National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Adverse Events (1)
- Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) (3)
- Diabetes (1)
- Disparities (1)
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) (1)
- Healthcare Costs (1)
- Health Insurance (1)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (1)
- Health Status (2)
- Hospital Readmissions (3)
- Hospitals (3)
- Long-Term Care (2)
- Medicaid (1)
- (-) Medicare (18)
- Nursing Homes (2)
- Orthopedics (1)
- Outcomes (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (3)
- Patient Experience (4)
- Patient Safety (1)
- Payment (9)
- Provider (1)
- Provider: Physician (1)
- Provider Performance (9)
- Public Reporting (1)
- (-) Quality Improvement (18)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (1)
- Quality Measures (2)
- Quality of Care (13)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (1)
- Respiratory Conditions (1)
- Surgery (4)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 18 of 18 Research Studies DisplayedCollins CR, Abel MK, Shui A
Preparing for participation in the centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' bundle care payment initiative-advanced for major bowel surgery.
This study aimed to assess where the largest opportunities for care improvement lay with the bundled payment reimbursement model and how best to identify patients at high risk of suffering costly complications, including hospital readmission. The authors used a cohort of patients from 2014 and 2016 who met inclusion criteria for the Major Bowel Bundled Payment Program and performed a cost analysis to identify opportunities for improved care efficiency. Using the results, they identified readmissions as a target for improvement and then assessed whether the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program surgical risk calculator (ACS NSQIP SRC) could accurately identify patients within the bundled payment population who were at high risk of readmission using a logistic regression model. Patients who were readmitted within 90-days post-surgery were 2.53 times more likely to be high-cost (>$60,000) then non-readmitted patients. However, the ACS NSQIP SRC did not accurately predict patients at high risk of readmission within the first 30 days post-surgery.
AHRQ-funded; HS024532.
Citation: Collins CR, Abel MK, Shui A .
Preparing for participation in the centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' bundle care payment initiative-advanced for major bowel surgery.
Perioper Med 2022 Dec 9;11(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13741-022-00286-9..
Keywords: Provider Performance, Payment, Hospital Readmissions, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Surgery, Medicare, Medicaid
Waters TM, Burns N, Kaplan CM
Combined impact of medicare's hospital pay for performance programs on quality and safety outcomes is mixed.
The authors examined the combined impact of Medicare's pay for performance (P4P) programs on clinical areas and populations targeted by the programs, as well as those outside their focus. Using HCUP data, and consistent with previous studies for individual programs, they detected minimal, if any, effect of Medicare's hospital P4P programs on quality and safety. They recommended a redesigning of the P4P programs before continuing to expand them.
AHRQ-funded; HS025148.
Citation: Waters TM, Burns N, Kaplan CM .
Combined impact of medicare's hospital pay for performance programs on quality and safety outcomes is mixed.
BMC Health Serv Res 2022 Jul 28;22(1):958. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08348-w..
Keywords: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), Medicare, Payment, Provider Performance, Hospitals, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Patient Safety
Roberts ET, Song Z, Ding L
Changes in patient experiences and assessment of gaming among large clinician practices in precursors of the merit-based incentive payment system.
Medicare's Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), a public reporting and pay-for-performance program, adjusts clinician payments based on publicly reported measures that are chosen primarily by clinicians or their practices. Within precursor programs of the MIPS, this study examined 1) practices' selection of Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) patient experience measures for quality scoring under pay-for-performance and 2) the association between mandated public reporting on CAHPS measures and performance on those measures.
AHRQ-funded; HS026727.
Citation: Roberts ET, Song Z, Ding L .
Changes in patient experiences and assessment of gaming among large clinician practices in precursors of the merit-based incentive payment system.
JAMA Health Forum 2021 Oct;2(10). doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.3105..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Patient Experience, Medicare, Provider Performance, Payment, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Markovitz AA, Ayanian JZ, Warrier A
Medicare Advantage plan double bonuses drive racial disparity in payments, yield no quality or enrollment improvements.
