National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Adverse Drug Events (ADE) (3)
- Adverse Events (10)
- Antibiotics (2)
- Behavioral Health (1)
- Blood Clots (1)
- Blood Thinners (2)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (2)
- Care Management (2)
- Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) (3)
- Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI) (5)
- Children/Adolescents (3)
- Chronic Conditions (1)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (1)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (1)
- Communication (1)
- Comparative Effectiveness (2)
- Critical Care (2)
- Disparities (1)
- Elderly (2)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (1)
- (-) Evidence-Based Practice (56)
- Eye Disease and Health (1)
- Falls (3)
- Guidelines (8)
- Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) (10)
- Healthcare Delivery (2)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (2)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (1)
- Heart Disease and Health (1)
- Hospitals (6)
- Implementation (3)
- Infectious Diseases (4)
- Injuries and Wounds (2)
- Inpatient Care (4)
- Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (3)
- Kidney Disease and Health (2)
- Labor and Delivery (1)
- Long-Term Care (3)
- Medical Devices (1)
- Medical Errors (2)
- Medication (13)
- Medication: Safety (8)
- Mortality (1)
- Newborns/Infants (1)
- Nursing (2)
- Nursing Homes (2)
- Obesity (2)
- Opioids (2)
- Organizational Change (1)
- Orthopedics (2)
- Outcomes (6)
- Pain (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (16)
- (-) Patient Safety (56)
- Policy (1)
- Practice Patterns (2)
- Pregnancy (1)
- Pressure Ulcers (2)
- Prevention (9)
- Provider (1)
- Provider: Physician (2)
- Quality Improvement (19)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (1)
- Quality Measures (1)
- Quality of Care (21)
- Registries (1)
- Research Methodologies (1)
- Risk (3)
- Shared Decision Making (1)
- Substance Abuse (1)
- Surgery (15)
- System Design (1)
- Teams (1)
- TeamSTEPPS (1)
- Tools & Toolkits (4)
- Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) (4)
- Women (2)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 25 of 56 Research Studies DisplayedLeland NE, Lekovitch C, Martínez J
Optimizing post-acute care patient safety: a scoping review of multifactorial fall prevention interventions for older adults.
The purpose of this scoping review was to describe the evidence for multifactorial post-acute care (PAC) fall prevention interventions for older patients. The researchers included 33 studies and characterized common intervention domains including: evaluating patient-specific fall risk factors, developing an individualized risk profile and treatment plan that targets each patient's fall risk factors, and implementing facility-based strategies such as staff education. There was not consensus across studies in how the domains were addressed and to what extent. The researchers concluded that health system efforts to prevent accidental falls in PAC should consider a patient-centered multifactorial approach.
AHRQ-funded; HS022907.
Citation: Leland NE, Lekovitch C, Martínez J .
Optimizing post-acute care patient safety: a scoping review of multifactorial fall prevention interventions for older adults.
J Appl Gerontol 2022 Oct;41(10):2187-96. doi: 10.1177/07334648221104375..
Keywords: Elderly, Falls, Prevention, Patient Safety, Evidence-Based Practice
Schnipper JL, Reyes Nieva H, Mallouk M
Effects of a refined evidence-based toolkit and mentored implementation on medication reconciliation at 18 hospitals: results of the MARQUIS2 study.
This study was a follow-up of the first Multicenter Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement Study (MARQUIS1) that demonstrated mentored implementation of a medication reconciliation best practices toolkit. The toolkit decreased total unintentional medication discrepancies in five hospitals, but results varied by site. The toolkit has been refined with lessons learned and retooled as MARQUIS2. The tool was implemented at 18 North American hospitals or hospital systems from 2016 to 2018, offering 17 system-level and 6-patient-level interventions. One of eight physicians coached each site remotely via monthly calls and one or two site visits. A total of 4947 patients were sampled, with 1229 preimplementation and 3718 postimplementation. A steady decline in medication discrepancy rates were experienced from 2.85 discrepancies per patient down to 0.98 discrepancies. An interrupted time series analysis of the 17 sites showed the intervention was associated with a 5% relative decrease in discrepancies per month.
AHRQ-funded; HS025486; HS023757.
Citation: Schnipper JL, Reyes Nieva H, Mallouk M .
Effects of a refined evidence-based toolkit and mentored implementation on medication reconciliation at 18 hospitals: results of the MARQUIS2 study.
BMJ Qual Saf 2022 Apr;31(4):278-86. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012709..
Keywords: Medication, Evidence-Based Practice, Tools & Toolkits, Implementation, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Medication: Safety, Patient Safety
Penfold RB, Thompson EE, Hilt RJ
Development of a symptom-focused model to guide the prescribing of antipsychotics in children and adolescents: results of the first phase of the Safer Use of Antipsychotics in Youth (SUAY) Clinical Trial.
The purpose of this study was to develop a new approach to prescribing guidelines as part of a pragmatic trial, Safer Use of Antipsychotics in Youth (SUAY; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03448575), which supports prescribers in delivering high-quality mental health care to youths. Prescribing guidelines are often ignored because they do not incorporate the real-world availability of first-line psychosocial treatments, comorbid conditions, and clinical complexity. The investigators indicated that their approach addressed some of these concerns.
AHRQ-funded; HS026001; HS023258.
Citation: Penfold RB, Thompson EE, Hilt RJ .
Development of a symptom-focused model to guide the prescribing of antipsychotics in children and adolescents: results of the first phase of the Safer Use of Antipsychotics in Youth (SUAY) Clinical Trial.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2022 Jan;61(1):93-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2021.04.010..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Medication, Behavioral Health, Patient Safety, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice
Bender M, Williams M, Cruz MF
A study protocol to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the Clinical Nurse Leader care model in improving quality and safety outcomes.
The authors discuss the Clinical Nurse Leader care model, a Hybrid Type II Implementation-Effectiveness study to evaluate the effect of the care model on standardized quality and safety outcomes and to identify implementation characteristics that are sufficient and necessary to achieve outcomes. Findings are expected to elucidate Registered Nurse's mechanisms of action as organized into frontline models of care and link actions to improved care quality and safety.
AHRQ-funded; HS027181.
Citation: Bender M, Williams M, Cruz MF .
A study protocol to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the Clinical Nurse Leader care model in improving quality and safety outcomes.
Nurs Open 2021 Nov;8(6):3688-96. doi: 10.1002/nop2.910..
Keywords: Implementation, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Patient Safety, Nursing, Evidence-Based Practice
Vu K, Zhou J, Everhart A
Uptake of evidence by physicians: de-adoption of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents after the TREAT trial.
Variation in de-adoption of ineffective or unsafe treatments is not well-understood. In this study the investigators examined de-adoption of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) in anemia treatment among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) following new clinical evidence of harm and ineffectiveness (the TREAT trial) and the FDA's revision of its safety warning. The investigators found that physician specialty had a dominant role in prescribing decision, and specializations with higher use of treatment (nephrologists) were more responsive to new evidence of unsafety and ineffectiveness.
AHRQ-funded; HS025164.
Citation: Vu K, Zhou J, Everhart A .
Uptake of evidence by physicians: de-adoption of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents after the TREAT trial.
BMC Nephrol 2021 Aug 21;22(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12882-021-02491-y..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Medication: Safety, Medication, Patient Safety, Practice Patterns, Provider: Physician
Navis A, George MC, Nmashie A
Validation of the Safer Opioid Prescribing Evaluation Tool (SOPET) for assessing adherence to the Centers for Disease Control opioid prescribing guidelines.
This study assessed the use of the Safer Opioid Prescribing Evaluation Tool (SOPET) which was designed to improve the implementation of the 2016 Centers for Disease Control Guidelines on the prescription of opioids for chronic pain. Four raters with varying levels of clinical experience were trained to use the SOPET and then used it to evaluate 21 baseline patient scenarios. Inter-rater reliability was measured using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) estimates and their 95% confidence intervals for the total SOPET score based on a mean-rating absolute-agreement, two-way random-effects model. Inter-rater reliability was found to be good for the three physician raters (0.92, 0.97, and 0.99). However, inter-rater reliability for the non-physician rater was lower (0.67).
AHRQ-funded; HS025641.
Citation: Navis A, George MC, Nmashie A .
Validation of the Safer Opioid Prescribing Evaluation Tool (SOPET) for assessing adherence to the Centers for Disease Control opioid prescribing guidelines.
Pain Med 2020 Dec 25;21(12):3655-59. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa138..
Keywords: Opioids, Medication, Medication: Safety, Patient Safety, Guidelines, Practice Patterns, Pain, Chronic Conditions, Evidence-Based Practice
Hu QL, Grant MC, Hornor MA
Technical evidence review for emergency major abdominal operation conducted for the AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery.
This technical evidence review focuses on the use of enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) for emergency major abdominal surgery conducted for the AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery (ISCR). This national ERP initiative is funded by AHRQ and implemented in 2017 through a collaboration with American College of Surgeons, and Johns Hopkins Medicine Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality. Five common emergency general surgery (EGS) procedures were focused on: perforated peptic ulcer repair, colectomy, lysis of adhesions, small bowel resection, and exploratory laparotomy. The authors identified seventeen candidate components for emergency major abdominal ERP. The components span the continuum of care from preoperative setting to hospital discharge. For every component they conducted a systematic literature review to find relevant studies. Each component was examined for rationale, evidence, and summary and recommendations. Many were supported by evidence and guidelines specific to their particular operation. Key gaps in literature were highlighted, specifically lack of evidence specific to these operations across many ERP processes.
AHRQ-funded; 233201500020I.
Citation: Hu QL, Grant MC, Hornor MA .
Technical evidence review for emergency major abdominal operation conducted for the AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery.
J Am Coll Surg 2020 Dec;231(6):743-64.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.08.772..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Surgery, Patient Safety, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Hu QL, Fischer CP, Wescott AB
Evidence review for the American College of Surgeons Quality Verification part I: building quality and safety resources and infrastructure.
The goal of this review was to synthesize the evidence supporting the first 4 of 12 American College of Surgeons (ACS) Quality Verification Program core principles of building quality and safety resources and infrastructure. Findings showed that, despite heterogeneous study design and lack of randomized controlled trials, the available literature supports the importance of committed top-level hospital leadership, mid-level leadership, and committee dedicated to surgical quality and culture of safety and high reliability. In conclusion, adequate resources and infrastructure integral to the ACS Quality Verification Program are critical to achieving safe and high-quality surgical outcomes.
AHRQ-funded; 233201500020I.
Citation: Hu QL, Fischer CP, Wescott AB .
Evidence review for the American College of Surgeons Quality Verification part I: building quality and safety resources and infrastructure.
J Am Coll Surg 2020 Nov;231(5):557-69.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.08.758..
Keywords: Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Patient Safety, Surgery, Evidence-Based Practice
Yao X, Inselman JW, Ross JS
Comparative effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants across kidney function in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Patients with atrial fibrillation and severely decreased kidney function were excluded from the pivotal non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) trials, thereby raising questions about comparative safety and effectiveness in patients with reduced kidney function. This study aimed to compare oral anticoagulants across the range of kidney function in patients with atrial fibrillation.
AHRQ-funded; HS025517; HS025164; HS025402; HS022882; HS024075.
Citation: Yao X, Inselman JW, Ross JS .
Comparative effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants across kidney function in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2020 Oct;13(10):e006515. doi: 10.1161/circoutcomes.120.006515..
Keywords: Kidney Disease and Health, Cardiovascular Conditions, Blood Thinners, Medication, Medication: Safety, Patient Safety, Comparative Effectiveness, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Outcomes
Shoemaker-Hunt S, Hall K, Hoffman L
Advancing patient safety: reviews from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Making Healthcare Safer III report.
This paper discusses the Making Healthcare Safer (MHS) reports from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). The reports—providing an analysis of the evidence for various patient safety practices (PSPs)—have served as a consolidated and up-to-date source of information for multiple stakeholders, including healthcare providers, health system administrators, researchers, and government agencies.
AHRQ-funded; 233201500013I.
Citation: Shoemaker-Hunt S, Hall K, Hoffman L .
Advancing patient safety: reviews from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Making Healthcare Safer III report.
J Patient Saf 2020 Sep;16(3S Suppl 1):S1-s2. doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000761..
Keywords: Patient Safety, Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Shoemaker-Hunt SJ, Wyant BE
The effect of opioid stewardship interventions on key outcomes: a systematic review.
In this study, the investigators sought to identify potential patient safety practices to reduce high-risk opioid prescribing. They conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify opioid stewardship (OS) strategies implemented in primary care and other settings. The investigators concluded that the strength of the evidence was low to moderate that OS efforts decreased numbers of opioid prescriptions, proportion of patients on long-term opioids, or days' supply. The strength of the evidence for OS initiatives producing significant reductions in opioid dosages was moderate.
AHRQ-funded; 233201500013I.
Citation: Shoemaker-Hunt SJ, Wyant BE .
The effect of opioid stewardship interventions on key outcomes: a systematic review.
J Patient Saf 2020 Sep;16(3S Suppl 1):S36-s41. doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000710..
Keywords: Opioids, Medication, Medication: Safety, Patient Safety, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Substance Abuse, Prevention
Chatterjee P, Williams MD, Coppin JD
Effectiveness of copper-impregnated solid surfaces on lowering microbial bio-burden levels in an acute care hospital.
This study examined whether using novel coper-impregnated solid materials on high-touch surfaces in patient rooms lowered bacterial contamination which may lead to health care-associated infections in acute care hospitals. Sixteen rooms were installed with copper-impregnated surfaces and were compared to standard noncopper laminate surfaces in 16 rooms over a 3-day period. Samples were taken 3 times per day. A lower level of microbial contamination was found in copper-impregnated solid surfaces as compared to standard surfaces.
AHRQ-funded; HS025598.
Citation: Chatterjee P, Williams MD, Coppin JD .
Effectiveness of copper-impregnated solid surfaces on lowering microbial bio-burden levels in an acute care hospital.
Open Forum Infect Dis 2020 Aug;7(8). doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa238..
Keywords: Patient Safety, Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs), Infectious Diseases, Hospitals, Comparative Effectiveness, Prevention, Evidence-Based Practice
Villa Zapata L, Hansten PD, Panic J
Risk of bleeding with exposure to warfarin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Warfarin use can trigger the occurrence of bleeding independently or as a result of a drug-drug interaction when used in combination with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). This article examines the risk of bleeding in individuals exposed to concomitant warfarin and NSAID compared with those taking warfarin alone. The investigators concluded that risk of bleeding was significantly increased among persons taking warfarin and a NSAID or COX-2 inhibitor together as compared with taking warfarin alone.
AHRQ-funded; HS025984.
Citation: Villa Zapata L, Hansten PD, Panic J .
Risk of bleeding with exposure to warfarin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Thromb Haemost 2020 Jul;120(7):1066-74. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1710592..
Keywords: Blood Thinners, Medication, Medication: Safety, Risk, Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events, Patient Safety, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Outcomes
Meddings J, Greene MT, Ratz D
Multistate programme to reduce catheter-associated infections in intensive care units with elevated infection rates.
AHRQ’s Safety Program for ICUs aimed to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) in intensive care units with elevated rates. Included hospitals had at least one adult intensive care unit with elevated CLABSI or CAUTI rates. The investigators targeted intensive care units with elevated catheter infection rates but yielded no statistically significant reduction in CLABSI, CAUTI or catheter utilization in the first two of six planned cohorts. Improvements in the interventions based on lessons learned from these initial cohorts are being applied to subsequent cohorts.
AHRQ-funded; 233201500016I.
Citation: Meddings J, Greene MT, Ratz D .
Multistate programme to reduce catheter-associated infections in intensive care units with elevated infection rates.
BMJ Qual Saf 2020 May;29(5):418-29. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009330..
Keywords: Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI), Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI), Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs), Infectious Diseases, Patient Safety, Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Hospitals, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Inpatient Care, Critical Care
Liu JY, Hu QL, Lamaina M
Surgical technical evidence review for acute cholecystectomy conducted for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery.
In this study, the authors identified 13 overall components to consider for a nonelective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis enhanced recovery pathways. They indicated that hospitals participating in AHRQ’s Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery will be supported in carrying out practices that enhance care for patients and in gathering data to support continuous quality improvement around the enhanced recovery pathways.
AHRQ-funded; 233201500020I.
Citation: Liu JY, Hu QL, Lamaina M .
Surgical technical evidence review for acute cholecystectomy conducted for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery.
J Am Coll Surg 2020 Mar;230(3):354.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.11.014..
Keywords: Surgery, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Patient Safety, Evidence-Based Practice
Dhruva SS, Ross JS, Mortazavi BJ
Association of use of an intravascular microaxial left ventricular assist device vs intra-aortic balloon pump with in-hospital mortality and major bleeding among patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
This study examines outcomes among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock. Two interventions are compared: intravascular microaxial left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) versus intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABPs). The American College of Cardiology’s National Cardiovascular Data Registry was used to identify patients with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock from hospitals participating in the CathPCI and Chest Pain-MI registries and identified 28,304 patients. Over the study period (2015 to 2017), LVAD was used in 6.2% of patients and IABP in 29.9%. LVAD was shown to have higher rates of in-hospital death and major bleeding complications compared to IABP.
AHRQ-funded; HS022882; HS025402; HS025517; HS026379.
Citation: Dhruva SS, Ross JS, Mortazavi BJ .
