National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 2 of 2 Research Studies DisplayedMcKinney WT, Schaffhausen CR, Schladt D
Designing a patient-specific search of transplant program performance and outcomes: feedback from heart transplant candidates and recipients.
The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients provides transplant program-specific information, but it is unclear what patients and stakeholders need to know. Acceptance criteria for the candidate waitlist and donor organs vary by program and region, but there is no means to search for programs by the clinical profiles of recipients and donors. The authors examined variability in program-specific characteristics that could influence access to transplantation.
AHRQ-funded; HS026379; HS024527.
Citation: McKinney WT, Schaffhausen CR, Schladt D .
Designing a patient-specific search of transplant program performance and outcomes: feedback from heart transplant candidates and recipients.
Clin Transplant 2021 Feb;35(2):e14183. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14183..
Keywords: Transplantation, Surgery, Heart Disease and Health, Cardiovascular Conditions, Registries, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Shared Decision Making
Schaffhausen CR, Bruin MJ, Chu S
Comparing pretransplant and posttransplant outcomes when choosing a transplant center: focus groups and a randomized survey.
In response to calls for an increased focus on pretransplant outcomes and other patient-centered metrics in public reports of center outcomes, this mixed methods study evaluated how the content and presentation style of new information influenced decision-making. This mixed methods design utilized qualitative and quantitative phases where the strengths of one method helped address limitations of the other, and multiple methods facilitated comparing results. The authors concluded that the presentation of public reports influenced decision-making behavior.
AHRQ-funded; HS026379; HS024527.
Citation: Schaffhausen CR, Bruin MJ, Chu S .
Comparing pretransplant and posttransplant outcomes when choosing a transplant center: focus groups and a randomized survey.
Transplantation 2020 Jan;104(1):201-10. doi: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002809..
Keywords: Transplantation, Shared Decision Making, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Outcomes