National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Adverse Drug Events (ADE) (1)
- Adverse Events (1)
- Antibiotics (1)
- Care Management (1)
- Children/Adolescents (1)
- (-) Chronic Conditions (8)
- Community-Based Practice (1)
- Comparative Effectiveness (2)
- COVID-19 (1)
- Diabetes (3)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (1)
- (-) Evidence-Based Practice (8)
- Guidelines (2)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- Hepatitis (1)
- Home Healthcare (1)
- Medication (3)
- Medication: Safety (1)
- Opioids (1)
- Outcomes (2)
- Pain (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (4)
- Patient Safety (1)
- Patient Self-Management (1)
- Practice Patterns (1)
- Prevention (2)
- Primary Care (1)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (1)
- Respiratory Conditions (2)
- Risk (1)
- Screening (2)
- Skin Conditions (1)
- Telehealth (1)
- Treatments (1)
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) (2)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 8 of 8 Research Studies DisplayedNavis A, George MC, Nmashie A
Validation of the Safer Opioid Prescribing Evaluation Tool (SOPET) for assessing adherence to the Centers for Disease Control opioid prescribing guidelines.
This study assessed the use of the Safer Opioid Prescribing Evaluation Tool (SOPET) which was designed to improve the implementation of the 2016 Centers for Disease Control Guidelines on the prescription of opioids for chronic pain. Four raters with varying levels of clinical experience were trained to use the SOPET and then used it to evaluate 21 baseline patient scenarios. Inter-rater reliability was measured using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) estimates and their 95% confidence intervals for the total SOPET score based on a mean-rating absolute-agreement, two-way random-effects model. Inter-rater reliability was found to be good for the three physician raters (0.92, 0.97, and 0.99). However, inter-rater reliability for the non-physician rater was lower (0.67).
AHRQ-funded; HS025641.
Citation: Navis A, George MC, Nmashie A .
Validation of the Safer Opioid Prescribing Evaluation Tool (SOPET) for assessing adherence to the Centers for Disease Control opioid prescribing guidelines.
Pain Med 2020 Dec 25;21(12):3655-59. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa138..
Keywords: Opioids, Medication, Medication: Safety, Patient Safety, Guidelines, Practice Patterns, Pain, Chronic Conditions, Evidence-Based Practice
Chou R, Blazina I, Bougatsos C
Screening for hepatitis B virus infection in nonpregnant adolescents and adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
The authors updated the 2014 hepatitis B virus (HBV) screening review in nonpregnant adolescents and adults to inform the USPSTF. They found no direct evidence for the clinical benefits and harms of HBV screening vs no screening. Antiviral therapy for HBV infection was associated with improved intermediate outcomes and may improve clinical outcomes.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500009I.
Citation: Chou R, Blazina I, Bougatsos C .
Screening for hepatitis B virus infection in nonpregnant adolescents and adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2020 Dec 15;324(23):2423-36. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.19750..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Children/Adolescents, Hepatitis, Chronic Conditions, Screening, Evidence-Based Practice, Prevention
Gelfand JM, Armstrong AW, Bell S
National Psoriasis Foundation COVID-19 Task Force guidance for management of psoriatic disease during the pandemic: Vversion 1.
This article describes the process that was used to create the first version of a guidance document for management of psoriatic disease during the COVID-19 pandemic developed by the National Psoriasis Foundation. A task force of 18 physician voting members with expertise in dermatology, rheumatology, epidemiology, infectious diseases, and critical care was created with supplementation by nonvoting members. A Delphi process was created, out of which 22 guidance statements were approved. All guidance statements were recommended, with 9 of them high consensus, and the remaining 13 were moderate consensus. Topics covered included how COVID-19 can impact patients, how medical care can be optimized during the pandemic, and what patients can do to lower their risk of getting infected with COVID-19. This guidance will be updated by the TF as new data emerges.
AHRQ-funded; HS026372.
Citation: Gelfand JM, Armstrong AW, Bell S .
National Psoriasis Foundation COVID-19 Task Force guidance for management of psoriatic disease during the pandemic: Vversion 1.
J Am Acad Dermatol 2020 Dec;83(6):1704-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.09.001..
Keywords: Skin Conditions, Chronic Conditions, Care Management, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, COVID-19
Presley C, Agne A, Shelton T
Mobile-enhanced peer support for African Americans with Type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.
This study compared the effectiveness of a community-based diabetes self-management education (DSME) plus mobile health (mHealth)-enhanced peer support intervention to community-based DSME alone for African American adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. This randomized controlled trial took place in Jefferson County, Alabama within a safety-net healthcare system with a group diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and hemoglobin A1C ≥ 7.5%. The intervention group reviewed community-based DSME plus 6 months of mHealth-enhanced peer support, including 12 weekly phone calls, then 3 monthly calls from community health workers. The control group received community based DSME only. Primary outcomes were lower A1C and secondary outcomes were lower diabetes distress, depressive symptoms, self-efficacy or confidence in their ability to manage diabetes, and social support. Of 120 participants selected, 97 completed the study. Both groups experienced clinical meaning reduction in A1C. Participants in the intervention group experienced a significantly larger reduction in diabetes distress compared to the control group.
AHRQ-funded; HS019465.
Citation: Presley C, Agne A, Shelton T .
Mobile-enhanced peer support for African Americans with Type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.
J Gen Intern Med 2020 Oct;35(10):2889-96. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06011-w..
Keywords: Telehealth, Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient Self-Management, Diabetes, Chronic Conditions, Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Community-Based Practice, Comparative Effectiveness, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Outcomes, Education: Patient and Caregiver
Obinwa U, Pérez A, Lingvay I
Multilevel variation in diabetes screening within an integrated health system.
Variation in diabetes screening in clinical practice is poorly described. In this study, the investigators examined the interplay of patient, provider, and clinic factors explaining variation in diabetes screening within an integrated health care system in the U.S. They concluded that screening practices varied widely and were only partially explained by patient, provider, and clinic factors available in the EHR.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Obinwa U, Pérez A, Lingvay I .
Multilevel variation in diabetes screening within an integrated health system.
Diabetes Care 2020 May;43(5):1016-24. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1622..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Diabetes, Screening, Primary Care, Prevention, Evidence-Based Practice, Chronic Conditions
Dobler CC, Morrow AS, Beuschel B
Pharmacologic therapies in patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
The authors evaluated the comparative effectiveness and adverse events of pharmacologic interventions for adults with exacerbation of COPD. Sixty-eight randomized controlled trials were selected for evaluation and data extraction. They found that antibiotics and systemic corticosteroids reduced treatment failure in adults with mild to severe exacerbation of COPD.
AHRQ-funded.
Citation: Dobler CC, Morrow AS, Beuschel B .
Pharmacologic therapies in patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Ann Intern Med 2020 Mar 17;172(6):413-23. doi: 10.7326/m19-3007..
Keywords: Respiratory Conditions, Chronic Conditions, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Comparative Effectiveness, Medication, Antibiotics, Treatments, Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events
Wilson ME, Dobler CC, Morrow AS
Association of home noninvasive positive pressure ventilation with clinical outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
The association of home noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) with outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and hypercapnia is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of home NIPPV via bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) devices and noninvasive home mechanical ventilator (HMV) devices with clinical outcomes and adverse events in patients with COPD and hypercapnia.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500013I.
Citation: Wilson ME, Dobler CC, Morrow AS .
Association of home noninvasive positive pressure ventilation with clinical outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
JAMA 2020 Feb 4;323(5):455-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.22343..
Keywords: Respiratory Conditions, Chronic Conditions, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Outcomes, Evidence-Based Practice, Home Healthcare
McCoy RG, Lipska KJ, Van Houten HK
Paradox of glycemic management: multimorbidity, glycemic control, and high-risk medication use among adults with diabetes.
Researchers examined contemporary patterns of glycemic control and use of medications known to cause hypoglycemia among adults with diabetes across age and multimorbidity. They found that the proportion of patients achieving low HbA1c levels was highest among older and multimorbid patients. Older patients and patients with higher comorbidity burden were more likely to be treated with insulin to achieve these HbA1c levels despite the potential for hypoglycemia and uncertain long-term benefit.
AHRQ-funded; HS024075.
Citation: McCoy RG, Lipska KJ, Van Houten HK .
Paradox of glycemic management: multimorbidity, glycemic control, and high-risk medication use among adults with diabetes.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2020 Feb;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001007..
Keywords: Diabetes, Medication, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Evidence-Based Practice, Risk, Chronic Conditions