Association of use of an intravascular microaxial left ventricular assist device vs intra-aortic balloon pump with in-hospital mortality and major bleeding among patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
JAMA 2020 Feb 25;323(8):734-45. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0254..
Keywords: Medical Devices, Heart Disease and Health, Cardiovascular Conditions, Mortality, Adverse Events, Registries, Patient Safety, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice
Businger AC, Fuller TE, Schnipper JL
Lessons learned implementing a complex and innovative patient safety learning laboratory project in a large academic medical center.
This paper describes the challenges, recommendations and lessons learned while developing and implementing a Patient Safety Learning Laboratory (PSLL) project, which is comprised of a suite of HIT tools integrated with a newly implemented Electronic Health Record (EHR) vendor system in the acute care setting of a large academic medical center. The PSLL Administrative Core engaged stakeholders and study personnel throughout all phases of the project. Challenges to implementation included stakeholder engagement, project scope and complexity, technology and governance, and team structure. Some changes were implemented during the trial and others were labeled as lessons learned for future iterative interventions. A willingness to think outside of current workflows and processes to change health system culture around adverse event prevention was one of the keys to success.
AHRQ-funded; HS023535.
Citation: Businger AC, Fuller TE, Schnipper JL .
Lessons learned implementing a complex and innovative patient safety learning laboratory project in a large academic medical center.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020 Feb;27(2):301-07. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz193.
.
.
Keywords: Patient Safety, Implementation, Health Information Technology (HIT), Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Evidence-Based Practice
Grant MC, Gibbons MM, Ko CY
Evidence review conducted for the AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery: focus on anesthesiology for gynecologic surgery.
This paper is an evidence review of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for gynecologic surgery that will be used as part of AHRQ’s Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery. This initiative was developed in partnership with the American College of Surgeons and the Johns Hopkins Medicine Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality. The authors conducted a literature review of the various anesthesia components which may influence outcomes and facilitate recovery after gynecological surgery. They included interventions for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of care and then summarized the best available evidence for ERAS for gynecological surgery. The best evidence was summarized for recommendations to be used in the initiative.
Citation: Grant MC, Gibbons MM, Ko CY .
Evidence review conducted for the AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery: focus on anesthesiology for gynecologic surgery.
AHRQ-funded; 233201500020I..
Keywords: Patient Safety, Surgery, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Women
Leary JC, Walsh KE, Morin RA
Quality and safety of pediatric inpatient care in community hospitals: a scoping review.
This study’s aim was to conduct a scoping review and synthesize literature on the quality and safety of pediatric inpatient care in nonpediatric hospitals in the United States. A systematic literature review was performed in October 2016 to identify pediatric studies that reported on safety, effectiveness, efficiency, timeliness, patient-centeredness, or equity set. A total of 44 articles were included using inclusion criteria. There was a moderate or high risk of bias for 72% of the studies. This study shows there is very limited research currently and would benefit from more multicenter collaborations.
AHRQ-funded; HS024133.
Citation: Leary JC, Walsh KE, Morin RA .
Quality and safety of pediatric inpatient care in community hospitals: a scoping review.
J Hosp Med 2019 Nov 1;14(10):694-703. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3268..
Keywords: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Children/Adolescents, Inpatient Care, Hospitals, Patient Safety, Quality of Care
Goswami E, Ogden RK, Bennett WE
Evidence-based development of a nephrotoxic medication list to screen for acute kidney injury risk in hospitalized children.
This paper describes an initiative to develop an evidence-based list of nephrotoxic medications to screen for acute kidney injury (AKI) risk in hospitalized children. This initiative, called the Nephrotoxic Injury Negated by Just-in-time Action quality improvement collaborative, convened a Nephrotoxic Medication (NTMx) Subcommittee composed of pediatric nephrologists, a pharmacist, and a pediatric intensivist. The committee reviewed NTMx lists, conducted a literature review of the disputed medications, and assigned an evidence grade based on the association between nephrotoxicity and the quality of the data. The subcommittee then came to a majority consensus to which medications should be included on the list. The list was presented to the larger collaborative and voted on. This list will be continually updated and voted on annually.
AHRQ-funded; HS023763.
Citation: Goswami E, Ogden RK, Bennett WE .
Evidence-based development of a nephrotoxic medication list to screen for acute kidney injury risk in hospitalized children.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2019 Oct 30;76(22):1869-74. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxz203..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Medication: Safety, Medication, Patient Safety, Risk, Evidence-Based Practice, Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events
Mixon AS, Kripalani S, Stein J
An on-treatment analysis of the MARQUIS study: interventions to improve inpatient medication reconciliation.
This paper examined evidence-based interventions implemented in five US hospitals to improve inpatient medication reconciliation. The sites implemented one to seven interventions in 791 patients during a 25-month implementation period. Three interventions were associated with significant decreases in potentially harmful reconciliation rates while two interventions were associated with significant increases. The positive interventions included: defining clinical roles and responsibilities, training, and hiring staff to perform discharge medication reconciliation. The negative interventions were training staff to take medication histories and implementing a new electronic health record (EHR) system.
AHRQ-funded; HS019598.
Citation: Mixon AS, Kripalani S, Stein J .
An on-treatment analysis of the MARQUIS study: interventions to improve inpatient medication reconciliation.
J Hosp Med 2019 Oct;14(10):614-17. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3308..
Keywords: Medication, Evidence-Based Practice, Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events, Medical Errors, Patient Safety, Hospitals, Healthcare Delivery, Inpatient Care
Mixon AS, Smith GR, Mallouk M
Design of MARQUIS2: study protocol for a mentored implementation study of an evidence-based toolkit to improve patient safety through medication reconciliation.
The first Multi-center Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement Study (MARQUIS1) demonstrated that implementation of a medication reconciliation best practices toolkit decreased total unintentional medication discrepancies in five hospitals. In this study, the investigators sought to implement the MARQUIS toolkit in more diverse hospitals, incorporating lessons learned from MARQUIS1.
AHRQ-funded; HS023757; HS025486.
Citation: Mixon AS, Smith GR, Mallouk M .
Design of MARQUIS2: study protocol for a mentored implementation study of an evidence-based toolkit to improve patient safety through medication reconciliation.
BMC Health Serv Res 2019 Sep 11;19(1):659. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4491-5.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Medication, Patient Safety, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures, Tools & Toolkits
Balk EM, Adam GP, Corsi K
Adverse events associated with nonsurgical treatments for urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review.
Investigators systematically reviewed nonsurgical interventions for urgency, stress, or mixed urinary incontinence (UI) in women, focusing on adverse events (AEs). They found that behavioral therapies and neuromodulation have a low risk of adverse events, while anticholinergics and alpha agonists have high rates of dry mouth and constitutional effects. Further, onabotulinum toxin A (BTX) is associated with UTIs and voiding dysfunction, and periurethral bulking agents are associated with erosion and voiding dysfunction. They concluded that these AEs should be considered when selecting appropriate UI treatment options, noting that AE reporting is inconsistent and that AE rates across studies tended to vary widely.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500002.
Citation: Balk EM, Adam GP, Corsi K .
Adverse events associated with nonsurgical treatments for urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review.
J Gen Intern Med 2019 Aug;34(8):1615-25. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05028-0.
.
.
Keywords: Adverse Events, Patient Safety, Women, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Paje D, Rogers MAM, Conlon A
Use of peripherally inserted central catheters in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: a prospective cohort study.
Existing guidelines, including Choosing Wisely recommendations, endorse avoiding placement of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The purpose of this study was to describe the frequency of and characteristics associated with PICC use in hospitalized patients with stage 3b or greater CKD (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] <45 mL/min/1.73 m2).
AHRQ-funded; HS025891.
Citation: Paje D, Rogers MAM, Conlon A .
Use of peripherally inserted central catheters in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: a prospective cohort study.
Ann Intern Med 2019 Jul 2;171(1):10-18. doi: 10.7326/m18-2937..
Keywords: Kidney Disease and Health, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient Safety, Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI), Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs)
Grant MC, Gibbons M M, Ko CY
Evidence review conducted for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery: focus on anesthesiology for bariatric surgery.
The authors conducted an evidence review to select anesthetic interventions that positively influence outcomes and facilitate recovery after bariatric surgery. They summarize the best available evidence to recommend the anesthetic components of care for enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery. The concluded that there is evidence in the literature, and from society guidelines, to support AHRQ’s Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery goals for bariatric surgery.
AHRQ-funded; 233201500020I.
Citation: Grant MC, Gibbons M M, Ko CY .
Evidence review conducted for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery: focus on anesthesiology for bariatric surgery.
Anesth Analg 2019 Jul;129(1):51-60. doi: 10.1213/ane.0000000000003696..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Medication, Obesity, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Patient Safety, Quality Improvement, Surgery