trial to reduce diagnostic errors in pediatric primary care.
This paper discusses the results of Project RedDE, which was a virtual collaborative quality improvement study to reduce diagnostic errors in pediatric primary care practices. Forty-three practices were initially recruited, with a total of 31 practices left at the end due to practice dropout and two participating practices merging. This study was a randomized controlled trial targeting three common diagnostic errors (missed diagnoses of adolescent depression, abnormal blood pressure, and lack of followup for abnormal laboratory results). Contamination across study groups was a recurring problem, but risk mitigations were used. Electronic health records contributed to teams’ success.
AHRQ-funded; HS203608.
Citation: Bundy DG, Singh H, Stein RE .
The design and conduct of Project RedDE: a cluster-randomized trial to reduce diagnostic errors in pediatric primary care.
Clin Trials 2019 Apr;16(2):154-64. doi: 10.1177/1740774518820522..
Keywords: Adverse Events, Children/Adolescents, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Prevention, Primary Care, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement
Lacson R, Cochon L, Ip I
Classifying safety events related to diagnostic imaging from a safety reporting system using a human factors framework.
This study measured the prevalence of safety events related to diagnostic imaging reported to an electronic safety reporting system. The authors evaluated reports all system reports from 2015 at an academic medical center. Out of 11,570 safety reports submitted, only 7% were related to diagnostic imaging. The adverse event was reported as either result communication or harm during the imaging procedure itself. The harms were rates from 0 to 4 by the reporter. Harms from 2-4 were considered as “potential harm."
AHRQ-funded; HS024722.
Citation: Lacson R, Cochon L, Ip I .
Classifying safety events related to diagnostic imaging from a safety reporting system using a human factors framework.
J Am Coll Radiol 2019 Mar;16(3):282-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.10.015..
Keywords: Adverse Events, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Imaging, Patient Safety, Medical Errors