National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Adverse Events (7)
- Children/Adolescents (2)
- Decision Making (1)
- (-) Diagnostic Safety and Quality (17)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (1)
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) (1)
- Healthcare Delivery (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (2)
- Health Systems (1)
- Hospitals (4)
- Imaging (3)
- Inpatient Care (2)
- Learning Health Systems (1)
- Medical Errors (9)
- Medicare (1)
- Neurological Disorders (1)
- (-) Patient Safety (17)
- Payment (1)
- Quality Improvement (9)
- (-) Quality of Care (17)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 17 of 17 Research Studies DisplayedAuerbach AD, Lee TM, Hubbard CC
Diagnostic errors in hospitalized adults who died or were transferred to intensive care.
The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to determine the prevalence, underlying causes, and harms of diagnostic errors in hospitalized adults who were transferred to an intensive care unit or who died. Data was taken from 29 academic medical centers in the U.S. in a random sample of adults hospitalized with general medical conditions. Errors were found to have contributed to temporary harm, permanent harm, or death in nearly 18% of patients; among patients who died, diagnostic error was judged to have contributed to death in 6.6% of cases. The researchers noted that problems with choosing and interpreting tests and the processes involved with clinician assessment were a high priority for improvement efforts.
AHRQ-funded; HS027369.
Citation: Auerbach AD, Lee TM, Hubbard CC .
Diagnostic errors in hospitalized adults who died or were transferred to intensive care.
JAMA Intern Med 2024 Feb; 184(2):164-73. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.7347..
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Hospitals, Inpatient Care, Quality of Care, Patient Safety, Adverse Events
Dalal AK, Schnipper JL, Raffel K
Identifying and classifying diagnostic errors in acute care across hospitals: early lessons from the Utility of Predictive Systems in Diagnostic Errors (UPSIDE) study.
This paper describes the Utility of Predictive Systems in Diagnostic Errors (UPSIDE) study, whose aim was to define the prevalence and underlying causes of diagnostic errors (DEs) in patients who die in the hospital or are transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) after the first 48 hours. This study was conducted at 31 hospitals with more than 2500 cases reviewed using electronic health records. The authors identified some insights into key requirements into building a robust DE surveillance program by developing these steps: 1) Develop a shared understanding of what constitutes a diagnostic error; 2) Use validated tools to identify diagnostic errors and classify process failures, but respect your context; 3) Develop a standard approach to using electronic health records for case reviews; 4) Ensure reliability and consistency of the case review process; and 5) Link diagnostic error case reviews to institutional safety programs. They also developed steps to establish a diagnosis error review process at the hospital level with six processes.
AHRQ-funded; HS027369; HS026613.
Citation: Dalal AK, Schnipper JL, Raffel K .
Identifying and classifying diagnostic errors in acute care across hospitals: early lessons from the Utility of Predictive Systems in Diagnostic Errors (UPSIDE) study.
J Hosp Med 2024 Feb; 19(2):140-45. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13136..
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Patient Safety, Quality of Care, Hospitals
Newman-Toker DE, Nassery N, Schaffer AC
Burden of serious harms from diagnostic error in the USA.
Americans who experience serious harm from misdiagnosis annually. Serious harm is defined as permanent morbidity or morality. This cross-sectional analysis used nationally representative observational data. The authors estimated annual incident vascular events and infections from 21.5 million (M) sampled US hospital discharges (2012-2014). US-based cancer registries were used to find annual new cancers. They derived diagnostic errors and serious harms by multiplying by literature-based rates for disease-specific incidences for 15 major vascular events, infections and cancers ('Big Three' categories). Extrapolating to all diseases (including non-'Big Three' dangerous disease categories), they estimated total serious harms annually in the USA to be 795,000 (plausible range 598,000-1,023,000). Using more conservative assumptions they estimated 549,000 serious harms. These results were compatible with setting-specific serious harm estimates from inpatient, emergency department and ambulatory care. Fifteen dangerous diseases accounted for 50.7% of total serious harms and the top 5 (stroke, sepsis, pneumonia, venous thromboembolism and lung cancer) accounted for 38.7%.
AHRQ-funded; HS027614; HS029350.
Citation: Newman-Toker DE, Nassery N, Schaffer AC .
Burden of serious harms from diagnostic error in the USA.
BMJ Qual Saf 2024 Jan 19; 33(2):109-20. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014130..
Keywords: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Patient Safety, Quality of Care, Adverse Events
Schnipper JL, Raffel KE, Keniston A
Achieving diagnostic excellence through prevention and teamwork (ADEPT) study protocol: a multicenter, prospective quality and safety program to improve diagnostic processes in medical inpatients.
This paper describes the protocol for a study that will build surveillance for hospital diagnostic errors into usual care, benchmark diagnostic performance across sites, pilot test interventions, and evaluate the program's impact on diagnostic error rates. The authors will test achieving diagnostic excellence through prevention and teamwork (ADEPT), a multicenter, real-world quality and safety program utilizing interrupted time-series techniques to evaluate outcomes. They will use a randomly sampled population of medical patients hospitalized at 16 US hospitals who died, were transferred to intensive care, or had a rapid response during the hospitalization. There will be surveillance for diagnostic errors on 10 events per month per site using a previously established two-person adjudication process. With guidance from national experts in quality and safety, study sites will report and benchmark diagnostic error rates, share lessons regarding underlying causes, and design, implement, and pilot test interventions using both Safety I and Safety II approaches aimed at patients, providers, and health systems. The primary outcome sought after will be the number of diagnostic errors per patient, using segmented multivariable regression to evaluate change in y-intercept and change in slope after initiation of the program.
AHRQ-funded; HS029366.
Citation: Schnipper JL, Raffel KE, Keniston A .
Achieving diagnostic excellence through prevention and teamwork (ADEPT) study protocol: a multicenter, prospective quality and safety program to improve diagnostic processes in medical inpatients.
J Hosp Med 2023 Dec; 18(12):1072-81. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13230..
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Patient Safety, Quality of Care, Hospitals, Inpatient Care
Bradford A, Shofer M, Singh H
AHRQ Author: Shofer M, Singh H
Measure Dx: implementing pathways to discover and learn from diagnostic errors.
This paper discusses Measure Dx, a new AHRQ resource that translates knowledge from diagnostic measurement research into actionable recommendations. This resource guides healthcare organizations to detect, analyze, and learn from diagnostic safety events as part of a continuous learning and feedback cycle. The goal of Measure Dx is to advance new frontiers in reducing preventable diagnostic harm to patients.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 233201500022I; HS027363.
Citation: Bradford A, Shofer M, Singh H .
Measure Dx: implementing pathways to discover and learn from diagnostic errors.
Int J Qual Health Care 2022 Sep 10;34(3). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzac068..
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Patient Safety, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Health Systems, Learning Health Systems
Zimolzak AJ, Shahid U, Giardina TD
Why test results are still getting "lost" to follow-up: a qualitative study of implementation gaps.
Lack of timely follow-up of abnormal test results is common and has been implicated in missed or delayed diagnosis, resulting in potential for patient harm. As part of a larger project to implement change strategies to improve follow-up of diagnostic test results, this study sought to identify specifically where implementation gaps exist, as well as possible solutions identified by front-line staff.
AHRQ-funded; HS27363.
Citation: Zimolzak AJ, Shahid U, Giardina TD .
Why test results are still getting "lost" to follow-up: a qualitative study of implementation gaps.
J Gen Intern Med 2022 Jan;37(1):137-44. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06772-y..
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Patient Safety, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Cifra CL, Sittig DF, Singh H
Bridging the feedback gap: a sociotechnical approach to informing clinicians of patients' subsequent clinical course and outcomes.
This paper discusses challenges to the development of systems for effective patient outcome feedback to improve diagnosis and proposes the application of a sociotechnical approach using health information technology (HIT) to support the implementation of such systems. It discusses current barriers to effective clinician feedback, reasons for them, and features of potential IT solutions. Evaluation and implementation of the feedback process within a sociotechnical health system are then discussed. The authors use an eight-dimension sociotechnical model for studying health IT by authors Sittig and Singh. The eight dimensions are hardware and software; clinical content; human–computer interface; people; workflow and communication; organisational policies and procedures; external rules, regulations and pressures; and system measurement and monitoring. A table is included that shows the potential considerations for each dimension.
AHRQ-funded; 33201500022I; HS027363.
Citation: Cifra CL, Sittig DF, Singh H .
Bridging the feedback gap: a sociotechnical approach to informing clinicians of patients' subsequent clinical course and outcomes.
BMJ Qual Saf 2021 Jul;30(7):591-97. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012464..
Keywords: Health Information Technology (HIT), Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Patient Safety, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Marshall TL, Ipsaro AJ, Le M
Increasing physician reporting of diagnostic learning opportunities.
This study investigated methods to improve physician reporting of diagnostic errors at the pediatric division of a hospital. In that pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) division only 1 diagnostic-related safety event was reported in the preceding 4 years. The authors aimed to improve attending physician reporting of suspected diagnostic errors from 0 to 2 per 100 PHM patient admissions within 6 months. The improvement team used the Model for Improvement and used the term diagnostic learning opportunity (DLO) with clinicians as opposed to diagnostic error to lessen the stigma. They developed an electronic reporting form and encouraged its use through reminders, scheduled reflection time, and monthly progress reports. Over the course of 13 weeks, there was an increase from 0 to 1.6 per patient admission reports files. Most events (66%) were true diagnostic errors.
AHRQ-funded; HS023827.
Citation: Marshall TL, Ipsaro AJ, Le M .
Increasing physician reporting of diagnostic learning opportunities.
Pediatrics 2021 Jan;147(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-2400..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Patient Safety, Hospitals, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Dadlez NM, Adelman J, Bundy DG
Contributing factors for pediatric ambulatory diagnostic process errors: Project RedDE.
This study examined root causes of three common pediatric diagnostic errors by having 31 practices enrolled in a national QI collaborative perform monthly “mini-RCAs” (mini root cause analyses). The diagnoses errors studied were missed adolescent depression, missed elevated blood pressure, and missed actionable laboratory values. Twenty-eight practices submitted 184 mini-RCAs with the most common causes being patient volume (adolescent depression and elevated BP), inadequate staffing (adolescent depression), clinic milieu (elevated BP), written communication and provider knowledge (actionable laboratory values), and electronic health records (EHRs) – (elevated BP and actionable laboratory values). The median number of mini-RCAs submitted was 6.
AHRQ-funded; HS024538; HS024713; HS026121.
Citation: Dadlez NM, Adelman J, Bundy DG .
Contributing factors for pediatric ambulatory diagnostic process errors: Project RedDE.
Pediatr Qual Saf 2020 May-Jun;5(3):e299. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000299..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Patient Safety
LaHue SC, Albers K, Goldman S
Cervical dystonia incidence and diagnostic delay in a multiethnic population.
This study examined rates of diagnostic delay of cervical dystonia (CD) and the population of CD patients. Cases were identified from electronic medical records and multistage screening of more than 3 million Kaiser Permanente Northern California members from 2003-2007. CD incidence is greater in women and increases with age. About half of CD patients had a diagnostic delay. They were first given diagnoses of essential tremor, cervical disc disease, neck sprain/strain, anxiety and depression. Adverse effects are associated with diagnostic delay.
AHRQ-funded; HS018413.
Citation: LaHue SC, Albers K, Goldman S .
Cervical dystonia incidence and diagnostic delay in a multiethnic population.
Mov Disord 2020 Mar;35(3):450-56. doi: 10.1002/mds.27927..
Keywords: Neurological Disorders, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Patient Safety, Quality of Care
Sheehan SE, Safdar N, Singh H
Detection and remediation of misidentification errors in radiology examination ordering.
In this study, the investigators described the pilot testing of a quality improvement methodology using electronic trigger tools and preimaging checklists to detect "wrong-side" misidentification errors in radiology examination ordering, and to measure staff adherence to departmental policy in error remediation. The investigators concluded that their trigger tool enabled the detection of substantially more imaging ordering misidentification errors than preimaging safety checklists alone, with a high positive predictive value.
AHRQ-funded; HS022087; HS017820.
Citation: Sheehan SE, Safdar N, Singh H .
Detection and remediation of misidentification errors in radiology examination ordering.
Appl Clin Inform 2020 Jan;11(1):79-87. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3402730..
Keywords: Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Patient Safety, Imaging, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Singh H, Graber ML, Hofer TP
Measures to improve diagnostic safety in clinical practice.
In this paper, the investigators discuss how the need to develop measures to improve diagnostic performance could move forward at a time when the scientific foundation needed to inform measurement is still evolving. They highlight challenges and opportunities for developing potential measures of "diagnostic safety" related to clinical diagnostic errors and associated preventable diagnostic harm. In doing so, they propose a starter set of measurement concepts for initial consideration that seem reasonably related to diagnostic safety and call for these to be studied and further refined.
AHRQ-funded; HS022087.
Citation: Singh H, Graber ML, Hofer TP .
Measures to improve diagnostic safety in clinical practice.
J Patient Saf 2019 Dec;15(4):311-16. doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000338.
.
.
Keywords: Patient Safety, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Healthcare Delivery, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Medical Errors, Adverse Events
Cochon LR, Kapoor N, Carrodeguas E
Variation in follow-up imaging recommendations in radiology reports: patient, modality, and radiologist predictors.
The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and to identify factors associated with follow-up recommendations in radiology reports from multiple modalities, patient care settings, and imaging divisions. A trained algorithm classified 318,366 report; the findings indicate that substantial interradiologist variation exists in the probability of recommending a follow-up examination in a radiology report.
AHRQ-funded; HS024722.
Citation: Cochon LR, Kapoor N, Carrodeguas E .
Variation in follow-up imaging recommendations in radiology reports: patient, modality, and radiologist predictors.
Radiology 2019 Jun;291(3):700-07. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182826..
Keywords: Decision Making, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Imaging, Patient Safety, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement
Berenson R, Singh H
Payment innovations to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce diagnostic error.
Researchers examined ways that payment innovations could be used to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce diagnostic error among Medicare patients. They recommended three different approaches: 1) coding changes in the Medicare Physician Fee schedule; new Alternative Payment Models (APMs) that could improve accuracy in challenging cases and even provide second or third opinions; and 3) have a method that accurate diagnoses would trigger APM payments and establish payment amounts.
AHRQ-funded; HS022087; HS017820.
Citation: Berenson R, Singh H .
Payment innovations to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce diagnostic error.
Health Aff 2018 Nov;37(11):1828-35. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0714..
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Payment, Medical Errors, Medicare, Patient Safety, Quality of Care
Qiu J, Harold Li H, Zhang T
Automatic x-ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto-optimization.
Insufficient image contrast associated with radiation therapy daily setup x-ray images could negatively affect accurate patient treatment setup. The study authors developed a method to perform automatic and user-independent contrast enhancement on 2D kilo voltage (kV) and megavoltage (MV) x-ray images. The study concluded that the proposed method is able to outperform the standard image contrast adjustment procedures that are currently used in the commercial clinical systems.
AHRQ-funded; HS022888.
Citation: Qiu J, Harold Li H, Zhang T .
Automatic x-ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto-optimization.
J Appl Clin Med Phys 2017 Nov;18(6):218-23. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12172..
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Quality of Care, Imaging, Patient Safety
Rogith D, Iyengar MS, Singh H
Using fault trees to advance understanding of diagnostic errors.
In this study, the investigators used fault trees to advance understanding of diagnostic errors. A team of three experts reviewed 10 published cases of diagnostic error and constructed fault trees. The fault trees were modeled according to currently available conceptual frameworks characterizing diagnostic error. The 10 trees were then synthesized into a single fault tree to identify common contributing factors and pathways leading to diagnostic error. The investigators indicate that fault trees might provide a useful framework for both quantitative and qualitative analysis of diagnostic errors.
AHRQ-funded; HS022087; HS023602.
Citation: Rogith D, Iyengar MS, Singh H .
Using fault trees to advance understanding of diagnostic errors.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2017 Nov;43(11):598-605. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.06.007..
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Patient Safety, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement
Cole B, Dickerson JA, Graber ML
AHRQ Author: Henriksen K
A prospective tool for risk assessment of sendout testing.
The authors developed a tool to assess risk of diagnostic errors involving laboratory sendout testing. The tool was determined, through testing at nine pilot sites, to be both useful and easy to use. It could be used by other laboratories to identify the areas of highest risk to patients, which in turn may guide them in focusing their quality improvement efforts and resources.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 29032001T.
Citation: Cole B, Dickerson JA, Graber ML .
A prospective tool for risk assessment of sendout testing.
Clin Chim Acta 2014 Jul 1;434:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.03.028.
.
.
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Quality of Care, Medical Errors, Patient Safety