National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Adverse Events (1)
- Ambulatory Care and Surgery (2)
- Blood Clots (1)
- Burnout (1)
- Cancer (1)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (4)
- Caregiving (1)
- Care Management (1)
- Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) (1)
- Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI) (2)
- Children/Adolescents (3)
- Chronic Conditions (1)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (1)
- Communication (1)
- Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) (10)
- Critical Care (1)
- Data (1)
- Diabetes (1)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (1)
- Disparities (3)
- Education: Continuing Medical Education (2)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (2)
- Elderly (7)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (6)
- Emergency Department (3)
- Emergency Medical Services (EMS) (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (5)
- Guidelines (1)
- Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) (6)
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) (2)
- Healthcare Costs (4)
- Healthcare Delivery (5)
- Healthcare Utilization (2)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (9)
- Health Insurance (1)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (2)
- Health Status (1)
- Health Systems (5)
- Heart Disease and Health (2)
- Home Healthcare (5)
- Hospital Discharge (2)
- Hospitalization (4)
- Hospital Readmissions (11)
- Hospitals (37)
- Implementation (1)
- Infectious Diseases (1)
- Injuries and Wounds (1)
- Inpatient Care (1)
- Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (1)
- Learning Health Systems (1)
- Long-Term Care (9)
- Medicaid (2)
- Medicare (22)
- Mortality (2)
- Newborns/Infants (1)
- Nursing Homes (19)
- Obesity (1)
- Organizational Change (1)
- Outcomes (7)
- Palliative Care (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (4)
- Patient Experience (15)
- Patient Safety (15)
- Payment (22)
- Pneumonia (1)
- Policy (5)
- Practice Improvement (1)
- Practice Patterns (1)
- Pregnancy (1)
- Prevention (1)
- Primary Care (4)
- Provider (5)
- Provider: Health Personnel (1)
- Provider: Nurse (1)
- Provider: Physician (2)
- (-) Provider Performance (120)
- Public Reporting (8)
- Quality Improvement (39)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (22)
- Quality Measures (42)
- (-) Quality of Care (120)
- Quality of Life (1)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (2)
- Registries (1)
- Respiratory Conditions (3)
- Risk (1)
- Rural Health (1)
- Sepsis (3)
- Shared Decision Making (5)
- Simulation (2)
- Social Media (1)
- Stroke (2)
- Surgery (11)
- Surveys on Patient Safety Culture (1)
- Teams (1)
- Telehealth (1)
- Training (2)
- Transplantation (1)
- Vulnerable Populations (1)
- Women (1)
- Workflow (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
101 to 120 of 120 Research Studies DisplayedCalaman S, Hepps JH, Bismilla Z
The creation of standard-setting videos to support faculty observations of learner performance and entrustment decisions.
The authors report their experience developing videos that represent five levels of performance for an entrustable professional activities (EPA) for patient handoffs. They describe a process that begins with mapping the EPA to the critical competencies needed to make an entrustment decision. Each competency is then defined by five milestones (behavioral descriptors of performance at five advancing levels).
AHRQ-funded; HS019456.
Citation: Calaman S, Hepps JH, Bismilla Z .
The creation of standard-setting videos to support faculty observations of learner performance and entrustment decisions.
Acad Med 2016 Feb;91(2):204-9. doi: 10.1097/acm.0000000000000853..
Keywords: Education: Continuing Medical Education, Provider Performance, Patient Safety, Quality of Care
Walkey AJ, Weinberg J, Wiener RS
Association of do-not-resuscitate orders and hospital mortality rate among patients with pneumonia.
The researchers evaluated the effect of analytic approaches accounting for do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status on risk-adjusted hospital mortality rates and performance rankings. They found that after accounting for patient DNR status and between-hospital variation in the association between DNR status and mortality, hospitals with higher DNR rates had lower mortality.
AHRQ-funded; HS020672.
Citation: Walkey AJ, Weinberg J, Wiener RS .
Association of do-not-resuscitate orders and hospital mortality rate among patients with pneumonia.
JAMA Intern Med 2016 Jan;176(1):97-104. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6324.
.
.
Keywords: Hospitals, Mortality, Quality of Care, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures, Pneumonia, Provider Performance, Respiratory Conditions
Kronick R, Casalino LP, Bindman AB
AHRQ Author: Kronick R
Apple pickers or federal judges: strong versus weak incentives in physician payment.
