National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Cardiovascular Conditions (1)
- Children/Adolescents (1)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (2)
- Communication (1)
- Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (1)
- Guidelines (2)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- Hospitalization (1)
- Hospitals (3)
- Implementation (1)
- Inpatient Care (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (2)
- (-) Patient and Family Engagement (6)
- Patient Experience (3)
- Patient Safety (1)
- Primary Care (1)
- Primary Care: Models of Care (1)
- Quality Improvement (2)
- Quality Measures (1)
- (-) Quality of Care (6)
- Shared Decision Making (2)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 6 of 6 Research Studies DisplayedDickinson WP, Nease DE, Rhyne RL
Practice transformation support and patient engagement to improve cardiovascular care: from EvidenceNOW Southwest (ENSW).
The purpose of this study was to improve cardiovascular care through supporting primary care practices' adoption of evidence-based guidelines; a cluster randomized trial compared standard practice support--practice facilitation, practice assessment with feedback, health information technology assistance, and collaborative learning sessions--and standard support plus patient engagement support. Findings showed that practice transformation support can assist practices with improving quality of care. Patient engagement in practice transformation can further enhance practices' implementation of aspects of new models of care.
AHRQ-funded; HS023904.
Citation: Dickinson WP, Nease DE, Rhyne RL .
Practice transformation support and patient engagement to improve cardiovascular care: from EvidenceNOW Southwest (ENSW).
J Am Board Fam Med 2020 Sep-Oct;33(5):675-86. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.05.190395..
Keywords: Cardiovascular Conditions, Primary Care: Models of Care, Primary Care, Patient and Family Engagement, Evidence-Based Practice, Implementation, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Fisher KA, Gallagher TH, Smith KM
Communicating with patients about breakdowns in care: a national randomised vignette-based survey.
This study examined the impact of an apology when problems occur in patient care breakdowns occur at hospitals. Breakdowns included slow response to call bell, rude aide, and unanswered questions. A national online survey of 1188 adults aged 35 years or older were sampled from an online panel representative of the entire US population, created and maintained by GfK. Twice as many participants receiving an in-depth prompt about care breakdowns would recommend the hospital compared with those receiving no prompt (18.4% vs 8.8%). Almost three times as many participants who received a full apology would probably/definitely recommend the hospital compared with those receiving no apology (34.1% vs 13.6%). The survey also asked whether the respondent would speak up, with feeling upset being a strong determinant of greater intent to speak up.
AHRQ-funded; HS024596; HS022757.
Citation: Fisher KA, Gallagher TH, Smith KM .
Communicating with patients about breakdowns in care: a national randomised vignette-based survey.
BMJ Qual Saf 2020 Apr;29(4):313-19. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009712..
Keywords: Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Patient Experience, Patient and Family Engagement, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Hospitals
Feng JY, Toomey SL, Elliott MN
Factors associated with family experience in pediatric inpatient care.
Researchers assessed which aspects of pediatric inpatient experience have the strongest relationships with parents' willingness to recommend a hospital. Their cross-sectional study examined surveys completed by parents of children hospitalized at hospitals using the Child Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Survey. They found that child comfort and nurse-parent communication showed the strongest relationships with willingness to recommend, followed by preparing to leave the hospital, doctor-parent communication, and keeping parents informed. They recommended improvement efforts focusing on creating an age-appropriate environment, improving the effectiveness of provider interactions, and engaging parents to share their values and concerns.
AHRQ-funded; HS020513; HS025299.
Citation: Feng JY, Toomey SL, Elliott MN .
Factors associated with family experience in pediatric inpatient care.
Pediatrics 2020 Mar;145(3): e20191264. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-1264..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Children/Adolescents, Quality Measures, Quality of Care, Inpatient Care, Patient Experience, Hospitals, Hospitalization, Patient and Family Engagement, Clinician-Patient Communication
Haldar S, Mishra SR, Pollack AH
Informatics opportunities to involve patients in hospital safety: a conceptual model.
This study investigated how hospital inpatients experience undesirable events (UEs) and to see if those present opportunities for new informatics solutions. The authors surveyed 242 patients and caregivers during their hospital stay and asked them open-ended questions about their experiences with UEs. They then developed a 4-stage conceptual model which illustrates inpatient experiences: from when they first encounter UEs, and opportunities to promote inpatients’ participation and engagement in the quality and safety of their care, help healthcare systems learn from inpatient experience, and reduce those harmful events.
AHRQ-funded; HS022894.
Citation: Haldar S, Mishra SR, Pollack AH .
Informatics opportunities to involve patients in hospital safety: a conceptual model.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020 Feb;27(2):202-11. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz167.
.
.
Keywords: Patient Safety, Hospitals, Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient and Family Engagement, Patient Experience, Quality of Care
Hoffman AS, Sepucha KR, Abhyankar P
Explanation and elaboration of the Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluations (SUNDAE) guidelines: examples of reporting SUNDAE items from patient decision aid evaluation literature.
This Explanation and Elaboration article expands on the 26 items in the SUNDAE guidelines, providing a rationale for each item, and including examples for how each item has been reported in published papers evaluating patient decision aids. Authors and reviewers may wish to use it broadly to inform structuring of patient decision aid evaluation reports, or use it as a reference to obtain details about how to report individual checklist items.
AHRQ-funded; HS024250.
Citation: Hoffman AS, Sepucha KR, Abhyankar P .
Explanation and elaboration of the Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluations (SUNDAE) guidelines: examples of reporting SUNDAE items from patient decision aid evaluation literature.
BMJ Qual Saf 2018 May;27(5):389-412. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006985..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Guidelines, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient and Family Engagement, Quality of Care
Hoffman AS, Sepucha KR, Abhyankar P
Explanation and elaboration of the Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluations (SUNDAE) guidelines: examples of reporting SUNDAE items from patient decision aid evaluation literature.
This Explanation and Elaboration article expands on the 26 items in the SUNDAE guidelines, providing a rationale for each item, and including examples for how each item has been reported in published papers evaluating patient decision aids. Authors and reviewers may wish to use it broadly to inform structuring of patient decision aid evaluation reports, or use it as a reference to obtain details about how to report individual checklist items.
AHRQ-funded; HS024250.
Citation: Hoffman AS, Sepucha KR, Abhyankar P .
Explanation and elaboration of the Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluations (SUNDAE) guidelines: examples of reporting SUNDAE items from patient decision aid evaluation literature.
BMJ Qual Saf 2018 May;27(5):389-412. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006985..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Guidelines, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient and Family Engagement, Quality of Care