Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Access to Care (14)
- Adverse Drug Events (ADE) (2)
- Adverse Events (2)
- Alcohol Use (12)
- Ambulatory Care and Surgery (5)
- Antibiotics (1)
- Anxiety (4)
- Asthma (1)
- Autism (3)
- Behavioral Health (27)
- Blood Pressure (13)
- Cancer (124)
- Cancer: Breast Cancer (55)
- Cancer: Cervical Cancer (11)
- Cancer: Colorectal Cancer (52)
- Cancer: Lung Cancer (15)
- Cancer: Ovarian Cancer (7)
- Cancer: Prostate Cancer (17)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (11)
- Care Coordination (1)
- Caregiving (3)
- Care Management (4)
- Case Study (47)
- Children/Adolescents (55)
- Chronic Conditions (15)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (6)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (1)
- Colonoscopy (21)
- Communication (3)
- Community-Based Practice (10)
- Community Partnerships (1)
- Comparative Effectiveness (5)
- COVID-19 (5)
- Cultural Competence (4)
- Data (1)
- Decision Making (29)
- Dementia (2)
- Dental and Oral Health (2)
- Depression (23)
- Diabetes (22)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (60)
- Digestive Disease and Health (4)
- Disabilities (3)
- Disparities (20)
- Domestic Violence (5)
- Education (1)
- Education: Continuing Medical Education (2)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (6)
- Elderly (31)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (7)
- Emergency Department (13)
- Emergency Medical Services (EMS) (3)
- Evidence-Based Practice (88)
- Eye Disease and Health (5)
- Family Health and History (8)
- Genetics (16)
- Guidelines (61)
- Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) (1)
- Healthcare Costs (22)
- Healthcare Delivery (7)
- Healthcare Utilization (17)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (22)
- Health Insurance (4)
- Health Literacy (2)
- Health Promotion (9)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (5)
- Health Status (2)
- Health Systems (2)
- Heart Disease and Health (7)
- Hepatitis (12)
- Hospitalization (4)
- Hospital Readmissions (1)
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) (26)
- Imaging (40)
- Implementation (10)
- Infectious Diseases (15)
- Injuries and Wounds (2)
- Inpatient Care (2)
- Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (1)
- Learning Health Systems (1)
- Lifestyle Changes (2)
- Low-Income (9)
- Maternal Care (7)
- Medicaid (6)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) (4)
- Medicare (7)
- Medication (11)
- Medication: Safety (2)
- Men's Health (1)
- Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (1)
- Mortality (1)
- Neurological Disorders (8)
- Newborns/Infants (8)
- Nutrition (4)
- Obesity (5)
- Obesity: Weight Management (1)
- Opioids (3)
- Organizational Change (2)
- Osteoporosis (2)
- Outcomes (2)
- Pain (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (8)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (12)
- Patient Adherence/Compliance (8)
- Patient and Family Engagement (1)
- Patient Experience (2)
- Patient Safety (3)
- Payment (2)
- Policy (6)
- Practice Patterns (8)
- Pregnancy (19)
- Prevention (169)
- Primary Care (55)
- Primary Care: Models of Care (6)
- Provider (1)
- Provider: Clinician (1)
- Provider: Health Personnel (1)
- Provider: Pharmacist (1)
- Provider Performance (3)
- Public Health (4)
- Quality Improvement (3)
- Quality Measures (2)
- Quality of Care (6)
- Quality of Life (4)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (34)
- Rehabilitation (1)
- Research Methodologies (4)
- Respiratory Conditions (4)
- Risk (17)
- Rural/Inner-City Residents (1)
- Rural Health (8)
- (-) Screening (426)
- Sepsis (1)
- Sexual Health (10)
- Sickle Cell Disease (1)
- Simulation (2)
- Skin Conditions (1)
- Sleep Problems (5)
- Social Determinants of Health (32)
- Social Stigma (1)
- Stroke (1)
- Substance Abuse (14)
- Surgery (3)
- Telehealth (2)
- Tobacco Use (3)
- Tobacco Use: Smoking Cessation (2)
- Training (1)
- Trauma (2)
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) (117)
- Urban Health (9)
- Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) (2)
- Vaccination (2)
- Value (10)
- Veterans (8)
- Vitamins and Supplements (4)
- Vulnerable Populations (17)
- Women (85)
- Workflow (3)
- Young Adults (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a monthly compilation of research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers and recently published in journals or newsletters.
