National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Access to Care (1)
- Adverse Drug Events (ADE) (1)
- Adverse Events (4)
- Ambulatory Care and Surgery (2)
- Antimicrobial Stewardship (1)
- Anxiety (1)
- Arthritis (2)
- Asthma (1)
- Back Health and Pain (2)
- Behavioral Health (13)
- Blood Clots (1)
- Blood Thinners (3)
- Brain Injury (1)
- Cancer (20)
- Cancer: Breast Cancer (5)
- Cancer: Colorectal Cancer (1)
- Cancer: Lung Cancer (1)
- Cancer: Prostate Cancer (2)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (10)
- Care Coordination (1)
- Caregiving (1)
- Care Management (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) (1)
- Children/Adolescents (13)
- Chronic Conditions (7)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (1)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (1)
- Colonoscopy (1)
- Communication (7)
- Community-Based Practice (1)
- Community Partnerships (2)
- Comparative Effectiveness (61)
- Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) (1)
- COVID-19 (4)
- Critical Care (1)
- Cultural Competence (2)
- Data (49)
- Dementia (1)
- Dental and Oral Health (1)
- Depression (5)
- Diabetes (5)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (9)
- Digestive Disease and Health (1)
- Disparities (4)
- Education (1)
- Education: Academic (1)
- Education: Continuing Medical Education (3)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (1)
- Elderly (8)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (13)
- Emergency Department (9)
- Emergency Medical Services (EMS) (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (119)
- Falls (1)
- Genetics (5)
- Guidelines (25)
- Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) (2)
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) (2)
- Healthcare Costs (4)
- Healthcare Delivery (13)
- Health Information Exchange (HIE) (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (30)
- Health Insurance (1)
- Health Literacy (1)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (82)
- Health Status (1)
- Health Systems (2)
- Heart Disease and Health (5)
- Home Healthcare (1)
- Hospital Readmissions (1)
- Hospitals (3)
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) (2)
- Imaging (6)
- Implementation (11)
- Infectious Diseases (4)
- Injuries and Wounds (1)
- Kidney Disease and Health (1)
- Labor and Delivery (1)
- Learning Health Systems (3)
- Long-Term Care (1)
- Low-Income (1)
- Maternal Care (3)
- Medicaid (4)
- Medical Errors (1)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) (6)
- Medicare (8)
- Medication (20)
- Medication: Safety (2)
- Mortality (3)
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) (2)
- Neurological Disorders (2)
- Newborns/Infants (1)
- Nursing (2)
- Nursing Homes (5)
- Obesity (3)
- Obesity: Weight Management (1)
- Orthopedics (2)
- Outcomes (21)
- Pain (5)
- Palliative Care (2)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (9)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (76)
- Patient Adherence/Compliance (4)
- Patient and Family Engagement (9)
- Patient Experience (4)
- Patient Safety (8)
- Policy (7)
- Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN) (3)
- Pregnancy (5)
- Prevention (10)
- Primary Care (10)
- Primary Care: Models of Care (1)
- Provider: Health Personnel (1)
- Provider Performance (1)
- Public Health (2)
- Quality Improvement (6)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (4)
- Quality Measures (5)
- Quality of Care (10)
- Quality of Life (3)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (7)
- Registries (7)
- Rehabilitation (1)
- (-) Research Methodologies (418)
- Respiratory Conditions (3)
- Risk (10)
- Screening (4)
- Shared Decision Making (13)
- Sickle Cell Disease (1)
- Simulation (1)
- Skin Conditions (4)
- Social Determinants of Health (8)
- Social Media (3)
- Stroke (1)
- Surgery (8)
- System Design (1)
- Teams (2)
- Training (3)
- Treatments (2)
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) (8)
- Vaccination (2)
- Vulnerable Populations (1)
- Web-Based (2)
- Women (7)
- Young Adults (2)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
351 to 375 of 418 Research Studies DisplayedBerkman ND, Lohr KN, Ansari MT
Grading the strength of a body of evidence when assessing health care interventions: an EPC update.
