National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 5 of 5 Research Studies DisplayedWernli KJ, Smith RE, Henderson LM
Decision quality and regret with treatment decisions in women with breast cancer: pre-operative breast MRI and breast density.
The authors evaluated self-report of decision quality and regret with breast cancer surgical treatment by pre-operative breast MRI use in women recently diagnosed with breast cancer. They found that breast MRI use in the diagnostic work-up of breast cancer does not negatively alter women's perceptions of surgical treatment decisions in early survivorship.
AHRQ-funded; HS018366.
Citation: Wernli KJ, Smith RE, Henderson LM .
Decision quality and regret with treatment decisions in women with breast cancer: pre-operative breast MRI and breast density.
Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022 Aug;194(3):607-16. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06648-7..
Keywords: Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Shared Decision Making, Women, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Dullabh P, Sandberg SF, Heaney-Huls K
AHRQ Author: Berliner E, Dymek C, Harrison MI, Swiger J
Challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support: findings from a horizon scan.
This AHRQ-authored horizon scan identified challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support (PC CDS) and future directions for PC CDS. The authors engaged a technical expert panel, conducted a scoping literature review, and interviewed key informants. They quantitatively analyzed literature and interview transcripts and mapped the findings to the 4 phases translating evidence into PC CDS interventions (Prioritizing, Authoring, Implementing, and Measuring) and to external factors. Twelve challenges were identified for PC CDS development with lack of patient input identified as a critical challenge. Lack of patient-centered terminology standards was viewed as a challenge in authoring PC CDS. They also found a dearth of CDS studies that measured clinical outcomes, creating significant gaps in the understanding of PC CDS’ impact.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 233201500023I.
Citation: Dullabh P, Sandberg SF, Heaney-Huls K .
Challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support: findings from a horizon scan.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022 Jun 14;29(7):1233-43. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac059.
.
.
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Patient-Centered Healthcare, Health Information Technology (HIT), Shared Decision Making, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice
Dullabh P, Heaney-Huls K, Hovey L
The technology landscape of patient-centered clinical decision support - where are we and what is needed?
This paper explores the technology landscape for patient-centered clinical decision support (PC CDS) and what has come out of Patient Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) and health care delivery system transformation efforts. The authors explore what is needed to make it more shareable, standards-based, and publicly available with the goal of improving patient care and clinical outcomes. Three sources of information were used: (1) a 22-member technical expert panel; (2) a literature review of peer-reviewed and grey literature; and (3) key informant interviews with PC CDS stakeholders. Ten salient technical considerations that span all phases of PC CDS development were identified. Although significant progress has been made, challenges remain.
AHRQ-funded; 233201500023I.
Citation: Dullabh P, Heaney-Huls K, Hovey L .
The technology landscape of patient-centered clinical decision support - where are we and what is needed?
Stud Health Technol Inform 2022 Jun 6;290:350-53. doi: 10.3233/shti220094..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Shared Decision Making
Lin E, Uhler LM, Finley EP
Incorporating patient-reported outcomes into shared decision-making in the management of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study protocol.
This article describes a US-based 2-year, two-site hybrid type 1 study to assess clinical effectiveness and implementation of a machine learning-based patient decision aid integrating patient-reported outcomes and clinical variables to support shared decision-making for patients with knee osteoarthritis considering total knee replacement. Study results will be disseminated through conference presentations, publications and professional societies.
AHRQ-funded; HS027037.
Citation: Lin E, Uhler LM, Finley EP .
Incorporating patient-reported outcomes into shared decision-making in the management of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study protocol.
BMJ Open 2022 Feb 21;12(2):e055933. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055933..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Arthritis, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Orthopedics, Health Information Technology (HIT), Evidence-Based Practice
Chrenka EA, Solberg LI, Asche SE
Is shared decision-making associated with better patient-reported outcomes? A longitudinal study of patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty.
This study examined whether shared decision making (SDM) provides better outcomes using patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty as a test case. This observational longitudinal survey-based study surveyed patients receiving an initial THA or TKA from a large, multispecialty medical group in the Midwestern United States after they were scheduled for surgery and again at 12 months after their procedure. The majority of included patients were white (1255 of 1344) with only 3% using Medicaid benefits at the time of surgery. The three-item collaboRATE measure of SDM was added to existing patient surveys of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Patient responses were analyzed in regression models to estimate the association between preoperative collaborate scores and Oxford knee or hip scores at 12 months postoperatively. There was a moderate, positive association between preoperative collaborate scores and the Oxford scores at 12 months. The association suggests that SDM could be one tool to encourage better outcomes.
AHRQ-funded; HS025618.
Citation: Chrenka EA, Solberg LI, Asche SE .
Is shared decision-making associated with better patient-reported outcomes? A longitudinal study of patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty.
Clin Orthop Relat Res 2022 Jan;480(1):82-91. doi: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001920..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Orthopedics, Surgery