Results
1 to 25 of 426 Research Studies DisplayedSteeves-Reece AL, Davis MM, Hiebert Larson J
Patients' willingness to accept social needs navigation after in-person versus remote screening.
The authors conducted a cross-sectional study in order to assess possible adverse effects of screening patients remotely on patient engagement and interest in accepting social needs navigation. Participants were Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries in the Oregon Accountable Health Communities (AHC) model. The results indicated that over 70% of participants were willing to accept help with social needs; neither the mode of screening nor interaction term were significantly associated with willingness to accept navigation assistance. The authors concluded remote screening may not adversely affect patient willingness to accept health care-based navigation for social needs.
AHRQ-funded; HS027707.
Citation: Steeves-Reece AL, Davis MM, Hiebert Larson J .
Patients' willingness to accept social needs navigation after in-person versus remote screening.
J Am Board Fam Med 2023 Apr 3;36(2):229-39. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220259R1.
Keywords: Telehealth, Screening, Health Information Technology (HIT), Social Determinants of Health
Vo H, Valentine KD, Barry MJ
Evaluation of the shared decision-making process scale in cancer screening and medication decisions.
The objectives of this study were to examine the reliability and validity of the Shared Decision-Making (SDM) Process scale for cancer screening and medication decisions. Researchers conducted a secondary data analysis of more than 6,000 participants who made decisions about breast, colon, or prostate cancer screening or taking medication for menopause, depression, hypertension or high cholesterol. They concluded that the SDM Process scale demonstrated construct validity and retest reliability.
AHRQ-funded; HS025718.
Citation: Vo H, Valentine KD, Barry MJ .
Evaluation of the shared decision-making process scale in cancer screening and medication decisions.
Patient Educ Couns 2023 Mar;108:107617. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.107617.
Keywords: Decision Making, Cancer, Medication, Screening
Franco MI, Staab EM, Zhu M
Pragmatic clinical trial of population health, portal-based depression screening: the PORTAL-Depression study.
Utilizing patient portals in a population health framework for depression screening presents a potentially effective method for proactively engaging and identifying individuals with depression. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a population health-based depression screening compared to in-clinic screening alone in detecting patients with depression. A practical clinical trial conducted at an urban, academic, tertiary care center's adult internal medicine outpatient clinic included a total of 2713 eligible adult patients due for depression screening with active portal accounts. Patients with known depression or bipolar disorder, and those who had been screened within the previous year were excluded. Participants were randomly allocated to receive either usual care (n = 1372) or population health care (n = 1341). In the usual care group, medical assistants screened patients during clinic visits. In the population health care group, patients were sent portal-based letters inviting them to complete an online screener, irrespective of appointment status. The Computerized Adaptive Test for Mental Health (CAT-MH™) was used for both in-clinic and portal-based screenings. The study found that the population health care group displayed a higher depression screening rate compared to the usual care group (43% (n = 578) vs. 33% (n = 459), p < 0.0001). Additionally, the rate of positive screens was greater in the population health care group than in the usual care group (10% (n = 58) vs. 4% (n = 17), p < 0.001).
AHRQ-funded; HS26151
Citation: Franco MI, Staab EM, Zhu M .
Pragmatic clinical trial of population health, portal-based depression screening: the PORTAL-Depression study.
J Gen Intern Med 2023 Mar;38(4):857-64. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07779-9.
Keywords: Depression, Behavioral Health, Screening, Health Information Technology (HIT)
Ho TH, Bissell MCS, Lee CI
Prioritizing screening mammograms for immediate interpretation and diagnostic evaluation on the basis of risk for recall.