The authors provide an introduction for five papers commissioned by AHRQ focusing on incentives for physicians that are featured in this special issue of Health Services Research. These papers concentrate on suggesting a conceptual framework for the use of financial incentives in health care, key implications of the evidence to date on pay for performance and public reporting in health care and several related topics.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Kronick R, Casalino LP, Bindman AB .
Apple pickers or federal judges: strong versus weak incentives in physician payment.
Health Serv Res 2015 Dec;50 Suppl 2:2049-56. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12424.
.
.
Keywords: Payment, Provider Performance, Policy, Health Services Research (HSR), Quality of Care, Healthcare Costs, Quality Improvement
Berenson RA, Rice T
Beyond measurement and reward: methods of motivating quality improvement and accountability.
The article examines public policies designed to improve quality and accountability that do not rely on financial incentives and public reporting of provider performance. It concludes that public policies related to quality improvement should focus more on methods of enhancing professional intrinsic motivation, while recognizing the potential role of organizations to actively promote and facilitate that motivation.
AHRQ-funded
Citation: Berenson RA, Rice T .
Beyond measurement and reward: methods of motivating quality improvement and accountability.
Health Serv Res 2015 Dec;50 Suppl 2:2155-86. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12413.
.
.
Keywords: Quality Improvement, Policy, Provider Performance, Quality of Care, Payment
Layton TJ, Ryan AM
Higher incentive payments in Medicare Advantage's pay-for-performance program did not improve quality but did increase plan offerings.
The researchers evaluated the effects of the size of financial bonuses on quality of care and the number of plan offerings in the Medicare Advantage Quality Bonus Payment Demonstration. They concluded that at great expense to Medicare, double bonuses in the Medicare Advantage Quality Bonus Payment Demonstration were not associated with improved quality but were associated with more plan offerings.
AHRQ-funded; HS018546.
Citation: Layton TJ, Ryan AM .
Higher incentive payments in Medicare Advantage's pay-for-performance program did not improve quality but did increase plan offerings.
Health Serv Res 2015 Dec;50(6):1810-28. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12409..
Keywords: Medicare, Payment, Provider Performance, Health Services Research (HSR), Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Schlesinger M, Grob R, Shaller D
Using patient-reported information to improve clinical practice.
The purposes of this study were to assess what is known about the relationship between patient experience measures and incentives designed to improve care, and to identify how public policy and medical practices can promote patient-valued outcomes in health systems with strong financial incentives. It concluded that unless public policies are attentive to patients' perspectives, stronger financial incentives for clinicians can threaten aspects of care that patients most value.
AHRQ-funded.
Citation: Schlesinger M, Grob R, Shaller D .
Using patient-reported information to improve clinical practice.
Health Serv Res 2015 Dec;50 Suppl 2:2116-54. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12420.
.
.
Keywords: Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Patient Experience, Provider Performance, Policy, Payment, Public Reporting
Mukamel DB, Ye Z, Glance LG
Does mandating nursing home participation in quality reporting make a difference? Evidence from Massachusetts.
This study investigated one of the mechanisms that may detract from the effectiveness of quality report cards: voluntary versus mandatory participation of nursing homes in public quality reporting. It found that once reporting became mandatory, nonvolunteers improved more than volunteers in all but 2 staffing measures.
AHRQ-funded; HS021844.
Citation: Mukamel DB, Ye Z, Glance LG .
Does mandating nursing home participation in quality reporting make a difference? Evidence from Massachusetts.
Med Care 2015 Aug;53(8):713-9. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000390..
Keywords: Nursing Homes, Long-Term Care, Public Reporting, Provider Performance, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures, Elderly
Smith B, McDuff J, Naierman N
What consumers want to know about quality when choosing a hospice provider.
This study drew on focus group and survey data collected in 5 metropolitan areas to learn more about hospice quality data. The researchers found that participants placed top priority on measures related to pain and symptom management. The National Quality Forum-approved measures resonate well with consumers, who also appear to be ready for access to data on the quality of hospice providers.
AHRQ-funded; HS021870.
Citation: Smith B, McDuff J, Naierman N .
What consumers want to know about quality when choosing a hospice provider.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2015 Jun;32(4):393-400. doi: 10.1177/1049909114524475.
.
.
Keywords: Caregiving, Education: Patient and Caregiver, Shared Decision Making, Palliative Care, Provider Performance, Public Reporting, Quality of Care, Quality Indicators (QIs)
Abrahamson K, Miech E, Davila HW
Pay-for-performance policy and data-driven decision making within nursing homes: a qualitative study.
The researchers explored ways in which data were collected, thought about and used by nursing home employees as a result of participation in a pay-for-performance (P4P) program. Their findings indicated that participants in the Minnesota Performance-based Incentive Payment Program’s quality improvement (QI) projects perceived a change in the rate and manner in which they gathered, used, and considered data in their QI decisions.
AHRQ-funded; HS018464
Citation: Abrahamson K, Miech E, Davila HW .
Pay-for-performance policy and data-driven decision making within nursing homes: a qualitative study.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 May;24(5):311-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003362..
Keywords: Nursing Homes, Long-Term Care, Payment, Provider Performance, Shared Decision Making, Policy, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Michtalik HJ, Carolan HT, Haut ER
Use of provider-level dashboards and pay-for-performance in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.
The researchers sequentially examined an individualized physician dashboard and pay-for-performance program to improve venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis rates among hospitalists. They found that direct feedback using dashboards was associated with significantly improved compliance, with further improvement after incorporating an individual physician pay-for-performance program.
AHRQ-funded; HS017952; HS022331.
Citation: Michtalik HJ, Carolan HT, Haut ER .
Use of provider-level dashboards and pay-for-performance in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.
J Hosp Med 2015 Mar;10(3):172-8. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2303..
Keywords: Provider Performance, Payment, Blood Clots, Prevention, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Hospitals, Patient Safety
Ryan AM, Burgess JF, Pesko MF
The early effects of Medicare's mandatory hospital pay-for-performance program.
This study evaluated the impact of hospital value-based purchasing (HVBP) on clinical quality and patient experience during its initial implementation period. It found that hospitals that were exposed to HVBP did not show greater improvement for either the clinical process or patient experience measures during the program’s initial implementation period.
AHRQ-funded; HS018546
Citation: Ryan AM, Burgess JF, Pesko MF .
The early effects of Medicare's mandatory hospital pay-for-performance program.
Health Serv Res. 2015 Feb;50(1):81-97. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12206..
Keywords: Medicare, Provider Performance, Payment, Hospitals, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Patient Experience
Hussey PS, Luft HS, McNamara P
AHRQ Author: McNamara P
Public reporting of provider performance at a crossroads in the United States: summary of current barriers and recommendations on how to move forward.
The authors presented a vision statement and 10 recommendations for public reports to achieve their potential for engaging and informing consumers.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded.
Citation: Hussey PS, Luft HS, McNamara P .
Public reporting of provider performance at a crossroads in the United States: summary of current barriers and recommendations on how to move forward.
Med Care Res Rev 2014 Oct;71(5 Suppl):5s-16s. doi: 10.1177/1077558714535980.
.
.
Keywords: Education: Patient and Caregiver, Quality of Care, Provider: Health Personnel, Provider Performance, Public Reporting
Bevans KB, Moon J, Carle AC
Patient reported outcomes as indicators of pediatric health care quality.
The authors described and illustrated in case examples the functions, benefits, and challenges of patient-reported outcomes applications. They concluded that pediatric patient-reported outcomes are increasingly recognized as valuable indicators of health care quality in the clinical environment and as measures of organization- and provider-level performance.
AHRQ-funded; HS020408.
Citation: Bevans KB, Moon J, Carle AC .
Patient reported outcomes as indicators of pediatric health care quality.
Acad Pediatr 2014 Sep-Oct;14(5 Suppl):S90-6. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2014.06.002..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Quality of Care, Children/Adolescents, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures, Provider Performance
Maggard-Gibbons M
The use of report cards and outcome measurements to improve the safety of surgical care: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
This review summarized the history of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project and its components, and described the evidence that feeding outcomes back to providers, along with real-time comparisons with other hospital rates, leads to quality improvement, better patient outcomes, cost savings and overall improved patient safety.
AHRQ-funded; 2902007100621.
Citation: Maggard-Gibbons M .
The use of report cards and outcome measurements to improve the safety of surgical care: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
BMJ Qual Saf 2014 Jul;23(7):589-99. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002223..
Keywords: Quality Improvement, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures, Quality of Care, Surgery, Patient Safety, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Provider Performance
Arora VM, Berhie S, Horwitz LI
Using standardized videos to validate a measure of handoff quality: the handoff mini-clinical examination exercise.
The researchers report the results of the development of a shorter Handoff Mini-Clinical Examination Exercise (CEX), along with the formal establishment of its construct validity, namely its ability to distinguish between levels of performance in 3 domains of handoff quality. They were able to demonstrate evidence that the Handoff Mini-CEX can draw reliable and valid conclusions regarding handoff performance by physicians in U.S. hospitals.
AHRQ-funded; HS018278
Citation: Arora VM, Berhie S, Horwitz LI .
Using standardized videos to validate a measure of handoff quality: the handoff mini-clinical examination exercise.
J Hospital Med. 2014 Jul;9(7):441-6. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2185.
.
.
Keywords: Provider Performance, Quality Measures, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Education: Continuing Medical Education, Patient Safety
Paddock SM
Statistical benchmarks for health care provider performance assessment: a comparison of standard approaches to a hierarchical Bayesian histogram-based method.
The author compares histogram-based statistical benchmarking to other more widely used statistical benchmarking methods to demonstrate whether and how their performance differs, both in terms of setting a performance benchmark and also in terms of which providers are identified as exceeding the performance benchmark. Her study uses publicly available data from 3,240 hospitals on two process-of-care measures.
AHRQ-funded; HS021860
Citation: Paddock SM .
Statistical benchmarks for health care provider performance assessment: a comparison of standard approaches to a hierarchical Bayesian histogram-based method.
Health Serv Res. 2014 Jun;49(3):1056-73. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12149..
Keywords: Quality of Care, Quality Measures, Provider Performance
Sherman KL, Gordon EJ, Mahvi DM
Surgeons' perceptions of public reporting of hospital and individual surgeon quality.
This study (1) evaluated surgeons’ perceptions of public reporting of surgical quality; and (2) identified specific barriers to surgeons’ acceptance of public reporting. It found that surgeons are generally in favor of public reporting, but that they continue to have substantive concerns, particularly with respect to reporting individual level outcomes data.
AHRQ-funded; HS021857.
Citation: Sherman KL, Gordon EJ, Mahvi DM .
Surgeons' perceptions of public reporting of hospital and individual surgeon quality.
Med Care 2013 Dec;51(12):1069-75. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000013..
Keywords: Public Reporting, Quality of Care, Hospitals, Surgery, Provider Performance
Quigley DD, Martino SC, Brown JA
Evaluating the content of the communication items in the CAHPS clinician and group survey and supplemental items with what high-performing physicians say they do.
The authors examined the content of the CAHPS® Clinician and Group Survey and found that the survey items captured many of the most commonly mentioned doctor-patient communication behaviors and practices identified by high-performing physicians. However, three key aspects of communication--nonverbal communication, greeting patients, and tracking personal information about patients--were not captured by the current survey.
AHRQ-funded; HS016980.
Citation: Quigley DD, Martino SC, Brown JA .
Evaluating the content of the communication items in the CAHPS clinician and group survey and supplemental items with what high-performing physicians say they do.
Patient. 2013;6(3):169-77. doi: 10.1007/s40271-013-0016-1..
Keywords: Communication, Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Quality of Care, Clinician-Patient Communication, Provider Performance
Werner RM, Konetzka RT, Kim MM
Quality improvement under nursing home compare: the association between changes in process and outcome measures.
The researchers tested the extent to which improvements in outcomes of care are explained by changes in nursing home processes. Of the 5 outcome measures examined, they found that only improvements in the percentage of nursing home residents in moderate or severe pain were associated with changes in nursing home processes of care. They concluded that understanding the mechanism behind improvements in nursing home outcomes may be key to successfully achieving broad quality improvements across nursing homes.
AHRQ-funded; HS021861.
Citation: Werner RM, Konetzka RT, Kim MM .
Quality improvement under nursing home compare: the association between changes in process and outcome measures.
Med Care 2013 Jul;51(7):582-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31828dbae4.
.
.
Keywords: Nursing Homes, Long-Term Care, Quality Improvement, Quality Measures, Quality of Care, Provider Performance, Outcomes
Pesis-Katz I, Phelps CE, Temkin-Greener H
AHRQ Author: Spector WD
Making difficult decisions: the role of quality of care in choosing a nursing home.
The authors investigated how quality of care affects nursing home choice. They examined choices in California, Ohio, New York, and Texas, in 2001. They found that, in all states, consumers were more likely to choose nursing homes of high hotel services quality but not clinical care quality; choice was also significantly associated with shorter distance from prior residence, not-for-profit status, and larger facility size.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Pesis-Katz I, Phelps CE, Temkin-Greener H .
Making difficult decisions: the role of quality of care in choosing a nursing home.
Am J Public Health 2013 May;103(5):e31-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2013.301243.
.
.
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Quality of Care, Nursing Homes, Provider Performance, Quality of Life