National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Arthritis (1)
- Asthma (1)
- Cancer (1)
- Cancer: Colorectal Cancer (1)
- Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) (1)
- Children/Adolescents (2)
- Chronic Conditions (1)
- (-) Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (16)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (1)
- Colonoscopy (1)
- Decision Making (7)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (3)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (2)
- Emergency Department (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (7)
- Guidelines (1)
- Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (11)
- Implementation (1)
- Kidney Disease and Health (1)
- Medication (1)
- Opioids (1)
- Orthopedics (1)
- Outcomes (2)
- Pain (2)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (4)
- (-) Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (16)
- Prevention (1)
- Primary Care (1)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (1)
- Registries (1)
- Respiratory Conditions (1)
- Screening (2)
- Sepsis (2)
- Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 16 of 16 Research Studies DisplayedKrishnan JA, Margellos-Anast H, Kumar R
Coordinated Health Care Interventions for Childhood Asthma Gaps in Outcomes (CHICAGO) plan.
The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare an emergency-department- (ED) only intervention and home visits by community health workers for 6 months (ED-plus-home) and enhanced usual care (UC). The study enrolled children aged 5 to 11 years with uncontrolled asthma. The primary outcomes were change over 6 months in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Asthma Impact Scale score in children and Satisfaction with Participation in Social Roles score in caregivers. The secondary outcomes included guideline-recommended ED discharge care and self-management. The study found that of the 373 children recruited, only 63% completed the 6-month follow-up visit. Differences in Asthma Impact Scores or caregivers' Satisfaction with Participation in Social Roles scores were not significant. However, in the intervention groups guideline-recommended ED discharge care improved significantly versus in the UC group, and self-management behaviors were significantly improved in the ED-plus-home group versus in the ED-only and UC groups.
AHRQ-funded; HS027804.
Citation: Krishnan JA, Margellos-Anast H, Kumar R .
Coordinated Health Care Interventions for Childhood Asthma Gaps in Outcomes (CHICAGO) plan.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob 2023 Aug; 2(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2023.100100..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Asthma, Respiratory Conditions, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Emergency Department, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Health Information Technology (HIT), Racial and Ethnic Minorities
Dhopeshwarkar RV, Freij M, Callaham M
AHRQ Author: Harrison MI, Swiger J, Lomotan EA, Dymek C
Lessons learned from a national initiative promoting publicly available standards-based clinical decision support.
The purpose of this study was to discuss lessons learned from a national program promoting publicly available, standards-based Clinical decision support (CDS) resources, describe the challenges encountered with their use, and make suggestions for areas of improvement. The source of the findings was an evaluation of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient-Centered Outcomes Research CDS Initiative, the purpose of which was to advance evidence into practice through standards-based and publicly available CDS. The researchers utilized a review of literature and program materials, conducted key informant interviews, and administered a web-based survey about a public repository of CDS archives and tools for writing standards-based CDS. The review identified key lessons for developing and implementing standards-based CDS through publicly available repositories such as CDS Connect. The researchers identified trust as a key factor in uptake, which can be strengthened by transparent information on underlying evidence, collaboration with experts, and feedback loops between users and developers to support continuous quality improvement. In addition, lower-resourced health systems will need more support to ensure effective implementation and utilization. Finally, the study found that health systems want more information about patient-centered, clinical, and cost-related outcomes to facilitate justifying the investment required to implement publicly available, standards-based CDS.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 233201500023I.
Citation: Dhopeshwarkar RV, Freij M, Callaham M .
Lessons learned from a national initiative promoting publicly available standards-based clinical decision support.
Appl Clin Inform 2023 May; 14(3):566-74. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1769911..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Rizk S, Kaelin VC, Sim JGC
Implementing an electronic patient-reported outcome and decision support tool in early intervention.
