National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- (-) Children/Adolescents (4)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (1)
- Decision Making (1)
- Emergency Department (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (4)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (1)
- (-) Implementation (4)
- Outcomes (1)
- (-) Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (4)
- Research Methodologies (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 4 of 4 Research Studies DisplayedRizk S, Kaelin VC, Sim JGC
Implementing an electronic patient-reported outcome and decision support tool in early intervention.
The study’s aim was to identify and prioritize early intervention (EI) stakeholders' perspectives of supports and barriers to implementing the Young Children's Participation and Environment Measure (YC-PEM), an electronic patient-reported outcome (e-PRO) tool, for scaling its implementation across multiple local and state EI programs. A mixed-methods study was conducted with EI families (n = 6), service coordinators (n = 9), and program leadership (n = 7). Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted and used to share quantitative trial results. All three stakeholder groups identified thematic supports and barriers across multiple constructs within each of four Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) domains: (1) Six themes for "intervention characteristics," (2) Six themes for "process," (3) Three themes for "inner setting," and (4) Four themes for "outer setting." Priorities from stakeholders included prioritized reaching families with diverse linguistic preferences and user navigation needs, further tailoring its interface with automated data capture and exchange processes ("process"); and fostering a positive implementation climate ("inner setting"). Improving EI access (“outer setting”) using YC-PEM e-PRO results was also articulated by service coordinators and program leadership.
AHRQ-funded; HS027583.
Citation: Rizk S, Kaelin VC, Sim JGC .
Implementing an electronic patient-reported outcome and decision support tool in early intervention.
Appl Clin Inform 2023 Jan; 14(1):91-107. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1760631..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Health Information Technology (HIT), Children/Adolescents, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Implementation
Ishimine P, Adelgais K, Barata I
Executive summary: the 2018 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference: Aligning the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Research Agenda to Reduce Health Outcome Gaps.
Emergency care providers share a compelling interest in developing an effective patient-centered, outcomes-based research agenda that can decrease variability in pediatric outcomes. The 2018 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference "Aligning the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Research Agenda to Reduce Health Outcome Gaps (AEMCC)" aimed to fulfill this role. This paper discusses the conference which convened major thought leaders and stakeholders to introduce a research, scholarship, and innovation agenda for pediatric emergency care specifically to reduce health outcome gaps.
AHRQ-funded; HS026101.
Citation: Ishimine P, Adelgais K, Barata I .
Executive summary: the 2018 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference: Aligning the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Research Agenda to Reduce Health Outcome Gaps.
Acad Emerg Med 2018 Dec;25(12):1317-26. doi: 10.1111/acem.13667..
Keywords: Implementation, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Children/Adolescents, Emergency Department, Outcomes, Research Methodologies
Morrow AS, Whiteside SP, Sim LA
Developing tools to enhance the use of systematic reviews for clinical care in health systems.
The researchers’ goal was to develop tools to facilitate the uptake of evidence as summarized in systematic reviews by clinical decisionmakers in health systems. After they conducted a systematic review on the management of anxiety in children, the researchers interviewed health system representatives, clinicians and patients to gain additional information about decisionmaking. Two decision-aid tools - one for the health system and the other for the clinical encounter - were then developed using stakeholders' feedback and literature searches. The health system decision aid provided information on patients who were candidates for treatment, values and preferences, costs and resources, acceptability, impact on health equity, feasibility, drug dosing, alternative therapies, remission rates, and prognosis. The encounter decision aid was produced as a set of cards that contained information on the issues that drive treatment decisions. Health system stakeholders found the first decision aid useful, and patients, parents, and clinicians found the second to be helpful.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500013I; 29032001T.
Citation: Morrow AS, Whiteside SP, Sim LA .
Developing tools to enhance the use of systematic reviews for clinical care in health systems.
BMJ Evid Based Med 2018 Dec;23(6):206-09. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-110995..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Decision Making, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Implementation
Clancy CM, Margolis PA, Miller M
AHRQ Author: Clancy CM
Collaborative networks for both improvement and research.
The authors discuss collaborative improvement networks, which can serve as large-scale, health system laboratories to engage clinicians, researchers, patients, and parents in testing approaches to translate research into practice. Creation of total population registries in collaborative network sites provides large, representative study samples with high-quality data which can be used to generate evidence and to inform clinical decision-making. Collaborative networks for improvement and research offer the opportunity not only to make improvements but also to study improvements to determine which interventions and combination of strategies work best in which settings.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; HS021114.
Citation: Clancy CM, Margolis PA, Miller M .
Collaborative networks for both improvement and research.
Pediatrics 2013 Jun;131 Suppl 4:S210-4. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3786H.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR), Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Children/Adolescents, Implementation