National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Antibiotics (1)
- Blood Clots (1)
- Blood Thinners (1)
- Brain Injury (2)
- Cancer (1)
- Cancer: Breast Cancer (2)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (2)
- Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) (1)
- Children/Adolescents (3)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (2)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (2)
- Communication (3)
- Comparative Effectiveness (2)
- (-) Decision Making (40)
- Dementia (1)
- Diabetes (1)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (4)
- Digestive Disease and Health (1)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (1)
- Elderly (1)
- Emergency Department (3)
- Emergency Medical Services (EMS) (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (19)
- (-) Guidelines (40)
- Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) (1)
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) (1)
- Healthcare Delivery (1)
- Healthcare Utilization (3)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (2)
- Health Literacy (1)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (1)
- Heart Disease and Health (2)
- Hospitalization (1)
- Imaging (7)
- Implementation (1)
- Influenza (1)
- Inpatient Care (1)
- Labor and Delivery (1)
- Long-Term Care (1)
- Medication (3)
- Neurological Disorders (3)
- Nursing Homes (1)
- Outcomes (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (5)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (3)
- Patient and Family Engagement (3)
- Patient Safety (1)
- Practice Patterns (2)
- Pregnancy (1)
- Prevention (4)
- Primary Care (1)
- Provider (3)
- Provider: Clinician (1)
- Provider: Physician (3)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Quality of Care (5)
- Research Methodologies (2)
- Respiratory Conditions (2)
- Stroke (1)
- Surgery (6)
- Trauma (1)
- Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) (2)
- Women (2)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 25 of 40 Research Studies DisplayedDjulbegovic B, Hozo I, Lizarraga D
Decomposing clinical practice guidelines panels' deliberation into decision theoretical constructs.
The creation of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) is hindered by the absence of a clear and transparent structure for integrating key components needed to develop practice recommendations. The purpose of the study was to compare the American Society of Hematology (ASH) CPG panel's deliberations for managing pulmonary embolism (PE) to relevant decision-theoretic constructs to evaluate the concordance between panel recommendations and explicit decision modeling. Five constructs were identified, with three employed to rephrase the panel's recommendations: 1) a standard, expected utility threshold (EUT) decision model; 2) an acceptable regret threshold model (ARg) for determining the acceptable frequency of false negative (FN) or false positive (FP) recommendations, and 3) fast-and-frugal tree (FFT) decision trees for devising a comprehensive strategy for PE management. The researchers compared four management approaches: withholding testing versus D-dimer → computerized pulmonary angiography (CTPA) ('ASH-Low') versus CTPA → D-dimer ('ASH-High') versus treatment without testing. The study found that various models yielded diverse recommendations. For instance, EUT suggested that testing should be withheld for prior PE probability <0.13%, a clinically implausible threshold up to 15 times (2/0.13) lower than the ASH guidelines threshold for excluding PE (at post probability of PE ≤2%). Only three models concurred that the 'ASH low' strategy should be applied to pretest PE probabilities between 0.13% and 13.27% and that the 'ASH high' approach should be utilized in a narrow range of prior PE probabilities between 90.85% and 93.07%. For all other prior PE probabilities, selecting one model did not guarantee consistency with other models
AHRQ-funded; HS024917
Citation: Djulbegovic B, Hozo I, Lizarraga D .
Decomposing clinical practice guidelines panels' deliberation into decision theoretical constructs.
J Eval Clin Pract 2023 Apr;29(3):459-71. doi: 10.1111/jep.13809.
Keywords: Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Decision Making
Tyler A, Dempsey A, Spencer S
Do the guidelines apply?-A multisite, combined stakeholder qualitative case study to understand care decisions in bronchiolitis.
Researchers sought an improved understanding of factors that influence care decisions across multiple stakeholders and diverse settings in order to develop effective strategies to de-implement unnecessary testing and treatment for bronchiolitis. A qualitative case study was conducted across two geographically distinct university affiliated children's hospitals, including semistructured interviews and focus groups with patient participants. The researchers found that, incongruent with provider and care team perceptions, parents reported that they desire an evidence-based, less-is-more approach to bronchiolitis care.
AHRQ-funded; HS026512.
Citation: Tyler A, Dempsey A, Spencer S .
Do the guidelines apply?-A multisite, combined stakeholder qualitative case study to understand care decisions in bronchiolitis.