Using national data for 2008-18, investigators found that double bonuses were not associated with either improvements in plan quality or increased Medicare Advantage enrollment. Additionally, double bonuses increased payments to plans to care for Black beneficiaries by $60 per year, compared with $91 for White beneficiaries. These findings suggest that double bonuses not only fail to improve quality and enrollment but also foster a racially inequitable distribution of Medicare funds that disfavors Black beneficiaries. This study supports eliminating double bonuses, thereby saving Medicare an estimated $1.8 billion per year.
AHRQ-funded; HS000053.
Citation: Markovitz AA, Ayanian JZ, Warrier A .
Medicare Advantage plan double bonuses drive racial disparity in payments, yield no quality or enrollment improvements.
Health Aff 2021 Sep;40(9):1411-19. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00349..
Keywords: Medicare, Health Insurance, Payment, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Disparities, Racial and Ethnic Minorities
Meyers DJ, Trivedi AN, Wilson IB, DJ, Trivedi AN, Wilson IB
Higher Medicare Advantage Star Ratings are associated with improvements In patient outcomes.
Researchers examined CMS' five-star rating system for the overall quality of Medicare Advantage (MA) contracts. They found that enrollees experiencing a one-star MA rating increase were 20.8 percent less likely to leave their plan voluntarily to enroll in another plan or traditional Medicare. When hospitalized, enrollees were 3.4 percent more likely to use a higher-quality hospital and 2.6 percent less likely to be readmitted within ninety days. These findings suggest that MA star ratings may capture key domains of an MA plan's quality.
AHRQ-funded; HS027051.
Citation: Meyers DJ, Trivedi AN, Wilson IB, DJ, Trivedi AN, Wilson IB .
Higher Medicare Advantage Star Ratings are associated with improvements In patient outcomes.
Health Aff 2021 Feb;40(2):243-50. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00845..
Keywords: Patient Experience, Provider Performance, Medicare, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Outcomes
Tang AB, Childers CP, Dworsky JQ
Surgeon work captured by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program across specialties.
The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database is increasingly used for surgical research. However, it is unclear how well this database represents the breadth of work performed by different specialties. Using the 2017 NSQIP participant use file and the 2017 Medicare Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary file, the investigators evaluated (1) what proportion of surgical work was captured by NSQIP, (2) what procedures and disciplines were undersampled, and (3) the overall concordance between the NSQIP sample and a national sample.
AHRQ-funded; HS000046.
Citation: Tang AB, Childers CP, Dworsky JQ .
Surgeon work captured by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program across specialties.
Surgery 2020 Mar;167(3):550-55. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.11.013..
Keywords: Surgery, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Provider: Physician, Provider, Medicare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Sharma H, Konetzka RT, Smieliauskas F
The relationship between reported staffing and expenditures in nursing homes.
AHRQ-funded; HS024967.
Citation: Sharma H, Konetzka RT, Smieliauskas F .
The relationship between reported staffing and expenditures in nursing homes.
Med Care Res Rev 2019 Dec 1;76(6):758-83. doi: 10.1177/1077558717739214..
Keywords: Nursing Homes, Long-Term Care, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Provider Performance, Medicare
Schwarzkopf R, Behery OA, Yu H
Patterns and costs of 90-day readmission for surgical and medical complications following total hip and knee arthroplasty.
Unplanned readmissions following elective total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty as a result of surgical complications likely have different quality improvement targets and cost implications than those for nonsurgical readmissions. In this study, the investigators compared payments, timing, and location of unplanned readmissions with Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)-defined surgical complications to readmissions without such complications.
AHRQ-funded; HS022882.
Citation: Schwarzkopf R, Behery OA, Yu H .
Patterns and costs of 90-day readmission for surgical and medical complications following total hip and knee arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty 2019 Oct;34(10):2304-07. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.05.046..
Keywords: Orthopedics, Surgery, Hospital Readmissions, Adverse Events, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Medicare, Hospitals
Fraze TK, Lewis VA, Tierney E
Quality of care improves for patients with diabetes in Medicare shared savings accountable care organizations: organizational characteristics associated with performance.
This study analyzed secondary data retrospectively to examine Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) Accountable Care Organizations’ performance on diabetes metrics in the first 2 years of ACO contracts in order to determine how ACO organizational characteristics - such as composition, staffing, care management, and experiences with health reform - were associated with quality of care delivered to patients with diabetes.
AHRQ-funded; HS024075.
Citation: Fraze TK, Lewis VA, Tierney E .
Quality of care improves for patients with diabetes in Medicare shared savings accountable care organizations: organizational characteristics associated with performance.
Popul Health Manag 2018 Oct;21(5):401-08. doi: 10.1089/pop.2017.0102..
Keywords: Diabetes, Quality of Care, Medicare, Provider Performance, Quality Improvement
Martin BI, Lurie JD, Farrokhi FR
Early effects of Medicare's Bundled Payment For Care Improvement program for lumbar fusion.
The purpose of this study was to describe the early effects of Bundled Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI) program participation for lumbar fusion on 90-day reimbursement, procedure volume, reoperation, and readmission. The investigators included 89,605 beneficiaries undergoing lumbar fusion, finding that the mean age was 73.4 years, with 59% women, 92% White, and 22% with a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2 or more. Participant hospitals had greater procedure volume, bed size, and total discharges. Relative to nonparticipants, risk-bearing hospitals had a slightly increased fusion procedure volume from 2012 to 2013, did not reduce 90-day episode of care costs, increased 90-day readmission rate, and increased repeat surgery rates.
AHRQ-funded; HS024714; HS024075; HS021695.
Citation: Martin BI, Lurie JD, Farrokhi FR .
Early effects of Medicare's Bundled Payment For Care Improvement program for lumbar fusion.
Spine 2018 May 15;43(10):705-11. doi: 10.1097/brs.0000000000002404.
.
.
Keywords: Payment, Medicare, Quality Improvement, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Surgery
Hatfield LA, Zaslavsky AM
Implications of variation in the relationships between beneficiary characteristics and Medicare Advantage CAHPS measures.
The researchers studied how differences in quality score adjustments across Medicare Advantage contracts change comparisons for individuals and contracts. They found that, for average consumers, standard adjustment is sufficient to represent variation in contract quality standardized to a common population. For people with characteristics far from average, personalized reporting using their characteristics and contract-specific coefficients can substantially change the expected quality measures across contracts.
AHRQ-funded; HS016978.
Citation: Hatfield LA, Zaslavsky AM .
Implications of variation in the relationships between beneficiary characteristics and Medicare Advantage CAHPS measures.
Health Serv Res 2017 Aug;52(4):1310-29. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12544.
.
.
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Medicare, Health Status, Patient Experience, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement, Quality Measures
Bhatt SP, Wells JM, Iyer AS
Results of a Medicare bundled payments for care improvement initiative for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease readmissions.
This study evaluated whether a comprehensive chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) multidisciplinary intervention focusing on inpatient, transitional, and outpatient care as part of an institution's Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) participation would reduce 30-day all-cause readmission rates for COPD exacerbations and reduce overall costs. It concluded that a Medicare BPCI intervention did not reduce 30-day all-cause readmission rates or overall costs after hospitalization for acute exacerbation of COPD.
AHRQ-funded; HS013852.
Citation: Bhatt SP, Wells JM, Iyer AS .
Results of a Medicare bundled payments for care improvement initiative for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease readmissions.
Ann Am Thorac Soc 2017 May;14(5):643-48. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201610-775BC.
.
.
Keywords: Respiratory Conditions, Payment, Hospital Readmissions, Medicare, Quality Improvement
Coulam R, Kralewski J, Dowd B
The role of medical group practice administrators in the adoption and implementation of Medicare's physician quality reporting system.
The purpose of this study was to gain insights into the role these administrators play in quality assurance programs. It found that administrators conducted due diligence on Medicare's physician quality reporting system, influenced how the issue was presented to physicians for adoption, and managed implementation thereafter. Administrators' recommendations were heavily influenced by practice characteristics, financial incentives, and practice commitments to early adoption of quality improvement innovations.
