National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Access to Care (1)
- Behavioral Health (1)
- (-) Care Management (4)
- Chronic Conditions (1)
- Comparative Effectiveness (1)
- Depression (1)
- Healthcare Delivery (3)
- (-) Health Insurance (4)
- Maternal Care (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (1)
- Payment (1)
- Primary Care (2)
- Primary Care: Models of Care (1)
- Teams (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 4 of 4 Research Studies DisplayedAuty SG, Daw JR, Wallace J
State-level variation in supplemental maternity kick payments in Medicaid managed care.
The purpose of the cross-sectional study described in this research letter was to assesses the prevalence and magnitude of state-level delivery event–triggered kick payments to Medicaid managed care (MMC) plans for covering pregnant patients and the association of such payments with delivery costs. MMC kick payment rates were compared with average state Medicaid fee-for-service (FFS) payments for delivery hospitalizations and state kick payment rates compared with the Medicaid-Medicare fee index. The authors found “substantial and potentially unwarranted” state variation in delivery kick payment rates within MMC. They noted that if kick payment rates are set too low, plans may attempt to avoid pregnant enrollees by limiting coverage of certain services or restricting maternity care clinicians in their networks, with consequences for Black and Indigenous maternity patients.
AHRQ-funded; HS028754.
Citation: Auty SG, Daw JR, Wallace J .
State-level variation in supplemental maternity kick payments in Medicaid managed care.
JAMA Intern Med 2023 Jan; 183(1):80-82. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.5146..
Keywords: Care Management, Health Insurance, Access to Care, Payment, Maternal Care
Kilbourne AM, Prenovost KM, Liebrecht C
Randomized controlled trial of a collaborative care intervention for mood disorders by a national commercial health plan.
This study investigated the outcomes of a collaborative care intervention for patients with mood disorders. The randomized controlled trial was conducted with Aetna insurance enrollees who were recently hospitalized for unipolar major depression or bipolar disorder. An evidence-based chronic care model (CCM) program was developed that included 10 sessions of a Life Goals self-management program and brief contacts were also made by a care manager. Outcomes measured were changes over 12 months in depression symptoms and mental health-related quality of life through two different short questionnaires. Clinical outcomes improved for patients receiving CCM although there was substantial attrition in the program.
AHRQ-funded; HS021425.
Citation: Kilbourne AM, Prenovost KM, Liebrecht C .
Randomized controlled trial of a collaborative care intervention for mood disorders by a national commercial health plan.
Psychiatr Serv 2019 Mar;70(3):219-24. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800336..
Keywords: Depression, Behavioral Health, Health Insurance, Care Management, Teams, Healthcare Delivery
Luo Z, Chen Q, Annis AM
A comparison of health plan- and provider-delivered chronic care management models on patient clinical outcomes.
Two contrasting strategies of chronic care management include provider-delivered care management (PDCM) and health plan-delivered care management (HPDCM). The researchers aimed to compare the effectiveness of PDCM vs. HPDCM on improving clinical outcomes for patients with chronic diseases. They found that in a commercially insured population, neither PDCM nor HPDCM resulted in substantial improvement in patients' clinical indicators in the first year.
AHRQ-funded; HS020108.
Citation: Luo Z, Chen Q, Annis AM .
A comparison of health plan- and provider-delivered chronic care management models on patient clinical outcomes.
J Gen Intern Med 2016 Jul;31(7):762-70. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3617-2.
.
.
Keywords: Chronic Conditions, Care Management, Primary Care: Models of Care, Primary Care, Healthcare Delivery, Comparative Effectiveness, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Health Insurance
Annis AM, Holtrop JS, Tao M
Comparison of provider and plan-based targeting strategies for disease management.
The researchers described and contrasted the targeting methods and engagement outcomes for health plan-delivered disease management with those of a provider-delivered care management program. They concluded that both provide advantages and that an optimal model may be to combine the strengths of each approach to maximize benefits in care management.
AHRQ-funded; HS020108.
Citation: Annis AM, Holtrop JS, Tao M .
Comparison of provider and plan-based targeting strategies for disease management.
Am J Manag Care 2015 May;21(5):344-51.
.
.
Keywords: Care Management, Primary Care, Health Insurance, Healthcare Delivery