The authors discussed the state of revision of 2010 guidance on grading the strength of evidence (SOE) of the effectiveness of drugs, devices, and other preventive and therapeutic interventions in systematic reviews produced by AHRQ's Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) program. They concluded that EPC working groups will consider ongoing challenges and modify guidance as needed, on issues such as combining trials and observational studies in bodies of evidence, weighting domains, and combining qualitative and quantitative syntheses.
AHRQ-funded; 290200710056I.
Citation: Berkman ND, Lohr KN, Ansari MT .
Grading the strength of a body of evidence when assessing health care interventions: an EPC update.
J Clin Epidemiol 2015 Nov;68(11):1312-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.023.
.
.
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Evidence-Based Practice, Quality of Care, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Research Methodologies
Haukoos JS, Lewis RJ
The propensity score.
The authors discuss studies by Rozé et al and Huybrechts et al that used propensity score matching and propensity score stratification, respectively. They argue that although both methods are more valid in terms of balancing study groups than simple matching or stratification based on baseline characteristics, they vary in their ability to minimize bias. In general, propensity score matching minimizes bias to a greater extent than propensity score stratification.
AHRQ-funded; HS021749.
Citation: Haukoos JS, Lewis RJ .
The propensity score.
JAMA 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1637-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13480..
Keywords: Research Methodologies, Data, Risk
Christensen R, Maxwell LJ, Juni P
Consensus on the need for a hierarchical list of patient-reported pain Outcomes for Metaanalyses of Knee Osteoarthritis Trials: An OMERACT Objective.
A group of international experts convened to address issues regarding the need to develop hierarchical lists of outcome measurement instruments for a particular outcome for metaanalyses. After discussions, most participants agreed that there is a need to develop a methodology for generation of hierarchical lists of outcome measurement instruments to guide metaanalyses.
AHRQ-funded; HS021110.
Citation: Christensen R, Maxwell LJ, Juni P .
Consensus on the need for a hierarchical list of patient-reported pain Outcomes for Metaanalyses of Knee Osteoarthritis Trials: An OMERACT Objective.
J Rheumatol 2015 Oct;42(10):1971-75. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.141384..
Keywords: Research Methodologies, Arthritis, Pain, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Dusetzina SB, Brookhart MA, Maciejewski ML
Control outcomes and exposures for improving internal validity of nonrandomized studies.
The authors review examples of control outcomes and exposures from prior studies and provide recommendations for conducting and reporting these analyses. They found that there is inconsistent terminology for these concepts, making study identification challenging. They recommend that the rigor of nonrandomized studies can be improved with inclusion of control outcomes and exposures for bias detection.
AHRQ-funded; HS023099; HS023085.
Citation: Dusetzina SB, Brookhart MA, Maciejewski ML .
Control outcomes and exposures for improving internal validity of nonrandomized studies.
Health Serv Res 2015 Oct;50(5):1432-51. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12279..
Keywords: Research Methodologies, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Outcomes
Gephart SM
Fostering best practice: strategies for writing evidence-based practice briefs.
In this editorial, the author provides instructions to make the task of writing a brief manageable for even the newest of authors. From asking a compelling clinical question to telling the story of a critical appraisal of evidence to making recommendations, the overall goal of writing such a brief is to support best practice care in the neonatal intensive care unit.
AHRQ-funded; HS022908.
Citation: Gephart SM .
Fostering best practice: strategies for writing evidence-based practice briefs.
Adv Neonatal Care 2015 Oct;15(5):299-306. doi: 10.1097/anc.0000000000000222.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Nursing, Research Methodologies, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU)
Whicher DM, Miller JE, Dunham KM
Gatekeepers for pragmatic clinical trials.
The authors provided a framework to help guide gatekeepers' decision-making related to the use of resources for pragmatic clinical trials. They stated that recognition of the complex set of considerations that should inform decision-making will guide gatekeepers in making justifiable choices regarding the use of limited and valuable resources.
