National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Adverse Events (2)
- Arthritis (3)
- Behavioral Health (1)
- Cancer (5)
- Cancer: Breast Cancer (2)
- Cancer: Prostate Cancer (2)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (1)
- Care Coordination (2)
- Caregiving (6)
- Children/Adolescents (8)
- Chronic Conditions (5)
- (-) Clinician-Patient Communication (70)
- Communication (33)
- Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) (2)
- Critical Care (2)
- Cultural Competence (1)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (2)
- Digestive Disease and Health (1)
- Education: Continuing Medical Education (1)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (4)
- Elderly (1)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (7)
- Emergency Department (5)
- Evidence-Based Practice (4)
- Eye Disease and Health (1)
- Family Health and History (1)
- Genetics (1)
- Healthcare Costs (1)
- Healthcare Delivery (2)
- Healthcare Utilization (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (11)
- Health Literacy (7)
- Hospital Discharge (1)
- Hospitalization (1)
- Hospitals (3)
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) (2)
- Inpatient Care (5)
- Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (1)
- Lifestyle Changes (2)
- Medical Errors (2)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) (1)
- Medication (2)
- Neurological Disorders (1)
- Newborns/Infants (2)
- Nursing Homes (1)
- Nutrition (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (15)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (4)
- Patient Adherence/Compliance (1)
- (-) Patient and Family Engagement (70)
- Patient Experience (14)
- Patient Safety (4)
- Patient Self-Management (3)
- Primary Care (2)
- Provider (1)
- Provider: Clinician (1)
- Provider: Nurse (1)
- Provider: Physician (2)
- Provider Performance (1)
- Quality Improvement (2)
- Quality Measures (1)
- Quality of Care (6)
- Shared Decision Making (29)
- Social Media (1)
- Substance Abuse (1)
- Surgery (1)
- Telehealth (1)
- Tools & Toolkits (1)
- Training (2)
- Web-Based (2)
- Women (2)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 25 of 70 Research Studies DisplayedLiu SK, Bourgeois F, Dong J
What's going well: a qualitative analysis of positive patient and family feedback in the context of the diagnostic process.
This paper evaluated positive patient/family feedback to generate broader perspectives on what constitutes a "good" diagnostic process (DxP). Eligible participants included patients/families living with chronic conditions with visits in three urban pediatric subspecialty clinics (site 1) and one rural adult primary care clinic (site 2) who were then invited to complete a survey between December 2020 and March 2020. The authors adapted the Healthcare Complaints Analysis Tool (HCAT) to conduct a qualitative analysis on a subset of patient/family responses with ≥20 words. A total of 7,075 surveys were completed before 18,129 visits (39 %) at site 1, and 460 surveys were completed prior to 706 (65 %) visits at site 2. Positive feedback was provided by 1,578 participants, ranging from 1-79 words. Categories of 272 comments with ≥20 words described: Relationships (60 %), Clinical Care (36 %), and Environment (4 %). In the Relationships category patients/families most commonly noted: thorough and competent attention (46 %), clear communication and listening (41 %) and emotional support and human connection (39 %). For Clinical Care, patients highlighted: timeliness (31 %), effective clinical management (30 %), and coordination of care (25 %).
AHRQ-funded; HS027367.
Citation: Liu SK, Bourgeois F, Dong J .
What's going well: a qualitative analysis of positive patient and family feedback in the context of the diagnostic process.
Diagnosis 2024 Feb 1; 11(1):63-72. doi: 10.1515/dx-2023-0075.
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Patient and Family Engagement
Sprackling CM, Kieren MQ, Nacht CL
Adolescent access to clinicians' notes: adolescent, parent, and clinician perspectives.
This study’s goal was to identify adolescent, parent, and clinician perspectives on the anticipated benefits and concerns of giving adolescents access to clinicians’ notes and strategies in response to a 2021 federal mandate. The authors conducted six focus groups with adolescents, parents, and clinicians at a children's hospital from May to October 2021. A semistructured facilitator guide captured patient perspectives of the benefits, concerns, and strategies. A total of 38 stakeholders (17 adolescents, 10 parents, and 11 clinicians) described four benefits, three concerns, and four implementation strategies regarding adolescent note-sharing. Potential benefits captured in the focus groups included adolescents using notes to remember and reinforce the visit, gaining knowledge about their health, strengthening the adolescent-clinician relationship, and increasing agency in health care decisions. Concerns the guide captured included notes leading to a breach in confidentiality, causing negative emotions, and becoming less useful for clinicians. Strategies to address these concerns included making note-sharing more secure, optimizing note layout and content, setting clear expectations, and having a portion of the note for clinician use only.