Acad Pediatr 2022 Jul;22(5):806-17. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.08.003..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Respiratory Conditions, Decision Making, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice
Kistler CE, Wretman Zimmerman, S S
Overdiagnosis of urinary tract infections by nursing home clinicians versus a clinical guideline.
The purpose of this study was to examine the concordance between clinicians' diagnosis of suspected urinary tract infection (UTI) with a clinical guideline treated as the gold standard, in order to inform overprescribing and antibiotic stewardship in nursing homes. The authors conducted a cross-sectional web-based survey of a national convenience sample of nursing-home clinicians, including a discrete choice experiment with 19 randomly selected scenarios of nursing-home residents with possible UTIs. Responses were compared to the guideline. The results indicated that nursing-home clinicians tend to over-diagnose UTI. The authors concluded that this necessitates systems-based interventions to augment clinical decisionmaking.
AHRQ-funded; HS024519.
Citation: Kistler CE, Wretman Zimmerman, S S .
Overdiagnosis of urinary tract infections by nursing home clinicians versus a clinical guideline.
J Am Geriatr Soc 2022 Apr;70(4):1070-81. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17638..
Keywords: Nursing Homes, Long-Term Care, Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), Guidelines, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Decision Making
Marin JR, Rodean J, Mannix RC
Association of clinical guidelines and decision support with CT use in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury.
The objective of this study was to examine whether the presence of clinical guidelines and clinical decision support (CDS) for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) were associated with lower head computed tomography (CT) use. The investigators concluded that clinical guidelines for mTBI, and particularly CDS, were associated with lower rates of head CT use without adverse clinical outcomes.
AHRQ-funded; HS026006.
Citation: Marin JR, Rodean J, Mannix RC .
Association of clinical guidelines and decision support with CT use in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury.
J Pediatr 2021 Aug;235:178-83.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.04.026..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making, Health Information Technology (HIT), Brain Injury, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Imaging
Djulbegovic B, Hozo I, Li SA
Certainty of evidence and intervention's benefits and harms are key determinants of guidelines' recommendations.
This study’s goal was to identify the key determinants of clinical guideline development. This study used a web-based survey of 12 panels of 153 “voting” members who issued 2941 recommendations and a qualitative analysis of 13 panels of 311 attendees. When intervention’s benefits outweigh harms compared with no recommendations: the probability of issuing strong recommendations in favor of intervention was 0.22 when certainty of evidence (CoE) was very low; 0.5 when low; 0.74 when moderate, and 0.85 when high. No other factor significantly affected recommendations. Panelists spent over 50% of their time debating CoE with the chairs and co-chairs dominating discussion.
AHRQ-funded; HS024917.
Citation: Djulbegovic B, Hozo I, Li SA .
Certainty of evidence and intervention's benefits and harms are key determinants of guidelines' recommendations.
J Clin Epidemiol 2021 Aug;136:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.025..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Research Methodologies, Decision Making
Ehlers AP, Vitous CA, Sales A
Exploration of factors associated with surgeon deviation from practice guidelines for management of inguinal hernias.
Investigators explored factors associated with surgeon choice of approach (minimally invasive vs open) in inguinal hernia repair as a tool to gain an understanding of guideline-discordant care. They found that decision-making for the approach to inguinal hernia repair was largely influenced by surgeon preference and access to resources rather than patient factors. Although a one-size-fits-all approach is not recommended, the operative approach should ideally be informed by patient factors, including hernia characteristics. They recommended addressing surgeon preference and available resources with a clinician-facing decision aid to provide an opportunity to optimize care for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.
AHRQ-funded; HS025778.
Citation: Ehlers AP, Vitous CA, Sales A .
Exploration of factors associated with surgeon deviation from practice guidelines for management of inguinal hernias.
JAMA Netw Open 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2023684. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.23684..
Keywords: Surgery, Guidelines, Provider: Physician, Provider, Decision Making, Evidence-Based Practice
Chen DW, Reyes-Gastelum D, Radhakrishnan A
Physician-reported misuse of thyroid ultrasonography.
The authors explored physician-reported use of thyroid ultrasonography. They found that a substantial number of physicians endorsed the use of ultrasonography for reasons not supported by clinical guidelines and in conflict with the Choosing Wisely recommendations. They concluded that their study highlights the need for focused physician education on clinically supported and unsupported indications for use of thyroid ultrasonography, with potential roles for future clinical practice guidelines, patient decision-making aids, and clinical decision-making support tools.
AHRQ-funded; HS024512.
Citation: Chen DW, Reyes-Gastelum D, Radhakrishnan A .
Physician-reported misuse of thyroid ultrasonography.
JAMA Surg 2020 Oct;155(10):984-86. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.2507..
Keywords: Imaging, Decision Making, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice
Smith ME, Vitous CA, Hughes TM
Barriers and facilitators to de-implementation of the Choosing Wisely((R)) guidelines for low-value breast cancer surgery.
The objective of this study was to understand why surgeons stop performing certain unnecessary cancer operations but not others and how best to de-implement entrenched and emerging unnecessary procedures. The investigators concluded that with a growing focus on the elimination of ineffective, unproven or low value practices, it is imperative that the behavioral determinants are understood and targeted with specific interventions to decrease utilization rapidly.
AHRQ-funded; HS026030.
Citation: Smith ME, Vitous CA, Hughes TM .
Barriers and facilitators to de-implementation of the Choosing Wisely((R)) guidelines for low-value breast cancer surgery.
Ann Surg Oncol 2020 Aug;27(8):2653-63. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08285-0..
Keywords: Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Surgery, Decision Making, Guidelines, Women
Brand-McCarthy SR, Delaney RK, Noseworthy PA
Can shared decision making improve stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation?: Implications of the updated guidelines.
This paper discusses the need for shared decision making (SDM) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients not just at the beginning of treatment but throughout during ongoing care. Use of SDM can help with patient adherence to recommended anticoagulation treatment regimens and lifestyle changes. It can help build a strong partnership between clinician and patient.
AHRQ-funded; HS026379.
Citation: Brand-McCarthy SR, Delaney RK, Noseworthy PA .
Can shared decision making improve stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation?: Implications of the updated guidelines.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2020 Mar;13(3):e006080. doi: 10.1161/circoutcomes.119.006080..
Keywords: Decision Making, Stroke, Heart Disease and Health, Cardiovascular Conditions, Prevention, Guidelines, Blood Thinners, Medication, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication
Dugas AF, Hsieh YH, LoVecchio F
Derivation and validation of a clinical decision guideline for influenza testing in 4 US emergency departments.
This study looked at which patients should be tested for influenza among adult emergency department (ED) patients with fever or respiratory symptoms who met criteria for antiviral treatment per 2013 CDC guidelines. A prospective cohort study was conducted at 4 US EDs from November 2013 to April 2014. All 1941 enrolled participants were tested for influenza using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and 183 patients (9.4%) had influenza. The CDC clinical decision guidelines (CDGs) for influenza testing includes new or increased cough (2 points), headache (1 point), subjective fever (1 point), and triage temperature >100.4F degrees. The CDG had a sensitivity and specificity of 94.1% and 36.6% respectively in the derivation set and the validation set.
AHRQ-funded; HS009699.
Citation: Dugas AF, Hsieh YH, LoVecchio F .
Derivation and validation of a clinical decision guideline for influenza testing in 4 US emergency departments.
Clin Infect Dis 2020 Jan;70(1):49-58. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz171..
Keywords: Guidelines, Decision Making, Influenza, Respiratory Conditions, Emergency Department, Evidence-Based Practice, Diagnostic Safety and Quality
Strassle PD, Kinlaw AC, Chaumont N
Rates of elective colectomy for diverticulitis continued to increase after 2006 guideline change.
Gastroenterology 2019 Dec;157(6):1679-81.e11. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.08.045.
The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to assess whether trends in elective and urgent/emergent colectomy changed after July 2006. The authors suggest that given the risks associated with elective colectomy, their findings demonstrate the need for a more evidence-based decision-making process, incorporating both patient preferences and patient-reported outcomes, for those considering elective colectomy for uncomplicated and some cases of complicated diverticulitis.
The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to assess whether trends in elective and urgent/emergent colectomy changed after July 2006. The authors suggest that given the risks associated with elective colectomy, their findings demonstrate the need for a more evidence-based decision-making process, incorporating both patient preferences and patient-reported outcomes, for those considering elective colectomy for uncomplicated and some cases of complicated diverticulitis.