The study’s aim was to identify and prioritize early intervention (EI) stakeholders' perspectives of supports and barriers to implementing the Young Children's Participation and Environment Measure (YC-PEM), an electronic patient-reported outcome (e-PRO) tool, for scaling its implementation across multiple local and state EI programs. A mixed-methods study was conducted with EI families (n = 6), service coordinators (n = 9), and program leadership (n = 7). Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted and used to share quantitative trial results. All three stakeholder groups identified thematic supports and barriers across multiple constructs within each of four Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) domains: (1) Six themes for "intervention characteristics," (2) Six themes for "process," (3) Three themes for "inner setting," and (4) Four themes for "outer setting." Priorities from stakeholders included prioritized reaching families with diverse linguistic preferences and user navigation needs, further tailoring its interface with automated data capture and exchange processes ("process"); and fostering a positive implementation climate ("inner setting"). Improving EI access (“outer setting”) using YC-PEM e-PRO results was also articulated by service coordinators and program leadership.
AHRQ-funded; HS027583.
Citation: Rizk S, Kaelin VC, Sim JGC .
Implementing an electronic patient-reported outcome and decision support tool in early intervention.
Appl Clin Inform 2023 Jan; 14(1):91-107. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1760631..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Health Information Technology (HIT), Children/Adolescents, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Implementation
Salloum RG, Bilello L, Bian J
Study protocol for a type III hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial to evaluate scaling interoperable clinical decision support for patient-centered chronic pain management in primary care.
The objective of this 3-year project is to study the adaptation and implementation of an existing interoperable clinical decision support (CDS) tool for pain treatment shared decision making, with tailored implementation support, in new clinical settings in the OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium. The evaluation will be organized by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, with an adaptation and tailoring of PainManager, an open source interoperable CDS tool. It is anticipated that this evaluation will establish the feasibility and obtain preliminary data in preparation for a multi-site pragmatic trial targeting the effectiveness of PainManager and tailored implementation support on shared decision making and patient-reported pain and physical function.
AHRQ-funded; R18 HS028584.
Citation: Salloum RG, Bilello L, Bian J .
Study protocol for a type III hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial to evaluate scaling interoperable clinical decision support for patient-centered chronic pain management in primary care.
Implement Sci 2022 Jul 15;17(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01217-4..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Pain, Chronic Conditions, Primary Care, Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Dullabh P, Sandberg SF, Heaney-Huls K
AHRQ Author: Berliner E, Dymek C, Harrison MI, Swiger J
Challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support: findings from a horizon scan.
This AHRQ-authored horizon scan identified challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support (PC CDS) and future directions for PC CDS. The authors engaged a technical expert panel, conducted a scoping literature review, and interviewed key informants. They quantitatively analyzed literature and interview transcripts and mapped the findings to the 4 phases translating evidence into PC CDS interventions (Prioritizing, Authoring, Implementing, and Measuring) and to external factors. Twelve challenges were identified for PC CDS development with lack of patient input identified as a critical challenge. Lack of patient-centered terminology standards was viewed as a challenge in authoring PC CDS. They also found a dearth of CDS studies that measured clinical outcomes, creating significant gaps in the understanding of PC CDS’ impact.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 233201500023I.
Citation: Dullabh P, Sandberg SF, Heaney-Huls K .
Challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support: findings from a horizon scan.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022 Jun 14;29(7):1233-43. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac059.
.
.
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Patient-Centered Healthcare, Health Information Technology (HIT), Decision Making, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice
Dullabh P, Heaney-Huls K, Hovey L
The technology landscape of patient-centered clinical decision support - where are we and what is needed?
This paper explores the technology landscape for patient-centered clinical decision support (PC CDS) and what has come out of Patient Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) and health care delivery system transformation efforts. The authors explore what is needed to make it more shareable, standards-based, and publicly available with the goal of improving patient care and clinical outcomes. Three sources of information were used: (1) a 22-member technical expert panel; (2) a literature review of peer-reviewed and grey literature; and (3) key informant interviews with PC CDS stakeholders. Ten salient technical considerations that span all phases of PC CDS development were identified. Although significant progress has been made, challenges remain.
AHRQ-funded; 233201500023I.
Citation: Dullabh P, Heaney-Huls K, Hovey L .
The technology landscape of patient-centered clinical decision support - where are we and what is needed?
