National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Access to Care (13)
- Adverse Drug Events (ADE) (5)
- Adverse Events (9)
- Alcohol Use (3)
- Ambulatory Care and Surgery (7)
- Antimicrobial Stewardship (1)
- Anxiety (1)
- Asthma (5)
- Autism (3)
- Behavioral Health (47)
- Blood Clots (1)
- Blood Pressure (3)
- Blood Thinners (1)
- Brain Injury (2)
- Burnout (2)
- Cancer (33)
- Cancer: Breast Cancer (9)
- Cancer: Colorectal Cancer (4)
- Cancer: Lung Cancer (1)
- Cancer: Prostate Cancer (2)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (20)
- Care Coordination (22)
- Caregiving (9)
- Care Management (17)
- Case Study (3)
- Centers for Education and Research on Therapeutics (CERTs) (1)
- Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) (2)
- Children/Adolescents (51)
- Chronic Conditions (50)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (8)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (37)
- Colonoscopy (1)
- Communication (30)
- Community-Based Practice (11)
- Community Partnerships (1)
- Comparative Effectiveness (9)
- Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) (9)
- COVID-19 (3)
- Critical Care (2)
- Cultural Competence (5)
- Data (6)
- Decision Making (61)
- Dementia (1)
- Dental and Oral Health (1)
- Depression (9)
- Diabetes (25)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (5)
- Dialysis (1)
- Digestive Disease and Health (2)
- Disabilities (2)
- Disparities (10)
- Education: Academic (1)
- Education: Continuing Medical Education (2)
- Education: Curriculum (1)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (15)
- Elderly (17)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (27)
- Emergency Department (12)
- Emergency Medical Services (EMS) (2)
- Evidence-Based Practice (50)
- Falls (3)
- Family Health and History (5)
- Genetics (2)
- Guidelines (8)
- Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) (2)
- Healthcare Costs (13)
- Healthcare Delivery (75)
- Healthcare Utilization (10)
- Health Information Exchange (HIE) (2)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (53)
- Health Insurance (3)
- Health Literacy (11)
- Health Promotion (1)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (12)
- Health Systems (7)
- Heart Disease and Health (12)
- Home Healthcare (2)
- Hospital Discharge (7)
- Hospitalization (8)
- Hospital Readmissions (3)
- Hospitals (10)
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) (4)
- Hypertension (1)
- Imaging (2)
- Implementation (17)
- Infectious Diseases (2)
- Injuries and Wounds (5)
- Inpatient Care (5)
- Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (5)
- Kidney Disease and Health (1)
- Labor and Delivery (2)
- Learning Health Systems (5)
- Long-Term Care (1)
- Low-Income (4)
- Maternal Care (5)
- Medicaid (6)
- Medical Errors (2)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) (5)
- Medical Liability (1)
- Medicare (8)
- Medication (35)
- Medication: Safety (1)
- Men's Health (1)
- Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (1)
- Mortality (2)
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) (1)
- Neurological Disorders (4)
- Newborns/Infants (3)
- Nursing (4)
- Nursing Homes (7)
- Nutrition (3)
- Obesity (7)
- Obesity: Weight Management (6)
- Opioids (4)
- Organizational Change (19)
- Orthopedics (4)
- Osteoporosis (1)
- Outcomes (14)
- Pain (5)
- Palliative Care (10)
- (-) Patient-Centered Healthcare (448)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (86)
- Patient Adherence/Compliance (11)
- Patient and Family Engagement (62)
- Patient Experience (31)
- Patient Safety (20)
- Patient Self-Management (11)
- Payment (3)
- Policy (9)
- Practice Improvement (12)
- Practice Patterns (6)
- Pregnancy (5)
- Prevention (20)
- Primary Care (133)
- Primary Care: Models of Care (36)
- Provider (16)
- Provider: Clinician (5)
- Provider: Health Personnel (6)
- Provider: Nurse (2)
- Provider: Pharmacist (3)
- Provider: Physician (7)
- Provider Performance (2)
- Public Health (2)
- Quality Improvement (40)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (2)
- Quality Measures (6)
- Quality of Care (60)
- Quality of Life (6)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (17)
- Registries (3)
- Rehabilitation (10)
- Research Methodologies (9)
- Respiratory Conditions (3)
- Risk (8)
- Rural Health (4)
- Screening (8)
- Sepsis (1)
- Sexual Health (3)
- Sickle Cell Disease (5)
- Skin Conditions (1)
- Sleep Problems (1)
- Social Determinants of Health (4)
- Social Media (1)
- Social Stigma (1)
- Stress (1)
- Substance Abuse (7)
- Surgery (13)
- Surveys on Patient Safety Culture (1)
- System Design (1)
- Teams (23)
- TeamSTEPPS (1)
- Telehealth (15)
- Tools & Toolkits (5)
- Training (4)
- Transitions of Care (12)
- Transplantation (1)
- Trauma (1)
- Treatments (1)
- Urban Health (3)
- Vulnerable Populations (14)
- Web-Based (6)
- Women (14)
- Workforce (1)
- Young Adults (3)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 25 of 448 Research Studies DisplayedMeyerhoff J, Kruzan KP, Reddy M
Preparing a workforce of care coordinators to address patient mental health needs in the digital age: training and needs identification.
Previous research shows Care Coordinators (CCs) are frequently the primary point of contact for patients with medical health and mental health comorbidities in integrated healthcare settings, and they are less comfortable addressing mental health concerns than physical health concerns. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of training to support CCs' management of patient mental health needs prior to digital mental health intervention implementation. The researchers delivered a 1-hour training focused on the evaluation and management of depression and suicide-related thoughts and behaviors to CCs within a large healthcare system's Division of Ambulatory Care Coordination. Prior to and following the training CCs completed online surveys. The study found that training resulted in increased comfort working with clinical populations. including patients with suicide-related ideations and behaviors.
AHRQ-funded; HS028003.
Citation: Meyerhoff J, Kruzan KP, Reddy M .
Preparing a workforce of care coordinators to address patient mental health needs in the digital age: training and needs identification.
SAGE Open Nurs 2023 Jan-Dec; 9. doi: 10.1177/23779608231173279..
Keywords: Behavioral Health, Training, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Care Management, Healthcare Delivery
McGowan M, D'Amico M, Kang M
A survey of patient-centered practices in perinatal quality collaboratives.
This research brief shows the results of a web-based survey of US perinatal quality collaborative (PQC) leaders to explore patient-centered practices for quality improvement (QI) initiatives. The survey consisted of multiple-choice questions including procedures for soliciting community input through community advisory boards, (CABs), social media, surveys, and town halls and measures to capture individual patient experiences, including patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs). Over one third (35%) of the 40 PQCs responded with over half reporting an active CAB, with the most common participants including community members. CAB recruitment was most often performed by existing PQC members or leaders. Only half of CABs offered their members compensation. Four organizations used no patient-centered strategies, and only two collected PREMs. In total 12 out of 14 respondents provided at least one free survey response. The respondents highlighted how patient engagement is a powerful tool for shaping diverse aspects of PQCs, from “birth equity” to “how to engage community and patients.”
AHRQ-funded; HS025465.
Citation: McGowan M, D'Amico M, Kang M .
A survey of patient-centered practices in perinatal quality collaboratives.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2023 May; 161(2):670-71. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14636..
Keywords: Patient-Centered Healthcare, Maternal Care, Quality of Care
Mao Y, Li Y, McGarry B
Are online reviews of assisted living communities associated with patient-centered outcomes?
The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between assisted living (AL) online quality review ratings and AL residents' home time. The researchers identified Medicare beneficiaries who entered AL communities in 2018, with the main outcome of resident home time in the year after AL admission. Additional outcomes were the percentage of time spent in emergency room, inpatient hospital, nursing home, and inpatient hospice. The study sample included 59,831 residents in 12,143 ALs. AL online Google reviews for 2013-2017 were linked to 2018-2019 Medicare data. AL average rating score and rating status were generated using Google reviews. The study found that from 2013 to 2017, ALs received an average rating of 4.1 on Google, with a standard deviation of 1.1. Each one-unit increase in the AL's average online rating was associated with an increase in residents' risk-adjusted home time by 0.33 percentage points. Residents in high-rated ALs had a 0.64 pp increase in home time compared with residents in ALs without ratings. Thet study concluded that higher online rating scores were positively associated with residents' home time, and a lack of ratings was related with decreased home time.
AHRQ-funded; HS026893.
Citation: Mao Y, Li Y, McGarry B .
Are online reviews of assisted living communities associated with patient-centered outcomes?
J Am Geriatr Soc 2023 May; 71(5):1505-14. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18192..
Keywords: Elderly, Long-Term Care, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Nursing Homes, Provider Performance, Medicare, Medicaid
Orth LE, Feudtner C, Kempe A
A coordinated approach for managing polypharmacy among children with medical complexity: rationale and design of the Pediatric Medication Therapy Management (pMTM) randomized controlled trial.
Pediatric polypharmacy (the use of 5 concurrent medications or more) is widespread and increases the risk of medication-related problems (MRPs). Although MRPs are related with pediatric morbidity and healthcare use, polypharmacy is rarely evaluated during typical clinical care for CMC. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial will be to examine whether a pharmacist-led Pediatric Medication Therapy Management (pMTM) intervention decreases MRP counts, as well as symptom burden and acute healthcare use, and will test the hypotheses that a patient-centered medication optimization intervention delivered by pediatric pharmacists will result in lower MRP counts, stable or improved symptom burdens, and fewer cumulative acute healthcare encounters at 90 days following pMTM compared to usual care. Eligible participants include all children ages 2 to 18 years old, with more than 1 complex chronic condition, and with 5 or more active medications, as well as their primary caregivers. Child participants and their primary caregivers will be randomized to pMTM or usual care before a non-acute primary care visit and followed for 90 days. Secondary outcomes include Parent-Reported Outcomes of Symptoms (PRO-Sx) symptom burden scores and acute healthcare visit counts. Costs of program replication will be evaluated using time-driven activity-based scoring.
AHRQ-funded; HS028979.
Citation: Orth LE, Feudtner C, Kempe A .
A coordinated approach for managing polypharmacy among children with medical complexity: rationale and design of the Pediatric Medication Therapy Management (pMTM) randomized controlled trial.
BMC Health Serv Res 2023 Apr 29; 23(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09439-y..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Medication, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Kuzma N, Khan A, Rickey L
Effect of Patient and Family Centered I-PASS on adverse event rates in hospitalized children with complex chronic conditions.
This study’s objective was to compare the effect of the intervention Patient and Family Centered (PFC)I-PASS on adverse events (AE) rates in children with and without complex chronic conditions (CCCs). A cohort of 3106 hospitalized children from seven North American pediatric hospitals between December 2014 and January 2017 were included. An effect modification analysis did not show difference in the intervention on children with and without CCCs. There was no statistically significant change in AEs for children with or without CCCs.
AHRQ-funded; HS022986.
Citation: Kuzma N, Khan A, Rickey L .
Effect of Patient and Family Centered I-PASS on adverse event rates in hospitalized children with complex chronic conditions.
J Hosp Med 2023 Apr;18(4):316-20. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13065.
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Chronic Conditions, Adverse Events, Inpatient Care, Transitions of Care
Lee AK, Bobb JF, Richards JE
Integrating alcohol-related prevention and treatment into primary care: a cluster randomized implementation trial.
This study’s goal was to evaluate an implementation intervention to increase (1) population-based alcohol-related prevention with brief interventions and (2) treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD) in primary care implemented with a broader program of behavioral health integration. This stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial called the Sustained Patient-Centered Alcohol-Related Care (SPARC) trial included 22 primary care practices in an integrated health system in Washington state. Participants consisted of all adult patients 18 years or older with primary care visits from January 2015 to July 2018. The study included 7 waves, with practices randomly assigned launch dates. A total of 333,596 patients visited primary care (mean age, 48 years; 193,583 [58%] female; 234,764 [70%] White individuals). The proportion of patients with brief intervention was higher during SPARC intervention than usual care periods (57 vs 11 per 10,000 patients per month). The proportion with AUD treatment engagement did not differ during intervention and usual care. However, it did increase intermediate outcomes: screening (83.2% vs 20.8%), new AUD diagnosis (33.8 vs 28.8 per 10,000), and treatment initiation (7.8 vs 6.2 per 10,000).
AHRQ-funded; HS023173.
Citation: Lee AK, Bobb JF, Richards JE .
Integrating alcohol-related prevention and treatment into primary care: a cluster randomized implementation trial.
JAMA Intern Med 2023 Apr;183(4):319-28. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.7083.
Keywords: Alcohol Use, Substance Abuse, Behavioral Health, Primary Care, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Miller-Rosales C, Brewster AL, Shortell SM
Multilevel influences on patient engagement and chronic care management.
This study used data collected from the National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems to examine health system- and physician practice-level capabilities associated with adoption of (1) patient engagement strategies and (2) chronic care management processes for adult patients with diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease. A total of 796 physician practices and 247 health systems were analyzed from 2017 to 2018. Health systems with processes to assess clinical evidence and with more advanced health information technology (HIT) functionality adopted more practice-level chronic care management processes, but not patient engagement strategies, compared with systems lacking these capabilities. More patient engagement strategies and chronic care management processes were adopted by physician practices with cultures oriented to innovation, more advanced HIT functionality, and with a process to assess clinical evidence than those without those characteristics.
AHRQ-funded; HS024075.
Citation: Miller-Rosales C, Brewster AL, Shortell SM .
Multilevel influences on patient engagement and chronic care management.
Am J Manag Care 2023 Apr; 29(4):196-202. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2023.89348..
Keywords: Patient and Family Engagement, Chronic Conditions, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Stange KC, Miller WL, Etz RS
The role of primary care in improving population health.
This article explored ways in which primary care might influence population health by serving as a force for integration across fragmented systems. The authors examined the interacting mechanisms by which general practice leads to the emergent properties of health, equity, quality, and sustainable resource use. The article also examined how primary care might interact with the other influencers of population health.
AHRQ-funded; HS025312; HS028253.
Citation: Stange KC, Miller WL, Etz RS .
The role of primary care in improving population health.
Milbank Q 2023 Apr; 101(S1):795-840. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12638..
Keywords: Primary Care, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Bierman AS, Burke BT, Comfort LN
AHRQ Author: Bierman AS, Burke BT, Comfort LN, Gerstein M, Mueller NM, Umscheid CA
From precision medicine to precision care: choosing and using precision medicine in the context of multimorbidity.
Swift progress in personalized medicine offers significant potential to decrease disease and death rates for numerous health issues. To maximize the advantages of personalized medicine and minimize negative outcomes, addressing real-world obstacles in applying this research to clinical practice is crucial. A primary challenge involves selecting and employing personalized medicine approaches in everyday practice, considering the care of a substantial portion of individuals with multiple coexisting conditions. Personalized medicine should be incorporated into a broader framework of individualized care, which takes into account factors that impact the efficacy of specific treatments. Individualized care combines a patient-focused approach with personalized medicine to guide decision-making and care plans, considering multiple health conditions, functional ability, personal values, goals, preferences, and social and societal contexts. Creating dissemination and implementation strategies for personalized medicine centered around individualized care can enhance patient-centric quality and health outcomes, direct interventions toward those who will benefit most, improve access to novel treatments, reduce the likelihood of treatment withdrawal due to unforeseen side effects, and promote health equity by customizing interventions and care for diverse individuals and communities. Delivering personalized medicine within the scope of individualized care supports respectful treatment that aligns with patient preferences, values, and objectives, fostering trust and offering necessary information for informed decision-making. Accelerating its adoption demands focus on the entire translational research continuum: devising innovative methods, proving their value, disseminating and implementing findings, and involving patients throughout the process. This includes basic science, preclinical and clinical research, and integration into practice, all aimed at enhancing health. This paper scrutinizes the challenges in adopting personalized medicine in the presence of multiple health conditions. The authors conclude that while the promise of personalized medicine is immense, proactive measures are essential to prevent unintended repercussions and ensure its equitable and efficient implementation.
AHRQ-authored: All.
Citation: Bierman AS, Burke BT, Comfort LN .
From precision medicine to precision care: choosing and using precision medicine in the context of multimorbidity.
Cambridge Prisms: Precision Medicine 2023 Feb 21;1:e19. doi:10.1017/pcm.2023.8.
Keywords: Learning Health Systems, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Tierney WM, Henning JM, Altillo BS
User-centered design of a clinical tool for shared decision-making about diet in primary care.
This study described how the authors engaged primary care clinicians and their patients in an iterative design process for a software application to enhance clinician-patient diet discussions. The goal is to help prevent clinician burnout and career dissatisfaction brought on by poorly designed health information technology. Individual clinician and patient interviews were conducted to detail the desired informational content of the screens displayed followed by iterative reviews of intermediate and final versions of the program and its outputs. Participants were primary care clinicians practicing in an urban federally qualified health center and two academic primary care clinics, and their patients who were overweight or obese with diet-sensitive conditions. Three iterations of design and review were conducted with substantial evolution of the program’s content, format, and flow of information. The amount of information was fine-tuned so it would be just the right amount displayed to facilitate shared dietary goal setting.
AHRQ-funded; HS027660.
Citation: Tierney WM, Henning JM, Altillo BS .
User-centered design of a clinical tool for shared decision-making about diet in primary care.
J Gen Intern Med 2023 Feb; 38(3):715-26. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07804-x..
Keywords: Patient-Centered Healthcare, Decision Making, Primary Care
Moise N, Paniagua-Avila A, Barbecho JM
A theory-informed, rapid cycle approach to identifying and adapting strategies to promote sustainability: optimizing depression treatment in primary care clinics seeking to sustain collaborative care (the transform depcare study).
