National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Adverse Events (2)
- Behavioral Health (2)
- Children/Adolescents (2)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (2)
- Disparities (3)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (1)
- Emergency Department (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (1)
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (2)
- Hospital Readmissions (1)
- (-) Hospitals (8)
- Inpatient Care (2)
- Medical Errors (2)
- Medicare (1)
- Medication (1)
- Outcomes (1)
- Patient Safety (3)
- Provider Performance (1)
- Quality of Care (2)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (1)
- Substance Abuse (1)
- Surgery (2)
- Teams (1)
- Telehealth (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 8 of 8 Research Studies DisplayedParikh K, Hall M, Tieder JS
Disparities in racial, ethnic, and payer groups for pediatric safety events in US hospitals.
A retrospective cohort study using the 2019 Kids' Inpatient Database found disparities in pediatric safety events. Black and Hispanic children had significantly higher odds in 5 of 7 safety indicators compared to white children, especially in postoperative sepsis and respiratory failure. Medicaid-covered children also showed higher odds in 4 of 7 indicators compared to privately insured children, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to enhance hospital patient safety, particularly among minority and Medicaid-covered populations.
AHRQ-funded; HS028484.
Citation: Parikh K, Hall M, Tieder JS .
Disparities in racial, ethnic, and payer groups for pediatric safety events in US hospitals.
Pediatrics 2024 Mar; 153(3):e2023063714. doi: 10.1542/peds.2023-063714.
Keywords: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), Disparities, Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Children/Adolescents, Patient Safety, Hospitals
Bui LN, Knox M, Miller-Rosales C
Hospital capabilities associated with behavioral health integration within emergency departments.
The objective of this study was to identify hospital capabilities associated with behavioral health processes in emergency departments. Responses to the National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems were linked American Hospital Association Annual Survey data. Most hospitals reported screening for behavioral health conditions and provided direct referrals to community-based clinicians. Approximately half the hospitals used team approaches to behavioral health. Hospitals that reported more barriers to care delivery innovations also reported less screening and usage of a team approach. The authors concluded that research and interventions which focus on removing barriers or adding processes to disseminate best practices offer a path to accelerate behavioral health integration in emergency departments.
AHRQ-funded; HS024075.
Citation: Bui LN, Knox M, Miller-Rosales C .
Hospital capabilities associated with behavioral health integration within emergency departments.
Med Care 2024 Mar; 62(3):170-74. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001973.
Keywords: Behavioral Health, Emergency Department, Hospitals, Substance Abuse, Teams, Telehealth, Health Information Technology (HIT)
Wu J, Yuan CT, Moyal-Smith R
Electronic health record-supported implementation of an evidence-based pathway for perioperative surgical care.
This study examines the role of electronic health records (EHRs) in implementing enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) for perioperative surgical care. Interviews with informaticians and clinicians from eight US hospitals revealed three thematic clusters: "EHR difficulties," "EHR enablers," and "EHR barriers." Researchers concluded that high performers and improvers successfully integrated ERPs into EHRs with dedicated multidisciplinary teams, while others faced challenges. Early involvement of informatics expertise benefited ERP implementation and sustainability.
AHRQ-funded; 2332015000201.
Citation: Wu J, Yuan CT, Moyal-Smith R .
Electronic health record-supported implementation of an evidence-based pathway for perioperative surgical care.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2024 Feb 16; 31(3):591-99. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad237.
Keywords: Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Surgery, Evidence-Based Practice, Hospitals
Auerbach AD, Lee TM, Hubbard CC
Diagnostic errors in hospitalized adults who died or were transferred to intensive care.
The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to determine the prevalence, underlying causes, and harms of diagnostic errors in hospitalized adults who were transferred to an intensive care unit or who died. Data was taken from 29 academic medical centers in the U.S. in a random sample of adults hospitalized with general medical conditions. Errors were found to have contributed to temporary harm, permanent harm, or death in nearly 18% of patients; among patients who died, diagnostic error was judged to have contributed to death in 6.6% of cases. The researchers noted that problems with choosing and interpreting tests and the processes involved with clinician assessment were a high priority for improvement efforts.
AHRQ-funded; HS027369.
Citation: Auerbach AD, Lee TM, Hubbard CC .
Diagnostic errors in hospitalized adults who died or were transferred to intensive care.
JAMA Intern Med 2024 Feb; 184(2):164-73. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.7347..
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Hospitals, Inpatient Care, Quality of Care, Patient Safety, Adverse Events
Dalal AK, Schnipper JL, Raffel K
Identifying and classifying diagnostic errors in acute care across hospitals: early lessons from the Utility of Predictive Systems in Diagnostic Errors (UPSIDE) study.
This paper describes the Utility of Predictive Systems in Diagnostic Errors (UPSIDE) study, whose aim was to define the prevalence and underlying causes of diagnostic errors (DEs) in patients who die in the hospital or are transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) after the first 48 hours. This study was conducted at 31 hospitals with more than 2500 cases reviewed using electronic health records. The authors identified some insights into key requirements into building a robust DE surveillance program by developing these steps: 1) Develop a shared understanding of what constitutes a diagnostic error; 2) Use validated tools to identify diagnostic errors and classify process failures, but respect your context; 3) Develop a standard approach to using electronic health records for case reviews; 4) Ensure reliability and consistency of the case review process; and 5) Link diagnostic error case reviews to institutional safety programs. They also developed steps to establish a diagnosis error review process at the hospital level with six processes.
AHRQ-funded; HS027369; HS026613.
Citation: Dalal AK, Schnipper JL, Raffel K .
Identifying and classifying diagnostic errors in acute care across hospitals: early lessons from the Utility of Predictive Systems in Diagnostic Errors (UPSIDE) study.
J Hosp Med 2024 Feb; 19(2):140-45. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13136..
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Patient Safety, Quality of Care, Hospitals
Kalata S, Schaefer SL, Nuliyahu U
Low-volume elective surgery and outcomes in Medicare beneficiaries treated at hospital networks.
This cross-sectional study’s objective was to quantify low-volume surgery and associated outcomes within hospital networks. This study used Medicare Provider Analysis and Review data to examine fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 66 to 99 years who underwent 1 of 10 elective surgical procedures (abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, carotid endarterectomy, mitral valve repair, hip or knee replacement, bariatric surgery, or resection for lung, esophageal, pancreatic, or rectal cancers) in a network hospital from 2016 to 2018. Hospital volume for each procedure (calculated with the use of National Inpatient Sample data) was compared with yearly hospital volume standards for that procedure recommended by The Leapfrog Group. The authors analyzed primary outcomes which were postoperative complications, 30-day readmission, and 30-day mortality, stratified by the volume status of the hospital and network type. Secondary outcome was the availability of a different high-volume hospital within the same network or outside the network and its proximity to the patient (based on hospital referral region and zip code). In all, data were analyzed for 950,079 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries (average age 74.4 years; 621,138 females and 427,931 males) who underwent 1,049,069 procedures at 2469 hospitals within 382 networks. Of these networks, almost 100% [380 (99.5%)] had at least 1 low-volume hospital performing the elective procedure of interest. In 79.8% of procedures that were performed at low-volume hospitals, there was a hospital that met volume standards within the same network and hospital referral region located a median (IQR) distance of 29 (12-60) miles from the patient's home. In adjusted analyses, postoperative outcomes were inferior at low-volume hospitals compared with hospitals meeting volume standards, with a 30-day mortality of 8.1% at low-volume hospitals vs 5.5% at hospitals that met volume standards.
AHRQ-funded; HS028606.
Citation: Kalata S, Schaefer SL, Nuliyahu U .
Low-volume elective surgery and outcomes in Medicare beneficiaries treated at hospital networks.
JAMA Surg 2024 Feb; 159(2):203-10. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6542.
Keywords: Surgery, Medicare, Hospitals, Outcomes
Nash KA, Weerahandi H, Yu H
Measuring equity in readmission as a distinct assessment of hospital performance.
This study examined the measure of equitable readmissions in hospitals as developed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Objectives were to define a measure of equitable readmissions; identify hospitals with equitable readmissions by insurance (dual eligible vs non-dual eligible) or patient race (Black vs White); and compare hospitals with and without equitable readmissions by hospital characteristics and performance on accountability measures (quality, cost, and value). The authors used data from a cross-section of hospitals who were eligible for the CMS Hospital-Wide Readmission measure using Medicare data from July 2018 through June 2019. Of 4638 hospitals, they found that 74% served a sufficient number of dual-eligible patients, and 42% served a sufficient number of Black patients to apply CMS Disparity Methods by insurance and race. Of these eligible hospitals, 17% had equitable readmission rates by insurance and 30% by race. Hospitals with equitable readmissions by insurance or race cared for a lower percentage of Black patients (insurance, 1.9% vs 3.3%, race, 7.6% vs 9.3%), and differed from nonequitable hospitals in multiple domains (teaching status, geography, size. In examining equity by insurance, hospitals with low costs were more likely to have equitable readmissions, and there was no relationship between quality and value, and equity. In examining equity by race, hospitals with high overall quality were more likely to have equitable readmissions, and there was no relationship between cost and value, and equity.
AHRQ-funded; HS022882.
Citation: Nash KA, Weerahandi H, Yu H .
Measuring equity in readmission as a distinct assessment of hospital performance.
JAMA 2024 Jan 9; 331(2):111-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.24874..
Keywords: Hospital Readmissions, Hospitals, Provider Performance, Disparities
Wolf RM, Hall M, Williams DJ
Disparities in pharmacologic restraint for children hospitalized in mental health crisis.
This retrospective cohort study examined associations between pharmacologic restraint use and race and ethnicity among children (aged 5-≤18 years) admitted for mental health conditions to acute care nonpsychiatric children's hospitals. Study period was 2018 to 2022 and was conducted at 41 US children’s hospitals and included a cohort of 61,503 hospitalizations. Compared with non-Hispanic Black children, children of non-Hispanic White (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.81), Asian (aOR, 0.82), or other race and ethnicity (aOR, 0.68) were less likely to receive pharmacologic restraint, with no significant difference with Hispanic children. When stratified by sex, racial/ethnic differences were magnified in males, except for Hispanic males, and not found in females. Sensitivity analysis revealed amplified disparities for all racial/ethnic groups, including Hispanic youth.
AHRQ-funded; HS026122.
Citation: Wolf RM, Hall M, Williams DJ .
Disparities in pharmacologic restraint for children hospitalized in mental health crisis.
Pediatrics 2024 Jan; 153(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2023-061353..
Keywords: Disparities, Children/Adolescents, Behavioral Health, Inpatient Care, Hospitals, Medication