National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Behavioral Health (1)
- Cancer: Breast Cancer (1)
- Care Management (1)
- Chronic Conditions (2)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (1)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (1)
- Colonoscopy (1)
- Community-Based Practice (1)
- COVID-19 (1)
- Cultural Competence (1)
- Data (1)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (1)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (2)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (1)
- Emergency Department (2)
- Evidence-Based Practice (6)
- Guidelines (1)
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) (1)
- Healthcare Costs (3)
- (-) Healthcare Delivery (26)
- Healthcare Utilization (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (2)
- Health Insurance (1)
- Health Literacy (3)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (2)
- Health Systems (1)
- Hospitals (1)
- Implementation (2)
- Learning Health Systems (1)
- Outcomes (1)
- Pain (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (4)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (2)
- Patient and Family Engagement (7)
- Policy (3)
- Practice Patterns (1)
- Pregnancy (1)
- Primary Care (2)
- Primary Care: Models of Care (2)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Quality of Care (2)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (1)
- Screening (1)
- (-) Shared Decision Making (26)
- Surgery (1)
- Transitions of Care (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 25 of 26 Research Studies DisplayedSamal L, Fu HN, Camara DS
AHRQ Author: Camara DS, Wang J, Bierman AS
Health information technology to improve care for people with multiple chronic conditions.
The objective of this study was to review evidence regarding the use of Health Information Technology (health IT) interventions aimed at improving care for people living with multiple chronic conditions (PLWMCC) in order to identify critical knowledge gaps. The investigators concluded that the body of literature included in this review provides critical information on the state of the science as well as the many gaps that need to be filled for digital health to fulfill its promise in supporting care delivery that meets the needs of PLWMCC.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; HS026849; 290201600001B.
Citation: Samal L, Fu HN, Camara DS .
Health information technology to improve care for people with multiple chronic conditions.
Health Serv Res 2021 Oct;56(Suppl 1):1006-36. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13860..
Keywords: Chronic Conditions, Health Information Technology (HIT), Evidence-Based Practice, Shared Decision Making, Healthcare Delivery
Abrams EM, Shaker M, Oppenheimer J
The challenges and opportunities for shared decision making highlighted by COVID-19.
This article discusses the challenges and opportunities for shared decision making (SDM) that have been emphasized more recently due to the COVID-19 pandemic. It has changed how clinicians deliver care due to the need for social distancing and health service reallocation. It is causing clinicians to reevaluate common practices and enhance effectiveness of their management strategies.
AHRQ-funded; HS024599.
Citation: Abrams EM, Shaker M, Oppenheimer J .
The challenges and opportunities for shared decision making highlighted by COVID-19.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2020 Sep;8(8):2474-80.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.07.003.
.
.
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, COVID-19, Healthcare Delivery, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Guise JM, Reid E, Fiordalisi CV
AHRQ Author: Borsky A, Chang S
AHRQ series on improving translation of evidence: progress and promise in supporting learning health systems.
The authors discuss the articles in the AHRQ EPC series published in this journal over the past six months. They state that satisfaction, care, and costs would all improve if health care delivery were as efficient and effective as possible given current knowledge. They conclude that millions of health decisions must be made by clinicians, patients, and health care systems, and they believe better decisions will be made with evidence.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201700003C.
Citation: Guise JM, Reid E, Fiordalisi CV .
AHRQ series on improving translation of evidence: progress and promise in supporting learning health systems.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2020 Jan;46(1):51-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.10.008..
Keywords: Implementation, Evidence-Based Practice, Learning Health Systems, Health Systems, Healthcare Delivery, Shared Decision Making
Vogel JA, Rising KL, Jones J
Reasons patients choose the emergency department over primary care: a qualitative metasynthesis.
To enhance the acute care delivery system, a comprehensive understanding of the patient's perspectives for seeking care in the emergency department (ED) versus primary care (PC) is necessary. In this study, the investigators conducted a qualitative metasynthesis on reasons patients sought care in the ED instead of PC. The investigators concluded that reasons included: (1) urgency of the medical condition, (2) barriers to accessing primary care, (3) advantages of the ED, and (4) fulfillment of medical needs and quality of care in the ED.
AHRQ-funded; HS023901.
Citation: Vogel JA, Rising KL, Jones J .
