National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Cancer (1)
- Caregiving (1)
- Children/Adolescents (1)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (1)
- (-) Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) (15)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (3)
- Health Insurance (1)
- Health Literacy (1)
- Hospitals (4)
- Inpatient Care (1)
- Kidney Disease and Health (1)
- Low-Income (1)
- Medicare (1)
- (-) Patient Experience (15)
- Primary Care (4)
- Provider Performance (4)
- Quality Improvement (5)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (1)
- Quality Measures (3)
- Quality of Care (11)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (2)
- Research Methodologies (1)
- Urban Health (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 15 of 15 Research Studies DisplayedMartino SC, Reynolds KA, Grob R
Evaluation of a protocol for eliciting narrative accounts of pediatric inpatient experiences of care.
This study’s objective was to evaluate the measurement properties of a set of six items designed to elicit narrative accounts of pediatric inpatient experience. This cross-sectional survey with follow-up phone interviews used data from 163 participants recruited from a probability-based online panel of US adults. Eligible participants were family members of a child who had an overnight hospital stay in the past 12 months. Participants completed an online (n = 129) or phone (n = 34) survey about their child's hospitalization experience that contained closed-ended items from the Child HCAHPS Survey followed by the six narrative items. About two weeks after completing the survey, 47 participants additionally completed a one-hour, semi-structured phone interview, the results of which served as a "gold standard" for evaluating the fidelity of narrative responses. The average narrative was 248 words, with 79% of narratives mentioning a topic included on the Child HCAHPS survey; 89% mentioning a topic not covered by that survey; 75% including at least one detailed description of an actionable event. Overall, there was a 66% correspondence between narrative and interview responses, with higher correspondence in the phone than in the online condition (75% vs. 59%).
AHRQ-funded; HS025920; HS016978.
Citation: Martino SC, Reynolds KA, Grob R .
Evaluation of a protocol for eliciting narrative accounts of pediatric inpatient experiences of care.
Health Serv Res 2023 Apr;58(2):271-81. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14134.
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Patient Experience, Inpatient Care
Schuttner L, Guo R, Wong E
High-risk patient experiences associated with an intensive primary care management program in the Veterans Health Administration.
This study assessed high-risk patient experiences associated with an intensive primary care management program conducted at the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). The authors assessed patient experience using a patient survey based on the CAHPS Survey in 2019. Patient experience was assessed among 1) prior enrollees (n = 59) of an intensive management program (2014-2018); (2) nonenrollees (n = 356) at program sites; and (3) nonprogram site patients (n = 728). The VHA Office of Primary Care used a patient-centered medical home model (PACT) to deliver coordinated, continuous primary care through multidisciplinary teams. The PACT-Intensive Management (PIM) program was piloted at 5 sites from 2014 to 2018. Outcomes examined included patient ratings of patient-centered care; overall health care experience; and satisfaction with their usual outpatient care provider. Enrollees were more satisfied with their current provider versus nonenrollees within program sites. However, the authors weren’t sure if the benefits persisted after program conclusion.
AHRQ-funded; HS026369.
Citation: Schuttner L, Guo R, Wong E .
High-risk patient experiences associated with an intensive primary care management program in the Veterans Health Administration.
J Ambul Care Manage 2023 Jan-Mar;46(1):45-53. doi: 10.1097/jac.0000000000000428..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Patient Experience, Primary Care
Quigley DD, Elliott MN, Slaughter ME
Follow-up shadow coaching improves primary care provider-patient interactions and maintains improvements when conducted regularly: a spline model analysis.
The purpose of this study was to explore whether a second shadow coaching session (re-coaching) improves the patient experience and maintains it over time. The researchers observed a statistically significant increase of 3.7 points among re-coached providers after re-coaching on overall provider rating (OPR) and 3.5 points on provider communication (PC) (differences of 1, 3, and 5 points or more are considered small, medium, and large, respectively). Improvements from the re-coaching endured for 12 months for OPR and 8 months for PC.
AHRQ-funded; HS025920.
Citation: Quigley DD, Elliott MN, Slaughter ME .
Follow-up shadow coaching improves primary care provider-patient interactions and maintains improvements when conducted regularly: a spline model analysis.
J Gen Intern Med 2023 Jan; 38(1):221-27. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07881-y..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Primary Care, Clinician-Patient Communication, Patient Experience, Provider Performance
Nembhard IM, Matta S, Shaller D
Learning from patients: the impact of using patients' narratives on patient experience scores.