AHRQ-funded; HS026363.
Citation: Strassle PD, Kinlaw AC, Chaumont N .
Rates of elective colectomy for diverticulitis continued to increase after 2006 guideline change.
Gastroenterology 2019 Dec;157(6):1679-81.e11. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.08.045..
Keywords: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), Surgery, Healthcare Utilization, Guidelines, Decision Making, Digestive Disease and Health
Antunez AG, Telem DA DA, Dossett LA
Assessment of surgical specialty societies' Choosing Wisely recommendations.
This research study assesses the Choosing Wisely initiative from the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation which aims to reduce the use of low-value practices using evidence-based recommendation. The initiative has included participation from more than 80 specialty societies. The goal of this study was to assess deimplementation recommendations from surgical specialty societies to ascertain how many are directly applicable to surgical procedures or under surgeons’ control. They reviewed the recommendations proposed by surgical societies and requested participation from the eligible ones. Seventeen surgical societies submitted 110 recommendations on their surgical specialty. Out of those recommendations, more than (55%) were identified as perioperative care decisions and not under a surgeons’ control.
AHRQ-funded; HS026030.
Citation: Antunez AG, Telem DA DA, Dossett LA .
Assessment of surgical specialty societies' Choosing Wisely recommendations.
JAMA Surg 2019 Oct;154(10):971-73. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.2309..
Keywords: Surgery, Decision Making, Guidelines
Armstrong MJ, Gronseth GS, Day GS
Patient stakeholder versus physician preferences regarding amyloid PET testing.
Patient and caregiver perspectives on amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) use are largely unexplored, particularly as compared with clinician views. In this study, the investigators surveyed clinicians, patients, caregivers, and dementia advocates on topics relating to an evidence-based guideline on amyloid PET use. They found that patients and caregivers emphasized the importance of having a dementia diagnosis and placed more value on testing and outcomes for asymptomatic populations than clinicians.
AHRQ-funded; HS024159.
Citation: Armstrong MJ, Gronseth GS, Day GS .
Patient stakeholder versus physician preferences regarding amyloid PET testing.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2019 Jul-Sep;33(3):246-53. doi: 10.1097/wad.0000000000000311..
Keywords: Decision Making, Dementia, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Imaging, Neurological Disorders, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Provider, Provider: Physician
Djulbegovic B, Reljic T, Elqayam S
Structured decision-making drives guidelines panels' recommendations "for" but not "against" health interventions.
This study examined the determinants of guideline panels’ recommendations and whether there is a difference between how they make recommendations for or against health interventions. They examined the factors considered by members of 8 panels convened by the American Society of Hematology (ASH) to develop guidelines using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. They found that “for” decisions were made using certainty in evidence, balance of benefits and harms, and variability in patients’ values and preferences. However there was less strength of recommendation (SOR) certainty when making “against” recommendations.
AHRQ-funded; HS024917.
Citation: Djulbegovic B, Reljic T, Elqayam S .
Structured decision-making drives guidelines panels' recommendations "for" but not "against" health interventions.
J Clin Epidemiol 2019 Jun;110:23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.009..
Keywords: Decision Making, Guidelines, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice
Armstrong MJ
Developing the disorders of consciousness guideline and challenges of integrating shared decision-making into clinical practice.
The purpose of this study was to review methodology informing evidence-based guideline development and integration of guidelines into clinical care through shared decision-making (SDM) and to highlight challenges to SDM in disorders of consciousness. Recently published disorders of consciousness guideline recommendations provide strategies for clinicians to enhance quality care for these individuals and also to provide details helping clinicians partner with individuals with disorders of consciousness and their surrogates. Further research is recommended into many aspects of caring for individuals with disorders of consciousness and optimal strategies for partnering with surrogates in decision-making.
AHRQ-funded; HS024159.
Citation: Armstrong MJ .
Developing the disorders of consciousness guideline and challenges of integrating shared decision-making into clinical practice.
J Head Trauma Rehabil 2019 May/Jun;34(3):199-204. doi: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000496.
.
.
Keywords: Decision Making, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Neurological Disorders, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Li SA, Alexander PE, Reljic T
Evidence to decision framework provides a structured "roadmap" for making GRADE guidelines recommendations.