Reasons patients choose the emergency department over primary care: a qualitative metasynthesis.
J Gen Intern Med 2019 Nov;34(11):2610-19. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05128-x..
Keywords: Emergency Department, Primary Care, Shared Decision Making, Healthcare Delivery
Harle CA, DiIulio J, Downs SM
Decision-centered design of patient information visualizations to support chronic pain care.
The objective of this study was to describe a decision-centered design process, and resultant interactive patient information displays, to support key clinical decision requirements in chronic noncancer pain care. Through critical decision method interviews and a half-day multidisciplinary design workshop, researchers designed an interactive prototype, the Chronic Pain Treatment Tracker. This prototype summarizes the current treatment plan, past treatment history, potential future treatments, and treatment options that require caution. The researchers concluded that the Chronic Pain Treatment Tracker presents clinicians with the information they need in a structure that promotes quick uptake, understanding, and action.
AHRQ-funded; HS023306.
Citation: Harle CA, DiIulio J, Downs SM .
Decision-centered design of patient information visualizations to support chronic pain care.
Appl Clin Inform 2019 Aug;10(4):719-28. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1696668..
Keywords: Pain, Chronic Conditions, Shared Decision Making, Health Information Technology (HIT), Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Care Management, Healthcare Delivery
Ingraham A, Wang X, Havlena J
Factors associated with the interhospital transfer of emergency general surgery patients.
Researchers used data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample to determine patient- and hospital-level factors associated with interhospital emergency general surgery (EGS) transfers. They identified that hospital-level characteristics more strongly predicted the need for transfer than patient-related factors. They recommended considering these factors in order to facilitate transfer decision-making.
AHRQ-funded; HS025224.
Citation: Ingraham A, Wang X, Havlena J .
Factors associated with the interhospital transfer of emergency general surgery patients.
J Surg Res 2019 Aug;240:191-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.11.053..
Keywords: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), Emergency Department, Surgery, Shared Decision Making, Hospitals, Healthcare Delivery, Transitions of Care
Aouad M, Brown TT, Whaley CM
Reference pricing: the case of screening colonoscopies.
In this study, the investigators studied the introduction of reference pricing to the California Public Employees' Retirement System. The investigators found a 10 percentage point increase in the share of patients using an ambulatory surgery center (ASC), leading to a $2300 to $1700 reduction in prices paid for patients who switched to ASCs. They indicated that their results suggested the use of ASCs had a causal effect on prices paid and had no negative effect on patient health outcomes.
AHRQ-funded; HS022098.
Citation: Aouad M, Brown TT, Whaley CM .
Reference pricing: the case of screening colonoscopies.
J Health Econ 2019 May;65:246-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.03.002..
Keywords: Colonoscopy, Shared Decision Making, Health Services Research (HSR), Healthcare Costs, Healthcare Delivery, Screening
Bhise V, Rajan SS, Sittig DF
Defining and measuring diagnostic uncertainty in medicine: a systematic review.
In this paper, the authors conducted a systematic review to describe how diagnostic uncertainty is defined and measured in medical practice. The authors concluded that the term "diagnostic uncertainty" lacked a clear definition, and there was no comprehensive framework for its measurement in medical practice. Based on their review findings, they propose that diagnostic uncertainty be defined as a "subjective perception of an inability to provide an accurate explanation of the patient's health problem."
AHRQ-funded; HS022087; HS023602.
Citation: Bhise V, Rajan SS, Sittig DF .
Defining and measuring diagnostic uncertainty in medicine: a systematic review.
J Gen Intern Med 2018 Jan;33(1):103-15. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4164-1..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Healthcare Delivery
Davis CM, Guo M, Miyamura J
Key factors in obstetric delivery decision-making among Asian and Pacific Islander women by English proficiency.
Understanding (1) how expectant mothers gather information to decide where to give birth, and (2) who helps make that decision, provides critical health communication and decision-making insights. This survey found that the top three health decision-makers for both those Asian American and Pacific Islanders (AAPIs) with limited English proficiency and English-proficient AAPIs were themselves, their obstetrician, and their spouse, which did not differ significantly by language proficiency.
AHRQ-funded; HS021903.
Citation: Davis CM, Guo M, Miyamura J .
Key factors in obstetric delivery decision-making among Asian and Pacific Islander women by English proficiency.
Hawaii J Med Public Health 2017 Oct;76(10):279-86.
.
.
Keywords: Healthcare Delivery, Cultural Competence, Shared Decision Making, Pregnancy, Racial and Ethnic Minorities
Morgan DJ, Leppin AL, Smith CD
A practical framework for understanding and reducing medical overuse: conceptualizing overuse through the patient-clinician interaction.
The authors used an iterative, expert-informed, evidence-based process to develop a framework for conceptualizing interventions to reduce medical overuse. Given the complexity of defining and identifying overused care in nuanced clinical situations and the need to define care appropriateness in the context of an individual patient, this framework conceptualizes the patient-clinician interaction as the nexus of decisions regarding inappropriate care.
AHRQ-funded; HS018111.
Citation: Morgan DJ, Leppin AL, Smith CD .
A practical framework for understanding and reducing medical overuse: conceptualizing overuse through the patient-clinician interaction.
J Hosp Med 2017 May;12(5):346-51. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2738.
.
.
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Healthcare Delivery, Quality of Care, Healthcare Utilization, Clinician-Patient Communication
Robinson JC, Brown TT, Whaley C
Reference pricing changes the 'choice architecture' of health care for consumers.
This article summarizes reference pricing's impacts to date on patient choice, provider prices, surgical complications, and employer spending and estimates its potential impacts if expanded to more services and a broader population. Reference pricing induces consumers to select lower-price alternatives for all of the forms of care studied, leading to significant reductions in prices paid and spending incurred by insurers and employers.
AHRQ-funded; HS022098.
Citation: Robinson JC, Brown TT, Whaley C .
Reference pricing changes the 'choice architecture' of health care for consumers.
Health Aff 2017 Mar;36(3):524-30. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1256.
.
.
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Education: Patient and Caregiver, Healthcare Costs, Healthcare Delivery
Schlesinger M, Grob R
Treating, fast and slow: Americans' understanding of and responses to low-value care.
This article explores Americans’ understanding of low-value care in 2015, assesses the impact of media messaging, and tests alternative message framing. The study concluded that the public’s awareness of low-value care is incomplete, with substantial disparities related to race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.
AHRQ-funded; HS021858; HS016978.
Citation: Schlesinger M, Grob R .
Treating, fast and slow: Americans' understanding of and responses to low-value care.
Milbank Q 2017 Mar;95(1):70-116. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12246..
Keywords: Healthcare Delivery, Shared Decision Making, Healthcare Costs, Quality of Care
Armstrong MJ, Mullins CD
Value assessment at the point of care: incorporating patient values throughout care delivery and a draft taxonomy of patient values.
In this commentary, the authors propose a taxonomy of values underlying patient decision making and provide examples of how these impact provision of health care. Their draft taxonomy describes four categories of patient values: global, decisional, situational, and external, highlights different values impacting decision making and facilitates a more complete value assessment at the point of care.
AHRQ-funded; HS024159.
Citation: Armstrong MJ, Mullins CD .
Value assessment at the point of care: incorporating patient values throughout care delivery and a draft taxonomy of patient values.
Value Health 2017 Feb;20(2):292-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.11.008.
.
.
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Healthcare Delivery, Patient and Family Engagement
Califf RM, Robb MA, Bindman AB
AHRQ Author: Bindman AB, Dymek C
Transforming evidence generation to support health and health care decisions.
Collaborations among federal health agencies involved in biomedical research and health care delivery with regard to data sharing, research infrastructure, and computational capabilities require combining expertise and resources and will entail substantial changes to the culture of clinical research, In this article, the authors propose a set of core principles for data collaboration and system organizational design that they believe will further enable research efforts by both the private sector and government agencies.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Califf RM, Robb MA, Bindman AB .
Transforming evidence generation to support health and health care decisions.
N Engl J Med 2016 Dec 15;375(24):2395-400. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1610128.
.
.
Keywords: Healthcare Delivery, Shared Decision Making, Evidence-Based Practice, Policy
Lavallee DC, Chenok KE, Love RM
Incorporating patient-reported outcomes into health care to engage patients and enhance care.
The authors examine the opportunities for using patient-reported outcomes to enhance care delivery and outcomes as health care information needs and technology platforms change. They highlight emerging practices in which patient-reported outcomes provide value to patients and clinicians and improve care delivery. Finally, they examine present and future challenges to maximizing the use of patient-reported outcomes in the clinic.
AHRQ-funded; HS022789.
Citation: Lavallee DC, Chenok KE, Love RM .
Incorporating patient-reported outcomes into health care to engage patients and enhance care.
Health Aff 2016 Apr;35(4):575-82. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1362.
.
.
Keywords: Healthcare Delivery, Shared Decision Making, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Patient and Family Engagement, Quality Improvement
Carman KL, Maurer M, Mangrum R
Understanding an informed public's views on the role of evidence in making health care decisions.
The Community Forum Deliberative Methods Demonstration project, sponsored by AHRQ, obtained informed public views on the role of evidence in health care decisions through seventy-six deliberative groups involving 907 people overall, in the period August-November 2012. Although participants perceived evidence as being essential to high-quality care, they also believed that personal choice or clinical judgment could trump evidence.
AHRQ-funded; 290201000005C.
Citation: Carman KL, Maurer M, Mangrum R .
Understanding an informed public's views on the role of evidence in making health care decisions.
Health Aff 2016 Apr;35(4):566-74. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1112.
.
.
Keywords: Healthcare Delivery, Shared Decision Making, Evidence-Based Practice, Policy
Marshall DA, Burgos-Liz L, Pasupathy KS
Transforming healthcare delivery: integrating dynamic simulation modelling and big data in health economics and outcomes research.
The authors discussed the synergies between big data and dynamic simulation modelling (DSM), practical considerations and challenges, and how integrating big data and DSM can be useful to decision makers to address complex, systemic health economics and outcomes questions and to transform healthcare delivery.
AHRQ-funded; HS023710.
Citation: Marshall DA, Burgos-Liz L, Pasupathy KS .
Transforming healthcare delivery: integrating dynamic simulation modelling and big data in health economics and outcomes research.
Pharmacoeconomics 2016 Feb;34(2):115-26. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0330-7.
.
.
Keywords: Data, Shared Decision Making, Healthcare Delivery, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Frasier LL, Holden S, Holden T
Temporal trends in postmastectomy radiation therapy and breast reconstruction associated with changes in national comprehensive cancer network guidelines.
The researchers sought to determine whether revised guidelines have increased postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) and affected receipt of breast reconstruction. They found that changes in NCCN guidelines have been associated with an increase in PMRT among patients with tumors 5 cm or smaller and 1 to 3 positive nodes without an associated decrease in receipt of reconstruction.
AHRQ-funded; HS022403.
Citation: Frasier LL, Holden S, Holden T .
Temporal trends in postmastectomy radiation therapy and breast reconstruction associated with changes in national comprehensive cancer network guidelines.
JAMA Oncol 2016 Jan;2(1):95-101. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3717.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer: Breast Cancer, Healthcare Delivery, Shared Decision Making, Guidelines, Outcomes
Cohen DJ, Davis M, Balasubramanian BA
Integrating behavioral health and primary care: consulting, coordinating and collaborating among professionals.
This paper sought to describe how clinicians from different backgrounds interact to deliver integrated behavioral and primary health care, and the contextual factors that shape such interactions. It concluded that primary care and behavioral health clinicians, through their interactions, consult, coordinate, and collaborate with each other to solve patients' problems.
AHRQ-funded; HS022981.
Citation: Cohen DJ, Davis M, Balasubramanian BA .
Integrating behavioral health and primary care: consulting, coordinating and collaborating among professionals.
J Am Board Fam Med 2015 Sep-Oct;28 Suppl 1:S21-31. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150042.
.
.
Keywords: Healthcare Delivery, Community-Based Practice, Shared Decision Making, Behavioral Health, Primary Care
Reschovsky JD, Rich EC, Lake TK
Factors contributing to variations in physicians' use of evidence at the point of care: a conceptual model.
The purpose of this article is to help identify modifiable factors that can influence clinical decisions at the point of care. It presents a conceptual model and literature review of physician decisionmaking. The authors describe the multitude of factors—drawn from different disciplines—that have been shown to influence physician point-of-care decisions. They also present a conceptual framework for organizing these factors.
AHRQ-funded; 23320095642; 23337033T.
Citation: Reschovsky JD, Rich EC, Lake TK .
Factors contributing to variations in physicians' use of evidence at the point of care: a conceptual model.
