National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Adverse Events (3)
- Children/Adolescents (2)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (5)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- Health Insurance (1)
- (-) Medical Errors (9)
- Medical Liability (1)
- Patient Safety (7)
- Prevention (1)
- (-) Primary Care (9)
- Provider: Health Personnel (1)
- Public Reporting (1)
- Quality Improvement (4)
- Quality Measures (1)
- Quality of Care (3)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 9 of 9 Research Studies DisplayedPoghosyan L, Norful AA, Ghaffari A L, Norful AA, Ghaffari A
Psychometric testing of errors of care omission survey: a new tool on patient safety in primary care.
The goal of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a newly developed survey tool, the Errors of Care Omission Survey (ECOS), measuring omissions in primary care. Four factors emerged representing domains of omissions in primary care. Findings showed that the ECOS can be used in primary care to identify critical omissions, so actions can be taken by clinicians and administrators to prevent them before they result in patient harm. Recommendations included further testing with diverse samples.
AHRQ-funded; HS024758.
Citation: Poghosyan L, Norful AA, Ghaffari A L, Norful AA, Ghaffari A .
Psychometric testing of errors of care omission survey: a new tool on patient safety in primary care.
J Patient Saf 2021 Mar 1;17(2):e107-e14. doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000575..
Keywords: Primary Care, Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Patient Safety
Bundy DG, Singh H, Stein RE
The design and conduct of Project RedDE: a cluster-randomized trial to reduce diagnostic errors in pediatric primary care.
This paper discusses the results of Project RedDE, which was a virtual collaborative quality improvement study to reduce diagnostic errors in pediatric primary care practices. Forty-three practices were initially recruited, with a total of 31 practices left at the end due to practice dropout and two participating practices merging. This study was a randomized controlled trial targeting three common diagnostic errors (missed diagnoses of adolescent depression, abnormal blood pressure, and lack of followup for abnormal laboratory results). Contamination across study groups was a recurring problem, but risk mitigations were used. Electronic health records contributed to teams’ success.
AHRQ-funded; HS203608.
Citation: Bundy DG, Singh H, Stein RE .
The design and conduct of Project RedDE: a cluster-randomized trial to reduce diagnostic errors in pediatric primary care.
Clin Trials 2019 Apr;16(2):154-64. doi: 10.1177/1740774518820522..
Keywords: Adverse Events, Children/Adolescents, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Prevention, Primary Care, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement
Rinke ML, Singh H, Heo M
Diagnostic errors in primary care pediatrics: Project RedDE.
The objective of this study was to investigate the frequency of two high-frequency/subacute diagnostic errors (DEs), and one missed opportunity for diagnosis (MOD) in primary care pediatrics. DE or MOD rates in pediatric primary care were found to be 54 percent for patients with elevated BP, 11 percent for patients with abnormal laboratory values, and 62 percent for adolescents with an opportunity to evaluate for depression.
AHRQ-funded; HS022087; HS023608; HS023602.
Citation: Rinke ML, Singh H, Heo M .
Diagnostic errors in primary care pediatrics: Project RedDE.
Acad Pediatr 2018 Mar;18(2):220-27. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2017.08.005.
.
.
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Primary Care, Quality Improvement
Singh H, Schiff GD, Graber ML
The global burden of diagnostic errors in primary care.
In this narrative review, the authors discuss the global significance, burden and contributory factors related to diagnostic errors in primary care. They then synthesize available literature to discuss the types of presenting symptoms and conditions most commonly affected. Finally, they summarize interventions based on available data and suggest next steps to reduce the global burden of diagnostic errors.
AHRQ-funded; HS022087; HS023602.
Citation: Singh H, Schiff GD, Graber ML .
The global burden of diagnostic errors in primary care.
BMJ Qual Saf 2017 Jun;26(6):484-94. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005401.
.
.