Stud Health Technol Inform 2022 Jun 6;290:350-53. doi: 10.3233/shti220094..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Decision Making
Lin E, Uhler LM, Finley EP
Incorporating patient-reported outcomes into shared decision-making in the management of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study protocol.
This article describes a US-based 2-year, two-site hybrid type 1 study to assess clinical effectiveness and implementation of a machine learning-based patient decision aid integrating patient-reported outcomes and clinical variables to support shared decision-making for patients with knee osteoarthritis considering total knee replacement. Study results will be disseminated through conference presentations, publications and professional societies.
AHRQ-funded; HS027037.
Citation: Lin E, Uhler LM, Finley EP .
Incorporating patient-reported outcomes into shared decision-making in the management of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study protocol.
BMJ Open 2022 Feb 21;12(2):e055933. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055933..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making, Arthritis, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Orthopedics, Health Information Technology (HIT), Evidence-Based Practice
Gale BM, Hall KK
The use of patient monitoring systems to improve sepsis recognition and outcomes: a systematic review.
This systematic review’s aim was to determine the impact of automated patient monitoring systems (PMSs) on sepsis recognition and outcomes. The review was conducted using articles published from 2008 through 2018. Nineteen articles were identified for inclusion with 4 systematic reviews and 15 individual studies. Study results for outcome measures were mixed, with more than half the studies showing a significant improvement in at least one outcome measure (eg mortality, intensive care unit length of stay, ICU transfer). Evidence for process measure improvement was of moderate strength across multiple hospital units.
AHRQ-funded; 233201500013I.
Citation: Gale BM, Hall KK .
The use of patient monitoring systems to improve sepsis recognition and outcomes: a systematic review.
J Patient Saf 2020 Sep;16(3S Suppl 1):S8-s11. doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000750..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Sepsis, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Screening, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice
Richardson JE, Middleton B, Platt JE
Building and maintaining trust in clinical decision support: recommendations from the Patient-Centered CDS Learning Network.
Knowledge artifacts in digital repositories for clinical decision support (CDS) can promote the use of CDS in clinical practice. However, stakeholders will benefit from knowing which they can trust before adopting artifacts from knowledge repositories. In this paper, the investigators discuss their investigation into trust for knowledge artifacts and repositories by the Patient-Centered CDS Learning Network's Trust Framework Working Group (TFWG).
AHRQ-funded; HS024849.
Citation: Richardson JE, Middleton B, Platt JE .
Building and maintaining trust in clinical decision support: recommendations from the Patient-Centered CDS Learning Network.
Learn Health Syst 2020 Apr;4(2):e10208. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10208.
.
.
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Marcial LH, Blumenfeld B, Harle C
Barriers, facilitators, and potential solutions to advancing interoperable clinical decision support: multi-stakeholder consensus recommendations for the opioid use case.
These proceedings report on the AHRQ-sponsored Patient-Centered CDS Learning Network (PCCDS LN) Technical Framework Working Group (TechFWG), which was convened to identify barriers, facilitators, and potential solutions for interoperable clinical decision support, with a specific focus on addressing the opioid epidemic. The key insights were extrapolated to CDS-facilitated care improvement outside of the specific opioid use case. If applied broadly, the recommendations should help advance the availability and impact of interoperable CDS delivered at scale.
AHRQ-funded; HS024849.
Citation: Marcial LH, Blumenfeld B, Harle C .
Barriers, facilitators, and potential solutions to advancing interoperable clinical decision support: multi-stakeholder consensus recommendations for the opioid use case.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2020 Mar 4;2019:637-46..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making, Opioids, Medication, Pain, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Lomotan EA, Meadows G, Michaels M
AHRQ Author: Lomotan EA
To share is human! Advancing evidence into practice through a national repository of interoperable clinical decision support.
The purpose of this study was to describe how a national repository of clinical decision support (CDS) can serve as a public resource for healthcare systems, academic researchers, and informaticists seeking to share and reuse CDS knowledge resources. AHRQ’s CDS Connect has provided a functional platform where CDS developers are actively sharing their work. CDS sharing may lead to improved implementation efficiency through numerous pathways, and further research is ongoing to quantify efficiencies gained.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201600001U; 233201500022I.
