National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 1 of 1 Research Studies DisplayedGoodsmith N, Dossett EC, Gitlin R
Acceptability of reproductive goals assessment in public mental health care.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the perspectives of patients and clinicians on the feasibility of assessing reproductive objectives in public mental health facilities and provide insights for potential customization in these environments. The researchers analyzed primary qualitative data from clients and healthcare providers at four urban public mental health centers catering to individuals with persistent mental disorders (gathered between November 2020 and October 2021). This exploratory qualitative investigation involved female patients of reproductive age who spoke English and were predominantly Black or Latina, as well as mental health professionals (psychiatrists, therapists, case managers, nurses). The study focused on the acceptability of evaluating reproductive aspirations in mental health treatment and gathered input on two discussion guides for reproductive goals assessment: PATH (Pregnancy Attitudes, Timing, and Importance of Pregnancy Prevention) and OKQ (One Key Question). Semi-structured phone interviews were conducted with 22 patients and 36 healthcare providers. Rapid qualitative analysis was employed to summarize interview transcripts, and matrix analysis was used to identify themes. The study found that attitudes towards reproductive goals assessment were generally favorable. Clinicians believed that the discussion guides would "initiate" essential conversations, enhance comprehension of patients' objectives, and aid in medication guidance and planning. A small number of patients expressed unease or uncertainty; some recommended that providers seek permission or enable patients to introduce the subject. Additional themes encompassed the necessity for contextual framing to address personal inquiries, the importance of establishing rapport before posing questions, and the difficulty of managing multiple priorities. Several participants found both PATH and OKQ prompts acceptable; some favored the "dialogue-based" and "open-ended" phrasing of PATH.
AHRQ-funded; HS026407
Citation: Goodsmith N, Dossett EC, Gitlin R .
Acceptability of reproductive goals assessment in public mental health care.
Health Serv Res 2023 Apr;58(2):510-20. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14111.
Keywords: Behavioral Health, Women, Sexual Health