National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Cardiovascular Conditions (1)
- Children/Adolescents (1)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (2)
- Heart Disease and Health (1)
- Hospital Readmissions (2)
- (-) Hospitals (4)
- Medicare (1)
- Payment (1)
- Provider (1)
- (-) Provider Performance (4)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (1)
- Quality Measures (1)
- (-) Quality of Care (4)
- Respiratory Conditions (1)
- Stroke (1)
- Telehealth (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 4 of 4 Research Studies DisplayedMeddings J, Smith SN, Hofer TP
Mixed messages to consumers from Medicare: Hospital Compare grades versus value-based payment penalty.
This study examined the discrepancy of ratings with hospitals with low readmission grades for heart failure (HF) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) on the Hospital Compare website, yet received penalties for excessive readmissions under the hospital Readmissions Reduction Program. A retrospective data analysis was conducted of 2956 hospitals that had publicly reported HF grades on Hospital Compare. Of those, 92% were graded as “no different” than the national rate for HD readmissions, yet included 48.6% that were scored as having excessive HF admissions and 87% received an overall readmission penalty. Of the 120 hospitals graded as “better”, none were scored as having excessive HF readmissions and 50% were penalized. There were similar results for AMI.
AHRQ-funded; HS018334; HS019767.
Citation: Meddings J, Smith SN, Hofer TP .
Mixed messages to consumers from Medicare: Hospital Compare grades versus value-based payment penalty.
Am J Manag Care 2018 Dec;24(12):e399-e403..
Keywords: Medicare, Hospital Readmissions, Heart Disease and Health, Hospitals, Quality of Care, Cardiovascular Conditions, Provider Performance, Payment
Rolnick JA, Ryskina KL
The use of individual provider performance reports by US Hospitals.
In this study, the investigators examined overall trends in how hospitals use the electronic health record to track and provide feedback on provider performance. They used data from 2013 to 2015 from the American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey Information Technology Supplement, which asked hospitals if they have used electronic data to create performance profiles. They linked these data to AHA Annual Survey responses for all general adult and pediatric hospitals and used Multivariable logistic regression to model the odds of use as a function of hospital characteristics.
AHRQ-funded; HS022198.
Citation: Rolnick JA, Ryskina KL .
The use of individual provider performance reports by US Hospitals.
J Hosp Med 2018 Aug;13(8):562-65. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2922..
Keywords: Provider Performance, Quality of Care, Provider, Hospitals, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT)
Kaiser SV, Lam R, Joseph GB
Limitations of using pediatric respiratory illness readmissions to compare hospital performance.
Researcher sought to determine if a National Quality Forum (NQF)-endorsed measure for pediatric lower respiratory illness (LRI) 30-day readmission rates can meaningfully identify high- and low-performing hospitals. Subjects were children with LRI (bronchiolitis, influenza, or pneumonia as primary diagnosis, or with an LRI as a secondary diagnosis with a primary diagnosis of respiratory failure, sepsis, bacteremia, or asthma) from all hospital admissions in California from 2012 to 2014. The researchers were unable to identify meaningful variation in hospital performance without broadening the metric definition and merging multiple years of data. They recommend that utilizers of pediatric-quality measures consider modifying metrics to better evaluate the quality of pediatric care at low-volume hospitals.
AHRQ-funded; HS024385; HS022835; HS024592; HS025297.
Citation: Kaiser SV, Lam R, Joseph GB .
Limitations of using pediatric respiratory illness readmissions to compare hospital performance.
J Hosp Med 2018 Nov;13(11):737-42. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2988..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Respiratory Conditions, Provider Performance, Hospital Readmissions, Hospitals, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement
Moreno A, Schwamm LH, Siddiqui KA
Frequent hub-spoke contact is associated with improved spoke hospital performance: results from the Massachusetts General Hospital Telestroke Network.
This study investigated the association of a strong hub-spoke hospital connection with improved spoke hospital performance for acute ischemic stroke patients associated with the Massachusetts General Hospital Telestroke Network. Investigators identified 375 patients treated with tPA by conventional or telestroke methods from 2006-2015 with 16 spoke hospitals. There was a positive association between more frequent contact between a telestroke spoke and its hub and faster tPA delivery for patients.
AHRQ-funded; HS024561.
Citation: Moreno A, Schwamm LH, Siddiqui KA .
Frequent hub-spoke contact is associated with improved spoke hospital performance: results from the Massachusetts General Hospital Telestroke Network.
Telemed J E Health 2018 Sep;24(9):678-83. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0252..
Keywords: Health Information Technology (HIT), Hospitals, Provider Performance, Quality of Care, Stroke, Telehealth