The purpose of this study was to assess whether primary care clinics that often share patients' narratives with their staff have higher patient experience survey scores. The researchers conducted a 1-year study of 5,545 adult patients and 276 staff affiliated with nine clinics in one health system. The study found the frequency of sharing useful narratives with staff was related with patient experience scores for all measures, a result which was conditional upon staff confidence in their own knowledge. For operational measures such as care coordination, higher levels of sharing was associated with subsequently higher performance for more confident staff and lower performance or no difference for less confident staff, depending on the measure. For relational measures such as patient-provider communication, increased sharing was associated with higher scores for less confident staff and lower scores for more confident staff.
AHRQ-funded; HS016978.
Citation: Nembhard IM, Matta S, Shaller D .
Learning from patients: the impact of using patients' narratives on patient experience scores.
Health Care Manage Rev 2023 Jan-Mar; 49(1):2-13. doi: 10.1097/hmr.0000000000000386..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Patient Experience, Provider Performance
Evensen CT, Yost KJ, Keller S
Development and testing of the CAHPS Cancer Care Survey.
In order to develop the CAHPS Cancer Care Survey instrument, the authors conducted cognitive tests of the instrument as well as field tests at six cancer centers and four community oncology practices; the survey was then finalized and obtained the CAHPS trademark. The authors recommend mail-only, mail-telephone mixed-mode, and Web-mail mixed-mode data collection methods.
AHRQ-funded; 290200600019I.
Citation: Evensen CT, Yost KJ, Keller S .
Development and testing of the CAHPS Cancer Care Survey.
J Oncol Pract 2019 Nov;15(11):e969-e78. doi: 10.1200/jop.19.00039..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Cancer, Patient Experience, Quality of Care
Hargraves JL, Cosenza C, Elliott MN, et al.
The effect of different sampling and recall periods in the CAHPS Clinician & Group (CG-CAHPS) survey.
Researchers examined the effect of changing the sampling and reference periods for the CAHPS((R)) Clinician & Group Survey from 12 to 6 months. They found that shortening the reference reduced the proportion of respondents reporting a blood test, X-ray, or other tests, and the most positive response was selected more often on the 6-month survey for 12 out of 13 questions. They concluded that surveys using a 6-month recall period may yield slightly higher scores than surveys with a 12-month recall period.
AHRQ-funded; HS016978.
Citation: Hargraves JL, Cosenza C, Elliott MN, et al..
The effect of different sampling and recall periods in the CAHPS Clinician & Group (CG-CAHPS) survey.
Health Serv Res 2019 Oct;54(5):1036-44. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13173..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Patient Experience, Quality of Care, Research Methodologies
Beckett MK, Elliott MN, Burkhart Q
The effects of survey version on patient experience scores and plan rankings.
Researchers assessed the effect of changing survey questions on plan-level patient experience measures and ratings. Using CAHPS data, they concluded that their analyses illustrated how to assess the impact of seemingly minor survey modifications for other national surveys considering changes and highlighted the importance of screeners in instrument design.
AHRQ-funded; HS016978.
Citation: Beckett MK, Elliott MN, Burkhart Q .
The effects of survey version on patient experience scores and plan rankings.
Health Serv Res 2019 Oct;54(5):1016-22. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13172..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Patient Experience, Medicare, Quality of Care
Setodji CM, Peipert JD, Hays RD
Differential item functioning of the CAHPS(R) In-Center Hemodialysis Survey.
End-stage renal disease patients' experience of care is an integral part of the assessment of the quality of the care provided at hemodialysis centers and is needed to promote patient choice, quality improvement, and accountability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH-CAHPS(R)) survey and its equivalence in different age, gender, race, and education subgroups.
AHRQ-funded; HS016980; HS016978.
Citation: Setodji CM, Peipert JD, Hays RD .
Differential item functioning of the CAHPS(R) In-Center Hemodialysis Survey.
Qual Life Res 2019 Jul 26;28(11):3117-35. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02250-5.
.
.
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Kidney Disease and Health, Quality of Care, Patient Experience, Quality Improvement
Ahluwalia SC, Damberg CL, Haas A
How are medical groups identified as high-performing? The effect of different approaches to classification of performance.
The researchers examined how different classification approaches influence which providers are designated as "high-performers.” They found that classification of medical groups as high performing is sensitive to the domains of performance included, the classification approach, and the choice of threshold. They further suggest that the absence of a consistently applied approach to identifying high performers impedes efforts to reliably compare, select and reward high-performing providers.
AHRQ-funded; HS024067.
Citation: Ahluwalia SC, Damberg CL, Haas A .
How are medical groups identified as high-performing? The effect of different approaches to classification of performance.
BMC Health Serv Res 2019 Jul 18;19(1):500. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4293-9..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Patient Experience, Provider Performance, Quality of Care, Quality Measures
Sheetz KH, Nathan H, Dimick JB
Patients' perceptions of hospitals affiliated with America's highest-rated medical centers.
