National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Asthma (1)
- Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) (2)
- Children/Adolescents (3)
- Chronic Conditions (2)
- Diabetes (1)
- Disparities (2)
- (-) Health Insurance (5)
- Medicaid (1)
- Medicare (1)
- Outcomes (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (1)
- Payment (1)
- Quality Improvement (3)
- (-) Quality of Care (5)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 5 of 5 Research Studies DisplayedJiang DH, Mundell BF, Shah ND
Impact of high deductible health plans on diabetes care quality and outcomes: systematic review.
The authors sought to provide a systematic literature review of the impact of high deductible health plans (HDHPs) on the utilizations of services required for optimal management of diabetes and subsequent health outcomes. They found that, although HDHPs reduce some health care utilization and costs, they appear to do so at the expense of limiting high-value care and medication adherence.
AHRQ-funded; HS025517; HS024075; HS025164; HS025402.
Citation: Jiang DH, Mundell BF, Shah ND .
Impact of high deductible health plans on diabetes care quality and outcomes: systematic review.
Endocr Pract 2021 Nov;27(11):1156-64. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2021.07.001..
Keywords: Health Insurance, Diabetes, Chronic Conditions, Outcomes, Quality of Care, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Markovitz AA, Ayanian JZ, Warrier A
Medicare Advantage plan double bonuses drive racial disparity in payments, yield no quality or enrollment improvements.
Using national data for 2008-18, investigators found that double bonuses were not associated with either improvements in plan quality or increased Medicare Advantage enrollment. Additionally, double bonuses increased payments to plans to care for Black beneficiaries by $60 per year, compared with $91 for White beneficiaries. These findings suggest that double bonuses not only fail to improve quality and enrollment but also foster a racially inequitable distribution of Medicare funds that disfavors Black beneficiaries. This study supports eliminating double bonuses, thereby saving Medicare an estimated $1.8 billion per year.
AHRQ-funded; HS000053.
Citation: Markovitz AA, Ayanian JZ, Warrier A .
Medicare Advantage plan double bonuses drive racial disparity in payments, yield no quality or enrollment improvements.
Health Aff 2021 Sep;40(9):1411-19. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00349..
Keywords: Medicare, Health Insurance, Payment, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Disparities, Racial and Ethnic Minorities
Schechter SB, Pantell MS, Parikh K
Impact of a national quality collaborative on pediatric asthma care quality by insurance status.
The objective of this study was to assess whether disparities in asthma care and outcomes based on insurance type existed before a national quality improvement (QI) collaborative, and to determine the effects of the collaborative on these disparities. The investigators concluded that at baseline, children with public insurance had higher asthma health care utilization than those with private insurance, despite receiving more evidence-based care.
AHRQ-funded; HS026383; HS024554; HS024592.
Citation: Schechter SB, Pantell MS, Parikh K .
Impact of a national quality collaborative on pediatric asthma care quality by insurance status.
Acad Pediatr 2021 Aug;21(6):1018-24. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.02.009..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Asthma, Chronic Conditions, Disparities, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Health Insurance
Ireys HT, Brach C, Anglin G
AHRQ Author: Brach C
After the demonstration: what states sustained after the end of federal grants to improve children's health care quality.
As part of the CHIPRA Quality Demonstration Grant Program’s multifaceted evaluation, this study examined the extent to which states sustained key program activities after the demonstration ended. It concluded that as a result of the federal government's investment in this grant program, many demonstration states are in a strong position to extend and spread specific strategies for improving the quality of care for children in Medicaid and CHIP.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 29020090002191.
Citation: Ireys HT, Brach C, Anglin G .
After the demonstration: what states sustained after the end of federal grants to improve children's health care quality.
Matern Child Health J 2018 Feb;22(2):195-203. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2391-z.
.
.
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), Quality of Care, Health Insurance, Medicaid
Burton RA, Peters RA, Devers KJ
Perspectives on implementing quality improvement collaboratives effectively: qualitative findings from the CHIPRA quality demonstration grant program.
The most frequently pursued intervention in the Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA) quality demonstration (2010-2015) was quality improvement collaboratives. This study was conducted to identify which aspects of these collaboratives were viewed by organizers and participants as working well and which were not. It found that aspects of collaboratives that interviewees valued were aimed at attracting participation, maintaining engagement, or facilitating learning.
AHRQ-funded; 2902009000191.
Citation: Burton RA, Peters RA, Devers KJ .
Perspectives on implementing quality improvement collaboratives effectively: qualitative findings from the CHIPRA quality demonstration grant program.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2018 Jan;44(1):12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.08.004.
.
.
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), Health Insurance, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement