National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 2 of 2 Research Studies DisplayedMurphy DR, Wu L, Thomas EJ
Electronic trigger-based intervention to reduce delays in diagnostic evaluation for cancer: a cluster randomized controlled trial.
The researchers tested whether prospective use of electronic health record-based trigger algorithms to identify patients at risk of diagnostic delays could prevent delays in diagnostic evaluation for cancer. They found that electronic trigger-based interventions seem to be effective in reducing time to diagnostic evaluation of colorectal and prostate cancer as well as improving the proportion of patients who receive follow-up.
AHRQ-funded; HS017820.
Citation: Murphy DR, Wu L, Thomas EJ .
Electronic trigger-based intervention to reduce delays in diagnostic evaluation for cancer: a cluster randomized controlled trial.
J Clin Oncol 2015 Nov 1;33(31):3560-7. doi: 10.1200/jco.2015.61.1301..
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer: Prostate Cancer, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT)
Elstad EA, Sutkowi-Hemstreet A, Sheridan SL
Clinicians' perceptions of the benefits and harms of prostate and colorectal cancer screening.
The researchers sought to understand clinicians’ perceptions of the benefits and harms of two screening tests (colonoscopy and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing) that differ in their balance of potential benefits and harms. Clinicians perceived PSA testing to have a greater likelihood of harm as well as a lower likelihood of lengthening life relative to colonoscopy.
AHRQ-funded; HS000032; HS021133
Citation: Elstad EA, Sutkowi-Hemstreet A, Sheridan SL .
Clinicians' perceptions of the benefits and harms of prostate and colorectal cancer screening.
Med Decis Making. 2015 May;35(4):467-76. doi: 10.1177/0272989x15569780..
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Colonoscopy, Cancer: Prostate Cancer, Screening