It is unclear how guidelines panelists discuss and consider factors (criteria) that are formally and not formally included in the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. To describe the use of decision criteria, the investigators explored how panelists adhered to GRADE criteria and sought to identify any emerging non-GRADE criteria when the panelists used the Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework as part of GRADE application.
AHRQ-funded; HS024917.
Citation: Li SA, Alexander PE, Reljic T .
Evidence to decision framework provides a structured "roadmap" for making GRADE guidelines recommendations.
J Clin Epidemiol 2018 Dec;104:103-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.09.007..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Decision Making
Neal JL, Lowe NK, Phillippi JC
Likelihood of cesarean birth among parous women after applying leading active labor diagnostic guidelines.
The goals of this study were: Determine the proportions of women admitted to the hospital before or in active labor per the leading National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists/Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (ACOG/SMFM) guidelines; Compare associations of labor status at admission with oxytocin augmentation, cesarean birth, and adverse birth outcomes when using the different active labor diagnostic guidelines. Active labor diagnostic guidelines were applied retrospectively to cervical examination data. The authors conclude that many parous women with spontaneous labor onset are admitted to the hospital before active labor, and these women are more likely to receive oxytocin augmentation during labor and to have a cesarean birth. Implications for practice are discussed.
AHRQ-funded; HS024733.
Citation: Neal JL, Lowe NK, Phillippi JC .
Likelihood of cesarean birth among parous women after applying leading active labor diagnostic guidelines.
Midwifery 2018 Dec;67:64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.09.007..
Keywords: Decision Making, Guidelines, Hospitalization, Labor and Delivery, Pregnancy, Women
Admon AJ, Gupta A, Williams M
Appraising the evidence supporting Choosing Wisely(R) recommendations.
This study’s objective was to appraise the evidence supporting the Choosing Wisely® campaign initiated by the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Foundation to advance dialogue on prevention of unnecessary medical tests, treatments, and procedures. The authors extracted all 320 recommendations that were published through August 2014. The recommendations were then categorized by evidence strength and then a sample of referenced clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) using the validated Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. Overall, 70.3% of recommendations cited CPGs, whereas 22.2% cited primary research as their highest evidence level. Hospital medicine recommendations cited CPGs 90% of the time. However, the median overall score using AGREE II was 54.2% and even for hospital medicine-referenced CPGs was 58.3%.
AHRQ-funded; HS020672.
Citation: Admon AJ, Gupta A, Williams M .
Appraising the evidence supporting Choosing Wisely(R) recommendations.
J Hosp Med 2018 Oct;13(10):688-91. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2964..
Keywords: Decision Making, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Prevention, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement
Durkin MJ, Keller M, Butler AM
An assessment of inappropriate antibiotic use and guideline adherence for uncomplicated urinary tract infections.
In 2011, The Infectious Diseases Society of America released a clinical practice guideline (CPG) that recommended short-course antibiotic therapy and avoidance of fluoroquinolones for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs). This study assessed whether the CPG had an impact on national antibiotic prescribing practices. The study found that CPG was not associated with a clinically meaningful change in national antibiotic prescribing practices for UTIs.
AHRQ-funded; HS019455.
Citation: Durkin MJ, Keller M, Butler AM .
An assessment of inappropriate antibiotic use and guideline adherence for uncomplicated urinary tract infections.
Open Forum Infect Dis 2018 Sep;5(9):ofy198. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy198..
Keywords: Antibiotics, Decision Making, Guidelines, Practice Patterns, Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)
Hoffman AS, Sepucha KR, Abhyankar P
Explanation and elaboration of the Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluations (SUNDAE) guidelines: examples of reporting SUNDAE items from patient decision aid evaluation literature.
This Explanation and Elaboration article expands on the 26 items in the SUNDAE guidelines, providing a rationale for each item, and including examples for how each item has been reported in published papers evaluating patient decision aids. Authors and reviewers may wish to use it broadly to inform structuring of patient decision aid evaluation reports, or use it as a reference to obtain details about how to report individual checklist items.
AHRQ-funded; HS024250.
Citation: Hoffman AS, Sepucha KR, Abhyankar P .
Explanation and elaboration of the Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluations (SUNDAE) guidelines: examples of reporting SUNDAE items from patient decision aid evaluation literature.