Citation: Lomotan EA, Meadows G, Michaels M .
To share is human! Advancing evidence into practice through a national repository of interoperable clinical decision support.
Appl Clin Inform 2020 Jan;11(1):112-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701253..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Registries, Health Information Technology (HIT)
Magrath M, Yang E, Ahn C
Impact of a clinical decision support system on guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations for colonoscopy after polypectomy.
The goal of this study was to characterize guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations after implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR)-based Colonoscopy Pathology Reporting and Clinical Decision Support System (CoRS). Results showed that an EMR-based CoRS was widely used and significantly improved guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Magrath M, Yang E, Ahn C .
Impact of a clinical decision support system on guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations for colonoscopy after polypectomy.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2018 Nov;16(11):1321-28. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7050..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Health Information Technology (HIT), Colonoscopy, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Screening, Cancer, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Prevention
Goldstein SL
Automated/integrated real-time clinical decision support in acute kidney injury.
The author argues that early, real-time identification and notification to healthcare providers of patients at risk for, or with, acute or chronic kidney disease can drive simple interventions to reduce harm. Similarly, he believes that screening patients at risk for acute kidney injury with these platforms to alert research personnel will lead to improve study subject recruitment.
AHRQ-funded; HS023763; HS021114.
Citation: Goldstein SL .
Automated/integrated real-time clinical decision support in acute kidney injury.
Curr Opin Crit Care 2015 Dec;21(6):485-9. doi: 10.1097/mcc.0000000000000250.
.
.
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Kidney Disease and Health, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Diagnostic Safety and Quality
El-Jawahri A, Mitchell SL, Paasche-Orlow MK
A randomized controlled trial of a CPR and intubation video decision support tool for hospitalized patients.
The researchers examined the impact of a video decision tool for CPR and intubation on patients’ choices, knowledge, medical orders, and discussions with providers. They found that seriously ill patients who viewed a video about CPR and intubation were more likely not to want these treatments, be better informed about their options, have orders to forgo CPR/ intubation, and discuss preferences with providers.
AHRQ-funded; HS018780.
Citation: El-Jawahri A, Mitchell SL, Paasche-Orlow MK .
A randomized controlled trial of a CPR and intubation video decision support tool for hospitalized patients.
J Gen Intern Med 2015 Aug;30(8):1071-80. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3200-2..
Keywords: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making, Clinician-Patient Communication
Makam AN, Nguyen OK, Auerbach AD
Diagnostic accuracy and effectiveness of automated electronic sepsis alert systems: a systematic review.
This review aimed to determine whether automated real-time electronic sepsis alerts can: (1) accurately identify sepsis and (2) improve process measures and outcomes. It found that automated sepsis alerts derived from electronic health data may improve care processes but tend to have poor positive predictive value and do not improve mortality or length of stay.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Makam AN, Nguyen OK, Auerbach AD .
Diagnostic accuracy and effectiveness of automated electronic sepsis alert systems: a systematic review.
J Hosp Med 2015 Jun;10(6):396-402. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2347..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Health Information Technology (HIT), Sepsis, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Baillie CA, Epps M, Hanish A
Usability and impact of a computerized clinical decision support intervention designed to reduce urinary catheter utilization and catheter-associated urinary tract infections.
The researchers evaluated the usability and effectiveness of a computerized clinical decision support (CDS) intervention aimed at reducing the duration of urinary tract catheterizations. They found that usability improved to 15% with the revised reminder. The catheter utilization ratio declined over the 3 time periods, as did CAUTIs per 1,000 patient-days. They concluded that the usability of the reminder was highly dependent on its user interface, with a homegrown version of the reminder resulting in higher impact than a stock reminder.
AHRQ-funded; HS016946.
Citation: Baillie CA, Epps M, Hanish A .
Usability and impact of a computerized clinical decision support intervention designed to reduce urinary catheter utilization and catheter-associated urinary tract infections.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014 Sep;35(9):1147-55. doi: 10.1086/677630.
.
.
Keywords: Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI), Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs), Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)