National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Behavioral Health (1)
- Children/Adolescents (1)
- (-) Data (14)
- (-) Evidence-Based Practice (14)
- Guidelines (5)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (1)
- Health Systems (1)
- Learning Health Systems (1)
- Nursing (1)
- Nutrition (1)
- Policy (1)
- Prevention (1)
- Public Health (1)
- Quality Measures (1)
- Registries (1)
- Research Methodologies (10)
- Shared Decision Making (2)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 14 of 14 Research Studies DisplayedLin JS, Murad MH, Leas B
A narrative review and proposed framework for using health system data with systematic reviews to support decision-making.
This paper addresses when and how the use of health system data might make systematic reviews more useful to decisionmakers. The authors have developed a framework to guide the use of health system data alongside systematic reviews based on a narrative review of the literature and empirical experience. They recommend future methodological work on how best to handle internal and external validity concerns of health system data in the context of systematically reviewed data and work on developing infrastructure to do this type of work.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500007I; 29032001T05; 290201500005I; 290201500009I.
Citation: Lin JS, Murad MH, Leas B .
A narrative review and proposed framework for using health system data with systematic reviews to support decision-making.
J Gen Intern Med 2020 Jun;35(6):1830-35. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05783-5..
Keywords: Learning Health Systems, Health Systems, Evidence-Based Practice, Data, Shared Decision Making
Saldanha IJ, Smith BT, Ntzani E
The Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR): descriptive characteristics of publicly available data and opportunities for research.
Funded by the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), the Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR) is a free, web-based, open-source, data management and archival platform for reviews. The objectives of this study were to describe (1) the current extent of usage of SRDR and (2) the characteristics of all projects with publicly available data on the SRDR website.
AHRQ-funded; HHSA290201500002I_HHSA29032012T.
Citation: Saldanha IJ, Smith BT, Ntzani E .
The Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR): descriptive characteristics of publicly available data and opportunities for research.
Syst Rev 2019 Dec 20;8(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1250-y..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Data, Research Methodologies, Registries
Keenan GM, Lopez KD, Sousa VEC
A shovel-ready solution to fill the nursing data gap in the interdisciplinary clinical picture.
The purpose of this study was to critically evaluate the 2014 American Academy of Nursing (AAN) call-to-action plan for generating interoperable nursing data. The authors of the article present recommendations for revisions to AAN's plan as well as an evidence-based alternative to generating interoperable nursing data in the near term.
AHRQ-funded; HS015054.
Citation: Keenan GM, Lopez KD, Sousa VEC .
A shovel-ready solution to fill the nursing data gap in the interdisciplinary clinical picture.
Int J Nurs Knowl 2018 Jan;29(1):49-58. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12168..
Keywords: Data, Evidence-Based Practice, Nursing
Ji X, Machiraju R, Ritter A
Visualizing article similarities via sparsified article network and map projection for systematic reviews.
In this study, the authors visualized article similarities to extend its utilization in practical settings for SR researchers, aiming to promote human comprehension of article distributions and hidden patterns. To prompt an effective visualization in an interpretable, intuitive, and scalable way, they implemented a graph-based network visualization with three network sparsification approaches and a distance-based map projection via dimensionality reduction.
AHRQ-funded; HS025047.
Citation: Ji X, Machiraju R, Ritter A .
Visualizing article similarities via sparsified article network and map projection for systematic reviews.
Stud Health Technol Inform 2017;245:422-26.
.
.
Keywords: Data, Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR), Research Methodologies
Guise JM, Chang C, Butler M
AHRQ Author: Chang C
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 1: an introduction to a series of articles that provide guidance and tools for reviews of complex interventions.
The seven articles in this series reflect and distill the discussions from the in-person meeting and follow-up workgroups on tools and approaches to systematic reviews of complex interventions. The first three articles address how systematic reviews for complex interventions are conceptualized and operationalized for the protocol. The next two articles discuss how to choose appropriate analytic methods to implement analyses of complex interventions. The final two articles describe proposed reporting elements for systematic reviews of complex interventions.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201200004C; 290201200016I; 290201500011I.
Citation: Guise JM, Chang C, Butler M .
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 1: an introduction to a series of articles that provide guidance and tools for reviews of complex interventions.
J Clin Epidemiol 2017 Oct;90:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.011.
.
.
Keywords: Data, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Research Methodologies
Kelly MP, Noyes J, Kane RL
AHRQ Author: Chang C
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 2: defining complexity, formulating scope, and questions.
This paper builds on concepts introduced in paper 1 of this series. It describes the methodological, practical, and philosophical challenges and potential approaches for formulating the questions and scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions. Furthermore, it discusses the use of theory to help organize reviews of complex interventions.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290-2012-00004-C; 290-2015-00008I; 290-2015-00011I.
Citation: Kelly MP, Noyes J, Kane RL .
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 2: defining complexity, formulating scope, and questions.
J Clin Epidemiol 2017 Oct;90:11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.012.
.
.
Keywords: Data, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Research Methodologies
Viswanathan M, McPheeters ML, Murad MH
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 4: selecting analytic approaches.
This article addresses the uncertainty that systematic reviewers face in selecting methods for reviews of complex interventions. Specifically, it lays out parameters for systematic reviewers to consider when selecting analytic approaches that best answer the questions at hand and suggests analytic techniques that may be appropriate in different circumstances.
AHRQ-funded; 290201200004C.
Citation: Viswanathan M, McPheeters ML, Murad MH .
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 4: selecting analytic approaches.
J Clin Epidemiol 2017 Oct;90:28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.014.
.
.
Keywords: Data, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Research Methodologies
Guise JM, Butler M, Chang C
AHRQ Author: Chang C
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 7: PRISMA-CI elaboration and explanation.
The Complex Interventions Methods Workgroup developed an extension to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Complex Interventions (PRISMA-CI). Following the guidance for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extensions, this Explanation and Elaboration (EE) document accompanies the PRISMA-CI checklist to promote consistency in reporting of systematic reviews of complex interventions.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201200004C; 290201200016I; 290201500011I.
Citation: Guise JM, Butler M, Chang C .
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 7: PRISMA-CI elaboration and explanation.
J Clin Epidemiol 2017 Oct;90:51-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.017.
.
.
Keywords: Data, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Research Methodologies
Bashir R, Bourgeois FT, Dunn AG
A systematic review of the processes used to link clinical trial registrations to their published results.
Studies measuring the completeness and consistency of trial registration and reporting rely on linking registries with bibliographic databases. In this systematic review, the researchers quantified the processes used to identify these links. In 43 studies that examined cohorts of registry entries, 24 used automatic and manual processes to find articles; 3 only automatic; and 11 only manual (5 did not specify).
AHRQ-funded; HS024798.
Citation: Bashir R, Bourgeois FT, Dunn AG .
A systematic review of the processes used to link clinical trial registrations to their published results.
Syst Rev 2017 Jul 3;6(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0518-3.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Research Methodologies, Data
Paynter R, Banez LL, Erinoff E
AHRQ Author: Banez LL
Commentary on EPC methods: an exploration of the use of text-mining software in systematic reviews.
This commentary summarizes a recent peer-reviewed Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) white paper EPC Methods: An Exploration of the Use of Text-Mining Software in Systematic Reviews followed by a discussion of current and future issues.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Paynter R, Banez LL, Erinoff E .
Commentary on EPC methods: an exploration of the use of text-mining software in systematic reviews.
J Clin Epidemiol 2017 Apr;84:33-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.11.019..
Keywords: Data, Evidence-Based Practice, Research Methodologies
Wilcox HC, Kharrazi H, Wilson RF
Data linkage strategies to advance youth suicide prevention: a systematic review for a National Institutes of Health Pathways to Prevention Workshop.
This review sought to identify and describe data systems that can be linked to data from prevention studies to advance youth suicide prevention research. It concluded that there is untapped potential to evaluate and enhance suicide prevention efforts by linking suicide prevention data with existing data systems. However, sparse availability of data dictionaries and lack of adherence to standard data elements limit this potential.
AHRQ-funded; 290201200007I.
Citation: Wilcox HC, Kharrazi H, Wilson RF .
Data linkage strategies to advance youth suicide prevention: a systematic review for a National Institutes of Health Pathways to Prevention Workshop.
Ann Intern Med 2016 Dec 6;165(11):779-85. doi: 10.7326/m16-1281.
.
.
Keywords: Behavioral Health, Children/Adolescents, Data, Evidence-Based Practice, Prevention
Khatibzadeh S, Saheb Kashaf M, Micha R
A global database of food and nutrient consumption.
The authors conducted an empirical assessment of dietary intakes in order for evidence-based policy-making to address global health challenges. They derived The Global Dietary Database, which combines broad global coverage with estimates of food and nutrient consumption by age, sex and time. They believe that these data provide an empirical basis for global dietary surveillance, policy-making and priority setting to address diet-related burdens of disease.
AHRQ-funded; HS000062.
Citation: Khatibzadeh S, Saheb Kashaf M, Micha R .
A global database of food and nutrient consumption.
Bull World Health Organ 2016 Dec;94(12):931-34. doi: 10.2471/blt.15.156323.
.
.
Keywords: Data, Evidence-Based Practice, Nutrition, Policy, Public Health
Burda BU, Holmer HK, Norris SL
Limitations of A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and suggestions for improvement.
A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) is a commonly used tool to assess the quality of systematic reviews; however, modifications are needed to improve its usability, reliability, and validity. In this commentary, the authors summarize their experience and the experiences of others who have used AMSTAR and provide suggestions for its improvement.
AHRQ-funded; HS018500.
Citation: Burda BU, Holmer HK, Norris SL .
Limitations of A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and suggestions for improvement.
Syst Rev 2016 Apr 12;5:58. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0237-1.
.
.
Keywords: Research Methodologies, Data, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Quality Measures
Hartling L, Guise JM, Kato E
AHRQ Author: Kato, E, Berliner E
A taxonomy of rapid reviews links report types and methods to specific decision-making contexts.
The researchers described characteristics of rapid reviews and examined the impact of methodological variations on their reliability and validity. They concluded that rapid products have tremendous methodological variation and that categorization based on timeframe or type of synthesis reveals patterns. The similarity across rapid products lies in the close relationship with the end user to meet time-sensitive decision-making needs.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201200013I; 290201200010I; 290201200011I; 290201200015I; 290201200007I; 290201200004C.
Citation: Hartling L, Guise JM, Kato E .
A taxonomy of rapid reviews links report types and methods to specific decision-making contexts.
J Clin Epidemiol 2015 Dec;68(12):1451-62.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.05.036.
.
.
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Evidence-Based Practice, Data, Research Methodologies