Using the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey to measure how patients perceive a hospital’s overall quality and reputation, the investigators sought to determine whether HCAHPS scores increased for those affiliating with the prominent medical centers named to the U.S. News and World Report Honor Roll.
AHRQ-funded; HS023597.
Citation: Sheetz KH, Nathan H, Dimick JB .
Patients' perceptions of hospitals affiliated with America's highest-rated medical centers.
J Gen Intern Med 2019 Jun;34(6):787-88. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4822-y..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Patient Experience, Hospitals, Quality Measures, Quality of Care
Tieu L, Hobbs A, Sarkar U
Adapting patient experience data collection processes for lower literacy patient populations using tablets at the point of care.
This study compared the acceptability of low-literacy tablet-based and traditional paper-based patient experience surveys in English and Spanish. The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers & Systems Clinician & Group Survey (CG-CAHPS) was adapted for a pilot survey using low-literacy questions in Spanish and English. The majority of interview participants preferred the tablet version over the traditional paper-based survey. This was especially true for the younger and Latino respondents.
AHRQ-funded; HS022408.
Citation: Tieu L, Hobbs A, Sarkar U .
Adapting patient experience data collection processes for lower literacy patient populations using tablets at the point of care.
Med Care 2019 Jun;57 Suppl 6 Suppl 2:S140-s48. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001030..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Health Information Technology (HIT), Health Literacy, Patient Experience, Primary Care, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement, Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Urban Health
Fowler FJ, Cosenza C, Cripps LA
The effect of administration mode on CAHPS survey response rates and results: a comparison of mail and web-based approaches.
The researchers compared response rates, respondents' characteristics, and substantive results for CAHPS surveys administered using web and mail protocols. They found that response rates to surveys administered using the Internet protocols were lower than for the surveys administered by mail, but characteristics of respondents and survey answers were very similar across protocols. Respondents without email addresses tended to be older, less educated, and more likely to be male than those with email addresses, and there were a few differences in their responses.
AHRQ-funded; HS016978.
Citation: Fowler FJ, Cosenza C, Cripps LA .
The effect of administration mode on CAHPS survey response rates and results: a comparison of mail and web-based approaches.
Health Serv Res 2019 Jun;54(3):714-21. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13109..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient Experience, Primary Care, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement
Hanson C, Herring B, Trish E
Do health insurance and hospital market concentration influence hospital patients' experience of care?
Researchers examined the effects of insurance and hospital market concentration on hospital patients' experience of care. They found that changes in patient satisfaction are positively associated with increases in insurance concentration and negatively associated with increases in hospital concentration. They concluded that their findings add to the evidence on the harms of hospital consolidation but suggest that insurer consolidation may improve patient experience.
AHRQ-funded; HS026333.
Citation: Hanson C, Herring B, Trish E .
Do health insurance and hospital market concentration influence hospital patients' experience of care?
Health Serv Res 2019 May 16;54(4):805-15. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13168..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Health Insurance, Hospitals, Patient Experience, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement
Toomey SL, Elliott MN, Zaslavsky AM
Improving response rates and representation of hard-to-reach groups in family experience surveys.
This study examined the use of an audio-enabled tablet to survey parents of children discharged from 4 units of a children’s hospital. Normal mail survey response rates are very low, especially for black, Latino, and low-income respondents. This survey was done day of discharge at the hospital and there was a response rate of 71.1% via tablet versus 16.3% for mail only. The Child Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey was used. Tablet response rates were highest with fathers, those more likely to have a high school education or less, less likely to be white, and more likely to be publicly insured. The results are promising for future surveys using tablet administration.
AHRQ-funded; HS020513; HS025299.
Citation: Toomey SL, Elliott MN, Zaslavsky AM .
Improving response rates and representation of hard-to-reach groups in family experience surveys.
Acad Pediatr 2019 May - Jun;19(4):446-53. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.07.007..
Keywords: Caregiving, Children/Adolescents, Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Health Information Technology (HIT), Hospitals, Low-Income, Patient Experience, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement, Racial and Ethnic Minorities
Cefalu MS, Elliott MN, Setodji CM
Hospital quality indicators are not unidimensional: a reanalysis of Lieberthal and Comer.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the dimensionality of hospital quality indicators treated as unidimensional in a prior publication. The investigators found that there were four underlying dimensions of hospital quality: patient experience, mortality, and two clinical process dimensions. They concluded that hospital quality should be measured using a variety of indicators reflecting different dimensions of quality.
AHRQ-funded; HS016980; HS016978.
Citation: Cefalu MS, Elliott MN, Setodji CM .
Hospital quality indicators are not unidimensional: a reanalysis of Lieberthal and Comer.
Health Serv Res 2019 Apr;54(2):502-08. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13056..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Hospitals, Patient Experience, Provider Performance, Quality of Care, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures