National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Ambulatory Care and Surgery (1)
- Behavioral Health (1)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (2)
- Care Coordination (1)
- Care Management (1)
- Children/Adolescents (2)
- Communication (1)
- Community Partnerships (1)
- Decision Making (2)
- Dementia (1)
- Elderly (2)
- Emergency Department (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (12)
- Guidelines (2)
- Healthcare Delivery (4)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (1)
- Health Systems (2)
- Heart Disease and Health (1)
- Hospitals (2)
- (-) Implementation (15)
- Inpatient Care (1)
- Learning Health Systems (2)
- Neurological Disorders (1)
- Organizational Change (1)
- Outcomes (1)
- Pain (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (3)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (4)
- Patient and Family Engagement (1)
- Practice Improvement (1)
- Prevention (3)
- Primary Care (6)
- Primary Care: Models of Care (2)
- Quality Improvement (3)
- Quality of Care (3)
- Research Methodologies (2)
- System Design (1)
- TeamSTEPPS (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 15 of 15 Research Studies DisplayedIshimine P, Adelgais K, Barata I
Executive summary: the 2018 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference: Aligning the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Research Agenda to Reduce Health Outcome Gaps.
Emergency care providers share a compelling interest in developing an effective patient-centered, outcomes-based research agenda that can decrease variability in pediatric outcomes. The 2018 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference "Aligning the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Research Agenda to Reduce Health Outcome Gaps (AEMCC)" aimed to fulfill this role. This paper discusses the conference which convened major thought leaders and stakeholders to introduce a research, scholarship, and innovation agenda for pediatric emergency care specifically to reduce health outcome gaps.
AHRQ-funded; HS026101.
Citation: Ishimine P, Adelgais K, Barata I .
Executive summary: the 2018 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference: Aligning the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Research Agenda to Reduce Health Outcome Gaps.
Acad Emerg Med 2018 Dec;25(12):1317-26. doi: 10.1111/acem.13667..
Keywords: Implementation, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Children/Adolescents, Emergency Department, Outcomes, Research Methodologies
Morrow AS, Whiteside SP, Sim LA
Developing tools to enhance the use of systematic reviews for clinical care in health systems.
The researchers’ goal was to develop tools to facilitate the uptake of evidence as summarized in systematic reviews by clinical decisionmakers in health systems. After they conducted a systematic review on the management of anxiety in children, the researchers interviewed health system representatives, clinicians and patients to gain additional information about decisionmaking. Two decision-aid tools - one for the health system and the other for the clinical encounter - were then developed using stakeholders' feedback and literature searches. The health system decision aid provided information on patients who were candidates for treatment, values and preferences, costs and resources, acceptability, impact on health equity, feasibility, drug dosing, alternative therapies, remission rates, and prognosis. The encounter decision aid was produced as a set of cards that contained information on the issues that drive treatment decisions. Health system stakeholders found the first decision aid useful, and patients, parents, and clinicians found the second to be helpful.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500013I; 29032001T.
Citation: Morrow AS, Whiteside SP, Sim LA .
Developing tools to enhance the use of systematic reviews for clinical care in health systems.
BMJ Evid Based Med 2018 Dec;23(6):206-09. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-110995..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Decision Making, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Implementation
Guise JM, Savitz LA, Friedman CP
Mind the gap: putting evidence into practice in the era of learning health systems.
This paper discusses two main mechanisms to close the evidence-to-practice gap: (1) integrating Learning Health System (LHS) results with existing systematic review evidence and (2) providing this combined evidence in a standardized, computable data format.
AHRQ-funded; 29020120004C.
Citation: Guise JM, Savitz LA, Friedman CP .
Mind the gap: putting evidence into practice in the era of learning health systems.
J Gen Intern Med 2018 Dec;33(12):2237-39. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4633-1..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Healthcare Delivery, Learning Health Systems, Implementation
Shuman CJ, Xie XJ, Herr KA
Sustainability of evidence-based acute pain management practices for hospitalized older adults.
This article reported on the sustainability of evidence-based acute pain management practices in hospitalized older adults following testing of a multifaceted Translating Research Into Practice (TRIP) implementation intervention. Results revealed most evidence-based acute pain management practices were sustained for 18 months following implementation.
AHRQ-funded; HS010482.
Citation: Shuman CJ, Xie XJ, Herr KA .
Sustainability of evidence-based acute pain management practices for hospitalized older adults.
West J Nurs Res 2018 Dec;40(12):1749-64. doi: 10.1177/0193945917738781..
Keywords: Care Management, Elderly, Evidence-Based Practice, Inpatient Care, Pain, Implementation
Eder MM, Evans E, Funes M
Defining and measuring community engagement and community-engaged research: clinical and translational science institutional practices.
The institutions that comprise the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) consortium and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences continue to explore and develop community-engaged research strategies and to study the role of community academic partnerships in advancing the science of community engagement. The purpose of this study was to explore CTSA institutions in relation to an Institute of Medicine recommendation that community engagement occur in all stages of translational research and be defined and evaluated consistently.
AHRQ-funded; HS020518.
Citation: Eder MM, Evans E, Funes M .
Defining and measuring community engagement and community-engaged research: clinical and translational science institutional practices.
Prog Community Health Partnersh 2018;12(2):145-56. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2018.0034..
Keywords: Community Partnerships, Evidence-Based Practice, Research Methodologies, Implementation
Harrison MI, Grantham S
AHRQ Author: Harrison MI
Learning from implementation setbacks: identifying and responding to contextual challenges.
The authors addressed organizational learning about implementation context during setbacks to primary care redesign in an ambulatory system. They found that redesigned teams were not implemented as widely or rapidly as anticipated and did not deliver hoped-for gains in operational metrics; however, team redesign was leading to improvements in chronic care and prevention and eased provider burden. Redesign and system leaders engaged in more thorough organizational learning. Their responses to challenges helped to strengthen the redesign's prospects, improved the delivery system's position in its labor market, and helped the system prepare to meet emerging requirements for value-based care and population health.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 2902010000341.
Citation: Harrison MI, Grantham S .
Learning from implementation setbacks: identifying and responding to contextual challenges.
Learn Health Syst 2018 Oct;2(4):e10068. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10068..
Keywords: Organizational Change, Learning Health Systems, Health Systems, Primary Care: Models of Care, Primary Care, Ambulatory Care and Surgery, Implementation
Baloh J, Zhu X, Ward MM
Types of internal facilitation activities in hospitals implementing evidence-based interventions.
The aim of the study was to examine internal facilitation activities at 10 critical access hospitals in rural Iowa during their implementation of TeamSTEPPS, a patient safety intervention, and to identify characteristics that distinguish different types of facilitation activities. The investigators concluded that there are four types of facilitation activities that hospitals engage in while implementing evidence-based practices, offering a parsimonious way to characterize facilitation activities.
AHRQ-funded; HS024112; HS018396.
Citation: Baloh J, Zhu X, Ward MM .
Types of internal facilitation activities in hospitals implementing evidence-based interventions.
Health Care Manage Rev 2018 Jul/Sep;43(3):229-37. doi: 10.1097/hmr.0000000000000145..
Keywords: TeamSTEPPS, Implementation, Hospitals, Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR)
Callahan CM, Bateman DR, Wang S
State of science: bridging the science-practice gap in aging, dementia and mental health.
This article describes why new models of care in aging, dementia, and mental health diffuse inadequately into the healthcare systems and communities where they might benefit older adults. The investigators review a general framework for the diffusion of innovations and highlight the importance of other features of innovations that deter or facilitate diffusion.
AHRQ-funded; HS024384.
Citation: Callahan CM, Bateman DR, Wang S .
State of science: bridging the science-practice gap in aging, dementia and mental health.
J Am Geriatr Soc 2018 Apr;66(Suppl 1):S28-s35. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15320..
Keywords: Elderly, Dementia, Behavioral Health, Healthcare Delivery, Neurological Disorders, Implementation, Evidence-Based Practice
Meyers D, Miller T, Genevro J
AHRQ Author: Meyers D, Miller T, Genevro J, Zhan C, De La Mare J, Fournier A, Bennett H, McNellis RJ
EvidenceNOW: Balancing primary care implementation and implementation research.
In 2015, AHRQ invested in the largest primary care research project in its history. EvidenceNOW is a $112 million effort to disseminate and implement patient-centered outcomes research evidence in more than 1,500 primary care practices and to study how quality-improvement support can build the capacity of primary care practices to understand and apply evidence. EvidenceNOW comprises 7 implementation research grants, each funded to provide external quality-improvement support to primary care practices to implement evidence-based cardiovascular care and to conduct rigorous internal evaluations of their work.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Meyers D, Miller T, Genevro J .
EvidenceNOW: Balancing primary care implementation and implementation research.
Ann Fam Med 2018 Apr;16(Suppl 1):S5-s11. doi: 10.1370/afm.2196.
.
.
Keywords: Cardiovascular Conditions, Communication, Evidence-Based Practice, Heart Disease and Health, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Prevention, Primary Care, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement, Implementation
Armstrong MJ, Gronseth GS
Approach to assessing and using clinical practice guidelines.
Knowing when to use guidelines in clinical practice requires neurologists to assess the rigor of published guidelines. This review briefly describes guideline definitions and the American Academy of Neurology process for guideline development, outlines key elements for assessing guideline quality, and details a practical approach for incorporating guideline recommendations when partnering with patients in shared decision-making.
AHRQ-funded; HS024159.
Citation: Armstrong MJ, Gronseth GS .
Approach to assessing and using clinical practice guidelines.
Neurol Clin Pract 2018 Feb;8(1):58-61. doi: 10.1212/cpj.0000000000000417.
.
.
Keywords: Decision Making, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Patient and Family Engagement, Implementation
Tomoaia-Cotisel A, Farrell TW, Solberg LI
AHRQ Author: Harrison MI, Genevro JL
Implementation of care management: an analysis of recent AHRQ research.
This article describes care management (CM) implementation and associated lessons from 12 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality-sponsored projects. Two rounds of data collection resulted in project-specific narratives that were analyzed using an iterative approach analogous to framework analysis. Informants also participated as coauthors. Variation emerged across practices and over time regarding CM services provided, personnel delivering these services, target populations, and setting(s).
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; HS021933; 2902007.
Citation: Tomoaia-Cotisel A, Farrell TW, Solberg LI .
Implementation of care management: an analysis of recent AHRQ research.
Med Care Res Rev 2018 Feb;75(1):46-65. doi: 10.1177/1077558716673459.
.
.
Keywords: Care Coordination, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Primary Care, Implementation
Rangachari P
Innovation implementation in the context of hospital QI: lessons learned and strategies for success.
This paper conducts an integrative review of the literature on "innovation implementation" in hospitals and health systems over the last decade, since the spotlight was cast on "innovation implementation failure" in health care organizations (HCOs). It summarizes the lessons learned from the literature, discusses the relevance of management research on innovation implementation in HCOs, and identifies future research avenues.
AHRQ-funded; HS024335.
Citation: Rangachari P .
Innovation implementation in the context of hospital QI: lessons learned and strategies for success.
Innov Entrep Health 2018;5:1-14. doi: 10.2147/ieh.s151040.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Health Systems, Health Information Technology (HIT), Implementation, Quality Improvement, Hospitals, Quality of Care
Ono SS, Crabtree BF, Hemler JR
Taking innovation to scale in primary care practices: the functions of health care extension.
Health care extension is an approach to providing external support to primary care practices with the aim of diffusing innovation. EvidenceNOW was launched to rapidly disseminate and implement evidence-based guidelines for cardiovascular preventive care in the primary care setting. This article describes how cooperatives varied in their approaches to extension and provides early empirical evidence that health care extension is a feasible and potentially useful approach for providing quality improvement.
AHRQ-funded; HS023940.
Citation: Ono SS, Crabtree BF, Hemler JR .
Taking innovation to scale in primary care practices: the functions of health care extension.
Health Aff 2018 Feb;37(2):222-30. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1100.
.
.
Keywords: Primary Care, Implementation, Cardiovascular Conditions, Evidence-Based Practice, Healthcare Delivery, Practice Improvement, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Prevention
Ashok M, Hung D, Rojas-Smith L
AHRQ Author: Harrison M
Framework for research on implementation of process redesigns.
Complex system interventions benefit from close attention to factors affecting implementation and resultant outcomes. This article describes a framework for examining these factors in process redesign (PR) and for assessing PR outcomes. The authors concluded that their PR framework helped guide the qualitative study and aided researchers in informing their leadership about critical issues affecting PR implementation.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290200710056I; 2902010000221.
Citation: Ashok M, Hung D, Rojas-Smith L .
Framework for research on implementation of process redesigns.
Qual Manag Health Care 2018 Jan/Mar;27(1):17-23. doi: 10.1097/qmh.0000000000000158.
.
.
Keywords: Implementation, Primary Care: Models of Care, Primary Care, System Design
Doherty JA, Crelia SJ, Smith MW
AHRQ Author: Mabry-Hernandez IR, Ngo-Metzger Q
Large health systems' prevention guideline implementation: a qualitative study.
In 2015, researchers conducted and analyzed interviews with quality leaders from eight hospital-based systems and one physician organization who explained organizational processes to adapt, adopt, disseminate, and incentivize adherence to preventive services guidelines. Nearly all have a formal process for reviewing and refining guidelines, developing clinician support, and disseminating the approved guidelines.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Doherty JA, Crelia SJ, Smith MW .
Large health systems' prevention guideline implementation: a qualitative study.
Am J Prev Med 2018 Jan;54(1s1):S88-s94. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.07.025.
.
.
Keywords: Primary Care, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Prevention, Implementation, Healthcare Delivery