J Gen Intern Med 2015 Aug;30 Suppl 3:S555-61. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3366-7..
Keywords: Healthcare Delivery, Shared Decision Making, Evidence-Based Practice, Primary Care: Models of Care, Practice Patterns
DeCamp M, Sugarman J, Berkowitz SA
Meaningfully engaging patients in ACO decision making.
In this article, the authors describe how ACOs can achieve meaningful system-level patient engagement. They specify a three-step engagement framework: identifying beneficiary representatives, cultivating relationships, and evaluating engagement. They conclude that their proposed three-step framework can help accountable care organizations (ACOs) conceptualize a plan for meaningfully engaging patients in ACO governance.
AHRQ-funded; HS023684.
Citation: DeCamp M, Sugarman J, Berkowitz SA .
Meaningfully engaging patients in ACO decision making.
Am J Accountable Care 2015 Jun;3(2):30-33.
.
.
Keywords: Patient and Family Engagement, Shared Decision Making, Health Insurance, Healthcare Delivery
Brach C
AHRQ Author: Brach C
A daughter's frustration with the dearth of patient- and family-centered care.
This article is a first-person account of a hospitalization that describes the lack of patient and family inclusion in decision-making, failure to use plain language and other health literacy strategies, and disregard for patient and family preferences. The author concludes that if the health care system is going to shift from paternalistic to patient- and family-centered, providers must be trained in how to communicate and partner with patients and families. The author references resources to help hospitals make systematic changes to hard wire health literate and patient- and family-centered care.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Brach C .
A daughter's frustration with the dearth of patient- and family-centered care.
Patient Exp J 2014 Apr 1;1(1):43-47.
.
.
Keywords: Healthcare Delivery, Shared Decision Making, Health Literacy, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Brach C, Dreyer BP, Schillinger D
AHRQ Author: Brach C
Physicians' roles in creating health literate organizations: a call to action.
Physicians are being called on to deliver patient-centered care, reduce medical errors, and generally increase health care quality and health outcomes, all while containing costs. Fully engaging patients in prevention, decision-making and self-management activities is critical to achieving these aims. The authors of this paper concluded that being health literate must be a new way of delivering care rather than an add-on. For national health literacy goals to be met, health care organizations must ingrain health literacy into their routines.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Brach C, Dreyer BP, Schillinger D .
Physicians' roles in creating health literate organizations: a call to action.
J Gen Intern Med 2014 Feb;29(2):273-5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2619-6.
.
.
Keywords: Healthcare Delivery, Shared Decision Making, Health Literacy, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Randhawa G
AHRQ Author: Randhawa G
Moving to a user-driven research paradigm.
The combination of changes in research practice and in health care delivery, growing complexity in decision-making, increasing use of electronic health records, and growing resource constraints necessitate a shift to a user-driven research paradigm to generate new knowledge. This article's conceptual framework was created to clarify the perspective of the decision makers as well as the range of factors and the variability in thresholds used to make decisions. It may help researchers in creating actionable information to meet the needs of decision makers, which is needed for the transition to a user-driven research paradigm.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Randhawa G .
Moving to a user-driven research paradigm.
EGEMS 2013 Oct;1(2):1017. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1017.
.
.
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Evidence-Based Practice, Healthcare Delivery, Implementation
Koh HK, Brach C, Harris LM
AHRQ Author: Brach C
A proposed 'health literate care model' would constitute a systems approach to improving patients' engagement in care.
The researchers proposed a Health Literate Care Model that would weave health literacy strategies into the widely adopted Care Model (formerly known as the Chronic Care Model). Their new model calls for approaching all patients with the assumption that they are at risk of not understanding their health conditions or how to deal with them, and then confirming and ensuring patients' understanding. They suggested that health literacy would then become an organizational value infused into all aspects of planning and operations. They also proposed a measurement framework to track the impact of the new Health Literate Care Model on patient outcomes and quality of care.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Koh HK, Brach C, Harris LM .
A proposed 'health literate care model' would constitute a systems approach to improving patients' engagement in care.
Health Aff 2013 Feb;32(2):357-67. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1205.
.
.
Keywords: Healthcare Delivery, Shared Decision Making, Education: Patient and Caregiver, Health Literacy, Primary Care: Models of Care, Patient and Family Engagement