AHRQ-funded; HS000029.
Citation: Whicher DM, Miller JE, Dunham KM .
Gatekeepers for pragmatic clinical trials.
Clin Trials 2015 Oct;12(5):442-8. doi: 10.1177/1740774515597699.
.
.
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Evidence-Based Practice, Comparative Effectiveness, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Research Methodologies
Busse JW, Bartlett SJ, Dougados M
Optimal strategies for reporting pain in clinical trials and systematic reviews: recommendations from an OMERACT 12 Workshop.
A group of international experts convened to address issues regarding the need to develop hierarchical lists of outcome measurement instruments for a particular outcome for metaanalyses. After discussions, most participants agreed that there is a need to develop a methodology for generation of hierarchical lists of outcome measurement instruments to guide metaanalyses.
AHRQ-funded; HS021110.
Citation: Busse JW, Bartlett SJ, Dougados M .
Optimal strategies for reporting pain in clinical trials and systematic reviews: recommendations from an OMERACT 12 Workshop.
J Rheumatol 2015 Oct;42(10):1962-70. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.141440..
Keywords: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Arthritis, Research Methodologies, Pain
Coca Perraillon M, Shih YC, Thisted RA
Predicting the EQ-5D-3L Preference Index from the SF-12 Health Survey in a national US sample: a finite mixture approach.
The researchers developed a finite mixture model for cross-sectional data that maps the SF-12 to the EQ-5D-3L preference index. They concluded that finite mixtures offer a flexible modeling approach that can take into account idiosyncratic characteristics of the distribution of preferences. The use of mixture models allows researchers to obtain estimates of health utilities when only summary scores from the SF-12 and a limited number of demographic characteristics are available.
AHRQ-funded; HS000084; HS020263.
Citation: Coca Perraillon M, Shih YC, Thisted RA .
Predicting the EQ-5D-3L Preference Index from the SF-12 Health Survey in a national US sample: a finite mixture approach.
Med Decis Making 2015 Oct;35(7):888-901. doi: 10.1177/0272989x15577362..
Keywords: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), Research Methodologies
Vo NM, Trocki R
AHRQ Author: Vo NM, Trocki R
Virtual and peer reviews of grant applications at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
This study documents the first six unplanned virtual review (VR) sessions conducted during the 2012 hurricane season at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and their effects on review outcomes. Despite their technical novelty, all of the VR sessions have been successfully conducted to the satisfaction of reviewers and agency organizers. Special emphasis panel reviewers are more receptive to the new technology than study section reviewers.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Vo NM, Trocki R .
Virtual and peer reviews of grant applications at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
South Med J 2015 Oct;108(10):622-6. doi: 10.14423/smj.0000000000000353..
Keywords: Web-Based, Research Methodologies, Provider: Health Personnel
Polisena J, Garritty C, Umscheid CA
Rapid Review Summit: an overview and initiation of a research agenda.
This discussion paper highlights the important discussions that occurred during the Rapid Review Summit: Then, Now and in the Future, focusing on the initial development of a research agenda that resulted from the presentations and discussions. The research topics centered on three key areas of interest: (1) how to conduct a rapid review; (2) investigating the validity and utility of rapid reviews; and (3) how to improve access to rapid reviews.
AHRQ-funded; HS018987.
Citation: Polisena J, Garritty C, Umscheid CA .
Rapid Review Summit: an overview and initiation of a research agenda.
Syst Rev 2015 Sep 26;4:111. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0111-6.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Healthcare Delivery, Policy, Research Methodologies
Wang C, Dominici F, Parmigiani G
Accounting for uncertainty in confounder and effect modifier selection when estimating average causal effects in generalized linear models.
The authors propose and evaluate a Bayesian method to estimate average causal effects in studies with a large number of potential confounders, relatively few observations, likely interactions between confounders and the exposure of interest, and uncertainty on which confounders and interaction terms should be included. Their method is applicable across all exposures and outcomes that can be handled through generalized linear models.
