National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- (-) Cancer (11)
- Cancer: Colorectal Cancer (2)
- Cancer: Lung Cancer (1)
- Cancer: Prostate Cancer (1)
- Caregiving (2)
- Children/Adolescents (2)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (2)
- Communication (1)
- Comparative Effectiveness (1)
- Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) (1)
- Decision Making (2)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (1)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (1)
- Healthcare Delivery (1)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (1)
- Outcomes (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (2)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (2)
- Patient and Family Engagement (3)
- (-) Patient Experience (11)
- Patient Safety (1)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Quality of Care (3)
- Quality of Life (3)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 11 of 11 Research Studies DisplayedRivard SJ, Vitous CA, Bamdad MC
"I wish there had been resources": a photo-elicitation study of rectal cancer survivorship care needs.
Prior research reveals that healthcare providers are not skilled at identifying the most relevant rectal cancer survivorship issues. As a result, survivorship care is inadequate with most rectal cancer survivors reporting at least one unmet posttherapy need. The purpose of this photo-elicitation study was to explore rectal cancer survivors’ lived experiences using participant-submitted photographs and minimally structured qualitative interviews. Twenty rectal cancer survivors from a single center submitted photographs illustrative of their life after rectal cancer therapy. The study found that rectal cancer survivors’ recommendations to improve their survivorship care fell into three primary themes: 1) informational needs; 2) continued multidisciplinary follow up care; and 3) suggestions for support services. The study concluded that rectal cancer survivors want information that is more detailed and individualized, access to multidisciplinary follow-up care over time, and resources to alleviate the challenges of daily life.
AHRQ-funded; HS026772; HS000053.
Citation: Rivard SJ, Vitous CA, Bamdad MC .
"I wish there had been resources": a photo-elicitation study of rectal cancer survivorship care needs.
Ann Surg Oncol 2023 Jun; 30(6):3530-37. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-13042-6..
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer, Quality of Life, Patient Experience
Womack DM, Kennedy R, Chamberlin SR
Patients' lived experiences and recommendations for enhanced awareness and use of integrative oncology services in cancer care.
The purpose of this study was to involve patients in understanding improved clinic processes and digital health tools to support patient awareness and use of integrative oncology services. The patients were engaged in participatory design to explore their lived experiences as related to the utilization of integrative oncology services during and after conventional cancer treatment. The researchers held 10 design sessions with individual participants, which began with patient story telling regarding their path to and use of integrative oncology services. Feedback was then requested on the functionality of prototypes of mobile app screens intended to support patient symptom alleviation. The study found that oncology patients are active participants in the management of their symptoms and treatment side effects. Patients who used massage, yoga, and acupuncture reported a need for earlier patient education about those services. The study concluded that clinics can collaborate with patients to identify high priority needs, unmet needs and challenges, guide development of clinic process, and co-produce wellbeing in conventional cancer care.
AHRQ-funded; HS000046.
Citation: Womack DM, Kennedy R, Chamberlin SR .
Patients' lived experiences and recommendations for enhanced awareness and use of integrative oncology services in cancer care.
Patient Educ Couns 2022 Jul;105(7):2557-61. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.11.018..
Keywords: Cancer, Patient Experience, Patient and Family Engagement, Education: Patient and Caregiver
Richardson DR, Oakes AH, Crossnohere NL
Prioritizing the worries of AML patients: Quantifying patient experience using best-worst scaling.
Although patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) experience significant toxicities and poor outcomes, few studies have quantified patients' experience. In this study, a community-centered approach was used to develop an AML-specific best-worst scaling (BWS) instrument involving 13 items in four domains (psychological, physical, decision-making, treatment delivery) to quantify patient worry. A survey of patients and caregivers was conducted using the instrument. Data were analyzed using conditional logistic regression.
AHRQ-funded; HS000032.
Citation: Richardson DR, Oakes AH, Crossnohere NL .
Prioritizing the worries of AML patients: Quantifying patient experience using best-worst scaling.
Psychooncology 2021 Jul;30(7):1104-11. doi: 10.1002/pon.5652..
Keywords: Cancer, Patient Experience, Caregiving, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Evensen CT, Yost KJ, Keller S
Development and testing of the CAHPS Cancer Care Survey.
In order to develop the CAHPS Cancer Care Survey instrument, the authors conducted cognitive tests of the instrument as well as field tests at six cancer centers and four community oncology practices; the survey was then finalized and obtained the CAHPS trademark. The authors recommend mail-only, mail-telephone mixed-mode, and Web-mail mixed-mode data collection methods.
AHRQ-funded; 290200600019I.
Citation: Evensen CT, Yost KJ, Keller S .
Development and testing of the CAHPS Cancer Care Survey.
J Oncol Pract 2019 Nov;15(11):e969-e78. doi: 10.1200/jop.19.00039..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Cancer, Patient Experience, Quality of Care
Roydhouse JK, Gutman R, Keating NL
The association of proxy care engagement with proxy reports of patient experience and quality of life.