AHRQ-funded; HS027214; HS027894.
Citation: Sprackling CM, Kieren MQ, Nacht CL .
Adolescent access to clinicians' notes: adolescent, parent, and clinician perspectives.
J Adolesc Health 2024 Jan; 74(1):155-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.08.008..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Clinician-Patient Communication, Patient and Family Engagement
Buchanan CL, Morris MA, Matlock D
Parental experience and understanding of parent-provider discussions of treatment for infants with ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
The objective of this study was to understand what families perceive as necessary information to guide decisionmaking in the treatment of children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). The authors conducted semi-structured interviews with parents of children with UPJO. Their findings were organized into three major themes: barriers to meaningful participation in decisionmaking, logistical aspects, and psychosocial aspects. They concluded that these results highlighted the importance of caregivers needing clear and accurate information to engage in meaningful discussions related to surgical decisionmaking regarding UPJO treatment. They recommended patient education and enhanced psychosocial support for more meaningful parental engagement in the surgical decisionmaking process.
AHRQ-funded; HS024597.
Citation: Buchanan CL, Morris MA, Matlock D .
Parental experience and understanding of parent-provider discussions of treatment for infants with ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
PEC Innov 2023 Dec; 2:100142. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100142..
Keywords: Newborns/Infants, Patient Experience, Shared Decision Making, Patient and Family Engagement, Clinician-Patient Communication
Schuttner L, Hockett Sherlock S, Simons CE
My goals are not their goals: barriers and facilitators to delivery of patient-centered care for patients with multimorbidity.
This study’s goal was to clarify facilitators and barriers perceived by primary care physicians in the Veterans Health Administration to delivering patient-centered care for high-risk or complex patients with multimorbidity. The authors conducted semi-structured telephone interviews from April to July 2020 with 23 physicians across 20 clinical sites, with most being female (61%). Facilitators included: effective physician-patient communication to individualize care, prioritize among multiple needs, and elicit goals to improve patient engagement; access to care, enabled by interdisciplinary teams, and dictating personalized care planning; effortful but worthwhile care coordination and continuity; meeting complex needs through effective teamwork; and integrating medical and non-medical care aspects in recognition of patients' psychosocial contexts. Barriers included: intra- and interpersonal (e.g., perceived patient reluctance to engage in care); organizational (e.g., limited encounter time); and community or policy impediments (e.g., state decisional capacity laws) to patient-centered care.
AHRQ-funded; HS026369.
Citation: Schuttner L, Hockett Sherlock S, Simons CE .
My goals are not their goals: barriers and facilitators to delivery of patient-centered care for patients with multimorbidity.
J Gen Intern Med 2022 Dec;37(16):4189-96. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07533-1..
Keywords: Patient-Centered Healthcare, Healthcare Delivery, Chronic Conditions, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Patient and Family Engagement
Rosenberg SM, Gierisch JM, Revette AC
"Is it cancer or not?" A qualitative exploration of survivor concerns surrounding the diagnosis and treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ.
This study investigated the impact of a ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosis by engaging self-identified patients regarding their experience. Findings showed that, in a large, national sample, participants with a history of DCIS reported confusion and concern about the diagnosis and treatment, which caused worry and significant uncertainty.
AHRQ-funded; HS023680.
Citation: Rosenberg SM, Gierisch JM, Revette AC .
"Is it cancer or not?" A qualitative exploration of survivor concerns surrounding the diagnosis and treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Cancer 2022 Apr 15;128(8):1676-83. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34126..
Keywords: Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Shared Decision Making, Women, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Clinician-Patient Communication, Patient and Family Engagement, Communication
Boltey EM, Wright N, Mosley EA
Exploring the process of information sharing in an adult intensive care unit: an ethnographic study.
The purpose of this study was to examine how the process of information sharing takes place in the ICU from the perspectives of the professional team and family members. The researchers conducted ethnographic fieldwork focusing on behaviors and interactions of the interprofessional team and family members. Fieldwork of 17.5 observation hours, 6 shadowing sessions, and 12 semi-structured interviews with 17 total participants took place in a 20-bed medical ICU from May 2016 - October 2016. Three themes about the information sharing process were identified: 1) family factors influence information sharing; 2) clinician strategies can support engagement in the process of information sharing; and 3) the process of information sharing allows for trust building between ICU team and families. The researchers concluded that information sharing is a critical process that may act as a stimulus for effective ICU engagement with the patient and family.
AHRQ-funded; HS024552.
Citation: Boltey EM, Wright N, Mosley EA .
Exploring the process of information sharing in an adult intensive care unit: an ethnographic study.
J Interprof Care 2022 Mar-Apr;36(2):168-76. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2021.1899147..
Keywords: Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Clinician-Patient Communication, Patient and Family Engagement, Communication, Critical Care
Hershberger PJ, Pei Y, Bricker DA
Advancing motivational interviewing training with artificial intelligence: ReadMI.
The research team developed and tested a training tool, Real-time Assessment of Dialogue in Motivational Interviewing (ReadMI), that uses natural language processing to provide immediate motivational interviewing (MI) metrics and thereby address the need for more effective MI training. They found that the more time a physician spent talking, the less likely the physician was engaging in MI-consistent interview behaviors, including open-ended questions, reflective statements, or use of a change ruler. They concluded that ReadMI produced specific metrics that a trainer can share with a student, resident, or clinician for immediate feedback.
AHRQ-funded; HS026548.
Citation: Hershberger PJ, Pei Y, Bricker DA .
Advancing motivational interviewing training with artificial intelligence: ReadMI.
Adv Med Educ Pract 2021 Jun 4;12:613-18. doi: 10.2147/amep.S312373..
Keywords: Lifestyle Changes, Clinician-Patient Communication, Patient and Family Engagement
Aronson PL, Politi MC, Schaeffer P
Development of an app to facilitate communication and shared decision-making with parents of febrile infants ≤ 60 days old.
This study’s aim was to develop and test a tool to engage parents of febrile infants 60 days or less of age evaluated in the emergency department (ED). The tool was designed to improve communication between parents and healthcare providers and to support shared decision-making (SDM) about whether to perform a lumbar puncture (LP) for infants 29 to 60 days of age. The authors conducted a multi-phase development and testing process including individual, semi-structured interviews with parents and clinicians; design of a “storyboard” of the tool with design impression testing; development of a software application prototype called e-Care; and usability testing of e-Care using qualitative assessment and the System Usability Scale (SUS). The authors interviewed 27 parents and 23 clinicians. After the interviews, they developed separate versions of e-Care for infants aged 28 days or less and 29 to 60 days of age in both English and Spanish. e-Care is divided into 4 sections: 1) homepage; 2) why testing is done; 3) what tests are done; and 4) what happens after testing. The mean SUS score given by parents and clinicians was 90.3 representing “excellent” usability.
AHRQ-funded; HS026006.
Citation: Aronson PL, Politi MC, Schaeffer P .
Development of an app to facilitate communication and shared decision-making with parents of febrile infants ≤ 60 days old.
Acad Emerg Med 2021 Jan;28(1):46-59. doi: 10.1111/acem.14082..
Keywords: Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Newborns/Infants, Caregiving, Shared Decision Making, Patient and Family Engagement, Emergency Department, Health Information Technology (HIT)
McAlearney AS, Walker DM, Gaughan A
Helping patients be better patients: a qualitative study of perceptions about inpatient portal use.
This qualitative study looked at perceptions about inpatient portal use and its impact on patient experience and the care process. The authors interviewed 120 patients and 433 care team members across a seven-hospital academic medical center that offers an inpatient portal to hospitalized patients. Care team members felt the inpatient portal helped patients be “better patients” by improving their ability to be informed about their health and enabling them to be more involved in the care process. The care team members suggested portal use could be improved by addressing challenges with tablet administration, use of the patient education feature, and the functionality of the scheduling feature.
AHRQ-funded; HS024379; HS024091.
Citation: McAlearney AS, Walker DM, Gaughan A .
Helping patients be better patients: a qualitative study of perceptions about inpatient portal use.
Telemed J E Health 2020 Sep;26(9):1184-87. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0198..
Keywords: Telehealth, Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient and Family Engagement, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Inpatient Care, Hospitals
Greenhawt M
Shared decision-making in the care of a patient with food allergy.
The purpose of this study was to determine the value of shared decision-making in the care of patients with food allergy. Data was compiled via a narrative review of the shared decision-making and food allergy outcomes literature for the past 20 years. Findings showed that shared decision-making was an approach that could greatly enhance food allergy care and improve patient-reported outcomes.
AHRQ-funded; HS024599.
Citation: Greenhawt M .
Shared decision-making in the care of a patient with food allergy.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2020 Sep;125(3):262-67. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.05.031..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Clinician-Patient Communication, Patient and Family Engagement
Brady PW, Giambra BK, Sherman SN
The parent role in advocating for a deteriorating child: a qualitative study.
The objective of this study was to develop a comprehensive understanding of how families identify and communicate their child's deteriorating health with the hospital-based health care team. Following an analysis involving six themes, findings showed that families of children with medical complexity employed mature, experience-based pathways to identify deteriorating health. The investigators concluded that existing communication structures in the hospital are poorly equipped to incorporate families' expertise.
AHRQ-funded; HS023827.
Citation: Brady PW, Giambra BK, Sherman SN .
The parent role in advocating for a deteriorating child: a qualitative study.
Hosp Pediatr 2020 Sep;10(9):728-42. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-0065..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Patient and Family Engagement, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication
Liu LH, Garrett SB, Li J
Patient and clinician perspectives on a patient-facing dashboard that visualizes patient reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis.
The authors’ goal was to develop a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) 'dashboard' that could facilitate conversations about patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and that would be acceptable to a wide range of patients, including English and Spanish speakers and patients with adequate or limited health literacy. Using focus groups and principles of human-centered design, they created an RA dashboard that was well-accepted among patients and clinicians. They indicated that the ability to customize the data display was important for tailoring the dashboard to patients with diverse needs and preferences, with special attention to be given to feasibility concerns voiced by clinicians.
AHRQ-funded; HS025405.
Citation: Liu LH, Garrett SB, Li J .
Patient and clinician perspectives on a patient-facing dashboard that visualizes patient reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis.
Health Expect 2020 Aug;23(4):846-59. doi: 10.1111/hex.13057..
Keywords: Arthritis, Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient and Family Engagement, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Health Literacy
Lyles CR, Nelson EC, Frampton S
Using electronic health record portals to improve patient engagement: research priorities and best practices.
This literature review identified 53 studies published from September 2013 to June 2019 that informed best practices and priorities for future research on patient engagement with electronic health record (EHR) data through patient portals. While 90% of health care systems now offer patient portals, only 15-30% of patients use them to access their physicians or health care systems. Studies reviewed mostly involved outpatient settings and fell into 3 major categories: interventions to increase use of patient portals, usability testing of portal interfaces, and documentation of patient and clinician barriers to portal use. Limited health or digital literacy impacted patients’ use of portals. Clinicians reported a lack of workflows to support patient engagement through portals.
AHRQ-funded; HS023558.
Citation: Lyles CR, Nelson EC, Frampton S .
Using electronic health record portals to improve patient engagement: research priorities and best practices.
Ann Intern Med 2020 Jun 2;172(11 Suppl):S123-s29. doi: 10.7326/m19-0876..
Keywords: Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient and Family Engagement, Evidence-Based Practice, Health Literacy, Clinician-Patient Communication
Clarke MA, Fruhling AL, Sitorius M
Impact of age on patients' communication and technology preferences in the era of meaningful use: mixed methods study.
Impact of age on patients' communication and technology preferences in the era of meaningful use: mixed methods study.
AHRQ-funded; HS022110.
Citation: Clarke MA, Fruhling AL, Sitorius M .
Impact of age on patients' communication and technology preferences in the era of meaningful use: mixed methods study.
J Med Internet Res 2020 Jun;22(6):e13470. doi: 10.2196/13470..
Keywords: Elderly, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Patient and Family Engagement, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT)
Fisher KA, Gallagher TH, Smith KM
Communicating with patients about breakdowns in care: a national randomised vignette-based survey.
This study examined the impact of an apology when problems occur in patient care breakdowns occur at hospitals. Breakdowns included slow response to call bell, rude aide, and unanswered questions. A national online survey of 1188 adults aged 35 years or older were sampled from an online panel representative of the entire US population, created and maintained by GfK. Twice as many participants receiving an in-depth prompt about care breakdowns would recommend the hospital compared with those receiving no prompt (18.4% vs 8.8%). Almost three times as many participants who received a full apology would probably/definitely recommend the hospital compared with those receiving no apology (34.1% vs 13.6%). The survey also asked whether the respondent would speak up, with feeling upset being a strong determinant of greater intent to speak up.
AHRQ-funded; HS024596; HS022757.
Citation: Fisher KA, Gallagher TH, Smith KM .
Communicating with patients about breakdowns in care: a national randomised vignette-based survey.
BMJ Qual Saf 2020 Apr;29(4):313-19. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009712..