BMJ Qual Saf 2018 May;27(5):389-412. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006985..
Keywords: Decision Making, Guidelines, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient and Family Engagement, Quality of Care
Hoffman AS, Sepucha KR, Abhyankar P
Explanation and elaboration of the Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluations (SUNDAE) guidelines: examples of reporting SUNDAE items from patient decision aid evaluation literature.
This Explanation and Elaboration article expands on the 26 items in the SUNDAE guidelines, providing a rationale for each item, and including examples for how each item has been reported in published papers evaluating patient decision aids. Authors and reviewers may wish to use it broadly to inform structuring of patient decision aid evaluation reports, or use it as a reference to obtain details about how to report individual checklist items.
AHRQ-funded; HS024250.
Citation: Hoffman AS, Sepucha KR, Abhyankar P .
Explanation and elaboration of the Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluations (SUNDAE) guidelines: examples of reporting SUNDAE items from patient decision aid evaluation literature.
BMJ Qual Saf 2018 May;27(5):389-412. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006985..
Keywords: Decision Making, Guidelines, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient and Family Engagement, Quality of Care
Sepucha KR, Abhyankar P, Hoffman AS
Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluation studies: the development of SUNDAE Checklist.
This study sought to develop and reach consensus on reporting guidelines to improve the quality of publications evaluating patient decision aids (PDAs). The study concluded that the SUNDAE (Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluations) Checklist will help ensure that reports of PDA evaluation studies are understandable, transparent and of high quality.
AHRQ-funded; HS024250.
Citation: Sepucha KR, Abhyankar P, Hoffman AS .
Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluation studies: the development of SUNDAE Checklist.
BMJ Qual Saf 2018 May;27(5):380-88. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006986..
Keywords: Communication, Decision Making, Education: Patient and Caregiver, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Health Literacy, Patient-Centered Healthcare
McCreedy EM, Kane RL, Gollust SE
Patient-centered guidelines for geriatric diabetes care: potential missed opportunities to avoid harm.
Clinicians strive to deliver individualized, patient-centered care. However, these intentions are understudied. This research explored how patient characteristics associated with a high risk-to-benefit ratio with hypoglycemia medications affected decision making by primary care clinicians. The investigators found that primary care clinicians often chose to intensify glycemic control despite individual patient factors that warranted higher glycemic targets based on existing guidelines.
AHRQ-funded; HS000011.
Citation: McCreedy EM, Kane RL, Gollust SE .
Patient-centered guidelines for geriatric diabetes care: potential missed opportunities to avoid harm.
J Am Board Fam Med 2018 Mar-Apr;31(2):192-200. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.02.170141..
Keywords: Diabetes, Elderly, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Decision Making, Medication, Primary Care, Practice Patterns, Provider: Physician, Provider: Clinician, Provider
Armstrong MJ, Gronseth GS
Approach to assessing and using clinical practice guidelines.
Knowing when to use guidelines in clinical practice requires neurologists to assess the rigor of published guidelines. This review briefly describes guideline definitions and the American Academy of Neurology process for guideline development, outlines key elements for assessing guideline quality, and details a practical approach for incorporating guideline recommendations when partnering with patients in shared decision-making.
AHRQ-funded; HS024159.
Citation: Armstrong MJ, Gronseth GS .
Approach to assessing and using clinical practice guidelines.
Neurol Clin Pract 2018 Feb;8(1):58-61. doi: 10.1212/cpj.0000000000000417.
.
.
Keywords: Decision Making, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Patient and Family Engagement, Implementation
Sharp AL, Huang BZ, Tang T
Implementation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and Its association with use of computed tomography among patients with head injury.
The researchers evaluated the association of implementation of the Canadian CT Head Rule on head computed tomography (CT) imaging in community emergency departments (EDs). They found that a multicomponent implementation of the Canadian CT Head Rule was associated with a modest reduction in CT use and an increased diagnostic yield of head CTs for adult trauma encounters in community EDs.
AHRQ-funded; HS021271.
Citation: Sharp AL, Huang BZ, Tang T .
Implementation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and Its association with use of computed tomography among patients with head injury.
Ann Emerg Med 2018 Jan;71(1):54-63.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.06.022.
.
.
Keywords: Brain Injury, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making, Emergency Department, Guidelines, Healthcare Utilization, Imaging