National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Cancer (7)
- (-) Cancer: Lung Cancer (10)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (2)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (2)
- Guidelines (1)
- Healthcare Costs (1)
- Healthcare Utilization (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- (-) Imaging (10)
- Patient Safety (1)
- Prevention (3)
- Quality of Care (1)
- Quality of Life (1)
- Respiratory Conditions (1)
- Screening (5)
- Treatments (1)
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) (3)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 10 of 10 Research Studies DisplayedLee SJC, Lee J, Zhu H
Assessing barriers and facilitators to lung cancer screening: initial findings from a patient navigation intervention.
This study’s objective was to examine the challenges to providing lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography for patients, particularly minority, under-, and uninsured populations. The authors conducted a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of telephone-based navigation for lung cancer screening in an integrated, urban safety-net health care system. They used bilingual navigators (Spanish and English) to make systematic contact with patients, recording standardized call characteristics in a study-specific database. A total of 225 patients (mean age 63 years, 46% female, 70% racial/ethnic minority) were assigned navigators, with a total of 559 barriers to screening identified during 806 telephone calls. The most common barrier types were personal (46%), provider (30%), and practical (17%). System (6%) and psychosocial (1%) barriers were described by English-speaking patients, but not by Spanish-speaking patients. Provider-related barriers decreased by 80% over the course of the lung cancer screening process.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Lee SJC, Lee J, Zhu H .
Assessing barriers and facilitators to lung cancer screening: initial findings from a patient navigation intervention.
Popul Health Manag 2023 Jun; 26(3):177-84. doi: 10.1089/pop.2023.0053..
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Screening, Prevention, Imaging
Gerber DE, Hamann HA, Dorsey O
Clinician variation in ordering and completion of low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in a safety-net medical system.
Less than 5% of eligible individuals in the United States undergo lung cancer screening. Variation in clinicians' participation in lung cancer screening has not been determined. In this study the investigators examined medical providers who ordered ≥ 1 low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for lung cancer screening from February 2017 through February 2019 in an integrated safety-net healthcare system. The investigators concluded that in an integrated safety-net healthcare system, most adult primary care providers ordered LDCT.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Gerber DE, Hamann HA, Dorsey O .
Clinician variation in ordering and completion of low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in a safety-net medical system.
Clin Lung Cancer 2021 Jul;22(4):e612-e20. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.12.001..
Keywords: Imaging, Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer
Meza R, Jeon J, Toumazis I
Evaluation of the benefits and harms of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography: modeling study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
The purpose of this study was to inform the USPSTF guidelines by estimating the benefits and harms associated with various low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening strategies. Microsimulation modeling studies suggested that LDCT screening for lung cancer compared with no screening may increase lung cancer deaths averted and life-years gained when optimally targeted and implemented. Screening individuals at aged 50 or 55 years through aged 80 years with 20 pack-years or more of smoking exposure was estimated to result in more benefits than the 2013 USPSTF-recommended criteria and less disparity in screening eligibility by sex and race/ethnicity.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500011I.
Citation: Meza R, Jeon J, Toumazis I .
Evaluation of the benefits and harms of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography: modeling study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2021 Mar 9;325(10):988-97. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1077..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Imaging, Screening, Prevention, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines
Jonas DE, Reuland DS, Reddy SM
Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
The purpose of this study was to review the evidence on screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) to inform the USPSTF. Findings showed that screening high-risk persons with LDCT can reduce lung cancer mortality but can also cause false-positive results leading to unnecessary tests and invasive procedures, overdiagnosis, incidental findings, increases in distress, and, rarely, radiation-induced cancers.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500011I.
Citation: Jonas DE, Reuland DS, Reddy SM .
Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2021 Mar 9;325(10):971-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0377..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Imaging, Screening, Prevention, Evidence-Based Practice
Liu S, Mazur TR, Li H
A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
In this study, a method is reported to perform IMRT and VMAT treatment delivery verification using 3D volumetric primary beam fluences reconstructed directly from planned beam parameters and treatment delivery records. The goals of this paper are to demonstrate that 1) 3D beam fluences can be reconstructed efficiently, and 2) quality assurance (QA) based on the reconstructed 3D fluences is capable of detecting additional treatment delivery errors, particularly for VMAT plans.
