National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 3 of 3 Research Studies DisplayedGordon BE, Basak R, Carpenter WR
Factors influencing prostate cancer treatment decisions for African American and white men.
This prospective, population-based cohort study examined some possible reasons for mortality outcome differences for prostate cancer between African American (AA) and white patients. A cohort of 1170 men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer were enrolled from 2011 to 2013 before treatment in North Carolina. Participants were asked to rate their aggressiveness of their cancer, and also the importance of 10 factors their treatment decision-making process. Among low-risk patients, there was no difference in perception of their cancer as “not very aggressive”. Among high-risk patients, 54% of AA patients considered their cancer to be “not very aggressive” while only 24% of white patients did. For AA patients, cost, treatment time, and recovery time were considered very important more than white patients.
AHRQ-funded.
Citation: Gordon BE, Basak R, Carpenter WR .
Factors influencing prostate cancer treatment decisions for African American and white men.
Cancer 2019 May 15;125(10):1693-700. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31932..
Keywords: Decision Making, Cancer, Cancer: Prostate Cancer, Disparities, Men's Health, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Racial and Ethnic Minorities
Misra-Hebert AD, Hom G, Klein EA
Testing of a tool for prostate cancer screening discussions in primary care.
As prostate cancer (PCa) screening decisions often occur in outpatient primary care, a brief tool to help the PCa screening conversation in busy clinic settings is needed. This paper discusses a previously-created 9-item tool to aid (PCa) screening discussions. The study found that the brief conversation tool was well received in busy primary-care settings and improved patients' knowledge about the screening decision.
AHRQ-funded; HS024128.
Citation: Misra-Hebert AD, Hom G, Klein EA .
Testing of a tool for prostate cancer screening discussions in primary care.
Front Oncol 2018 Jun 28;8:238. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00238..
Keywords: Cancer: Prostate Cancer, Decision Making, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Primary Care, Screening
Roth JA, Ramsey SD, Carlson JJ
Cost-effectiveness of a biopsy-based 8-protein prostate cancer prognostic assay to optimize treatment decision making in Gleason 3 + 3 and 3 + 4 early stage prostate cancer.
A novel 8-protein prognostic assay generates a risk score at time of biopsy that is predictive of prostate cancer aggressiveness and can inform treatment decisions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using the assay to inform treatment decisions compared with usual care. The 8-protein assay strategy resulted in 0.04 more quality-adjusted life years and $700 less in costs compared with usual care.
AHRQ-funded; HS022982.
Citation: Roth JA, Ramsey SD, Carlson JJ .
Cost-effectiveness of a biopsy-based 8-protein prostate cancer prognostic assay to optimize treatment decision making in Gleason 3 + 3 and 3 + 4 early stage prostate cancer.
Oncologist 2015 Dec;20(12):1355-64. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0214.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Prostate Cancer, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Healthcare Costs, Decision Making