National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Cardiovascular Conditions (3)
- Care Management (1)
- (-) Comparative Effectiveness (5)
- Data (1)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (2)
- Evidence-Based Practice (3)
- Healthcare Delivery (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- Heart Disease and Health (1)
- Hospitals (1)
- Outcomes (1)
- (-) Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (5)
- Patient Safety (1)
- Prevention (2)
- Primary Care (2)
- Primary Care: Models of Care (1)
- (-) Quality Improvement (5)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (1)
- Quality of Care (3)
- Research Methodologies (1)
- Surgery (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 5 of 5 Research Studies DisplayedPersell SD, Liss DT, Walunas TL
Effects of 2 forms of practice facilitation on cardiovascular prevention in primary care: a practice-randomized, comparative effectiveness trial.
Effective quality improvement (QI) strategies are needed for small practices. The objective of this study was to compare practice facilitation implementing point-of-care (POC) QI strategies alone versus facilitation implementing point-of-care plus population management (POC+PM) strategies on preventive cardiovascular care. The investigators concluded that facilitator-led QI promoting population management approaches plus POC improvement strategies was not clearly superior to POC strategies alone.
AHRQ-funded; HS023921.
Citation: Persell SD, Liss DT, Walunas TL .
Effects of 2 forms of practice facilitation on cardiovascular prevention in primary care: a practice-randomized, comparative effectiveness trial.
.
Keywords: Cardiovascular Conditions, Prevention, Primary Care: Models of Care, Primary Care, Comparative Effectiveness, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Care Management, Healthcare Delivery
Hsu YJ, Kosinski AS, Wallace AS
Using a society database to evaluate a patient safety collaborative: the Cardiovascular Surgical Translational Study.
The authors assessed the utility of using external databases for quality improvement (QI) evaluations in the context of an innovative QI collaborative aimed to reduce three infections and improve patient safety across the cardiac surgery service line. They compared changes in each outcome between 15 intervention hospitals and 52 propensity score-matched hospitals, and found that improvement trends in several outcomes among the studied intervention hospitals were not statistically different from those in comparison hospitals. They conclude that using external databases may permit comparative effectiveness assessment by providing concurrent comparison groups, additional outcome measures, and longer follow-up.
AHRQ-funded; HS019934.
Citation: Hsu YJ, Kosinski AS, Wallace AS .
Using a society database to evaluate a patient safety collaborative: the Cardiovascular Surgical Translational Study.
J Comp Eff Res 2019 Jan;8(1):21-32. doi: 10.2217/cer-2018-0051..
Keywords: Patient Safety, Quality Improvement, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality of Care, Surgery, Cardiovascular Conditions, Comparative Effectiveness, Data, Hospitals, Research Methodologies, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Ciolino JD, Jackson KL, Liss DT
Design of Healthy Hearts in the Heartland (H3): a practice-randomized, comparative effectiveness study.
The Healthy Hearts in the Heartland (H3) study is part of a nationwide effort, EvidenceNOW, seeking to better understand the ability of small primary care practices to improve "ABCS" clinical quality measures: appropriate Aspirin therapy, Blood pressure control, Cholesterol management, and Smoking cessation. In this paper, the authors describe the design and randomization of the H3 study.
AHRQ-funded; HS023921.
Citation: Ciolino JD, Jackson KL, Liss DT .
Design of Healthy Hearts in the Heartland (H3): a practice-randomized, comparative effectiveness study.
Contemp Clin Trials 2018 Aug;71:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.06.004..
Keywords: Cardiovascular Conditions, Comparative Effectiveness, Evidence-Based Practice, Heart Disease and Health, Prevention, Primary Care, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Jensen RE, Snyder CF, Basch E
All together now: findings from a PCORI workshop to align patient-reported outcomes in the electronic health record.
The goal of this paper was to report key findings from a 2013 Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute workshop on patient-reported outcomes, to report a summary of actions that followed from the workshop, and to present resulting recommendations that address patient, clinical and research/quality improvement barriers to regular use.
AHRQ-funded; HS000029.
Citation: Jensen RE, Snyder CF, Basch E .
All together now: findings from a PCORI workshop to align patient-reported outcomes in the electronic health record.
J Comp Eff Res 2016 Nov;5(6):561-67. doi: 10.2217/cer-2016-0026.
.
.
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Quality Improvement
Zurovac J, Moreno L, Crosson J
Using multifactorial experiments for comparative effectiveness research in physician practices with electronic health record.
This paper identifies the opportunities for using efficient multifactorial designs and electronic health records (EHR) data to evaluate quality-improvement efforts in physician practices. It concludes that the use of efficient multifactor experimental designs, especially coupled with EHR data, has great promise for helping physician practices, hospitals, and other stakeholders conduct rapid-cycle comparative effectiveness research in order to assess alternative ways of implementing various aspects of care.
AHRQ-funded; HS022789.
Citation: Zurovac J, Moreno L, Crosson J .
Using multifactorial experiments for comparative effectiveness research in physician practices with electronic health record.
eGEMS 2013 Dec 30;1(3):1037. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1037..
Keywords: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Quality Improvement, Comparative Effectiveness