National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 2 of 2 Research Studies DisplayedLaughlin-Tommaso SK, Lu D, Thomas L
Short-term quality of life after myomectomy for uterine fibroids from the COMPARE-UF fibroid registry.
Investigators compared women's perception of their short-term health-related quality of life measures and reported time to return to usual activities and return to work for different routes of myomectomy. Using data from the Comparing Options for Management: Patient-centered Results for Uterine Fibroids (COMPARE-UF) registry, and including abdominal and laparoscopic myomectomy procedures, they found that women who underwent myomectomy had substantial improvement in health-related quality of life, regardless of route of myomectomy; abdominal myomectomy was associated with a nearly 2-week longer time to return to work than laparoscopic myomectomy.
AHRQ-funded; HS023418.
Citation: Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Lu D, Thomas L .
Short-term quality of life after myomectomy for uterine fibroids from the COMPARE-UF fibroid registry.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020 Apr;222(4):345.e1-45.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.052..
Keywords: Quality of Life, Women, Surgery, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Registries
Stewart EA, Lytle BL, Thomas L
The comparing options for management: patient-centered results for uterine fibroids (COMPARE-UF) registry: Rationale and design.
The purpose of the study was to design and establish a uterine fibroid (UF) registry based in the United States to provide comparative effectiveness data regarding UF treatment. This registry, called Comparing Options for Management: Patient-centered Results for Uterine Fibroids (COMPARE-UF), will generate evidence on the comparative effectiveness of different procedural options for UF, in order to help patients and their caregivers make informed decisions that best meet an individual patient's short- and long-term preferences.
AHRQ-funded; HS023418.
Citation: Stewart EA, Lytle BL, Thomas L .
The comparing options for management: patient-centered results for uterine fibroids (COMPARE-UF) registry: Rationale and design.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018 May 8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.004..
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Registries, Women