National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Cancer (2)
- Cancer: Breast Cancer (4)
- Comparative Effectiveness (2)
- (-) Decision Making (6)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (1)
- Genetics (3)
- Medication (2)
- Outcomes (2)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (1)
- Practice Patterns (1)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (1)
- Surgery (1)
- (-) Treatments (6)
- Women (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 6 of 6 Research Studies DisplayedSkrivankova V, Heagerty PJ
Single index methods for evaluation of marker-guided treatment rules based on multivariate marker panels.
Answering the scientific challenge to identify and validate the factors that can reliably be used to target treatment and to quantify the expected treatment benefit as a function of candidate markers, the authors of this article propose to focus on a smooth, non-parametric evaluation of a canonical single-index score that estimates the expected treatment benefit associated with patient characteristics. Their methods decouple the model used to generate the treatment benefit score from the methods adopted in order to evaluate the performance of the resulting single-index score. They also demonstrate that the canonical single-index treatment benefit score can be used for selecting subsets of patients with enriched expected treatment response.
AHRQ-funded; HS019222.
Citation: Skrivankova V, Heagerty PJ .
Single index methods for evaluation of marker-guided treatment rules based on multivariate marker panels.
Biometrics 2018 Jun;74(2):663-72. doi: 10.1111/biom.12752..
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Decision Making, Outcomes, Treatments
Semenkovich TR, Panni RZ, Hudson JL
Comparative effectiveness of upfront esophagectomy versus induction chemoradiation in clinical stage T2N0 esophageal cancer: a decision analysis.
This study examined comparative effectiveness and survival rates for upfront esophagectomy versus induction chemoradiation in patients with clinical stage T2N20 esophageal cancer. A decision analysis model was created for the two treatment strategies. Results showed comparable median survival rates for both strategies. The optimal treatment strategy depended on the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound staging.
AHRQ-funded; HS022330.
Citation: Semenkovich TR, Panni RZ, Hudson JL .
Comparative effectiveness of upfront esophagectomy versus induction chemoradiation in clinical stage T2N0 esophageal cancer: a decision analysis.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018 May;155(5):2221-30.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.01.006..
Keywords: Treatments, Cancer, Surgery, Comparative Effectiveness, Decision Making, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Outcomes, Medication
Wang SY, Kelly G, Gross C
Information needs of older women with early-stage breast cancer when making radiation therapy decisions.
The researchers identified the information older women with early-stage breast cancer need when making radiation therapy decisions, and who patients identify as the main decision maker. They found that older women consider themselves to be the main decision maker; they desire information and have more agency and input in the decision-making process than prior literature would suggest.
AHRQ-funded; HS023900.
Citation: Wang SY, Kelly G, Gross C .
Information needs of older women with early-stage breast cancer when making radiation therapy decisions.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017 Jul 15;98(4):733-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.001.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer: Breast Cancer, Decision Making, Education: Patient and Caregiver, Treatments
Roberts MC, Bryson A, Weinberger M
Oncologists' barriers and facilitators for oncotype DX use: qualitative study.
The purpose of this paper was to understand better the U.S. oncologists' oncotype DX (ODX) uptake and how they use ODX during adjuvant chemotherapy decision making. This study identified multi-level factors that influence ODX uptake, including organizational factors, interpersonal factors, and intrapersonal factors.
AHRQ-funded; HS022189.
Citation: Roberts MC, Bryson A, Weinberger M .
Oncologists' barriers and facilitators for oncotype DX use: qualitative study.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2016 Jan;32(5):355-61. doi: 10.1017/s026646231600060x.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer: Breast Cancer, Treatments, Decision Making, Genetics, Medication
Potosky AL, O'Neill SC, Isaacs C
Population-based study of the effect of gene expression profiling on adjuvant chemotherapy use in breast cancer patients under the age of 65 years.
The authors evaluated the relation between gene expression profiling (GEP) testing and the use of adjuvant chemotherapy by women treated in a general oncology practice. They found that adjuvant chemotherapy use after GEP testing is generally consistent with the recommended test interpretation for women with a high or low predicted risk of recurrence. Chemotherapy use in the intermediate-risk group increased with Recurrence Score values, and evidence from ongoing randomized trials may help to clarify whether this finding reflects optimal interpretation of GEP test results.
AHRQ-funded; HS022915.
Citation: Potosky AL, O'Neill SC, Isaacs C .
Population-based study of the effect of gene expression profiling on adjuvant chemotherapy use in breast cancer patients under the age of 65 years.
Cancer 2015 Nov 15;121(22):4062-70. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29621.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Treatments, Decision Making, Genetics, Practice Patterns, Women
Roberts MC, Weinberger M, Dusetzina SB
Racial variation in adjuvant chemotherapy initiation among breast cancer patients receiving oncotype DX testing.
The researchers examined whether adjuvant chemotherapy initiation varied by race. No racial differences were found in adjuvant chemotherapy initiation among women receiving ODX testing. As treatment decision-making becomes increasingly targeted with the use of genetic technologies, these results provide evidence that test results may drive treatment in a similar way across racial subgroups.
AHRQ-funded; HS022189.
Citation: Roberts MC, Weinberger M, Dusetzina SB .
Racial variation in adjuvant chemotherapy initiation among breast cancer patients receiving oncotype DX testing.
Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015 Aug;153(1):191-200. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3518-9..
Keywords: Cancer: Breast Cancer, Treatments, Decision Making, Genetics, Racial and Ethnic Minorities