This study used a collaborative care (CC) use case to describe a novel, theory-informed, stakeholder engaged process for operationalizing strategies for sustainability using a behavioral lens. The goal is to optimize depression treatment in primary care clinics using the Transform DepCare shared decision-making and psychoeducation patient tool. The authors applied the Behaviour Change Wheel to their prior mixed methods to identify key sustainability behaviors and determinants of sustainability. The authors enlisted 22 national and local stakeholders to operationalize and adapt a multi-level, multi-component implementation strategy to maximally target behavioral and contextual determinants of sustainability. They identified ongoing care manager CC delivery, provider treatment optimization, and patient enrollment as key sustainability behaviors. They determined that a waiting room that delivered DepCare, the results of which are delivered to providers, as well as ongoing problem-solving meetings/local technical assistance with care managers would be the most acceptable and equitable multi-level strategy in diverse settings seeking to sustain CC programs. Key improvements would include expanding the DepCare tool to incorporate anxiety/suicide screening, triage support, multi-modal delivery, and patient activation (vs. shared decision making) (patient); pairing summary reports with decisional support and yearly onboarding/motivational educational videos (provider); incorporating behavioral health providers into problem-solving meetings and shifting from billing support to quality improvement and triage (system).
AHRQ-funded; HS025198.
Citation: Moise N, Paniagua-Avila A, Barbecho JM .
A theory-informed, rapid cycle approach to identifying and adapting strategies to promote sustainability: optimizing depression treatment in primary care clinics seeking to sustain collaborative care (the transform depcare study).
Implement Sci Commun 2023 Jan 25; 4(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00383-2..
Keywords: Depression, Primary Care, Behavioral Health, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Zisman-Ilani Y, Thompson KD, Siegel LS
Crohn's disease shared decision making intervention leads to more patients choosing combination therapy: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
The purpose of this multi-site cluster randomised controlled trial was to test the impact of standard Crohn's disease care and compare with the impact of shared decision making (SDM) on the provider’s choice of therapy, quality of decisions, and provider trust. A total of 158 adult patients with Crohn's disease within 15 years of their diagnosis, with no prior Crohn's disease complications, and who were candidates to receive immunomodulators or biologics, from 14 diverse gastroenterology practices in the US, participated in the study. 99 of those participants received the intervention and 59 received standard care. The study found that participants in the intervention group chose combination therapy more frequently, had a significantly lower decisional conflict, and had greater trust in their provider.
AHRQ-funded; HS021747.
Citation: Zisman-Ilani Y, Thompson KD, Siegel LS .
Crohn's disease shared decision making intervention leads to more patients choosing combination therapy: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2023 Jan;57(2):205-14. doi: 10.1111/apt.17286..
Keywords: Digestive Disease and Health, Chronic Conditions, Decision Making, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Clinician-Patient Communication
Fareed N, Swoboda C, Singh P
Developing and testing an integrated patient mHealth and provider dashboard application system for type 2 diabetes management among Medicaid-enrolled pregnant individuals based on a user-centered approach: mixed-methods study.
The objective of this study was to develop user specifications for a tailored and integrated technology, patient application (mHealth) and provider dashboard, that provides a complete view of Medicaid-enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) during pregnancy and to develop prototypes based on users’ needs. Participating patients and providers stated a core set of expectations for the mHealth and dashboard applications. Participants then provided feedback to improve these applications. The authors concluded that digital health tools could transform health care among Medicaid-enrolled patients with T2D during pregnancy, with the goal of managing their blood glucose levels. Refining the stated needs and preferences of patients and providers to develop applications holds potential for tackling complicated health care issues.
AHRQ-funded; HS028822.
Citation: Fareed N, Swoboda C, Singh P .
Developing and testing an integrated patient mHealth and provider dashboard application system for type 2 diabetes management among Medicaid-enrolled pregnant individuals based on a user-centered approach: mixed-methods study.
Digit Health 2023 Jan-Dec; 9:20552076221144181. doi: 10.1177/20552076221144181..
Keywords: Patient-Centered Healthcare, Telehealth, Diabetes, Pregnancy, Chronic Conditions, Women, Health Information Technology (HIT)
Safon CB, Estela MG, Rosenberg J
Implementation of a novel pediatric behavioral health integration initiative.
The purpose of this concurrent, qualitative-dominant mixed methods empirical study was to explore healthcare professionals' perceptions of the impact of behavioral health integration (BHI) on pediatric primary care delivery in community health centers (CHCs). The researchers utilized semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals at the end of the implementation phase of a 3-year process and surveys administered at three time points. Qualitative themes were mapped onto the Relational Coordination (RC) conceptual framework to triangulate and complement final qualitative results with quantitative results. The researchers round five emergent themes aligning with RC domains. The results of the survey showed that healthcare professionals reported both greater behavioral healthcare integration into clinic practice and greater clinic readiness to address behavioral health needs. The researchers concluded that effective pediatric BHI and care delivery at CHCs may depend on solid professional relationships and communication.
AHRQ-funded; HS022242.
Citation: Safon CB, Estela MG, Rosenberg J .
Implementation of a novel pediatric behavioral health integration initiative.
J Behav Health Serv Res 2023 Jan;50(1):1-17. doi: 10.1007/s11414-022-09803-6..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Behavioral Health, Healthcare Delivery, Primary Care, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Community-Based Practice
Quigley DD, Quereshi N, Hays RD
Reasons primary care practices chose patient experience surveys during patient-centered medical home transformation.
This study’s objective was to identify reasons primary care practices chose to implement a patient experience survey during their patient-centered medical home transformation. The authors conducted interviews with a stratified-random sample of 105 of these practices. Fifty-one practices used a Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey and 53 administered another patient survey. The three most common reasons to use a survey were given as: (1) to compare performance against other practices, which requires systematically collected data across large numbers of practices (ie, the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey), (2) participation in an external patient-centered medical home program, and (3) survey administration cost. A second patient survey was used to identify quality improvement needs.
AHRQ-funded; HS016980; HS025920.
Citation: Quigley DD, Quereshi N, Hays RD .
Reasons primary care practices chose patient experience surveys during patient-centered medical home transformation.
J Ambul Care Manage 2023 Jan-Mar;46(1):34-44. doi: 10.1097/jac.0000000000000442.
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Patient-Centered Healthcare, Primary Care, Quality Improvement, Practice Improvement
Schuttner L, Hockett Sherlock S, Simons CE
My goals are not their goals: barriers and facilitators to delivery of patient-centered care for patients with multimorbidity.
This study’s goal was to clarify facilitators and barriers perceived by primary care physicians in the Veterans Health Administration to delivering patient-centered care for high-risk or complex patients with multimorbidity. The authors conducted semi-structured telephone interviews from April to July 2020 with 23 physicians across 20 clinical sites, with most being female (61%). Facilitators included: effective physician-patient communication to individualize care, prioritize among multiple needs, and elicit goals to improve patient engagement; access to care, enabled by interdisciplinary teams, and dictating personalized care planning; effortful but worthwhile care coordination and continuity; meeting complex needs through effective teamwork; and integrating medical and non-medical care aspects in recognition of patients' psychosocial contexts. Barriers included: intra- and interpersonal (e.g., perceived patient reluctance to engage in care); organizational (e.g., limited encounter time); and community or policy impediments (e.g., state decisional capacity laws) to patient-centered care.
AHRQ-funded; HS026369.
Citation: Schuttner L, Hockett Sherlock S, Simons CE .
My goals are not their goals: barriers and facilitators to delivery of patient-centered care for patients with multimorbidity.
J Gen Intern Med 2022 Dec;37(16):4189-96. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07533-1..
Keywords: Patient-Centered Healthcare, Healthcare Delivery, Chronic Conditions, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Patient and Family Engagement
Ortiz D, Perkins AJ, Fuchita M
Pre-existing anxiety and depression in injured older adults: an under-recognized comorbidity with major health implications.
The purpose of this retrospective post-hoc analysis study was to evaluate variations in baseline depression and anxiety screenings between older injured patients with pre-existing diagnoses and those without. Data from the Trauma Medical Home, a multicenter randomized controlled trial was used for analysis. The study found that almost 50% of the patients screened positive for at least mild depressive symptoms as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and 41% of the patients screened positive for at least mild anxiety symptoms as measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale. Female patients with a history of concurrent anxiety and depression, greater injury severity scores, and higher Charlson scores were more likely to have mild anxiety at the baseline assessment. Patients with a history of depression only, a prior history of depression and concurrent anxiety, and higher Charlson scores (greater medical comorbidity) were more likely to have experienced at least mild depression at the time of hospital discharge after traumatic injury.
AHRQ-funded; HS026390.
Citation: Ortiz D, Perkins AJ, Fuchita M .
Pre-existing anxiety and depression in injured older adults: an under-recognized comorbidity with major health implications.
Ann Surg Open 2022 Dec; 3(4):e217. doi: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000217..
