National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Cardiovascular Conditions (1)
- Comparative Effectiveness (1)
- Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) (1)
- Data (1)
- Hospitals (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (1)
- Patient Experience (1)
- Patient Safety (1)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (1)
- (-) Quality of Care (2)
- (-) Research Methodologies (2)
- Surgery (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 2 of 2 Research Studies DisplayedHargraves JL, Cosenza C, Elliott MN, et al.
The effect of different sampling and recall periods in the CAHPS Clinician & Group (CG-CAHPS) survey.
Researchers examined the effect of changing the sampling and reference periods for the CAHPS((R)) Clinician & Group Survey from 12 to 6 months. They found that shortening the reference reduced the proportion of respondents reporting a blood test, X-ray, or other tests, and the most positive response was selected more often on the 6-month survey for 12 out of 13 questions. They concluded that surveys using a 6-month recall period may yield slightly higher scores than surveys with a 12-month recall period.
AHRQ-funded; HS016978.
Citation: Hargraves JL, Cosenza C, Elliott MN, et al..
The effect of different sampling and recall periods in the CAHPS Clinician & Group (CG-CAHPS) survey.
Health Serv Res 2019 Oct;54(5):1036-44. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13173..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Patient Experience, Quality of Care, Research Methodologies
Hsu YJ, Kosinski AS, Wallace AS
Using a society database to evaluate a patient safety collaborative: the Cardiovascular Surgical Translational Study.
The authors assessed the utility of using external databases for quality improvement (QI) evaluations in the context of an innovative QI collaborative aimed to reduce three infections and improve patient safety across the cardiac surgery service line. They compared changes in each outcome between 15 intervention hospitals and 52 propensity score-matched hospitals, and found that improvement trends in several outcomes among the studied intervention hospitals were not statistically different from those in comparison hospitals. They conclude that using external databases may permit comparative effectiveness assessment by providing concurrent comparison groups, additional outcome measures, and longer follow-up.
AHRQ-funded; HS019934.
Citation: Hsu YJ, Kosinski AS, Wallace AS .
Using a society database to evaluate a patient safety collaborative: the Cardiovascular Surgical Translational Study.
J Comp Eff Res 2019 Jan;8(1):21-32. doi: 10.2217/cer-2018-0051..
Keywords: Patient Safety, Quality Improvement, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality of Care, Surgery, Cardiovascular Conditions, Comparative Effectiveness, Data, Hospitals, Research Methodologies, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research