The purpose of this study was to assess the association of proxy-specific covariates with proxy-reported patient cancer care experience, quality rating, and quality of life. The investigators concluded that collecting data on proxy engagement in care is warranted if proxy responses are used.
AHRQ-funded; HS000011.
Citation: Roydhouse JK, Gutman R, Keating NL .
The association of proxy care engagement with proxy reports of patient experience and quality of life.
Health Serv Res 2018 Oct;53(5):3809-24. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12980..
Keywords: Cancer, Patient Experience, Patient and Family Engagement, Quality of Life
Bardach NS, Burkhart Q, Richardson LP
Hospital-based quality measures for pediatric mental health care.
The objective of this study was to develop and test medical record-based measures used to assess quality of pediatric mental health care in the emergency department (ED) and inpatient settings. The investigators drafted an evidence-based set of pediatric mental health care quality measures for the ED and inpatient settings and used them to identify sex and race disparities and substantial hospital variation.
AHRQ-funded; HS020506.
Citation: Bardach NS, Burkhart Q, Richardson LP .
Hospital-based quality measures for pediatric mental health care.
Pediatrics 2018 Jun;141(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-3554..
Keywords: Cancer, Caregiving, Children/Adolescents, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Decision Making, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Patient Experience, Patient and Family Engagement
Roydhouse JK, Gutman R, Keating NL
Differences between proxy and patient assessments of cancer care experiences and quality ratings.
This study assessed the impact of proxy survey responses on cancer care experience reports and quality ratings. Adjusted proxy scores were modestly higher for medical care experiences but lower for nursing care and care coordination experiences. There were no significant differences between adjusted patient and proxy ratings of quality.
AHRQ-funded; HS000011.
Citation: Roydhouse JK, Gutman R, Keating NL .
Differences between proxy and patient assessments of cancer care experiences and quality ratings.
Health Serv Res 2018 Apr;53(2):919-43. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12672.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer: Lung Cancer, Quality of Care, Patient Experience
Tamirisa NP, Goodwin JS, Kandalam A
Patient and physician views of shared decision making in cancer.
The aim of the study was to explore patient and physician perceptions of shared decision making in clinical encounters for cancer care. Among the study’s multiple conclusions was that most physicians reported providing patients with written information, however, most patients reported that written information was too detailed and felt that the physicians did not assess the level of information they wished to receive.
AHRQ-funded; HS022134.
Citation: Tamirisa NP, Goodwin JS, Kandalam A .
Patient and physician views of shared decision making in cancer.
Health Expect 2017 Dec;20(6):1248-53. doi: 10.1111/hex.12564..
Keywords: Cancer, Decision Making, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient Experience, Clinician-Patient Communication
Fisher KA, Mazor KM
Patient and family complaints in cancer care: what can we learn from the tip of the iceberg?
This paper comments on the Mack et al. article “Evaluation of Patient and Family Outpatient Complaints as a Strategy to Prioritize Efforts to Improve Cancer Care Delivery”, published in 2017 in The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, in which Mack et al. categorized all complaints filed at a large outpatient cancer center during a two-year period, put forth a preliminary rating system for assessing complaint severity, and catalogued the actions taken in response to the complaints.
AHRQ-funded; HS024596; HS022757.
Citation: Fisher KA, Mazor KM .
Patient and family complaints in cancer care: what can we learn from the tip of the iceberg?
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2017 Oct;43(10):495-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.07.003..
Keywords: Cancer, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Patient Experience, Patient Safety, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement
Brand SR, Pickard L, Mack JW
What adult cancer care can learn from pediatrics.
However, pediatric cancer centers follow three core principles that enhance their patients’ overall care experience. This article discusses those principles, with the aim of helping adult cancer centers learn from what pediatric centers do well.
AHRQ-funded; HS000063.
Citation: Brand SR, Pickard L, Mack JW .
What adult cancer care can learn from pediatrics.
J Oncol Pract 2016 Sep;12(9):765-7. doi: 10.1200/jop.2016.015057..
Keywords: Cancer, Children/Adolescents, Health Services Research (HSR), Healthcare Delivery, Patient Experience, Children/Adolescents
Sohn W, Resnick MJ, Greenfield S
Impact of adherence to quality measures for localized prostate cancer on patient-reported health-related quality of life outcomes, patient satisfaction, and treatment-related complications.
Given the small number of narrowly focused measures in prostate cancer care, the researchers sought to determine whether adherence to any of the available payer-driven quality measures influences patient-centered outcomes, including health-related quality of life (HRQOL), patient satisfaction, and treatment-related complications. They concluded that compliance with available nationally endorsed quality indicators was not associated with clinically important changes in patient-centered outcomes (HRQOL, satisfaction, or complications) within 1-year.
AHRQ-funded; HS019356; HS022640.
Citation: Sohn W, Resnick MJ, Greenfield S .
Impact of adherence to quality measures for localized prostate cancer on patient-reported health-related quality of life outcomes, patient satisfaction, and treatment-related complications.
Med Care 2016 Aug;54(8):738-44. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000562.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Prostate Cancer, Quality of Life, Comparative Effectiveness, Patient Experience