The purpose of this study was to establish a prioritization method for immediate interpretation of screening mammograms and potential diagnostic assessment. A cohort based on the population, comprising screening mammograms conducted from 2012 to 2020 at 126 radiology centers from 7 Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium registries, was examined. Classification trees were used to identify combinations of clinical history (age, BI-RADS density, time elapsed since the previous mammogram, history of false-positive recall or biopsy outcome), screening technique (digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis), and facility features (profit status, location, screening volume, practice type, academic affiliation) that grouped screening mammograms by recall rate, with ≥12/100 classified as high and ≥16/100 as very high. The efficiency ratio was calculated as the percentage of recalls divided by the percentage of mammograms. The research cohort consisted of 2,674,051 screening mammograms in 925,777 women, with 235,569 recalls. The study found that the primary predictor of recall was the time interval since the last mammogram, followed by age, history of false-positive recall, breast density, history of benign biopsy, and screening method. Recall rates were extremely high for baseline mammograms and high for women with ≥5 years since their previous mammogram. The 9.2% of mammograms in subgroups with very high and high recall rates represented 19.2% of recalls, yielding an efficiency ratio of 2.1 compared to a random strategy. Including women under 50 with dense breasts accounted for 20.3% of mammograms and 33.9% of recalls (efficiency ratio = 1.7). Findings incorporating facility-level characteristics were analogous.
AHRQ-funded; HS018366
Citation: Ho TH, Bissell MCS, Lee CI .
Prioritizing screening mammograms for immediate interpretation and diagnostic evaluation on the basis of risk for recall.
J Am Coll Radiol 2023 Mar;20(3):299-310. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.09.030.
Keywords: Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Screening, Imaging, Women, Prevention, Diagnostic Safety and Quality
Barry MJ, Wolff TA, Pbert L
AHRQ Author: Wolff TA, Fan TM, Mabry-Hernandez IR, Mills J
Putting evidence into practice: an update on the US Preventive Services Task Force methods for developing recommendations for preventive services
The purpose of this study was to outline the current methodologies employed by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) evidence-based recommendations regarding preventive services to improve health for people nationwide, discuss the evolution of these methods to address health equity in preventive care, and identify areas requiring further research. The researchers found that the USPSTF selects subjects based on disease impact, the availability of novel evidence, and the feasibility of implementing the service within primary care settings. In the future, health equity will be increasingly taken into account. Analytical frameworks delineate the crucial questions and associations linking preventive measures to health outcomes. Contextual inquiries offer insights into the natural course of diseases, prevailing practices, health outcomes in vulnerable populations, and health equity considerations. The USPSTF allocates a certainty level to the net benefit estimation of a preventive service (high, moderate, or low) and assesses the net benefit magnitude (considerable, moderate, minimal, or none/negative). Utilizing these evaluations, the USPSTF assigns an alphabetic grade ranging from A (endorse) to D (advise against). When evidence is inadequate, an "I" statement is issued. The USPSTF aims to further refine its simulation modeling techniques and apply evidence to address conditions with limited data in populations disproportionately affected by disease. The authors concluded that exploratory efforts are in progress to gain a deeper understanding of the relationships between social constructs such as race, ethnicity, and gender and their impact on health outcomes, ultimately informing the creation of a USPSTF health equity framework.
Citation: Barry MJ, Wolff TA, Pbert L .
Putting evidence into practice: an update on the US Preventive Services Task Force methods for developing recommendations for preventive services
Ann Fam Med 2023 Mar-Apr;21(2):165-71. doi: 10.1370/afm.2946.
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Prevention, Screening
Kozhimannil KB, Lewis VA, Interrante JD
Screening for and experiences of intimate partner violence in the United States before, during, and after pregnancy, 2016-2019.
The objective of this study was to measure rates of intimate partner violence (IPV) screening during the perinatal period among people experiencing physical violence in the US. Data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System was used to describe the incidence of physical IPV before or during pregnancy. The results indicated that nearly half of those reporting physical IPV were not screened before or after pregnancy. The authors concluded that public health efforts to improve maternal health must address universal screening for IPV as well as access to care.
AHRQ-funded; HS027640.
Citation: Kozhimannil KB, Lewis VA, Interrante JD .
Screening for and experiences of intimate partner violence in the United States before, during, and after pregnancy, 2016-2019.
Am J Public Health 2023 Mar; 113(3):297-305. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2022.307195..
Keywords: Screening, Domestic Violence, Pregnancy, Women, Maternal Care
Asher GN, Feltner C, Harrison WN
Serologic screening for genital herpes: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Genital herpes, a viral sexually transmitted infection (STI) caused by herpes simplex virus (HSV) subtypes HSV-1 or HSV-2, is a prevalent STI in the US. Early identification of unrecognized HSV-2 infection could reduce transmission and morbidity. In 2016, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended against routine serologic screening for genital herpes in asymptomatic individuals. This updated evidence report aimed to identify studies published since the previous 2016 evidence review. A literature search was conducted from September 30, 2015, through January 16, 2022, with ongoing surveillance through July 22, 2022. The review identified no new eligible studies, leading to unchanged overall conclusions from the 2016 recommendation against screening. The prior recommendation was based on psychosocial harms from false-positive test results due to poor screening test accuracy and uncertain benefit of preventive viral medications for reducing viral shedding or improving health outcomes. The review focused on the general population of asymptomatic adolescents and adults and may not be applicable to populations at higher risk for infection, such as those with HIV or other immunosuppressive conditions.
AHRQ-funded; 75Q80120D00007.
Citation: Asher GN, Feltner C, Harrison WN .
Serologic screening for genital herpes: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2023 Feb 14; 329(6):510-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.20356..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Sexual Health, Infectious Diseases, Screening, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Prevention
Holcomb J, Rajan SS, Ferguson GM
Implementation of an evidence-based intervention with safety net clinics to improve mammography appointment adherence among underserved women.
This study evaluated the implementation of an evidence-based intervention in safety-net clinics to improve mammography appointment adherence in underserved women called the Peace of Mind Program. The intervention was implemented in 19 Federally Qualified Health centers and charity care clinics within the Greater Houston area. Surveys were given prior to adoption and at eight weeks post implementation to assess Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research constructs. A total of 4402 women were surveyed (baseline period 2078, intervention period 2324). Women in the intervention period or who completed the intervention were more likely to attend or reschedule their mammography appointment than those who did not complete the intervention. A total of 15 clinics prior to adoption and eight clinics completed the survey post implementation.
AHRQ-funded; HS023255.
Citation: Holcomb J, Rajan SS, Ferguson GM .
Implementation of an evidence-based intervention with safety net clinics to improve mammography appointment adherence among underserved women.
J Cancer Educ 2023 Feb; 38(1):309-18. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-02116-w..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Screening, Patient Adherence/Compliance, Imaging, Vulnerable Populations, Ambulatory Care and Surgery
Strayer TE, Spalluto LB, Burns A
Using the framework for reporting adaptations and modifications-expanded (frame) to study adaptations in lung cancer screening delivery in the Veterans Health Administration: a cohort study.
The purpose of this study was to apply the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Expanded (FRAME) to study adaptations in lung cancer screening delivery processes in a Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Initiative. Between 2019 and 2021 the researchers prospectively administered semi-structured interviews with lung cancer screening program navigators at 10 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs). Baseline process maps were developed for each program, and each program navigator reviewed process maps in subsequent years 1 and 2. Researchers then identified, documented, and mapped adaptations in screening processes to the FRAME categories. 16 interviews were conducted across 10 VHA lung cancer screening programs, with 6 of these being operational, and of those 3 reported adaptations to their screening processes that were planned or in response to COVID-19. In year 2 all 10 programs were operational and eligible. Programs reported 14 adaptations in year 2. The adaptations identified were both planned and unplanned and often prompted by increased workload; 57% of year 2 adaptations were associated with the identification and eligibility of Veterans and 43% were associated with follow-up with Veterans for screening results. During the 2 years, adaptations associated with data management and patient tracking took place in 60% of programs to improve the data collection and tracking of Veterans in the screening process. The study concluded that adaptations took place predominantly in the categories of patient identification and communication of results due to increased workload.
AHRQ-funded; HS026122; HS026395.
Citation: Strayer TE, Spalluto LB, Burns A .
Using the framework for reporting adaptations and modifications-expanded (frame) to study adaptations in lung cancer screening delivery in the Veterans Health Administration: a cohort study.
Implement Sci Commun 2023 Jan 12; 4(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00388-x..
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Screening, Veterans, Evidence-Based Practice, Learning Health Systems
Khoong EC, Rivadeneira NA, Pacca L
Extent of follow-up on abnormal cancer screening in multiple California public hospital systems: a retrospective review.
This report’s objective was to describes patterns of performance on follow-up of abnormal colon and breast cancer screening tests and explores the extent to which racial/ethnic disparities exist in public hospital systems. The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from five California public hospital systems between July 2015 and June 2017. The authors assessed follow-up rates of colonoscopy after positive fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) and breast tissue biopsy within 21 days after a BIRADS 4/5 mammogram. Negative associations with follow-up colonoscopy were associated with older age, Medicaid insurance, lack of insurance, English language and site; while Hispanic ethnicity and Asian race were positively associated with follow-up colonoscopy. Of 1702 BIRADS 4/5 mammograms, 64% received a timely biopsy; only site was associated with timely follow-up biopsy. Site-level factors were found to have a larger, more consistent impact on follow-up rates than patient sociodemographic traits.
AHRQ-funded; HS024412.
Citation: Khoong EC, Rivadeneira NA, Pacca L .
Extent of follow-up on abnormal cancer screening in multiple California public hospital systems: a retrospective review.
J Gen Intern Med 2023 Jan; 38(1):21-29. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07657-4..
Keywords: Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer, Screening, Disparities, Women
Mills J, Barnhart H
AHRQ Author: Mills J
Screening for prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents.
This Putting Prevention into Practice case study is used to increase understanding of the USPSTF final recommendation on screening for prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents. A case study was presented using a 12-year-old-patient with no specific concerns but had gained 18 pounds since their last wellness visit and lives a sedentary lifestyle. The patient’s family history of type 2 diabetes mellitus in maternal and paternal grandparents is described. Three multiple-choice questions are presented regarding harms and benefits of screening for prediabetes and type 2 diabetes for that patient.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Mills J, Barnhart H .
Screening for prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents.
Am Fam Physician 2023 Jan; 107(1):79-80..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Children/Adolescents, Diabetes, Screening, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Prevention, Chronic Conditions, Case Study
Kim HS, Hernaez R, Sansgiry S
Comparative effectiveness of surveillance colonoscopy intervals on colorectal cancer outcomes in a national cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
The purpose of this study was to determine the comparative effectiveness of varying colonoscopy intervals on colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Data was from the National Veterans Health Administration. Findings showed that, in a national cohort of patients with CRC-IBD, colonoscopy within 3 years prior to CRC diagnosis was associated with early tumor stage at diagnosis, and colonoscopy within 1 year was associated with a reduced all-cause mortality compared with no colonoscopy, supporting colonoscopy intervals of 1 to 3 years in patients with IBD in order to reduce late-stage CRC and all-cause mortality.
AHRQ-funded; HS024122.
Citation: Kim HS, Hernaez R, Sansgiry S .
Comparative effectiveness of surveillance colonoscopy intervals on colorectal cancer outcomes in a national cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022 Dec;20(12):2848-57.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.02.048..
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer, Digestive Disease and Health, Imaging, Screening, Comparative Effectiveness, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Dalton AF, Golin CE, Morris C
Effect of a patient decision aid on preferences for colorectal cancer screening among older adults: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.
This research studied the effects of a patient decision aid on preferences for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among adults aged 76 to 84 years. Participants were recruited from 14 community-based primary care practices who were not up to date with screening and had an appointment within 6 weeks. They were randomized to receive the intervention or control. Among the 424 participants, mean age was 76.8, 248 were women, and 333 were White. There were no statistically significant differences found in patient preferences between the health groups. Additional studies that are appropriately powered were recommended.
AHRQ-funded; HS021133.
Citation: Dalton AF, Golin CE, Morris C .
Effect of a patient decision aid on preferences for colorectal cancer screening among older adults: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.
JAMA Netw Open 2022 Dec;5(12):e2244982. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.44982..
Keywords: Elderly, Decision Making, Screening, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer
Lock LJ, Channa R, Brennan MB
Effect of health system on the association of rurality and level of disadvantage with receipt of diabetic eye screening.
The goal of this retrospective cohort study was to determine the role of level of disadvantage in diabetic eye screening to explain the effect of health systems on rural and urban disparities. Researchers used an all-payer, statewide claims database to include adult Wisconsin residents with diabetes who had claims billed throughout the baseline and measurement years. Results indicated that patients from urban underserved clinics were more likely to receive screening than those from rural underserved clinics; similar findings emerged for both Medicare and non-Medicare subgroups. The researchers concluded that health systems, especially those that serve urban underserved populations, have an opportunity to increase screening rates by leveraging health system-level interventions and supporting patients in overcoming barriers.
AHRQ-funded; HS026279.
Citation: Lock LJ, Channa R, Brennan MB .
Effect of health system on the association of rurality and level of disadvantage with receipt of diabetic eye screening.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2022 Dec;10(6):e003174. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2022-003174..
Keywords: Rural Health, Access to Care, Screening, Diabetes, Eye Disease and Health, Disparities, Chronic Conditions, Health Systems
Feltnerl. C, Wallace IF, Aymes S
Screening for obstructive sleep apnea in adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
The purpose of this study was to examine the evidence on screening for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in asymptomatic adults or those with unrecognized OSA symptoms to inform the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. The researchers utilized data from PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, and trial registries through August 23, 2021 and surveillance data through September 23, 2022. The main outcomes were accuracy, excessive daytime sleepiness, sleep-related and general health-related quality of life (QOL), and harms. Eighty-six studies were included (N = 11,051), researchers finding that no study directly compared screening with no screening. Five studies evaluating the accuracy of other screening tools provided inconsistent results. When compared with inactive control, positive airway pressure was associated with a significant improvement in ESS score from baseline, sleep-related QOL, and general health-related QOL measured by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) mental health component summary score change, and SF-36 physical health component summary score change. When compared with controls, utilization of mandibular advancement devices was also related with a significantly larger ESS score change. Reporting of other health outcomes was scarce; no trial included in the study found significant benefit related with treatment on mortality, cardiovascular events, or motor vehicle crashes. In 3 systematic reviews, positive airway pressure was significantly associated with reduced blood pressure; but the difference was relatively small. The researchers concluded that the accuracy and clinical usefulness of OSA screening tools was unclear.
Citation: Feltnerl. C, Wallace IF, Aymes S .
Screening for obstructive sleep apnea in adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2022 Nov 15;328(19):1951-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.18357..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Sleep Problems, Screening, Evidence-Based Practice, Prevention
Hickey EJ, Feinberg E, Kuhn J
Family impact during the time between autism screening and definitive diagnosis.
The purpose of this study was to explore parental perceptions of the impact their child’s behavior had on their family between the time risk of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) was identified and before formal medical diagnosis, and then compare family impact among those whose child met diagnostic criteria for ASD and those who did not. The study found that the parents of children who received a non-ASD diagnosis reported a higher baseline level of family impact. Perception of difficult child behavior was a stronger predictor of family impact than later diagnostic group, and child functioning did not predict family impact. The researchers concluded that in this specific population, perceived difficult child behavior is a stronger predictor of family impact than later diagnostic category.
