National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Cancer (1)
- Caregiving (1)
- Chronic Conditions (1)
- Comparative Effectiveness (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- Medicare (1)
- Neurological Disorders (1)
- Orthopedics (1)
- (-) Outcomes (8)
- Pain (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (5)
- (-) Patient Experience (8)
- Patient Safety (1)
- Provider Performance (1)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Quality Measures (1)
- Quality of Care (4)
- Surgery (3)
- Treatments (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 8 of 8 Research Studies DisplayedRichardson DR, Oakes AH, Crossnohere NL
Prioritizing the worries of AML patients: Quantifying patient experience using best-worst scaling.
Although patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) experience significant toxicities and poor outcomes, few studies have quantified patients' experience. In this study, a community-centered approach was used to develop an AML-specific best-worst scaling (BWS) instrument involving 13 items in four domains (psychological, physical, decision-making, treatment delivery) to quantify patient worry. A survey of patients and caregivers was conducted using the instrument. Data were analyzed using conditional logistic regression.
AHRQ-funded; HS000032.
Citation: Richardson DR, Oakes AH, Crossnohere NL .
Prioritizing the worries of AML patients: Quantifying patient experience using best-worst scaling.
Psychooncology 2021 Jul;30(7):1104-11. doi: 10.1002/pon.5652..
Keywords: Cancer, Patient Experience, Caregiving, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Aiyegbusi OL, Nair D, Peipert JD
A narrative review of current evidence supporting the implementation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures in the management of chronic diseases.
This review discusses and summarizes evidence of the impact of electronic patient-reported outcomes measures (ePROMs) on clinical parameters and outcomes relevant to chronic diseases. Various studies have demonstrated the feasibility of ePROMs in routine clinical practice with patients increasing expressing a preference for an electronic mode of administration. These ePROMs could have significant impacts on outcomes valued by patients, healthcare providers, and researchers. Recently published literature.
AHRQ-funded; HS026395.
Citation: Aiyegbusi OL, Nair D, Peipert JD .
A narrative review of current evidence supporting the implementation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures in the management of chronic diseases.
Ther Adv Chronic Dis 2021 May 24;12:20406223211015958. doi: 10.1177/20406223211015958..
Keywords: Chronic Conditions, Patient Experience, Health Information Technology (HIT), Outcomes, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice
Meyers DJ, Trivedi AN, Wilson IB, DJ, Trivedi AN, Wilson IB
Higher Medicare Advantage Star Ratings are associated with improvements In patient outcomes.
Researchers examined CMS' five-star rating system for the overall quality of Medicare Advantage (MA) contracts. They found that enrollees experiencing a one-star MA rating increase were 20.8 percent less likely to leave their plan voluntarily to enroll in another plan or traditional Medicare. When hospitalized, enrollees were 3.4 percent more likely to use a higher-quality hospital and 2.6 percent less likely to be readmitted within ninety days. These findings suggest that MA star ratings may capture key domains of an MA plan's quality.
AHRQ-funded; HS027051.
Citation: Meyers DJ, Trivedi AN, Wilson IB, DJ, Trivedi AN, Wilson IB .
Higher Medicare Advantage Star Ratings are associated with improvements In patient outcomes.
Health Aff 2021 Feb;40(2):243-50. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00845..
Keywords: Patient Experience, Provider Performance, Medicare, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Outcomes
Nuckols TK, Conlon C, Robbins M
Quality of care and patient-reported outcomes in carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective observational study.
This prospective observational study examined the association of higher quality care for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) with better outcomes. Adults diagnosed with CTS from 30 occupational health centers were recruited and their physicians' adherence to recommended care processes evaluated. Among 343 individuals, receiving better was associated with greater improvements. CTS symptoms showed greater improvement when physicians assessed and managed patient activity, when patients underwent necessary surgery, and when employers adjusted job tasks. The researchers conclude that efforts should be made to ensure patients with CTS receive essential care processes, including activity assessment and management as well as necessary surgery.
AHRQ-funded; HS018982.
Citation: Nuckols TK, Conlon C, Robbins M .
Quality of care and patient-reported outcomes in carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective observational study.
Muscle Nerve 2018 Jun;57(6):896-904. doi: 10.1002/mus.26041..
Keywords: Neurological Disorders, Outcomes, Patient Experience, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Quality of Care
Joseph A, Bayramzadeh S, Zamani Z
Safety, performance, and satisfaction outcomes in the operating room: a literature review.
This review of empirical literature focuses on the design of operating rooms (ORs) by investigating the physical environmental features of ORs associated with patient and staff outcomes. The article highlights gaps in the research and identifies areas where best practice and design assumptions need to be evaluated using rigorous design research.
AHRQ-funded; HS024380.
Citation: Joseph A, Bayramzadeh S, Zamani Z .
Safety, performance, and satisfaction outcomes in the operating room: a literature review.
HERD 2018 Apr;11(2):137-50. doi: 10.1177/1937586717705107..
Keywords: Patient Experience, Patient Safety, Outcomes, Surgery
Ehlers AP, Khor S, Cizik AM
Use of patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction for quality assessments.
This study investigated the relationship between PROs and satisfaction among spine surgery patients. The authors hypothesized that there would be significant disparities between patient satisfaction and PROs at the 1-year postoperative time point. The study found that overall, patients undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery reported being satisfied with outcomes, but the reported responses in PROs were much more variable.
AHRQ-funded; HS020025.
Citation: Ehlers AP, Khor S, Cizik AM .
Use of patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction for quality assessments.
Am J Manag Care 2017 Oct;23(10):618-22..
Keywords: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Patient Experience, Quality of Care, Surgery, Outcomes, Orthopedics
Waljee JF, Dimick JB
Do patient-reported outcomes correlate with clinical outcomes following surgery?
This study examines whether patient-reported outcomes (PROs) correlate with clinical outcomes following surgery. PROs are distinct from clinical outcomes and represent a potential indicator of performance that can be targeted to improve quality of care. Future studies that examine the influence of measurement techniques, case mix, and disease characteristics on PROs will inform efforts to routinely and efficiently integrate these critical outcomes into existing strategies to capture treatment effectiveness and quality of care for surgical conditions.
AHRQ-funded; HS023313.
Citation: Waljee JF, Dimick JB .
Do patient-reported outcomes correlate with clinical outcomes following surgery?
Adv Surg 2017 Sep;51(1):141-50. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2017.03.011..
Keywords: Quality of Care, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Surgery, Patient Experience, Quality Measures
Memtsoudis SG, Yoo D, Stundner O
Subsartorial adductor canal vs femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee replacement.
This study compares both single-shot femoral nerve block (FNB) and adductor canal block (ACB), side to side, in the same patients undergoing bilateral TKA. It found that the use of ACBs vs FNBs in knee arthroplasty patients yielded similar results in absolute pain scores, motor strength and patient satisfaction.
AHRQ-funded; HS021734.
Citation: Memtsoudis SG, Yoo D, Stundner O .
Subsartorial adductor canal vs femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee replacement.
Int Orthop 2015 Apr;39(4):673-80. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2527-3..
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Treatments, Outcomes, Patient Experience, Pain