National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Cancer (1)
- Cancer: Breast Cancer (1)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (3)
- Elderly (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (2)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- Medication (1)
- Opioids (1)
- Outcomes (1)
- Pain (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (2)
- (-) Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (5)
- Registries (1)
- (-) Shared Decision Making (5)
- Transplantation (1)
- Women (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 5 of 5 Research Studies DisplayedRichardson JE, Middleton B, Platt JE
Building and maintaining trust in clinical decision support: recommendations from the Patient-Centered CDS Learning Network.
Knowledge artifacts in digital repositories for clinical decision support (CDS) can promote the use of CDS in clinical practice. However, stakeholders will benefit from knowing which they can trust before adopting artifacts from knowledge repositories. In this paper, the investigators discuss their investigation into trust for knowledge artifacts and repositories by the Patient-Centered CDS Learning Network's Trust Framework Working Group (TFWG).
AHRQ-funded; HS024849.
Citation: Richardson JE, Middleton B, Platt JE .
Building and maintaining trust in clinical decision support: recommendations from the Patient-Centered CDS Learning Network.
Learn Health Syst 2020 Apr;4(2):e10208. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10208.
.
.
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Marcial LH, Blumenfeld B, Harle C
Barriers, facilitators, and potential solutions to advancing interoperable clinical decision support: multi-stakeholder consensus recommendations for the opioid use case.
These proceedings report on the AHRQ-sponsored Patient-Centered CDS Learning Network (PCCDS LN) Technical Framework Working Group (TechFWG), which was convened to identify barriers, facilitators, and potential solutions for interoperable clinical decision support, with a specific focus on addressing the opioid epidemic. The key insights were extrapolated to CDS-facilitated care improvement outside of the specific opioid use case. If applied broadly, the recommendations should help advance the availability and impact of interoperable CDS delivered at scale.
AHRQ-funded; HS024849.
Citation: Marcial LH, Blumenfeld B, Harle C .
Barriers, facilitators, and potential solutions to advancing interoperable clinical decision support: multi-stakeholder consensus recommendations for the opioid use case.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2020 Mar 4;2019:637-46..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Opioids, Medication, Pain, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Killelea BK, Evans SB, Mougalian SS
Association between perceived benefits and receipt of radiotherapy among older breast cancer patients.
This study examined perceptions of older women with stage I estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer who underwent lumpectomy and were considering or receiving radiotherapy. Perceptions among 63 older women was that radiotherapy would reduce their 10-year-risk of local recurrent by an average of 18.7% although the literature showed only an 8% risk reduction. Participants who had the perception of a larger benefit were more likely to receive radiotherapy treatment.
AHRQ-funded; HS023900.
Citation: Killelea BK, Evans SB, Mougalian SS .
Association between perceived benefits and receipt of radiotherapy among older breast cancer patients.
Breast J 2020 Feb;26(2):231-34. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13518..
Keywords: Elderly, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Women, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Shared Decision Making
Schaffhausen CR, Bruin MJ, Chu S
Comparing pretransplant and posttransplant outcomes when choosing a transplant center: focus groups and a randomized survey.
In response to calls for an increased focus on pretransplant outcomes and other patient-centered metrics in public reports of center outcomes, this mixed methods study evaluated how the content and presentation style of new information influenced decision-making. This mixed methods design utilized qualitative and quantitative phases where the strengths of one method helped address limitations of the other, and multiple methods facilitated comparing results. The authors concluded that the presentation of public reports influenced decision-making behavior.
AHRQ-funded; HS026379; HS024527.
Citation: Schaffhausen CR, Bruin MJ, Chu S .
Comparing pretransplant and posttransplant outcomes when choosing a transplant center: focus groups and a randomized survey.
Transplantation 2020 Jan;104(1):201-10. doi: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002809..
Keywords: Transplantation, Shared Decision Making, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Outcomes
Lomotan EA, Meadows G, Michaels M
AHRQ Author: Lomotan EA
To share is human! Advancing evidence into practice through a national repository of interoperable clinical decision support.
The purpose of this study was to describe how a national repository of clinical decision support (CDS) can serve as a public resource for healthcare systems, academic researchers, and informaticists seeking to share and reuse CDS knowledge resources. AHRQ’s CDS Connect has provided a functional platform where CDS developers are actively sharing their work. CDS sharing may lead to improved implementation efficiency through numerous pathways, and further research is ongoing to quantify efficiencies gained.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201600001U; 233201500022I.
Citation: Lomotan EA, Meadows G, Michaels M .
To share is human! Advancing evidence into practice through a national repository of interoperable clinical decision support.
Appl Clin Inform 2020 Jan;11(1):112-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701253..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Registries, Health Information Technology (HIT)