National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- (-) Back Health and Pain (8)
- Chronic Conditions (3)
- Comparative Effectiveness (3)
- Decision Making (1)
- Elderly (1)
- Emergency Department (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (3)
- (-) Medication (8)
- Opioids (2)
- Outcomes (2)
- Pain (3)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (5)
- Patient Experience (1)
- Practice Patterns (1)
- Risk (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 8 of 8 Research Studies DisplayedColloca L, Lee SE, Luhowy MN
Relieving acute pain (RAP) study: a proof-of-concept protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
This study hypothesizes that dose-extending placebos can be an effective treatment in relieving clinical acute pain in trauma patients who take opioids. Publishing this study protocol will enable researchers and funding bodies to stay up to date in their fields by providing exposure to research activity that may not be otherwise widely publicized.
AHRQ-funded; HS022135.
Citation: Colloca L, Lee SE, Luhowy MN .
Relieving acute pain (RAP) study: a proof-of-concept protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
BMJ Open 2019 Nov 11;9(11):e030623. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030623..
Keywords: Back Health and Pain, Pain, Chronic Conditions, Opioids, Medication
Kim HS, Kaplan SH, McCarthy DM
A comparison of analgesic prescribing among ED back and neck pain visits receiving physical therapy versus usual care.
Researchers used a retrospective cohort study to examine whether physical therapy (PT) is associated with lower analgesic prescribing in the emergency department (ED) setting. They found that, in this single center study, ED back and neck pain visits receiving PT were no less likely to receive an opioid prescription and were more likely to receive a benzodiazepine than visits receiving usual care. They conclude that, although prior studies demonstrated that PT may reduce opioid utilization in the subsequent year, these results indicated that analgesic prescribing is not reduced at the initial ED encounter.
AHRQ-funded; HS023011.
Citation: Kim HS, Kaplan SH, McCarthy DM .
A comparison of analgesic prescribing among ED back and neck pain visits receiving physical therapy versus usual care.
Am J Emerg Med 2019 Jul;37(7):1322-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.009..
Keywords: Opioids, Medication, Practice Patterns, Emergency Department, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Pain, Back Health and Pain, Outcomes, Evidence-Based Practice
Makris UE, Alvarez CA, Wei W
Association of statin use with risk of back disorder diagnoses.
Statins may increase vulnerability to myalgias and contribute to the myopathic component often experienced with back pain. This study’s goal was to examine the association of statin use with the risk of back disorder diagnoses. Researchers retrieved health care data for patients enrolled in TRICARE in the San Antonio military area. The overall cohort included 60,455 patients. Two treatment groups were identified: Statin users who recently received a first-time prescription for a statin and had been taking it for 120 days or more; statin non-users who never used statins and current users before they were prescribed statins. The study concludes that statin use is associated with increased likelihood of back disorder diagnoses.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Makris UE, Alvarez CA, Wei W .
Association of statin use with risk of back disorder diagnoses.
.
Keywords: Back Health and Pain, Medication, Pain, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Risk
Chou R, Deyo R, Friedly J
Systemic pharmacologic therapies for low back pain: a systematic review for an American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline.
The authors reviewed the current evidence on systemic pharmacologic therapies for acute or chronic nonradicular or radicular low back pain. They found that several systemic medications for low back pain are associated with small to moderate, primarily short-term effects on pain. New evidence suggests that acetaminophen is ineffective for acute low back pain, and duloxetine is associated with modest effects for chronic low back pain.
AHRQ-funded; 290201200014I.
Citation: Chou R, Deyo R, Friedly J .
Systemic pharmacologic therapies for low back pain: a systematic review for an American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline.
Ann Intern Med 2017 Apr 4;166(7):480-92. doi: 10.7326/m16-2458.
.
.
Keywords: Back Health and Pain, Medication, Comparative Effectiveness, Outcomes, Evidence-Based Practice
Makris UE, Edwards TC, Lavallee DC
Patient priority weighting of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire does not change results of the lumbar epidural steroid injections for spinal stenosis trial.
The researchers reevaluated whether outcomes for older adults receiving epidural steroid injections with or without corticosteroid improve after using patient-prioritized Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) items. Their findings provide additional evidence that epidural injection of corticosteroid + lidocaine offered minimal or no short-term benefit as compared with epidural injection of lidocaine alone for older adults with lumbar spinal stenosis.
AHRQ-funded; HS019222; HS022418.
Citation: Makris UE, Edwards TC, Lavallee DC .
Patient priority weighting of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire does not change results of the lumbar epidural steroid injections for spinal stenosis trial.
Spine 2017 Jan;42(1):42-48. doi: 10.1097/brs.0000000000001647.
.
.
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Elderly, Back Health and Pain, Medication
Turner JA, Comstock BA, Standaert CJ
Can patient characteristics predict benefit from epidural corticosteroid injections for lumbar spinal stenosis symptoms?
The study’s aim was to identify patient characteristics associated with benefits from epidural injections of corticosteroid with lidocaine versus epidural injections of lidocaine only for lumbar spinal stenosis symptoms. It found that among 21 baseline patient characteristics examined, none, including clinician rated spinal stenosis severity, were consistent predictors of benefit from epidural injections of lidocain corticosteroid versus lidocaine only.
AHRQ-funded; HS019222; HS022972.
Citation: Turner JA, Comstock BA, Standaert CJ .
Can patient characteristics predict benefit from epidural corticosteroid injections for lumbar spinal stenosis symptoms?
Spine J 2015 Nov;15(11):2319-31. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.06.050..
Keywords: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Decision Making, Medication, Back Health and Pain, Chronic Conditions
Chou R, Hashimoto R, Friedly J
Epidural corticosteroid injections for radiculopathy and spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
The researchers reviewed evidence on the benefits and harms of epidural corticosteroid injections in adults with radicular low back pain or spinal stenosis of any duration. They concluded that epidural corticosteroid injections for radiculopathy were associated with immediate reductions in pain and function. However, benefits were small and not sustained, and there was no effect on long-term surgery risk.
AHRQ-funded; 290201200014I.
Citation: Chou R, Hashimoto R, Friedly J .
Epidural corticosteroid injections for radiculopathy and spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ann Intern Med 2015 Sep 1;163(5):373-81. doi: 10.7326/m15-0934.
.
.
Keywords: Medication, Back Health and Pain, Chronic Conditions, Comparative Effectiveness, Evidence-Based Practice
Suri P, Pashova H, Heagerty PJ
Short-term improvements in disability mediate patient satisfaction after epidural corticosteroid injections for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.
The researchers sought to identify mediators of the effect of lumbar epidural injections of corticosteroid plus lidocaine on patient satisfaction at 6 weeks postinjection in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Three-week change in disability was a significant mediator of the effects of lumbar epidural corticosteroid injections on patient satisfaction at 6 weeks, explaining 48 percent to 60 percent of the treatment effect on satisfaction.
AHRQ-funded; HS019222; HS022972.
Citation: Suri P, Pashova H, Heagerty PJ .
Short-term improvements in disability mediate patient satisfaction after epidural corticosteroid injections for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.
Spine 2015 Sep 01;40(17):1363-70. doi: 10.1097/brs.0000000000001000.
.
.
Keywords: Medication, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Back Health and Pain, Patient Experience