AHRQ-funded; HS022242.
Citation: Hickey EJ, Feinberg E, Kuhn J .
Family impact during the time between autism screening and definitive diagnosis.
J Autism Dev Disord 2022 Nov;52(11):4908-20. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05354-5..
Keywords: Autism, Screening, Diagnostic Safety and Quality
Viswanathan M, Wallace IF, Cook Middleton J
Screening for depression and suicide risk in children and adolescents: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
The authors sought to review the evidence on screening for depression or suicide risk in children and adolescents to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force. They found indirect evidence that suggested some screening instruments were reasonably accurate for detecting depression. Further, psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy were associated with some benefits and no statistically significant harms for depression, but the evidence was limited for suicide risk screening instruments and interventions.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500011I.
Citation: Viswanathan M, Wallace IF, Cook Middleton J .
Screening for depression and suicide risk in children and adolescents: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2022 Oct 18;328(15):1543-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.16310..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Children/Adolescents, Depression, Behavioral Health, Screening, Primary Care, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Prevention
Viswanathan M, Wallace IF, Cook Middleton J
Screening for anxiety in children and adolescents: evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
The purpose of this paper was to review the evidence on screening for anxiety in children and adolescents to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force. Indirect evidence of findings suggested that some screening instruments were reasonably accurate. Cognitive behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy were associated with benefits; no statistically significant association with harms was reported.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500011I, 75Q80120D00007.
Citation: Viswanathan M, Wallace IF, Cook Middleton J .
Screening for anxiety in children and adolescents: evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2022 Oct 11;328(14):1445-55. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.16303..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Children/Adolescents, Anxiety, Behavioral Health, Primary Care, Screening, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Prevention
Ross RL, Rubio K, Rodriguez HP
Mammography and decision aid use for breast cancer screening in older women.
This study examines the association between practice-level decision-aid use and mammography use among older women. Physician practice responses to the 2017/2018 National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems were linked to 2016-17 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiary data from eligible beneficiaries aged 65-74 years. Findings showed that health information technology-enabled automation of mammography reminders and other advanced health information technology functions may support mammography, whereas breast cancer decision aids may reduce patients' propensities to be screened through the alignment of their preferences and screening decision.
AHRQ-funded; HS022241; HS024075.
Citation: Ross RL, Rubio K, Rodriguez HP .
Mammography and decision aid use for breast cancer screening in older women.
Am J Prev Med 2022 Oct;63(4):630-35. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.04.014..
Keywords: Imaging, Screening, Decision Making, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Women, Prevention, Cancer, Elderly
Holcomb J, Ferguson GM, Sun J
Stakeholder engagement in adoption, implementation, and sustainment of an evidence-based intervention to increase mammography adherence among low-income women.
The purpose of this document review study was to create a conceptual framework to guide stakeholder engagement in an evidence-based intervention to increase mammography appointment adherence in underserved and low-income women. The document review results were aligned with the constructs of the conceptual framework and an application of stakeholder engagement in an evidence-based mammography intervention. The researchers concluded that both the conceptual framework constructs and the stakeholder engagement strategies can be utilized across a range of organizations, programs, and settings.
AHRQ-funded; HS023255.
Citation: Holcomb J, Ferguson GM, Sun J .
Stakeholder engagement in adoption, implementation, and sustainment of an evidence-based intervention to increase mammography adherence among low-income women.
J Cancer Educ 2022 Oct;37(5):1486-95. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-01988-2..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Screening, Imaging, Women, Low-Income, Patient Adherence/Compliance
Henninger ML, Bean SI, Lin JS
Screening for syphilis infection in nonpregnant adults and adolescents: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the available published evidence on the potential benefits and harms of screening for syphilis infection in non-pregnant, asymptomatic adults and adolescents at increased risk for syphilis infection, for the purpose of supporting the 2022 United States Prevention Services Task Force recommendations statement on screening for syphilis infection.
