National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 2 of 2 Research Studies DisplayedDesai RJ, Wyss R, Jin Y
Extension of disease risk score-based confounding adjustments for multiple outcomes of interest: an empirical evaluation.
Use of disease risk score (DRS)-based confounding adjustment when estimating treatment effects on multiple outcomes is not well studied. In this empirical cohort study, the investigators compared dabigatran initiators and warfarin initiators with respect to risks of ischemic stroke and major bleeding in 12 sequential monitoring periods (90 days each), using data from the Truven Marketscan database (Truven Health Analytics, Ann Arbor, Michigan).
AHRQ-funded; HS022193.
Citation: Desai RJ, Wyss R, Jin Y .
Extension of disease risk score-based confounding adjustments for multiple outcomes of interest: an empirical evaluation.
Am J Epidemiol 2018 Nov;187(11):2439-48. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy130.
.
.
Keywords: Blood Thinners, Cardiovascular Conditions, Medication, Outcomes, Research Methodologies, Risk, Stroke
Irvin VL, Kaplan RM
AHRQ Author: Kaplan RM
Effect sizes and primary outcomes in large-budget, cardiovascular-related behavioral randomized controlled trials funded by NIH since 1980.
The authors reviewed large-budget, National Institutes of Health (NIH)-supported randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with behavioral interventions to assess (1) publication rates, (2) trial registration, (3) use of objective measures, (4) significant behavior and physiological change, and (5) effect sizes. They concludedc that behavioral trials complied with trial registration standards. Most reported a physiological benefit, but few documented morbidity or mortality benefits.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Irvin VL, Kaplan RM .
Effect sizes and primary outcomes in large-budget, cardiovascular-related behavioral randomized controlled trials funded by NIH since 1980.
Ann Behav Med 2016 Feb;50(1):130-46. doi: 10.1007/s12160-015-9739-7.
.
.
Keywords: Outcomes, Cardiovascular Conditions, Research Methodologies, Behavioral Health