National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Adverse Events (1)
- Cancer (6)
- (-) Cancer: Colorectal Cancer (11)
- Cancer: Lung Cancer (1)
- Cancer: Prostate Cancer (1)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (1)
- Colonoscopy (2)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (1)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (1)
- Elderly (2)
- Evidence-Based Practice (1)
- Family Health and History (1)
- Guidelines (2)
- Healthcare Costs (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- Health Promotion (1)
- Low-Income (1)
- Medication (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (1)
- Patient Adherence/Compliance (1)
- Patient Experience (1)
- Practice Patterns (2)
- Prevention (3)
- Primary Care (2)
- Quality of Care (1)
- Risk (1)
- Rural Health (1)
- Screening (8)
- Shared Decision Making (2)
- Stress (1)
- Surgery (1)
- Treatments (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 11 of 11 Research Studies DisplayedMagrath M, Yang E, Ahn C
Impact of a clinical decision support system on guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations for colonoscopy after polypectomy.
The goal of this study was to characterize guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations after implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR)-based Colonoscopy Pathology Reporting and Clinical Decision Support System (CoRS). Results showed that an EMR-based CoRS was widely used and significantly improved guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Magrath M, Yang E, Ahn C .
Impact of a clinical decision support system on guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations for colonoscopy after polypectomy.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2018 Nov;16(11):1321-28. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7050..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Health Information Technology (HIT), Colonoscopy, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Screening, Cancer, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Prevention
Predmore Z, Pannikottu J, Sharma R
Factors associated with the overuse of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.
The purpose of this systematic review was to examine factors associated with overuse of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, using studies that were in English, used a U.S. population, and contained original data. The review indicates that overuse of CRC screening was greater in the Northeast/Mid-Atlantic regions and in urban areas, but was lower in academically affiliated centers. The authors conclude that, although the literature supports important overuse of CRC screening, what drives these practices remains unclear and that future research should explore these factors thoroughly.
AHRQ-funded; HS000029.
Citation: Predmore Z, Pannikottu J, Sharma R .
Factors associated with the overuse of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.
Am J Med Qual 2018 Sep/Oct;33(5):472-80. doi: 10.1177/1062860618764302..
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Colonoscopy, Prevention, Screening
Lewis CL, Kistler CE, Dalton AF
A decision aid to promote appropriate colorectal cancer screening among older adults: a randomized controlled trial.
The purpose of this study was to test a patient decision aid (PtDA) to promote CRC screening in older adults. The PtDA was designed to facilitate individual decision-making to help patients understand the potential risks and benefit of CRC screening. 424 patients aged 70 – 84 who were not up to date with CRC screening participated in a double-blinded randomized controlled trial, using the PtDA or an attention control. Two outcomes - appropriate CRC screening behavior at 6 months following the initial visit or appropriate screening intent immediately after the visit - were defined as completed screening or intent for patients in good health, discussion about screening with their provider for patients in intermediate health, or no screening or intent for patients in poor health. Appropriate screening behavior at 6 months was higher in the intervention group; appropriate screening intent following the provider visit was also higher. The authors conclude that the PtDA for older adults promoted appropriate CRC screening behavior.
AHRQ-funded; HS021133.
Citation: Lewis CL, Kistler CE, Dalton AF .
A decision aid to promote appropriate colorectal cancer screening among older adults: a randomized controlled trial.
Med Decis Making 2018 Jul;38(5):614-24. doi: 10.1177/0272989x18773713..
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Shared Decision Making, Education: Patient and Caregiver, Elderly, Prevention, Screening
Kanters AE, Morris AM, Albrahamse PH
The effect of peer support on colorectal cancer patients' adherence to guideline-concordant multidisciplinary care.
Dis Colon Rectum 2018 Jul;61(7):817-23. doi: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001067.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of peer support on the attitudes of patients with colorectal cancer toward chemotherapy and their adherence to it. The study demonstrated that exposure to peer support is associated with higher adjuvant chemotherapy adherence.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of peer support on the attitudes of patients with colorectal cancer toward chemotherapy and their adherence to it. The study demonstrated that exposure to peer support is associated with higher adjuvant chemotherapy adherence.
AHRQ-funded; HS000053.
Citation: Kanters AE, Morris AM, Albrahamse PH .
The effect of peer support on colorectal cancer patients' adherence to guideline-concordant multidisciplinary care.
Dis Colon Rectum 2018 Jul;61(7):817-23. doi: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001067..
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Treatments, Guidelines, Medication, Patient Adherence/Compliance
Abelson JS, Chait A, Shen MJ
Sources of distress among patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer: a qualitative study.
The objective of this qualitative study was to explore sources of distress among colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgery. The investigators found that patients identified sources of stress at preoperative, in-hospital recovery and postoperative stages. Sources of stress included, but were not limited to: emotional reaction to diagnosis, negative emotional reaction to having a surgery, dealing with distressing physical symptoms and complications after surgery.
AHRQ-funded; HS000066.
Citation: Abelson JS, Chait A, Shen MJ .
Sources of distress among patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer: a qualitative study.
J Surg Res 2018 Jun;226:140-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.01.017..
Keywords: Adverse Events, Cancer, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Stress, Surgery
Kistler CE, Vu M, Sutkowi-Hemstreet A
Exploring factors that might influence primary-care provider discussion of and recommendation for prostate and colon cancer screening.
This study sought to examine circumstances under which primary-care providers would discuss and recommend two types of cancer screening services across a spectrum of net benefit and other factors known to influence screening. While most providers' reported practice patterns aligned with net benefit, some providers would discuss and recommend low-value cancer screening, particularly when faced with a patient request.
AHRQ-funded; HS019468; HS021133.
Citation: Kistler CE, Vu M, Sutkowi-Hemstreet A .
Exploring factors that might influence primary-care provider discussion of and recommendation for prostate and colon cancer screening.
Int J Gen Med 2018 May 17;11:179-90. doi: 10.2147/ijgm.s153887..
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer: Prostate Cancer, Primary Care, Practice Patterns, Screening
Singal AG, Corley DA, Kamineni A
Patterns and predictors of repeat fecal immunochemical and occult blood test screening in four large health care systems in the United States.
The objectives of this study were to characterize screening patterns and identify factors associated with repeat screening among patients who completed an index guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) or fecal immunochemical test (FIT). The investigators found that screening patterns varied substantially across healthcare systems, with consistent screening proportions ranging from 1 to 54.3% and no repeat screening proportions ranging from 6.9 to 42.8%. Consistent screening increased with older age but was less common among racial/ethnic minorities and patients with more comorbidities.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Singal AG, Corley DA, Kamineni A .
Patterns and predictors of repeat fecal immunochemical and occult blood test screening in four large health care systems in the United States.
Am J Gastroenterol 2018 May;113(5):746-54. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0023-x..
Keywords: Screening, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer, Practice Patterns, Diagnostic Safety and Quality
Roydhouse JK, Gutman R, Keating NL
Differences between proxy and patient assessments of cancer care experiences and quality ratings.
This study assessed the impact of proxy survey responses on cancer care experience reports and quality ratings. Adjusted proxy scores were modestly higher for medical care experiences but lower for nursing care and care coordination experiences. There were no significant differences between adjusted patient and proxy ratings of quality.
AHRQ-funded; HS000011.
Citation: Roydhouse JK, Gutman R, Keating NL .
Differences between proxy and patient assessments of cancer care experiences and quality ratings.
Health Serv Res 2018 Apr;53(2):919-43. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12672.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer: Lung Cancer, Quality of Care, Patient Experience
Davis MM, Freeman M, Shannon J
A systematic review of clinic and community intervention to increase fecal testing for colorectal cancer in rural and low-income populations in the United States - how, what and when?
Researchers conducted this systematic review to determine how implementation strategies and contextual factors influenced the uptake of interventions to increase fecal testing for colorectal cancer in rural and low-income populations. They found that provision of kits through the mail, use of pre-addressed stamped envelopes, client reminders and in-clinic distribution appeared most frequently in the highly effective/effective clinic-based study arms. Few studies described contextual factors or implementation strategies.
AHRQ-funded; HS022981.
Citation: Davis MM, Freeman M, Shannon J .
A systematic review of clinic and community intervention to increase fecal testing for colorectal cancer in rural and low-income populations in the United States - how, what and when?
BMC Cancer 2018 Jan 6;18(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3813-4.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Health Promotion, Low-Income, Rural Health, Screening
Naber SK, Kuntz KM, Henrikson NB
AHRQ Author: Ganiats TG
Cost effectiveness of age-specific screening intervals for people with family histories of colorectal cancer.
Despite relative risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) decreasing with age among individuals with a family history of CRC, no screening recommendations specify less frequent screening. Researchers found that for individuals with a family history of CRC, it is cost effective to gradually increase the screening interval if several subsequent screening colonoscopies have negative results and no new cases of CRC are found in family members.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Naber SK, Kuntz KM, Henrikson NB .
Cost effectiveness of age-specific screening intervals for people with family histories of colorectal cancer.
Gastroenterology 2018 Jan;154(1):105-16.e20. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.09.021.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Healthcare Costs, Family Health and History, Risk, Screening
Kistler CE, Golin C, Sundaram A
Individualized colorectal cancer screening discussions between older adults and their primary care providers: a cross-sectional study.
The aim of this study was to describe colorectal cancer (CRC) screening discussions and explore their associations with patient characteristics and screening intentions. The investigators found that CRC screening discussions varied by type of participant and content. They assert that future work is needed to determine if interventions focused on specific domains alters the appropriateness of participants' colorectal cancer screening intentions.
AHRQ-funded; HS021133.
Citation: Kistler CE, Golin C, Sundaram A .
Individualized colorectal cancer screening discussions between older adults and their primary care providers: a cross-sectional study.
MDM Policy Pract 2018 Jan-Jun;3(1):2381468318765172. doi: 10.1177/2381468318765172..
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Shared Decision Making, Elderly, Primary Care, Screening