AHRQ-funded; HS021991.
Citation: Wang C, Dominici F, Parmigiani G .
Accounting for uncertainty in confounder and effect modifier selection when estimating average causal effects in generalized linear models.
Biometrics 2015 Sep;71(3):654-65. doi: 10.1111/biom.12315.
.
.
Keywords: Data, Research Methodologies
Rodriguez M, Hogan PG, Satola SW
Discriminatory indices of typing methods for epidemiologic analysis of contemporary Staphylococcus aureus strains.
The researchers compared the discriminatory index of 5 typing methods for contemporary S. aureus strain characterization. They found that the typing methods yielded comparable discriminatory power for Aureus characterization overall; when discriminating among USA300 isolates, repetitive sequence-based PCR (repPCR) retained the highest discriminatory power.
AHRQ-funded; HS021736.
Citation: Rodriguez M, Hogan PG, Satola SW .
Discriminatory indices of typing methods for epidemiologic analysis of contemporary Staphylococcus aureus strains.
Medicine 2015 Sep;94(37):e1534. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000001534..
Keywords: Research Methodologies, Genetics, Public Health
Wyss R, Ellis AR, Brookhart MA
Matching on the disease risk score in comparative effectiveness research of new treatments.
The researchers used simulations and an empirical example to evaluate the performance of disease risk score (DRS) matching compared with propensity score (PS) matching when controlling large numbers of covariates in settings involving newly introduced treatments. When PS distributions are separated, DRS matching can improve the precision of effect estimates and allow researchers to evaluate the treatment effect in a larger proportion of the treated population.
AHRQ-funded; HS017950.
Citation: Wyss R, Ellis AR, Brookhart MA .
Matching on the disease risk score in comparative effectiveness research of new treatments.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2015 Sep;24(9):951-61. doi: 10.1002/pds.3810.
.
.
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Research Methodologies, Blood Thinners, Medication
Dickinson LM, Beaty B, Fox C
Pragmatic cluster randomized trials using covariate constrained randomization: a method for Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs).
This study used covariate constrained randomization with data on relevant variables before randomization was used to achieve balanced study arms in 2 pragmatic cluster randomized trials (CRTs). It found that covariate constrained randomization, which restricts the full randomization set to a subset in which differences between study arms are minimized, is a useful tool for achieving balanced study arms in CRTs.
AHRQ-funded; HS021138.
Citation: Dickinson LM, Beaty B, Fox C .
Pragmatic cluster randomized trials using covariate constrained randomization: a method for Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs).
J Am Board Fam Med 2015 Sep-Oct;28(5):663-72. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.05.150001.
.
.
Keywords: Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN), Research Methodologies, Primary Care
Fischer MA, Allen-Coleman C, Farrell SF
Stakeholder assessment of comparative effectiveness research needs for Medicaid populations.
Because children, pregnant women and people with mental illness have generally been underrepresented in research discussions, comparative effectiveness rsearch (CER) questions for these groups may be understudied. To address this problem, AHRQ commissioned a team to work with Medicaid Medical Directors and other stakeholders to identify relevant CER questions. Through an iterative process of topic identification and refinement, they developed relevant, feasible and actionable questions based on issues affecting Medicaid programs nationwide.
AHRQ-funded; 290200500161.
Citation: Fischer MA, Allen-Coleman C, Farrell SF .
Stakeholder assessment of comparative effectiveness research needs for Medicaid populations.
J Comp Eff Res 2015 Sep;4(5):465-71. doi: 10.2217/cer.15.26.
.
.
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Medicaid, Research Methodologies, Shared Decision Making, Vulnerable Populations
Thiel DB, Platt J, Platt T
Testing an online, dynamic consent portal for large population biobank research.