AHRQ-funded; 75Q80120D00004.
Citation: Henninger ML, Bean SI, Lin JS .
Screening for syphilis infection in nonpregnant adults and adolescents: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2022 Sep 27;328(12):1250-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.8612..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Screening, Prevention, Sexual Health, Infectious Diseases, Evidence-Based Practice
Jonas DE, Vander Schaaf EB, Riley S
Screening for prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents: evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
The purpose of this study was to explore the evidence on the benefits and harms of screening children and adolescents for prediabetes and type 2 diabetes to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). The researchers utilized references; experts; literature surveillance, and PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and trial registries. The final review included 8 publications with 856 participants with a mean age of 14 years. The researchers found that none of the eligible studies directly assessed the benefits or harms of preventive screening. The limited eligible clinical trials reported few health outcomes and found no difference between groups.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500007I.
Citation: Jonas DE, Vander Schaaf EB, Riley S .
Screening for prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents: evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2022 Sep 13;328(10):968-79. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.7957..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Children/Adolescents, Diabetes, Screening, Prevention, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines
Hicklin K, O'Leary MC, Nambiar S
Assessing the impact of multicomponent interventions on colorectal cancer screening through simulation: what would it take to reach national screening targets in North Carolina?
The authors simulated the impact of multicomponent interventions in North Carolina over 5 years to assess the potential for meeting national screening targets for colorectal cancer (CRC). They reported that each multicomponent intervention was associated with increased CRC screening and averted both CRC cases and deaths, while three had the potential to reach screening targets.
AHRQ-funded; HS022981.
Citation: Hicklin K, O'Leary MC, Nambiar S .
Assessing the impact of multicomponent interventions on colorectal cancer screening through simulation: what would it take to reach national screening targets in North Carolina?
Prev Med 2022 Sep;162:107126. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107126..
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer, Screening, Colonoscopy, Prevention
Schwartz HEM, Abel MK, Lin JA, et al. HEM, Abel MK, Lin JA
Barriers to colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in homeless patients: a case report and policy recommendations.
Researchers described the barriers encountered by a homeless patient with a history of colorectal cancer who was lost to follow up and presented 11 years later with a new primary colon cancer. They provided policy solutions to increase the use of primary and secondary screening, including essential private bathroom access for colonoscopy preparation in patients who had a positive screening or who require surveillance after diagnosis and treatment. They concluded that increasing early detection and treatment may be cost-effective and could reduce disparities in morbidity and mortality in homeless patients.
AHRQ-funded; HS024532.
Citation: Schwartz HEM, Abel MK, Lin JA, et al. HEM, Abel MK, Lin JA .
Barriers to colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in homeless patients: a case report and policy recommendations.
Ann Surg Open 2022 Sep;3(3):e183. doi: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000183..
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Colonoscopy, Vulnerable Populations, Screening, Access to Care, Case Study
Golmakani MK, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL
Nonhomogeneous Markov chain for estimating the cumulative risk of multiple false positive screening tests.
This study addressed the general challenge of estimating the cumulative risk of multiple false positive test results. The authors proposed a nonhomogeneous multistate model to describe the screening process including competing events and developed alternative approaches for estimating the cumulative risk of multiple false positive results using this multistate model based on existing estimators for the cumulative risk of a single false positive. The multistate model was based on existing estimators for the cumulative risk of a single false positive. They compared the performance of the newly proposed models through simulation studies and illustrated model performance using data on screening mammography from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. They found that in the context of screening mammography that the cumulative risk of multiple false positive results is high. For a high-risk individual, the cumulative probability of at least two false positive mammography results after 10 rounds of annual screening is 40.4.
AHRQ-funded; HS018366.
Citation: Golmakani MK, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL .
Nonhomogeneous Markov chain for estimating the cumulative risk of multiple false positive screening tests.
Biometrics 2022 Sep;78(3):1244-56. doi: 10.1111/biom.13484..
Keywords: Research Methodologies, Screening, Imaging, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer