National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Adverse Drug Events (ADE) (1)
- Adverse Events (2)
- Ambulatory Care and Surgery (1)
- Antibiotics (5)
- Antimicrobial Stewardship (4)
- Arthritis (1)
- Blood Clots (1)
- Blood Pressure (1)
- Blood Thinners (2)
- Brain Injury (3)
- Cancer (4)
- Cancer: Breast Cancer (1)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (3)
- Caregiving (3)
- Care Management (2)
- Children/Adolescents (7)
- Chronic Conditions (4)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (11)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (5)
- Clostridium difficile Infections (1)
- Communication (5)
- COVID-19 (3)
- Critical Care (1)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (3)
- Dialysis (2)
- Digestive Disease and Health (1)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (2)
- Elderly (6)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (3)
- Emergency Department (4)
- Evidence-Based Practice (7)
- Guidelines (2)
- Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) (1)
- Healthcare Delivery (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (12)
- Health Promotion (1)
- Health Systems (1)
- Heart Disease and Health (2)
- Hospital Discharge (1)
- Hospitals (3)
- Imaging (3)
- Inpatient Care (2)
- Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (2)
- Kidney Disease and Health (3)
- Long-Term Care (2)
- Maternal Care (1)
- Medical Devices (1)
- Medical Errors (1)
- Medication (10)
- Medication: Safety (2)
- Mortality (1)
- Newborns/Infants (3)
- Nursing Homes (2)
- Obesity (1)
- Obesity: Weight Management (1)
- Orthopedics (3)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (3)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (3)
- Patient Adherence/Compliance (1)
- Patient and Family Engagement (3)
- Patient Experience (1)
- Patient Safety (5)
- Patient Self-Management (1)
- Policy (1)
- Practice Patterns (1)
- Pregnancy (2)
- Prevention (1)
- Primary Care (2)
- Provider (1)
- Provider: Physician (2)
- Provider Performance (1)
- Quality Improvement (2)
- Quality of Care (3)
- Quality of Life (1)
- Registries (1)
- Research Methodologies (2)
- Respiratory Conditions (1)
- Risk (3)
- Sepsis (1)
- (-) Shared Decision Making (56)
- Sickle Cell Disease (2)
- Simulation (1)
- Sleep Problems (1)
- Surgery (11)
- Teams (1)
- Transitions of Care (1)
- Transplantation (4)
- Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) (2)
- Vaccination (1)
- Women (2)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 25 of 56 Research Studies DisplayedKennedy EE, Bowles KH, Aryal S
Systematic review of prediction models for postacute care destination decision-making.
This article reported a systematic review of studies containing development and validation of models predicting post-acute care destination after adult inpatient hospitalization, summarized clinical populations and variables, evaluated model performance, assessed risk of bias and applicability, and made recommendations to reduce bias in future models. Findings indicated that prediction modeling studies for post-acute care destinations were becoming more prolific in the literature, but model development and validation strategies were inconsistent, and performance was variable. Most models were developed using regression, but machine learning methods were increasing in frequency.
AHRQ-funded; HS026599; HS027742.
Citation: Kennedy EE, Bowles KH, Aryal S .
Systematic review of prediction models for postacute care destination decision-making.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021 Dec 28;29(1):176-86. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab197..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Transitions of Care
Ibemere SO, Tanabe P, Bonnabeau E
Awareness and use of the sickle cell disease toolbox by primary care providers in North Carolina.
The authors developed a decision support tool for sickle cell disease (SCD) for SCD management (SCD Toolbox) based on the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's SCD guidelines. Using data from primary care providers (PCPs) in North Carolina, they found that PCPs rarely co-managed with a specialist, had low awareness and use of the SCD Toolbox, and requested multiple formats for the toolbox.
AHRQ-funded; HS024501.
Citation: Ibemere SO, Tanabe P, Bonnabeau E .
Awareness and use of the sickle cell disease toolbox by primary care providers in North Carolina.
J Prim Care Community Health 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211049050. doi: 10.1177/21501327211049050..
Keywords: Sickle Cell Disease, Primary Care, Chronic Conditions, Shared Decision Making, Evidence-Based Practice
Greenberg JK, Ahluwalia R, Hill M
Development and external validation of the KIIDS-TBI tool for managing children with mild traumatic brain injury and intracranial injuries.
This study's objectives were to develop a new risk model with improved sensitivity compared to the CHIIDA model for the post-neuroimaging management of children with mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBI) and intracranial injuries and further to validate externally the new model and CHIIDA model in a multicenter data set. Findings showed that the KIIDS-TBI model had high sensitivity and moderate specificity for risk stratifying children with mTBI and intracranial injuries. The researchers concluded that the use of their clinical decision support tool may help improve the safe, resource-efficient management of this important patient population.
AHRQ-funded; HS027075.
Citation: Greenberg JK, Ahluwalia R, Hill M .
Development and external validation of the KIIDS-TBI tool for managing children with mild traumatic brain injury and intracranial injuries.
Acad Emerg Med 2021 Dec;28(12):1409-20. doi: 10.1111/acem.14333..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Brain Injury, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Health Information Technology (HIT)
Aronson PL, Schaeffer P, Niccolai LM
Parents' perspectives on communication and shared decision making for febrile infants ≤60 days old.
This study examined parents’ perceptions of receiving and understanding information in the emergency department (ED) and their perspectives on shared decision making (SDM) in the management of febrile infants 60 days of age or less. The authors conducted semistructured interviews with 23 parents of febrile infants ≤60 days old evaluated in the pediatric ED at an urban, academic medical center. Themes for parents’ perspectives on SDM included: 1) giving parents the opportunity to express their opinions and concerns builds confidence in the decision making process, 2) parents’ preferences for participation in decision making vary considerably, and 3) different perceptions about risk influence parents’ preferences about having their infant undergo a lumbar puncture (LP). Parents valued risk and benefits of having their infant undergo an LP differently, which influences their preferences.
AHRQ-funded; HS026006.
Citation: Aronson PL, Schaeffer P, Niccolai LM .
Parents' perspectives on communication and shared decision making for febrile infants ≤60 days old.
Pediatr Emerg Care 2021 Dec;37(12):e1213-e19. doi: 10.1097/pec.0000000000001977..
Keywords: Newborns/Infants, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Shared Decision Making, Emergency Department
Rao BR, Merchant FM, Howard DH
Shared decision-making for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: policy goals, metrics, and challenges.
Researchers discussed shared decision-making for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), including the results from a case study implementing the shared decision-making mandate for ICDs, which involved providing patients with decision aids prior to or following the doctor consultation.
AHRQ-funded; HS028558.
Citation: Rao BR, Merchant FM, Howard DH .
Shared decision-making for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: policy goals, metrics, and challenges.
J Law Med Ethics 2021 Win;49(4):622-29. doi: 10.1017/jme.2021.85..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Medical Devices, Policy, Cardiovascular Conditions
Xiong KZ, Shah S, Stone JA
Using a scenario-based hybrid approach to understand participant health behavior.
This study described a scenario-based hybrid approach that included a simulation exercise and a situational interview to understand how older adults first select and then take OTC medication. The authors concluded that the scenario-based hybrid approach not only yielded detailed information about behavior, but also allowed investigators to discern participants' decision-making, influences, and the rationales they used when selecting and taking OTC medications.
AHRQ-funded; HS024490.
Citation: Xiong KZ, Shah S, Stone JA .
Using a scenario-based hybrid approach to understand participant health behavior.
Res Social Adm Pharm 2021 Dec;17(12):2070-74. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.02.020..
Keywords: Elderly, Medication, Shared Decision Making
Morris AO, Gilson A, Chui MA
Utilizing a cognitive engineering approach to conduct a hierarchical task analysis to understand complex older adult decision-making during over-the-counter medication selection.
This study characterized older adults' cognitive decision-making process when seeking to self-medicate with over-the-counter (OTC) medications from their community pharmacy, and demonstrated how hierarchical task analysis (HTA) can be used to evaluate a pharmacy intervention's impact on their decision-making. Findings showed that, while selecting an OTC, older adults considered quantity, cost, form, regimen, safety, strength, appropriateness of OTC safety, generic/name-brand, past experiences, and ingredients. The study intervention reduced by half the number of factors considered. Findings suggested that HTA-informed decision profiles may provide pharmacists with critical insights into safety issues that older adults may not be considering so that pharmacists can support their decision-making.
AHRQ-funded; HS024490.
Citation: Morris AO, Gilson A, Chui MA .
Utilizing a cognitive engineering approach to conduct a hierarchical task analysis to understand complex older adult decision-making during over-the-counter medication selection.
Res Social Adm Pharm 2021 Dec;17(12):2116-26. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.07.005..
Keywords: Elderly, Shared Decision Making, Medication
Fowler FJ, Sepucha KR, Stringfellow V
Validation of the SDM Process scale to evaluate shared decision-making at clinical sites.
The Shared Decision-Making (SDM) Process scale utilizes 4 questions about decision-making behaviors: discussion of options, pros, cons, and preferences. The purpose of this study was to utilize data from mail surveys of patients who made surgical decisions at nine clinical sites and a national web survey to evaluate the reliability and validity of this measure for assessing shared decision-making at clinical sites. The study found that patients at sites employing decision aids to promote shared decision-making for surgeries involving the hip, knee, back, or breast cancer exhibited significantly higher scores compared to national cross-section samples of surgical patients in three of the four comparisons and significantly higher scores in both comparisons with "usual care sites". The reliability was demonstrated by an intra-class correlation of 0.93 at the clinical site level and an average correlation of SDM scores for knee and hip surgery patients treated at the same sites of 0.56.
AHRQ-funded; HS025718.
Citation: Fowler FJ, Sepucha KR, Stringfellow V .
Validation of the SDM Process scale to evaluate shared decision-making at clinical sites.
J Patient Exp 2021 Nov 26; 8:23743735211060811. doi: 10.1177/23743735211060811..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Whitebird RR, Solberg LI, Ziegenfuss JY
Personalized outcomes for hip and knee replacement: the patients point of view.
Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly being incorporated into clinical and surgical care for assessing outcomes. This study examined outcomes important to patients in their decision to have hip or knee replacement surgery, their perspectives on PROMs and shared decision-making, and factors they considered important for postoperative care.
AHRQ-funded; HS025618.
Citation: Whitebird RR, Solberg LI, Ziegenfuss JY .
Personalized outcomes for hip and knee replacement: the patients point of view.
J Patient Rep Outcomes 2021 Nov 4;5(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00393-z..
Keywords: Orthopedics, Surgery, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Patient Experience, Shared Decision Making
Chartash D, Sharifi M, Emerson B
Documentation of shared decisionmaking in the emergency department.
Patient-centered communication and shared decision making is a vital element of clinical practice, but little is known about its impact or value in the emergency department (ED) setting. The researchers of this study developed a natural language processing tool using regular expressions to identify shared decision making, patient-centered communications, and to describe visit-, site-, and temporal-level patterns within a large health system. The study took place in two parts: part 1 was the development and validation of the natural language processing tool, and part 2 was a retrospective analysis of shared decision making and patient discussion using the processing tool to assess ED physician and advanced practitioner documentation from 2013 to 2020. Compared to chart review of 600 ED notes, the accuracy rates of the natural language processing tool were 96.7% and 88.9% respectively. Between 2013 to 2020 the researchers observed greater likelihood of shared decision-making documentation among physicians vs advanced practice providers, higher likelihood among female vs male patients, and lower likelihood of shared decision-making in Black patients compared with White patients. The researchers also found that patient discussion and shared decision-making were associated with higher levels of commercial insurance status and level of triage. The study concluded that a natural language processing tool was developed, validated, and utilized to identify incidences of shared decision making from ED documentation, with the researchers finding multiple possible factors which contribute to variation in shared decision making.
AHRQ-funded; HS025701.
Citation: Chartash D, Sharifi M, Emerson B .
Documentation of shared decisionmaking in the emergency department.
Ann Emerg Med 2021 Nov;78(5):637-49. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.04.038..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Emergency Department, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT)
Shipe ME, Baechle JJ, Deppen SA
Modeling the impact of delaying surgery for early esophageal cancer in the era of COVID-19.
Surgical society guidelines have recommended changing the treatment strategy for early esophageal cancer during the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Delaying resection can allow for interim disease progression, but the impact of this delay on mortality is unknown. The COVID-19 infection rate at which immediate operative risk exceeds benefit is unknown. In this study, the investigators sought to model immediate versus delayed surgical resection in a T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma.
AHRQ-funded; HS026122.
Citation: Shipe ME, Baechle JJ, Deppen SA .
Modeling the impact of delaying surgery for early esophageal cancer in the era of COVID-19.
Surg Endosc 2021 Nov;35(11):6081-88. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08101-6..
Keywords: COVID-19, Cancer, Surgery, Shared Decision Making, Risk
Baughman KR, Ludwick R, Jarjoura D
Multi-site study of provider self-efficacy and beliefs in explaining judgments about need and responsibility for advance care planning.
This study’s objective was to examine the impact of advance care planning (ACP) self-efficacy and beliefs in explaining skilled nursing facility (SNF) provider judgements about resident need and provider responsibility for initiating ACP conversations. This observational multi-site study anonymously surveyed 348 registered nurses, LPNs, and social workers within 29 SNFs. Providers who had more negative beliefs about ACP were less likely to judge residents in need of ACP and less likely to feel responsible for ensuring that ACP occurred. Providers with higher self-efficacy for ACP were more likely to feel responsible for ensuring ACP conversations.
AHRQ-funded; HS022162.
Citation: Baughman KR, Ludwick R, Jarjoura D .
Multi-site study of provider self-efficacy and beliefs in explaining judgments about need and responsibility for advance care planning.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2021 Nov;38(11):1276-81. doi: 10.1177/1049909120979977..
Keywords: Care Management, Shared Decision Making
Reese TJ, Del Fiol G, Morgan K
A shared decision-making tool for drug interactions between warfarin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: design and usability study.
Exposure to life-threatening drug-drug interactions (DDIs) occurs despite the widespread use of clinical decision support. The DDI between warfarin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is common and potentially life-threatening. Patients can play a substantial role in preventing harm from DDIs; however, the current model for DDI decision-making is clinician centric. This study aimed to design and examine the usability of DDInteract, a tool to support shared decision-making (SDM) between a patient and provider for the DDI between warfarin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
AHRQ-funded; HS026198.
Citation: Reese TJ, Del Fiol G, Morgan K .
A shared decision-making tool for drug interactions between warfarin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: design and usability study.
JMIR Hum Factors 2021 Oct 26;8(4):e28618. doi: 10.2196/28618..
Keywords: Blood Thinners, Medication: Safety, Medication, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events, Patient Safety
Thomson MC, Allen LA, Halpern SD
Framing benefits in decision aids: effects of varying contextualizing statements on decisions about sacubitril-valsartan for heart failure.
The purpose of this study was to further understand benefit framing by testing the impact of a variety of contextualizing statements within a decision aid for the heart failure medication sacubitril-valsartan. Study participants received one of six versions of a decision aid for sacubitril-valsartan. The only factor that differed between the versions was a contextualizing statement. The participants were surveyed regarding their likelihood of taking sacubitril-valsartan at a cost of $50 per month and their perception of the benefit of the drug. The study found that 54% of the 1,873 participants were willing to take the medication at the cost of $50 per month. The researchers compared each of the 5 contextualizing statements with the baseline version; there were no significant differences in the participants’ reported likelihood of taking the medication. Higher income level, higher self-reported health status, and younger age were related with greater likelihood of taking sacubitril-valsartan. The researchers concluded that decision making was not affected by contextualizing statements tested within the decision aid.
AHRQ-funded; HS026081.
Citation: Thomson MC, Allen LA, Halpern SD .
Framing benefits in decision aids: effects of varying contextualizing statements on decisions about sacubitril-valsartan for heart failure.
MDM Policy Pract 2021 Jul-Dec;6(2):23814683211041623. doi: 10.1177/23814683211041623..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Heart Disease and Health, Cardiovascular Conditions
Samal L, Fu HN, Camara DS
AHRQ Author: Camara DS, Wang J, Bierman AS
Health information technology to improve care for people with multiple chronic conditions.
The objective of this study was to review evidence regarding the use of Health Information Technology (health IT) interventions aimed at improving care for people living with multiple chronic conditions (PLWMCC) in order to identify critical knowledge gaps. The investigators concluded that the body of literature included in this review provides critical information on the state of the science as well as the many gaps that need to be filled for digital health to fulfill its promise in supporting care delivery that meets the needs of PLWMCC.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; HS026849; 290201600001B.
Citation: Samal L, Fu HN, Camara DS .
Health information technology to improve care for people with multiple chronic conditions.
Health Serv Res 2021 Oct;56(Suppl 1):1006-36. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13860..