Michigan's BioTrust for Health contains over 4 million samples collected without written consent. Participant-centric initiatives are IT tools that hold great promise to address the consent challenges in biobank research. The authors created and pilot tested a dynamic informed consent simulation focusing on consent for research. Pilot testers raised concerns about the process of identity verification and appeared to have little experience with sharing health information online. The authors recommended applying online, dynamic approaches to address the consent challenges raised by biobanks with legacy sample collections.
AHRQ-funded; HS000053.
Citation: Thiel DB, Platt J, Platt T .
Testing an online, dynamic consent portal for large population biobank research.
Public Health Genomics 2015;18(1):26-39. doi: 10.1159/000366128.
.
.
Keywords: Data, Newborns/Infants, Research Methodologies, Screening
Xu X, Buta E, Anhang Price R
Methodological considerations when studying the association between patient-reported care experiences and mortality.
This study illustrated methodological considerations when assessing the relationship between patient care experiences and mortality. It found that the association between overall care experiences and mortality was significant for deaths not amenable to medical care and all-cause mortality, but not for amenable deaths.
AHRQ-funded; HS016980; HS016978.
Citation: Xu X, Buta E, Anhang Price R .
Methodological considerations when studying the association between patient-reported care experiences and mortality.
Health Serv Res 2015 Aug;50(4):1146-61. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12264..
Keywords: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), Patient Experience, Mortality, Quality of Care, Research Methodologies
Linares-Perdomo O, East TD, Brower R
Standardizing predicted body weight equations for mechanical ventilation tidal volume settings.
Predicted body weight (PBW) equations use height, age, and sex as input variables. The researchers compared National Institutes of Health (NIH) ARDS Network (ARDSNet), actuarial table (ACTUARIAL), and Stewart (STEWART) PBW equations used in clinical trials, across physiologic ranges for age and height. They concluded that significant differences between PBW equations for both men and women could be important sources of interstudy variation. Studies should adopt a standard PBW equation.
AHRQ-funded; HS006594.
Citation: Linares-Perdomo O, East TD, Brower R .
Standardizing predicted body weight equations for mechanical ventilation tidal volume settings.
Chest 2015 Jul;148(1):73-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-2843..
Keywords: Research Methodologies, Respiratory Conditions, Quality of Care
Ross ME, Kreider AR, Huang YS
Propensity score methods for analyzing observational data like randomized experiments: challenges and solutions for rare outcomes and exposures.
The researchers expanded upon an approach to the analysis of observational data sets that mimics a sequence of randomized studies by implementing propensity score models within each trial to achieve covariate balance, using weighting and matching. Challenges included a rare outcome, a rare exposure, substantial and important differences between exposure groups, and a very large sample size.
AHRQ-funded; HS018550.
Citation: Ross ME, Kreider AR, Huang YS .
Propensity score methods for analyzing observational data like randomized experiments: challenges and solutions for rare outcomes and exposures.
Am J Epidemiol 2015 Jun 15;181(12):989-95. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu469..
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Data, Research Methodologies
Proctor E, Luke D, Calhoun A
Sustainability of evidence-based healthcare: research agenda, methodological advances, and infrastructure support.
This project identifies the challenges associated with sustainability research and generates recommendations for accelerating and strengthening this work. Its recommendations fell into three domains: (1) pursue high priority research questions as a unified agenda on sustainability; (2) advance methods for sustainability research; (3) advance infrastructure to support sustainability research.
AHRQ-funded; HS020775.
Citation: Proctor E, Luke D, Calhoun A .
Sustainability of evidence-based healthcare: research agenda, methodological advances, and infrastructure support.
Implement Sci 2015 Jun 11;10:88. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0274-5..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Healthcare Delivery, Implementation, Research Methodologies
Whicher D, Kass N, Faden R
Stakeholders' views of alternatives to prospective informed consent for minimal-risk pragmatic comparative effectiveness trials.