AHRQ-funded; HS022888.
Citation: Liu S, Mazur TR, Li H .
A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
J Appl Clin Med Phys 2017 Jan;18(1):128-38. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12017.
.
.
Keywords: Patient Safety, Imaging, Cancer: Lung Cancer, Treatments, Quality of Care
Healy MA, Yin H, Reddy RM
Use of positron emission tomography to detect recurrence and associations with survival in patients with lung and esophageal cancers.
The researchers sought to evaluate utilization of positron emission tomography (PET) to detect recurrence in asymptomatic patients and relationships with survival for patients with lung and esophageal cancers. Despite statistically significant variation in use of PET to detect tumor recurrence, there was no association with improved two-year survival.
AHRQ-funded; HS020937.
Citation: Healy MA, Yin H, Reddy RM .
Use of positron emission tomography to detect recurrence and associations with survival in patients with lung and esophageal cancers.
J Natl Cancer Inst 2016 Jul;108(7). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv429.
.
.
Keywords: Imaging, Cancer, Cancer: Lung Cancer, Healthcare Utilization
Roth JA, Ramsey SD
Computed tomography screening for lung cancer: A high-value proposition?
This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of low-dose computed tomographic scan screening for lung cancer within the Canadian health care system. It found that compared with no screening, the reference scenario saved 51,000 quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CaD $52,000/QALY.
HS022982.
Citation: Roth JA, Ramsey SD .
Computed tomography screening for lung cancer: A high-value proposition?
JAMA 2016 Jan 5;315(1):77-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.17877..
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Imaging, Screening, Healthcare Costs, Quality of Life
Murphy DR, Thomas EJ, Meyer AN
Development and validation of electronic health record-based triggers to detect delays in follow-up of abnormal lung imaging findings.
In this study, the researchers developed an electronic health record (EHR)-based trigger algorithm to identify delays in follow-up evaluation of patients with imaging findings suggestive of lung cancer. After validating the trigger with retrospective data, they concluded that EHR-based triggers can be used to identify patients with suspicious imaging findings in whom follow-up diagnostic evaluation was delayed.
AHRQ-funded; HS017820.
Citation: Murphy DR, Thomas EJ, Meyer AN .
Development and validation of electronic health record-based triggers to detect delays in follow-up of abnormal lung imaging findings.
Radiology 2015 Oct;277(1):81-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015142530..
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Imaging
Smieliauskas F, MacMahon H, Salgia R
Geographic variation in radiologist capacity and widespread implementation of lung cancer CT screening.
The researchers estimated the prevalence of capacity constraints in the radiologist workforce and resulting potential disparities in access to lung cancer screening. They found that scaling up lung cancer screening would increase imaging procedures by an average of 4% across Health Service Areas (HSAs). HSAs that were rural, with many eligible smokers, and disproportionately Hispanic or low-income smokers had significantly higher odds of facing capacity constraints.
AHRQ-funded; HS018535.
Citation: Smieliauskas F, MacMahon H, Salgia R .
Geographic variation in radiologist capacity and widespread implementation of lung cancer CT screening.
J Med Screen 2014 Dec;21(4):207-15. doi: 10.1177/0969141314548055..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Cancer, Cancer: Lung Cancer, Screening, Imaging
Deppen SA, Blume JD, Kensinger CD
Accuracy of FDG-PET to diagnose lung cancer in areas with infectious lung disease: a meta-analysis.
The purpose of this study was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of positron emission tomography (PET) combined with fludeoxyglucose F18 (FDG) for pulmonary modules suspicious for lung cancer in regions where infectious lung disease is endemic and compare the accuracy in regions where such disease is rare. It found that the accuracy of FDG-PET was extremely heterogeneous.
AHRQ-funded; HS021554.
Citation: Deppen SA, Blume JD, Kensinger CD .
Accuracy of FDG-PET to diagnose lung cancer in areas with infectious lung disease: a meta-analysis.
JAMA 2014 Sep 24;312(12):1227-36. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.11488..
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Lung Cancer, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Respiratory Conditions, Imaging