Keywords: Chronic Conditions, Health Information Technology (HIT), Evidence-Based Practice, Shared Decision Making, Healthcare Delivery
Dutta S, McEvoy DS, Stump T
Clinical decision support reduces unnecessary tetanus vaccinations in the emergency department.
The authors implemented a clinical decision support alert in the electronic health record that warned providers when ordering a tetanus vaccine if a prior one had been given within 10 years and studied its efficacy to reduce potentially unnecessary vaccines in the ED. They found that a clinical decision support alert that warns ED clinicians that a patient may have an up-to-date tetanus vaccination status reduced potentially unnecessary vaccinations.
AHRQ-funded; HS027170.
Citation: Dutta S, McEvoy DS, Stump T .
Clinical decision support reduces unnecessary tetanus vaccinations in the emergency department.
Ann Emerg Med 2021 Sep;78(3):370-80. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.02.021..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Vaccination, Health Information Technology (HIT)
De Roo AC, Vitous CA, Rivard SJ
High-risk surgery among older adults: not-quite shared decision-making.
This study explored surgeons’ approaches to decision-making for surgery among adults ≥65 years at high-risk of postoperative complications or death. The authors conducted semistructured in-depth interviews with 46 practicing surgeons across Michigan. They found that although shared decision-making is strongly recommended, surgeons who perform high-risk operations among older adults predominantly focused on assessing risk and setting expectations with patients and families rather than inviting them to actively participate in the decision-making process. Surgeons were also influenced by quality metrics, referrals, and personal experiences.
AHRQ-funded; HS026772; HS000053.
Citation: De Roo AC, Vitous CA, Rivard SJ .
High-risk surgery among older adults: not-quite shared decision-making.
Surgery 2021 Sep;170(3):756-63. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.02.005..
Keywords: Elderly, Surgery, Shared Decision Making, Patient and Family Engagement
Sella T, Poorvu PD, Ruddy KJ
Impact of fertility concerns on endocrine therapy decisions in young breast cancer survivors.
The diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer can have profound effects on a young woman's family planning and fertility, particularly among women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. In this paper the authors discuss the Young Women's Breast Cancer Study, a multicenter cohort of women aged 40 years or younger and newly diagnosed with breast cancer from 2006 to 2016. The investigators concluded that concern about fertility was a contributor to adjuvant ET decisions among a substantial proportion of young breast cancer survivors.
AHRQ-funded; HS023680.
Citation: Sella T, Poorvu PD, Ruddy KJ .
Impact of fertility concerns on endocrine therapy decisions in young breast cancer survivors.
Cancer 2021 Aug 15;127(16):2888-94. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33596..
Keywords: Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Women, Pregnancy, Shared Decision Making
Dorr DA, D'Autremont C, Pizzimenti C
Assessing data adequacy for high blood pressure clinical decision support: a quantitative analysis.
This study examined guideline-based high blood pressure (HBP) and hypertension recommendations and evaluated the suitability and adequacy of the data and logic required for a Fast Healthcare Interoperable Resources-based, patient-facing clinical decision support HBP application. Findings showed that data quality from the electronic health record required to implement recommendations for HBP was highly inconsistent, reflecting a fragmented health care system and incomplete implementation of standard terminologies and workflows. Although imperfect, data were deemed adequate for two test use cases.
AHRQ-funded; HS026849.
Citation: Dorr DA, D'Autremont C, Pizzimenti C .
Assessing data adequacy for high blood pressure clinical decision support: a quantitative analysis.
Appl Clin Inform 2021 Aug;12(4):710-20. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1732401..
Keywords: Blood Pressure, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Health Information Technology (HIT)
Marin JR, Rodean J, Mannix RC
Association of clinical guidelines and decision support with CT use in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury.
The objective of this study was to examine whether the presence of clinical guidelines and clinical decision support (CDS) for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) were associated with lower head computed tomography (CT) use. The investigators concluded that clinical guidelines for mTBI, and particularly CDS, were associated with lower rates of head CT use without adverse clinical outcomes.
AHRQ-funded; HS026006.
Citation: Marin JR, Rodean J, Mannix RC .
Association of clinical guidelines and decision support with CT use in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury.
J Pediatr 2021 Aug;235:178-83.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.04.026..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Health Information Technology (HIT), Brain Injury, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Imaging
Djulbegovic B, Hozo I, Li SA
Certainty of evidence and intervention's benefits and harms are key determinants of guidelines' recommendations.
This study’s goal was to identify the key determinants of clinical guideline development. This study used a web-based survey of 12 panels of 153 “voting” members who issued 2941 recommendations and a qualitative analysis of 13 panels of 311 attendees. When intervention’s benefits outweigh harms compared with no recommendations: the probability of issuing strong recommendations in favor of intervention was 0.22 when certainty of evidence (CoE) was very low; 0.5 when low; 0.74 when moderate, and 0.85 when high. No other factor significantly affected recommendations. Panelists spent over 50% of their time debating CoE with the chairs and co-chairs dominating discussion.
AHRQ-funded; HS024917.
Citation: Djulbegovic B, Hozo I, Li SA .
Certainty of evidence and intervention's benefits and harms are key determinants of guidelines' recommendations.
J Clin Epidemiol 2021 Aug;136:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.025..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Research Methodologies, Shared Decision Making
Krein SL, Harrod M, Weston LE
Comparing peripherally inserted central catheter-related practices across hospitals with different insertion models: a multisite qualitative study.
Researchers compared peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs)-related processes across hospitals with different insertion delivery models. They concluded that vascular access nurses play critical roles in all aspects of PICC-related care. Further, there is variation in PICC decision-making, care and maintenance, and patient education across hospitals.
AHRQ-funded; HS025891.
Citation: Krein SL, Harrod M, Weston LE .
Comparing peripherally inserted central catheter-related practices across hospitals with different insertion models: a multisite qualitative study.
BMJ Qual Saf 2021 Aug;30(8):628-38. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011987..
Keywords: Inpatient Care, Shared Decision Making, Patient Safety, Hospitals
Schulz GL, Patterson Kelly K, Armer J
Uncovering family treatment decision-making processes: the value and application of case study methods to family research.
Research on how and why family processes influence phenomena is essential to advancing many areas of science. Case study methods offer an approach that overcomes some of the sampling and analysis obstacles researchers face when studying families. This article aimed to illustrate the benefits of case study methods for studying complex family processes using an example from treatment decision-making in sickle cell disease.
Citation: Schulz GL, Patterson Kelly K, Armer J .
Uncovering family treatment decision-making processes: the value and application of case study methods to family research.
J Fam Nurs 2021 Aug;27(3):191-98. doi: 10.1177/1074840720987223..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Research Methodologies
Shi Y, Amill-Rosario A, Rudin RS
Barriers to using clinical decision support in ambulatory care: do clinics in health systems fare better?
In this study, the investigators quantified the use of clinical decision support (CDS) and the specific barriers reported by ambulatory clinics and examined whether CDS utilization and barriers differed based on clinics' affiliation with health systems, providing a benchmark for future empirical research and policies related to this topic.
AHRQ-funded; HS024067.
Citation: Shi Y, Amill-Rosario A, Rudin RS .
Barriers to using clinical decision support in ambulatory care: do clinics in health systems fare better?
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021 Jul 30;28(8):1667-75. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab064..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Ambulatory Care and Surgery, Health Information Technology (HIT), Health Systems
Murad MH, Chang SM, Fiordalisi CV
AHRQ Author: Chang SM
Improving the utility of evidence synthesis for decision makers in the face of insufficient evidence.
The authors identified and suggested strategies to make insufficient evidence ratings in systematic reviews more actionable. A workgroup comprising members from AHRQ’s Evidence-Based Practice Program convened throughout 2020. They identified five strategies for supplementing systematic review findings when evidence on benefits or harms is expected to be, or found to be, insufficient: 1) reconsider eligible study designs, 2) summarize indirect evidence, 3) summarize contextual and implementation evidence, 4) consider modelling, and 5) incorporate unpublished health system data in the evidence synthesis. While these strategies may not increase the strength of evidence, they may improve the utility of reports for decision makers.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201700003C; 290201500013I; 290201500008I; 290201500007I; 290201500011I; 290201500010I; 290201500002I; 290201500005I; 290201500012I; 290201500006I.
Citation: Murad MH, Chang SM, Fiordalisi CV .
Improving the utility of evidence synthesis for decision makers in the face of insufficient evidence.
J Clin Epidemiol 2021 Jul;135:170-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.028..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Shared Decision Making, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research