This paper reports on interviews with Institutional Review Board members and researchers and on focus groups with patients from Geisinger and Johns Hopkins health systems, with the objective of eliciting participants' views of the acceptability of four different disclosure and authorization models for low-risk pragmatic comparative effectiveness trials of widely-used therapies. Results suggested that many participants believed that it was acceptable to streamline information disclosure and to use an opt-out process for eligible individuals who would prefer not to participate.
AHRQ-funded; HS021064.
Citation: Whicher D, Kass N, Faden R .
Stakeholders' views of alternatives to prospective informed consent for minimal-risk pragmatic comparative effectiveness trials.
J Law Med Ethics 2015 Summer;43(2):397-409. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12256.
.
.
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Research Methodologies
Brouwer ES, Napravnik S, Eron JJ, Jr.
Validation of Medicaid claims-based diagnosis of myocardial infarction using an HIV clinical cohort.
The investigators aimed to validate claims-based myocardial infarction (MI) algorithms in a Medicaid population using an HIV clinical cohort as the gold standard. Studying 1063 individuals over 2.5 years, 17 had an MI. Specificity ranged from 0.979 to 0.993 with the highest specificity obtained using the ICD-9 code 410.xx in the primary or secondary position and a length of stay greater than 3 days. Sensitivity of MI ascertainment varied from 0.588 to 0.824 depending on algorithm. They recommended that the type of algorithm used be prioritized based on study question and maximization of specific validation parameters that will minimize bias while also considering precision.
AHRQ-funded; HS018731.
Citation: Brouwer ES, Napravnik S, Eron JJ, Jr. .
Validation of Medicaid claims-based diagnosis of myocardial infarction using an HIV clinical cohort.
Med Care 2015 Jun;53(6):e41-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318287d6fd.
.
.
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Medicaid, Heart Disease and Health, Research Methodologies
Carman KL, Mallery C, Maurer M
Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: results from a randomized trial.
The researchers conducted a 5-arm randomized controlled trial, assigning participants to one of four deliberative methods or to a reading materials only control group. They found that participating in deliberation increased participants' knowledge of evidence and comparative effectiveness research and shifted participants' attitudes regarding the role of evidence in decision-making.
AHRQ-funded; 290201000005C.
Citation: Carman KL, Mallery C, Maurer M .
Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: results from a randomized trial.
Soc Sci Med 2015 May;133:11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.024..
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Evidence-Based Practice, Research Methodologies, Shared Decision Making
Featherstone RM, Dryden DM, Foisy M
Advancing knowledge of rapid reviews: an analysis of results, conclusions and recommendations from published review articles examining rapid reviews.
This paper summarizes results, conclusions, and recommendations from published review articles examining rapid reviews (RRs). RR definitions, methods, and applications vary substantially. Published review articles suggest that RRs should not be viewed as a substitute for a standard review, although they have unique value for decision-makers. Recommendations for RR producers include transparency of methods used and the development of reporting standards.
AHRQ-funded; 290201200004C; 290201200010I; 290201200011I; 290201200013I; 290201200015I.
Citation: Featherstone RM, Dryden DM, Foisy M .
Advancing knowledge of rapid reviews: an analysis of results, conclusions and recommendations from published review articles examining rapid reviews.
Syst Rev 2015 Apr 17;4:50. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0040-4.
.
.
Keywords: Research Methodologies, Evidence-Based Practice, Shared Decision Making
Cottrell EK, Whitlock EP, Kato E
AHRQ Author: Kato E
Defining the benefits and challenges of stakeholder engagement in systematic reviews.
The researchers examined the following questions: 1) what are the expected benefits of involving stakeholders in systematic reviews, and 2) what are the perceived challenges of involving stakeholders in systematic reviews? Using a literature scan and series of key informant interviews, they identified expected benefits such as establishing credibility and anticipating controversy. Challenges included time, training, resources and finding the right people.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201200004C
Citation: Cottrell EK, Whitlock EP, Kato E .
Defining the benefits and challenges of stakeholder engagement in systematic reviews.
Comp Eff Rev. 2015 Apr;5:13-19..
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Research Methodologies