National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 5 of 5 Research Studies DisplayedGreenberg JK, Otun A, Kyaw PT
Usability and acceptability of clinical decision support based on the KIIDS-TBI tool for children with mild traumatic brain injuries and intracranial injuries.
The Kids Intracranial Injury Decision Support tool for Traumatic Brain Injury (KIIDS-TBI) is a validated risk prediction model designed to manage children with mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBI) and intracranial injuries. Implementing electronic clinical decision support (CDS) may help integrate this evidence-based guidance into clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to assess the acceptability and usability of an electronic CDS tool for managing children with mTBI and intracranial injuries. Emergency medicine and neurosurgery physicians (10 each) from 10 hospitals in the United States participated in usability testing of a novel CDS prototype within a simulated electronic health record environment. The testing involved a think-aloud protocol, an acceptability and usability survey, and a semi-structured interview. The prototype underwent two updates during testing based on user feedback. Usability issues identified in the videos were categorized using content analysis, while interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. The study found that of the 20 participants, the majority worked at teaching hospitals (80%), freestanding children's hospitals (95%), and level-1 trauma centers (75%). During the two prototype updates, issues with clarity of terminology and navigation within the CDS interface were identified and resolved. As a result, the number of usability problems decreased from 35 in phase 1 to 8 in phase 3, and the number of errors made dropped from 18 in phase 1 to 2 in phase 3. According to the survey, 90% of participants found the tool easy to use, 95% found the tool useful in determining a patient's level of care, 90% found it likely to improve resource utilization, and 79% found it likely to improve patient safety. Interview themes focused on the CDS's capability to support evidence-based decision-making and enhance clinical workflow, as well as suggested implementation strategies and potential challenges.
AHRQ-funded; HS027075.
Citation: Greenberg JK, Otun A, Kyaw PT .
Usability and acceptability of clinical decision support based on the KIIDS-TBI tool for children with mild traumatic brain injuries and intracranial injuries.
Appl Clin Inform 2022 Mar; 13(2):456-67. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1745829..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Brain Injury, Health Information Technology (HIT)
Greenberg JK, Ahluwalia R, Hill M
Development and external validation of the KIIDS-TBI tool for managing children with mild traumatic brain injury and intracranial injuries.
This study's objectives were to develop a new risk model with improved sensitivity compared to the CHIIDA model for the post-neuroimaging management of children with mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBI) and intracranial injuries and further to validate externally the new model and CHIIDA model in a multicenter data set. Findings showed that the KIIDS-TBI model had high sensitivity and moderate specificity for risk stratifying children with mTBI and intracranial injuries. The researchers concluded that the use of their clinical decision support tool may help improve the safe, resource-efficient management of this important patient population.
AHRQ-funded; HS027075.
Citation: Greenberg JK, Ahluwalia R, Hill M .
Development and external validation of the KIIDS-TBI tool for managing children with mild traumatic brain injury and intracranial injuries.
Acad Emerg Med 2021 Dec;28(12):1409-20. doi: 10.1111/acem.14333..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Brain Injury, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Health Information Technology (HIT)
Marin JR, Rodean J, Mannix RC
Association of clinical guidelines and decision support with CT use in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury.
The objective of this study was to examine whether the presence of clinical guidelines and clinical decision support (CDS) for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) were associated with lower head computed tomography (CT) use. The investigators concluded that clinical guidelines for mTBI, and particularly CDS, were associated with lower rates of head CT use without adverse clinical outcomes.
AHRQ-funded; HS026006.
Citation: Marin JR, Rodean J, Mannix RC .
Association of clinical guidelines and decision support with CT use in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury.
J Pediatr 2021 Aug;235:178-83.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.04.026..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Health Information Technology (HIT), Brain Injury, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Imaging
Greenberg JK, Otun A, Nasraddin A
Electronic clinical decision support for children with minor head trauma and intracranial injuries: a sociotechnical analysis.
This paper discusses the development of an evidence-based clinical decision support (CDS) for management of children with minor head trauma (MHT) and evaluates the sociotechnical environment impacting the implementation of electronic CDS, including workflow and communication, institutional culture, and hardware and software infrastructure. Semi-structured qualitative focus group interviews were conducted with 28 physicians and four information technology specialists between March and May 2020. Five primary themes were identified through inductive thematic analysis: 1) clinical impact; 2) stakeholders and users; 3) tool content; 4) clinical practice integration; and 5) post-implementation evaluation measures. Participants generally supported CDS use to determine an appropriate level-of-care. However, some had mixed feelings regarding how the tool could best be used by neurosurgeons versus non-neurosurgeons. Feedback helped refine the tool content and highlighted potential technical and workflow barriers to address prior to implementation.
AHRQ-funded; HS027075.
Citation: Greenberg JK, Otun A, Nasraddin A .
Electronic clinical decision support for children with minor head trauma and intracranial injuries: a sociotechnical analysis.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021 May 19;21(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01522-w.
.
.
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Brain Injury, Health Information Technology (HIT), Evidence-Based Practice, Shared Decision Making
Sharp AL, Huang BZ, Tang T
Implementation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and Its association with use of computed tomography among patients with head injury.
The researchers evaluated the association of implementation of the Canadian CT Head Rule on head computed tomography (CT) imaging in community emergency departments (EDs). They found that a multicomponent implementation of the Canadian CT Head Rule was associated with a modest reduction in CT use and an increased diagnostic yield of head CTs for adult trauma encounters in community EDs.
AHRQ-funded; HS021271.
Citation: Sharp AL, Huang BZ, Tang T .
Implementation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and Its association with use of computed tomography among patients with head injury.
Ann Emerg Med 2018 Jan;71(1):54-63.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.06.022.
.
.
Keywords: Brain Injury, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Emergency Department, Guidelines, Healthcare Utilization, Imaging