AHRQ-funded; HS019964.
Citation: Coulam R, Kralewski J, Dowd B .
The role of medical group practice administrators in the adoption and implementation of Medicare's physician quality reporting system.
Health Care Manage Rev 2016 Apr-Jun;41(2):145-54. doi: 10.1097/hmr.0000000000000061.
.
.
Keywords: Medicare, Provider Performance, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Public Reporting
Hays RD, Mallett JS, Gaillot S
Performance of the Medicare Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems (CAHPS) physical functioning items.
This study evaluated physical functioning items in Medicare beneficiaries. It concluded that the physical functioning items target relatively easy activities, providing information for a minority of people in the sample with the lowest levels of physical functioning. Items representing higher levels of physical functioning are needed for the majority of the Medicare beneficiaries.
AHRQ-funded; HS016980.
Citation: Hays RD, Mallett JS, Gaillot S .
Performance of the Medicare Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems (CAHPS) physical functioning items.
Med Care 2016 Feb;54(2):205-9. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000475..
Keywords: Medicare, Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Health Status, Quality Improvement
Layton TJ, Ryan AM
Higher incentive payments in Medicare Advantage's pay-for-performance program did not improve quality but did increase plan offerings.
The researchers evaluated the effects of the size of financial bonuses on quality of care and the number of plan offerings in the Medicare Advantage Quality Bonus Payment Demonstration. They concluded that at great expense to Medicare, double bonuses in the Medicare Advantage Quality Bonus Payment Demonstration were not associated with improved quality but were associated with more plan offerings.
AHRQ-funded; HS018546.
Citation: Layton TJ, Ryan AM .
Higher incentive payments in Medicare Advantage's pay-for-performance program did not improve quality but did increase plan offerings.
Health Serv Res 2015 Dec;50(6):1810-28. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12409..
Keywords: Medicare, Payment, Provider Performance, Health Services Research (HSR), Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Lepore M, Leland NE
Nursing homes that increased the proportion of Medicare days saw gains in quality outcomes for long-stay residents.
The authors examined nationwide facility-level nursing home data for the period 2007-2010. They found that increasing the proportion of Medicare-covered patient days in a nursing home was significantly associated with improvements in the quality of daily pain, pressure ulcers, and performing activities of daily living.
AHRQ-funded; HS022907.
Citation: Lepore M, Leland NE .
Nursing homes that increased the proportion of Medicare days saw gains in quality outcomes for long-stay residents.
Health Aff 2015 Dec;34(12):2121-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0303.
.
.
Keywords: Long-Term Care, Medicare, Nursing Homes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Quality Improvement
Chen LM, Meara E, Birkmeyer JD
Medicare's Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiative: expanding enrollment suggests potential for large impact.
The researchers examined the cross-sectional association between Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) participation and providers' structural and cost characteristics. Overall participation in BPCI increased from about 400 in October 2013 to more than 2000 in June 2014. The authors concluded that growing participation in BPCI suggests strong interest in bundled payments.
AHRQ-funded; HS020671.
Citation: Chen LM, Meara E, Birkmeyer JD .
Medicare's Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiative: expanding enrollment suggests potential for large impact.
Am J Manag Care 2015 Nov;21(11):814-20.
.
.
Keywords: Healthcare Costs, Payment, Medicare, Quality Improvement
Ryan AM, Burgess JF, Pesko MF
The early effects of Medicare's mandatory hospital pay-for-performance program.
This study evaluated the impact of hospital value-based purchasing (HVBP) on clinical quality and patient experience during its initial implementation period. It found that hospitals that were exposed to HVBP did not show greater improvement for either the clinical process or patient experience measures during the program’s initial implementation period.
AHRQ-funded; HS018546
Citation: Ryan AM, Burgess JF, Pesko MF .
The early effects of Medicare's mandatory hospital pay-for-performance program.
Health Serv Res. 2015 Feb;50(1):81-97. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12206..
Keywords: Medicare, Provider Performance, Payment, Hospitals, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Patient Experience