National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Cancer (1)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (1)
- Chronic Conditions (1)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (1)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (1)
- Community-Based Practice (2)
- Comparative Effectiveness (1)
- Decision Making (1)
- Diabetes (1)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (1)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (5)
- (-) Evidence-Based Practice (9)
- (-) Health Information Technology (HIT) (9)
- Health Literacy (1)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (1)
- Implementation (2)
- Outcomes (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (2)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (5)
- Patient and Family Engagement (1)
- Patient Safety (1)
- Patient Self-Management (1)
- Primary Care (1)
- Provider (1)
- Provider: Pharmacist (1)
- Provider Performance (1)
- Quality Improvement (3)
- Quality Measures (1)
- Quality of Care (3)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (2)
- Registries (1)
- Telehealth (1)
- Women (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 9 of 9 Research Studies DisplayedPresley C, Agne A, Shelton T
Mobile-enhanced peer support for African Americans with Type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.
This study compared the effectiveness of a community-based diabetes self-management education (DSME) plus mobile health (mHealth)-enhanced peer support intervention to community-based DSME alone for African American adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. This randomized controlled trial took place in Jefferson County, Alabama within a safety-net healthcare system with a group diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and hemoglobin A1C ≥ 7.5%. The intervention group reviewed community-based DSME plus 6 months of mHealth-enhanced peer support, including 12 weekly phone calls, then 3 monthly calls from community health workers. The control group received community based DSME only. Primary outcomes were lower A1C and secondary outcomes were lower diabetes distress, depressive symptoms, self-efficacy or confidence in their ability to manage diabetes, and social support. Of 120 participants selected, 97 completed the study. Both groups experienced clinical meaning reduction in A1C. Participants in the intervention group experienced a significantly larger reduction in diabetes distress compared to the control group.
AHRQ-funded; HS019465.
Citation: Presley C, Agne A, Shelton T .
Mobile-enhanced peer support for African Americans with Type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.
J Gen Intern Med 2020 Oct;35(10):2889-96. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06011-w..
Keywords: Telehealth, Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient Self-Management, Diabetes, Chronic Conditions, Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Community-Based Practice, Comparative Effectiveness, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Outcomes, Education: Patient and Caregiver
Walter AW, Julce C, Sidduri N AW, Julce C, Sidduri N
Study protocol for the implementation of the Gabby Preconception Care System - an evidence-based, health information technology intervention for Black and African American women.
This hybrid type II implementation-effectiveness cohort study aimed at evaluating appropriateness, acceptability and feasibility implementation outcomes, while also systematically examining the clinical effectiveness of a preconception care (PCC) intervention, the Gabby System, for Black and African American women receiving health services in community-based sites. Contextual factors that influenced uptake and appropriate implementation strategies were identified to inform future scalability of the intervention.
AHRQ-funded; HS025131.
Citation: Walter AW, Julce C, Sidduri N AW, Julce C, Sidduri N .
Study protocol for the implementation of the Gabby Preconception Care System - an evidence-based, health information technology intervention for Black and African American women.
BMC Health Serv Res 2020 Sep 21;20(1):889. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05726-0..
Keywords: Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Women, Health Information Technology (HIT), Evidence-Based Practice, Community-Based Practice, Implementation
Homco J, Carabin H, Nagykaldi Z
Validity of medical record abstraction and electronic health record-generated reports to assess performance on cardiovascular quality measures in primary care.
The purpose of this study was to compare observed performance scores measured using 2 imperfect reference standard data sources with misclassification-adjusted performance scores obtained using bayesian latent class analysis. Using aspirin, blood pressure, and smoking performance data from the Healthy Hearts for Oklahoma Project, researchers found that extracting information for the same individuals using different data sources generated different performance score estimates. Recommendations included further research to identify the sources of these differences.
AHRQ-funded; HS023919.
Citation: Homco J, Carabin H, Nagykaldi Z .
Validity of medical record abstraction and electronic health record-generated reports to assess performance on cardiovascular quality measures in primary care.
JAMA Netw Open 2020 Jul;3(7):e209411. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9411..
Keywords: Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Cardiovascular Conditions, Quality Measures, Quality of Care, Primary Care, Provider Performance, Evidence-Based Practice
Lyles CR, Nelson EC, Frampton S
Using electronic health record portals to improve patient engagement: research priorities and best practices.
This literature review identified 53 studies published from September 2013 to June 2019 that informed best practices and priorities for future research on patient engagement with electronic health record (EHR) data through patient portals. While 90% of health care systems now offer patient portals, only 15-30% of patients use them to access their physicians or health care systems. Studies reviewed mostly involved outpatient settings and fell into 3 major categories: interventions to increase use of patient portals, usability testing of portal interfaces, and documentation of patient and clinician barriers to portal use. Limited health or digital literacy impacted patients’ use of portals. Clinicians reported a lack of workflows to support patient engagement through portals.
AHRQ-funded; HS023558.
Citation: Lyles CR, Nelson EC, Frampton S .
Using electronic health record portals to improve patient engagement: research priorities and best practices.
Ann Intern Med 2020 Jun 2;172(11 Suppl):S123-s29. doi: 10.7326/m19-0876..
Keywords: Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient and Family Engagement, Evidence-Based Practice, Health Literacy, Clinician-Patient Communication
Gernant SA, Adeoye-Olatunde OA, Murawski MM
Experiences applying technology to overcome common challenges in pharmacy practice-based research in the United States.
Despite the importance of pharmacy practice-based research in generating knowledge that results in better outcomes for patients, health systems and society alike, common challenges to PPBR persist. In this paper, the authors described PPBR challenges their research teams have encountered, and their experiences using technology-driven solutions to overcome such challenges. The authors describe the technology driven solutions they have used to address PPBR challenges.
AHRQ-funded; HS025943.
Citation: Gernant SA, Adeoye-Olatunde OA, Murawski MM .
Experiences applying technology to overcome common challenges in pharmacy practice-based research in the United States.
Pharmacy 2020 May 30;8(2):93. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy8020093..
Keywords: Provider: Pharmacist, Provider, Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR)
Hernandez-Boussard T, Blayney DW, Brooks JD
Leveraging digital data to inform and improve quality cancer care.
Efficient capture of routine clinical care and patient outcomes is needed at a population-level, as is evidence on important treatment-related side effects and their effect on well-being and clinical outcomes. The increasing availability of electronic health records (EHR) offers new opportunities to generate population-level patient-centered evidence on oncologic care that can better guide treatment decisions and patient-valued care. This study discussed how to leverage digital data to inform and improve quality cancer care.
AHRQ-funded; R01 HS024096.
Citation: Hernandez-Boussard T, Blayney DW, Brooks JD .
Leveraging digital data to inform and improve quality cancer care.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020 Apr;29(4):816-22. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.Epi-19-0873..
Keywords: Cancer, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Quality Improvement, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice
Businger AC, Fuller TE, Schnipper JL
Lessons learned implementing a complex and innovative patient safety learning laboratory project in a large academic medical center.
This paper describes the challenges, recommendations and lessons learned while developing and implementing a Patient Safety Learning Laboratory (PSLL) project, which is comprised of a suite of HIT tools integrated with a newly implemented Electronic Health Record (EHR) vendor system in the acute care setting of a large academic medical center. The PSLL Administrative Core engaged stakeholders and study personnel throughout all phases of the project. Challenges to implementation included stakeholder engagement, project scope and complexity, technology and governance, and team structure. Some changes were implemented during the trial and others were labeled as lessons learned for future iterative interventions. A willingness to think outside of current workflows and processes to change health system culture around adverse event prevention was one of the keys to success.
AHRQ-funded; HS023535.
Citation: Businger AC, Fuller TE, Schnipper JL .
Lessons learned implementing a complex and innovative patient safety learning laboratory project in a large academic medical center.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020 Feb;27(2):301-07. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz193.
.
.
Keywords: Patient Safety, Implementation, Health Information Technology (HIT), Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Evidence-Based Practice
Lomotan EA, Meadows G, Michaels M
AHRQ Author: Lomotan EA
To share is human! Advancing evidence into practice through a national repository of interoperable clinical decision support.
The purpose of this study was to describe how a national repository of clinical decision support (CDS) can serve as a public resource for healthcare systems, academic researchers, and informaticists seeking to share and reuse CDS knowledge resources. AHRQ’s CDS Connect has provided a functional platform where CDS developers are actively sharing their work. CDS sharing may lead to improved implementation efficiency through numerous pathways, and further research is ongoing to quantify efficiencies gained.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201600001U; 233201500022I.
Citation: Lomotan EA, Meadows G, Michaels M .
To share is human! Advancing evidence into practice through a national repository of interoperable clinical decision support.
Appl Clin Inform 2020 Jan;11(1):112-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701253..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Registries, Health Information Technology (HIT)
Liss DT, Peprah YA, Brown T
Using electronic health records to measure quality improvement efforts: findings from a large practice facilitation initiative.
This study described primary care practices' ability to obtain measures with reporting periods aligning with a large quality improvement initiative. Facilitators reported barriers to data collection such as practices lacking optional EHR features, and EHRs' inability to produce reporting periods across two calendar years. The authors conclude that EHR vendors' compliance with federal reporting requirements is not necessarily sufficient to support real-world quality improvement work. They recommended improvements in the flexibility and usability of EHRs' quality measurement functions, particularly for smaller practices.
AHRQ-funded; HS023921.
Citation: Liss DT, Peprah YA, Brown T .
Using electronic health records to measure quality improvement efforts: findings from a large practice facilitation initiative.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2020 Jan;46(1):11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.09.006..
Keywords: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Quality Improvement, Quality of Care