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Health Information Technology (HIT), Medical Errors, Patient Safety, Primary Care
Al-Mutairi A, Meyer AN, Thomas EJ
Accuracy of the safer Dx instrument to identify diagnostic errors in primary care.
The researchers aimed to test the accuracy of an instrument to help detect presence or absence of diagnostic error through record reviews. They found that their Safer Dx Instrument helped quantify the likelihood of diagnostic error in primary care visits, achieving a high degree of accuracy for measuring their presence or absence.
AHRQ-funded; HS022087.
Citation: Al-Mutairi A, Meyer AN, Thomas EJ .
Accuracy of the safer Dx instrument to identify diagnostic errors in primary care.
J Gen Intern Med 2016 Jun;31(6):602-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3601-x.
.
.
Keywords: Primary Care, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Patient Safety, Quality Improvement
Rabatin J, Williams E, Baier Manwell L
Predictors and outcomes of burnout in primary care physicians.
This study assessed relationships between primary care work conditions, physician burnout, quality of care, and medical errors. It found that burnout is highly associated with adverse work conditions and a greater intention to leave the practice, but not with adverse patient outcomes. Care quality thus appears to be preserved at great personal cost to primary care physicians.
AHRQ-funded; HS011955.
Citation: Rabatin J, Williams E, Baier Manwell L .
Predictors and outcomes of burnout in primary care physicians.
J Prim Care Community Health 2016 Jan;7(1):41-3. doi: 10.1177/2150131915607799.
.
.
Keywords: Provider: Health Personnel, Primary Care, Medical Errors, Patient Safety, Quality of Care
Crane S, Sloane PD, Elder N
Reporting and using near-miss events to improve patient safety in diverse primary care practices: a collaborative approach to learning from our mistakes.
This study assessed the feasibility of a near-miss reporting system in primary care practices and to describe initial reports and practice responses to them. It found that all 7 practices successfully implemented the system, reporting 632 near-miss events in 9 months and initiating 32 quality improvement projects based on the reports.
AHRQ-funded; HS019558.
Citation: Crane S, Sloane PD, Elder N .
Reporting and using near-miss events to improve patient safety in diverse primary care practices: a collaborative approach to learning from our mistakes.
J Am Board Fam Med 2015 Jul-Aug;28(4):452-60. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.04.140050..
Keywords: Adverse Events, Medical Errors, Patient Safety, Primary Care, Public Reporting, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Singh H, Sittig DF
Setting the record straight on measuring diagnostic errors. Reply to: 'Bad assumptions on primary care diagnostic errors' by Dr Richard Young.
This letter responds to a letter by Dr. Richard Young who criticizes Singh’s article on measuring diagnostic error. Singh defends his systems-based approach to advancing the science of measuring diagnostic error and acknowledges some of the uncertainties and evolution in the diagnostic process that Dr. Young writes about.
AHRQ-funded; HS022087
Citation: Singh H, Sittig DF .
Setting the record straight on measuring diagnostic errors. Reply to: 'Bad assumptions on primary care diagnostic errors' by Dr Richard Young.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 May;24(5):345-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004140..
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Patient Safety, Primary Care, Quality Measures
Schiff GD, Puopolo AL, Huben-Kearney A
Primary care closed claims experience of Massachusetts malpractice insurers.
The researchers studied patterns of primary care malpractice types, causes, and outcomes as part of a Massachusetts ambulatory malpractice risk and safety improvement project. During a 5-year period there were 7224 malpractice claims of which 551 (7.7%) were from primary care practices. In Massachusetts, most primary care claims filed were related to alleged misdiagnosis.
AHRQ-funded; HS019508.
Citation: Schiff GD, Puopolo AL, Huben-Kearney A .
Primary care closed claims experience of Massachusetts malpractice insurers.
JAMA Intern Med 2013 Dec 9-23;173(22):2063-8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11070..
Keywords: Primary Care, Medical Errors, Health Insurance, Patient Safety, Medical Liability