Keywords: Elderly, Anxiety, Depression, Behavioral Health, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Injuries and Wounds
Schumacher JR, Zahrieh D, Chow S
Increasing socioeconomically disadvantaged patients' engagement in breast cancer surgery decision-making through a shared decision-making intervention (A231701CD): protocol for a cluster randomised clinical trial.
This paper describes the protocol for a multisite randomized trial to test the impact of a newly developed decision aid to increase socioeconomically disadvantaged patients' engagement in breast cancer surgery decision-making. The study will be conducted through 10 surgical clinics within the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP). A stepped-wedge design with clinics will be randomized to the time of transition from usual care to the decision aid arm. Study participants will be female, aged ≥18 years, with newly diagnosed stage 0-III breast cancer who are planning breast surgery. Data collection will include a baseline surgeon survey, baseline patient survey, audio-recording of the surgeon-patient consultation, a follow-up patient survey and medical record data review. A subset of patients, surgeons, and clinic stakeholders will participate in interviews and focus groups.
AHRQ-funded; HS025194.
Citation: Schumacher JR, Zahrieh D, Chow S .
Increasing socioeconomically disadvantaged patients' engagement in breast cancer surgery decision-making through a shared decision-making intervention (A231701CD): protocol for a cluster randomised clinical trial.
BMJ Open 2022 Nov 17;12(11):e063895. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063895..
Keywords: Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Patient and Family Engagement, Decision Making, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Surgery, Women
Rodriguez HP, Kyalwazi MJ, Lewis VA
Adoption of patient-reported outcomes by health systems and physician practices in the USA.
This study examined the extent of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure adoption among health systems and physician practices nationally and examines the organizational capabilities associated with more extensive PRO adoption. A total of 323 US health system and 2,190 physician practices responded to one of two nationally representative surveys. Survey results found that pain (50.6%) and depression (43.8%) PROs were more commonly adopted by all hospitals and medical groups within health systems compared to disability PROs (26.5%). Systems with more advanced health IT functions were more likely to use disability and depression PROs than systems with less advanced health IT. Practice-level advanced health IT was positively associated with use of depression PRO, but not disability or pain PRO use. The three PROs were more likely to be adopted in practices with more chronic care management processes, broader medical and social risk screening, and more processes to support patient responsiveness. Also, compared to independent physician practices, system-owned practices and community health centers were less likely to adopt PROs.
AHRQ-funded; HS024075.
Citation: Rodriguez HP, Kyalwazi MJ, Lewis VA .
Adoption of patient-reported outcomes by health systems and physician practices in the USA.
J Gen Intern Med 2022 Nov;37(15):3885-92. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07631-0..
Keywords: Health Systems, Provider: Physician, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Valentine KD, Lipstein EA, Vo H
Pediatric caregiver version of the Shared Decision Making Process Scale: validity and reliability for ADHD treatment decisions.
This study’s goal was to examine the validity and reliability of a scale for a shared decision making (SDM) Process scale in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treatment decisions. This cross-sectional survey included 498 caregivers of children aged 5-13 diagnosed with ADHD who had made a decision about ADHD medication in the last 2 years. Surveys included the adapted SDM Process scale, decisional conflict, decision regret, and decision involvement. The scale was found to be acceptable and reliable. Scores demonstrated convergent validity, as they were higher for those without decisional conflict than those with decisional conflict and higher for caregivers who stated they made the decision with the provider than those who made the decision themselves. Higher scores were related to less regret, though the magnitude of the relationship was small.
AHRQ-funded; HS025718.
Citation: Valentine KD, Lipstein EA, Vo H .
Pediatric caregiver version of the Shared Decision Making Process Scale: validity and reliability for ADHD treatment decisions.
Acad Pediatr 2022 Nov-Dec;22(8):1503-09. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2022.07.014..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Behavioral Health, Decision Making, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Graber J, Kittelson A, Juarez-Colunga E
Comparing "people-like-me" and linear mixed model predictions of functional recovery following knee arthroplasty.
This study compared the relative strengths and weaknesses of 2 prediction model approaches for predicting functional recovery after knee arthroplasty: a neighbors-based "people-like-me" (PLM) approach and a linear mixed model (LMM) approach. The authors used 2 distinct datasets to train and then test PLM and LMM prediction approaches. They used the Timed Up and Go (TUG)-a common test of mobility-to operationalize physical function. Both approaches use patient characteristics and baseline postoperative TUG values to predict TUG recovery from days 1-425 following surgery. They then compared the accuracy and precision of the two approaches. A total of 317 patient records with 1379 TUG observations were used to train approaches, and 456 patient records with 1244 TUG observations were used to test the predictions. Both approaches performed similarly in terms of mean squared error and bias, but the PLM approach provided more accurate and precise estimates of prediction uncertainty.
