National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 2 of 2 Research Studies DisplayedBossick AS, Painter I, Williams EC
Development of a composite risk index of reproductive autonomy using state laws: association with maternal and neonatal outcomes.
This study investigated whether greater reproductive autonomy would be associated with lower rates of severe maternal morbidity (SMM), pregnancy-related mortality (PRM), preterm birth (PTB), and low birthweight. It was hypothesized that greater reproductive autonomy would lower the risks of poor maternal and neonatal outcomes. The authors developed a composite index to quantify state legislation, which was used to examine the association with maternal and neonatal outcomes. A Delphi panel was used to inform index development, and restrictive policies were assigned values of -1 and enabling policies +1. Publicly available data was used to conduct a cross-sectional study of all live births in the 50 US states for people ages 15 to 44 from 2016 to 2018 to examine the association between the risk index and PRM, SMM, PTB, and low birthweight. There were 11,530,785 births, 2,846 pregnancy-related deaths, and 154,384 cases of SMM from 2016 to 2018. The Delphi panel found a summed state measure of 106 laws in 8 categories that could affect reproductive anatomy. In adjusted analyses, states in the most enabling reproductive autonomy quartile had a 44.7 per 10,000 higher rate of SMM compared with the most restrictive quartile. However, the most enabling quartile was associated with a 9.87 per 100,000 lower rate of PRM and 0.67 per 100 lower rate of PTB compared with the most restrictive quartile.
AHRQ-funded; HS013853.
Citation: Bossick AS, Painter I, Williams EC .
Development of a composite risk index of reproductive autonomy using state laws: association with maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Womens Health Issues 2023 Jul-Aug; 33(4):359-66. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2023.03.008..
Keywords: Maternal Care, Sexual Health, Women, Newborns/Infants, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Mullins BT, Basak R, Broughman JR
Patient-reported sexual quality of life after different types of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy: analysis of a population-based prospective cohort.
This study compares the effects of different types of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy on sexual function. A population-based cohort of 835 men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer from 2011 through 2013 was recruited in collaboration with the Rapid Case Ascertainment system of the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry. They were enrolled prior to treatment and followed retrospectively using the validated Prostate Cancer Symptom Indices (PCSI) instrument. The sexual function scores were compared among patients who received the following treatment types: external-beam RT (EBRT), EBRT with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), brachytherapy, nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (RP), and non-nerve-sparing RP. The cohort was surveyed at 24 months post-therapy, and RT alone was found to result in the best preservation of sexual function with brachytherapy, RT with ADT, and nerve-sparing RP yielding similar outcomes. Patients treated with non-nerve-sparing RP experienced the worst sexual function outcome.
AHRQ-funded.
Citation: Mullins BT, Basak R, Broughman JR .
Patient-reported sexual quality of life after different types of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy: analysis of a population-based prospective cohort.
Cancer 2019 Oct 15;125(20):3657-65. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32288..
Keywords: Quality of Life, Sexual Health, Surgery, Treatments, Comparative Effectiveness, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Outcomes, Cancer: Prostate Cancer, Cancer, Evidence-Based Practice