National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 4 of 4 Research Studies DisplayedWilbanks J
Design issues in e-consent.
Informed consent has not been implemented as a relationship, but instead as a single-point transaction that must be completed in order to enroll participants. This paper discusses e-consent and notes that it is an opportunity to: truly inform research participants about clinical protocols; provide a meaningful choice architecture to support a potential participant’s decision making about whether or not to enroll; and serve as the beginning of an ongoing ethical relationship with study participants.
AHRQ-funded; HS022789.
Citation: Wilbanks J .
Design issues in e-consent.
J Law Med Ethics 2018 Mar;46(1):110-18. doi: 10.1177/1073110518766025..
Keywords: Decision Making, Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Research Methodologies
Pigott T, Noyes J, Umscheid CA
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 5: advanced analytic methods.
In this paper, the authors emphasize that the specific research question posed in the review should be used as a guide for choosing the appropriate analytic method. They present advanced analytic approaches that address some common questions that guide reviews of complex interventions such as: (1) How effective is the intervention? and (2) For whom does the intervention work and in what contexts?
AHRQ-funded; 290-2012-00004C; 290-2015-00005I; 290-2015-00004I; 290-2015-00009I; 290-2015-00013I; 290-2015-00011I; 290-2015-00003I.
Citation: Pigott T, Noyes J, Umscheid CA .
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 5: advanced analytic methods.
J Clin Epidemiol 2017 Oct;90:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.015.
.
.
Keywords: Decision Making, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Research Methodologies
Hartling L, Guise JM, Hempel S
AHRQ Author: Berliner E, Kato E
Fit for purpose: perspectives on rapid reviews from end-user interviews.
There is increasing demand for rapid reviews and timely evidence synthesis. The goal of this project was to understand end-user perspectives on the utility and limitations of rapid products including evidence inventories, rapid responses, and rapid reviews. Key informants indicated that the credibility of the review producer, relevance of key questions, and close working relationship between the end-user and producer are critical for any rapid product.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Hartling L, Guise JM, Hempel S .
Fit for purpose: perspectives on rapid reviews from end-user interviews.
Syst Rev 2017 Feb 17;6(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0425-7.
.
.
Keywords: Decision Making, Evidence-Based Practice, Research Methodologies
Hartling L, Guise JM, Hempel S
AHRQ Author: Berliner E, Kato E
Fit for purpose: perspectives on rapid reviews from end-user interviews.
There is increasing demand for rapid reviews and timely evidence synthesis. The goal of this project was to understand end-user perspectives on the utility and limitations of rapid products including evidence inventories, rapid responses, and rapid reviews. Key informants indicated that the credibility of the review producer, relevance of key questions, and close working relationship between the end-user and producer are critical for any rapid product.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Hartling L, Guise JM, Hempel S .
Fit for purpose: perspectives on rapid reviews from end-user interviews.
Syst Rev 2017 Feb 17;6(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0425-7.
.
.
Keywords: Decision Making, Evidence-Based Practice, Research Methodologies