AHRQ-funded; HS025692.
Citation: Graber J, Kittelson A, Juarez-Colunga E .
Comparing "people-like-me" and linear mixed model predictions of functional recovery following knee arthroplasty.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022 Oct 7;29(11):1899-907. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac123..
Keywords: Orthopedics, Surgery, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Outcomes
Steeves-Reece AL, Nicolaidis C, Richardson DM
"It made me feel like things are starting to change in society:" a qualitative study to foster positive patient experiences during phone-based social needs interventions.
Investigators conducted a pragmatic qualitative study with patients who had participated in a health-related social needs (HRSN) intervention. They found that patients were likely to have initial skepticism or reservations about the intervention; they identified 4 positive intervention components regarding patient experience; and they found that patients could be left with feelings of appreciation or hope, regardless of whether they connected with HRSN resources.
AHRQ-funded; HS027707.
Citation: Steeves-Reece AL, Nicolaidis C, Richardson DM .
"It made me feel like things are starting to change in society:" a qualitative study to foster positive patient experiences during phone-based social needs interventions.
Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022 Oct 3;19(19). doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912668..
Keywords: Patient Experience, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Telehealth, Health Information Technology (HIT)
Khullar D, Prasad K, Neprash H
Factors associated with patient trust in their clinicians: results from the healthy work place study.
The goal of this study was to determine workplace, clinician, and patient correlates of patient trust in their clinician. The sample used baseline data from the Healthy Work Place trial, a randomized trial of Midwest and East Coast primary care practices. Trust was found to relate mainly to several aspects of care variables (including satisfaction with explanations, overall satisfaction with provider, learning about medical conditions, and the clinician's personal manner), with lesser association with patient characteristics and clinician work conditions. Findings showed that trust was primarily related to what happens between clinicians and patients in the examination room.
AHRQ-funded; HS018160.
Citation: Khullar D, Prasad K, Neprash H .
Factors associated with patient trust in their clinicians: results from the healthy work place study.
Health Care Manage Rev 2022 Oct-Dec;47(4):289-96. doi: 10.1097/hmr.0000000000000336..
Keywords: Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient Experience, Clinician-Patient Communication
Salloum RG, Bilello L, Bian J
Study protocol for a type III hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial to evaluate scaling interoperable clinical decision support for patient-centered chronic pain management in primary care.
The objective of this 3-year project is to study the adaptation and implementation of an existing interoperable clinical decision support (CDS) tool for pain treatment shared decision making, with tailored implementation support, in new clinical settings in the OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium. The evaluation will be organized by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, with an adaptation and tailoring of PainManager, an open source interoperable CDS tool. It is anticipated that this evaluation will establish the feasibility and obtain preliminary data in preparation for a multi-site pragmatic trial targeting the effectiveness of PainManager and tailored implementation support on shared decision making and patient-reported pain and physical function.
AHRQ-funded; R18 HS028584.
Citation: Salloum RG, Bilello L, Bian J .
Study protocol for a type III hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial to evaluate scaling interoperable clinical decision support for patient-centered chronic pain management in primary care.
Implement Sci 2022 Jul 15;17(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01217-4..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Pain, Chronic Conditions, Primary Care, Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Dullabh P, Sandberg SF, Heaney-Huls K
AHRQ Author: Berliner E, Dymek C, Harrison MI, Swiger J
Challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support: findings from a horizon scan.
This AHRQ-authored horizon scan identified challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support (PC CDS) and future directions for PC CDS. The authors engaged a technical expert panel, conducted a scoping literature review, and interviewed key informants. They quantitatively analyzed literature and interview transcripts and mapped the findings to the 4 phases translating evidence into PC CDS interventions (Prioritizing, Authoring, Implementing, and Measuring) and to external factors. Twelve challenges were identified for PC CDS development with lack of patient input identified as a critical challenge. Lack of patient-centered terminology standards was viewed as a challenge in authoring PC CDS. They also found a dearth of CDS studies that measured clinical outcomes, creating significant gaps in the understanding of PC CDS’ impact.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 233201500023I.
Citation: Dullabh P, Sandberg SF, Heaney-Huls K .
Challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support: findings from a horizon scan.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022 Jun 14;29(7):1233-43. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac059.
.
.
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Patient-Centered Healthcare, Health Information Technology (HIT), Decision Making, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice