National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 3 of 3 Research Studies DisplayedWang SV, Maro JC, Baro E
Data mining for adverse drug events with a propensity score-matched tree-based scan statistic.
In this study, the investigators propose a method that combines tree-based scan statistics with propensity score-matched analysis of new initiator cohorts, a robust design for investigations of drug safety. They subsequently conducted plasmode simulations to evaluate performance. The authors suggest that TreeScan with propensity score matching shows promise as a method for screening and prioritization of potential adverse events.
AHRQ-funded; HS022193.
Citation: Wang SV, Maro JC, Baro E .
Data mining for adverse drug events with a propensity score-matched tree-based scan statistic.
Epidemiology 2018 Nov;29(6):895-903. doi: 10.1097/ede.0000000000000907..
Keywords: Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events, Patient Safety, Medication, Medication: Safety, Data, Research Methodologies
Bell SK, Etchegaray JM, Gaufberg E
A multi-stakeholder consensus-driven research agenda for better understanding and supporting the emotional impact of harmful events on patients and families.
A one-day conference of diverse stakeholder groups convened to establish a consensus-driven research agenda focused on the impact of patient and family emotional harm stemming from preventable medical error. Stakeholder groups reached consensus and designed a path forward to inform approaches that better support harmed patients and families, with both immediately actionable and longer-term research strategies.
AHRQ-funded; HS024463.
Citation: Bell SK, Etchegaray JM, Gaufberg E .
A multi-stakeholder consensus-driven research agenda for better understanding and supporting the emotional impact of harmful events on patients and families.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2018 Jul;44(7):424-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.03.007..
Keywords: Adverse Events, Medical Errors, Patient Safety, Research Methodologies
Chou R, Baker WL, Banez LL
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Evidence-based Practice Center methods provide guidance on prioritization and selection of harms in systematic reviews.
A workgroup of methodologists from Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPCs) developed consensus-based guidance on selection and prioritization of harms in systematic reviews. Ten recommendations were developed on selection and prioritization of harms, including routinely focusing on serious as well as less serious but frequent or bothersome harms; and routinely engaging stakeholders and using literature searches and other data sources to identify important harms.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; HS022998.
Citation: Chou R, Baker WL, Banez LL .
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Evidence-based Practice Center methods provide guidance on prioritization and selection of harms in systematic reviews.
J Clin Epidemiol 2018 Jun;98:98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.007.
.
.
Keywords: Adverse Events, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Research Methodologies