National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 1 of 1 Research Studies DisplayedFarrow NE, Lau BD, JohnBull EA
Is the meaningful use venous thromboembolism VTE-6 measure meaningful? A retrospective analysis of one hospital's VTE-6 cases.
The researchers assessed the validity of the Meaningful Use VTE-6 measure by reviewing the quality of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis provided to patients. Sixty percent of the patients identified as having sustained potentially preventable VTE were false positives. For the remaining forty percent, VTE was considered to be truly potentially preventable and those patients therefore provided targets for quality improvement measures.
AHRQ-funded; HS017952.
Citation: Farrow NE, Lau BD, JohnBull EA .
Is the meaningful use venous thromboembolism VTE-6 measure meaningful? A retrospective analysis of one hospital's VTE-6 cases.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2016 Sep;42(9):410-6.
.
.
Keywords: Blood Clots, Quality Improvement, Quality Measures, Quality Measures, Electronic Health Records (EHRs)