Keywords: Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Patient Experience, Patient and Family Engagement, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Hospitals
Feng JY, Toomey SL, Elliott MN
Factors associated with family experience in pediatric inpatient care.
Researchers assessed which aspects of pediatric inpatient experience have the strongest relationships with parents' willingness to recommend a hospital. Their cross-sectional study examined surveys completed by parents of children hospitalized at hospitals using the Child Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Survey. They found that child comfort and nurse-parent communication showed the strongest relationships with willingness to recommend, followed by preparing to leave the hospital, doctor-parent communication, and keeping parents informed. They recommended improvement efforts focusing on creating an age-appropriate environment, improving the effectiveness of provider interactions, and engaging parents to share their values and concerns.
AHRQ-funded; HS020513; HS025299.
Citation: Feng JY, Toomey SL, Elliott MN .
Factors associated with family experience in pediatric inpatient care.
Pediatrics 2020 Mar;145(3): e20191264. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-1264..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Children/Adolescents, Quality Measures, Quality of Care, Inpatient Care, Patient Experience, Hospitals, Hospitalization, Patient and Family Engagement, Clinician-Patient Communication
Salzman DH, Rising KL, Cameron KA
Setting a minimum passing standard for the uncertainty communication checklist through patient and physician engagement.
Historically, medically trained experts have served as judges to establish a minimum passing standard (MPS) for mastery learning. As mastery learning expands from procedure-based skills to patient-centered domains, such as communication, there is an opportunity to incorporate patients as judges in setting the MPS. In this study, the investigators described their process of incorporating patients as judges to set the minimum passing standard (MPS) and compared the MPS set by patients and emergency medicine residency program directors (PDs).
AHRQ-funded; HS025651.
Citation: Salzman DH, Rising KL, Cameron KA .
Setting a minimum passing standard for the uncertainty communication checklist through patient and physician engagement.
J Grad Med Educ 2020 Feb;12(1):58-65. doi: 10.4300/jgme-d-19-00483.1..
Keywords: Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient Safety, Education: Continuing Medical Education, Training, Provider Performance
Schoenfeld EM, Probst MA, Quigley
Does shared decision making actually occur in the emergency department? Looking at it from the patients' perspective.
In this study the investigators sought to assess the frequency, content, and quality of shared decision making (SDM) in the emergency department (ED), from patients' perspectives. The investigators found that fewer than half of ED patients surveyed reported they were involved in SDM. The most common decision for which SDM was used was around ED disposition (admission vs. discharge). When SDM was employed, patients generally rated the discussion highly.
AHRQ-funded; HS025701.
Citation: Schoenfeld EM, Probst MA, Quigley .
Does shared decision making actually occur in the emergency department? Looking at it from the patients' perspective.
Acad Emerg Med 2019 Dec;26(12):1369-78. doi: 10.1111/acem.13850..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Emergency Department, Clinician-Patient Communication, Patient and Family Engagement
Gaufberg E, Olmsted MW, Bell SK
Third things as inspiration and artifact: a multi-stakeholder qualitative approach to understand patient and family emotions after harmful events.
The authors discuss an AHRQ conference held to establish a research agenda on patient and family emotional harm after medical errors. Topics include implications for quality and safety, educational innovation, and qualitative research.
AHRQ-funded; HS024463.
Citation: Gaufberg E, Olmsted MW, Bell SK .
Third things as inspiration and artifact: a multi-stakeholder qualitative approach to understand patient and family emotions after harmful events.
J Med Humanit 2019 Dec;40(4):489-504. doi: 10.1007/s10912-019-09563-z..
Keywords: Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient Safety
Anderson AC, Akre E, Chen J
Exploring national trends of patient- and family-centered care among US children.
This study examined national trends in the receipt of high-quality patient-physician communication and patient empowerment through behavioral health counseling among children in the United States. They used Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data from 2010 to 2014. Two measures of patient- and family-centered care (PFCC) were analyzed: 1) a composite measure of high-quality patient-physician communication, and 2) patient empowerment through behavioral health counseling about healthy eating and exercise. There were high rates of receiving high-quality physician-patient communication (92-93%) as opposed to behavioral counseling about healthy eating (53-60%) and exercise (37-42%). There was a higher rate of high-quality physician-patient communication in 2014 than in 2010, but there was not a similar increase in receiving behavioral health counseling. Lower odds of receiving behavioral health counseling were found for parents with low income and low educational attainment as well as lack of insurance.
AHRQ-funded; HS022135.
Citation: Anderson AC, Akre E, Chen J .
Exploring national trends of patient- and family-centered care among US children.
J Child Health Care 2019 Jun;23(2):200-12. doi: 10.1177/1367493518786015..
Keywords: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), Children/Adolescents, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Family Health and History, Lifestyle Changes
Choe AY, Unaka NI, Schondelmeyer AC
Inpatient communication barriers and drivers when caring for limited english proficiency children.
The authors identified barriers to and drivers of effective interpreter service use when caring for hospitalized limited English proficiency (LEP) children from the perspectives of pediatric medical providers and interpreters. Using Group Level Assessment, they found that participants identified unique barriers and drivers that impact communication with LEP patients and their families during hospitalization. They suggested that future directions include exploring the perspective of LEP families and utilizing team-based and family-centered communication strategies to standardize and improve communication practices.
AHRQ-funded; HS025138.
Citation: Choe AY, Unaka NI, Schondelmeyer AC .
Inpatient communication barriers and drivers when caring for limited english proficiency children.
J Hosp Med 2019 Oct;14(10):607-13. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3240..
Keywords: Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Cultural Competence, Children/Adolescents, Inpatient Care, Patient and Family Engagement, Caregiving
Gressler LE, Natafgi NM, DeForge BR
What motivates people with substance use disorders to pursue treatment? A patient-centered approach to understanding patient experiences and patient-provider interactions.
The purpose of this study was to identify and define potential positive and negative factors in patient experiences and patient-provider interactions that are associated with the pursuit and maintenance of treatment by those suffering from substance use disorders (SUD). The investigators conducted two focus groups with patients in treatment for SUD and four in-depth interviews with healthcare providers involved in the treatment of patients with SUD.
AHRQ-funded; HS022135.
Citation: Gressler LE, Natafgi NM, DeForge BR .
What motivates people with substance use disorders to pursue treatment? A patient-centered approach to understanding patient experiences and patient-provider interactions.
J Subst Use 2019;24(6):587-99. doi: 10.1080/14659891.2019.1620891..
Keywords: Clinician-Patient Communication, Shared Decision Making, Healthcare Utilization, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient Experience, Patient and Family Engagement, Substance Abuse
Johnston FM, Beckman M
Navigating difficult conversations.
In this paper, the authors discussed breaking bad news and navigating difficult conversations in surgical oncology practice. They note that mounting evidence supports a patient-centered communication approach and models of shared decisionmaking. Physician training in patient-centered cancer communication also continues to evolve.
AHRQ-funded; HS024736.
Citation: Johnston FM, Beckman M .
Navigating difficult conversations.
J Surg Oncol 2019 Jul;120(1):23-29. doi: 10.1002/jso.25472..
Keywords: Cancer, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Shared Decision Making, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient and Family Engagement, Provider: Physician, Surgery
Hall TL, Knierim KE, Nease DE
Primary care practices' implementation of patient-team partnership: findings from EvidenceNOW Southwest.
The authors reported on practice characteristics associated with greater patient-team partnership scores. Using EvidenceNOW Southwest data, they found that practices can improve efforts to partner with patients to assess social needs, gather meaningful input on practice improvement and patient experience, and offer resource connections. These findings supplement recent evidence that patient registries and evidence-based guidelines may effectively prevent and manage cardiovascular disease.
AHRQ-funded; HS023904.
Citation: Hall TL, Knierim KE, Nease DE .
Primary care practices' implementation of patient-team partnership: findings from EvidenceNOW Southwest.
J Am Board Fam Med 2019 Jul-Aug;32(4):490-504. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180361..
Keywords: Cardiovascular Conditions, Clinician-Patient Communication, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Patient and Family Engagement, Primary Care, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement
Pavlo AJ, O'Connell M, Olsen S
Missing ingredients in shared decision-making?
This article discusses the practice of shared decision making (SDM) for clinicians when making decisions in health care. This widespread practice is considered the best approach for person-centered care, but for individuals diagnosed with serious mental illness there are still many barriers to effective collaboration. The authors suggest that more emphasis needs to be placed on the doctor-patient relationship itself conducting SDM.
AHRQ-funded; HS023000.
Citation: Pavlo AJ, O'Connell M, Olsen S .
Missing ingredients in shared decision-making?
Psychiatr Q 2019 Jun;90(2):333-38. doi: 10.1007/s11126-019-9624-9..
Keywords: Chronic Conditions, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Shared Decision Making, Behavioral Health, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Patient and Family Engagement