Scope and range—Accessibility |
System should allow reporting in both real time and after the event, and allow reporters repeated access to update the report. |
System should facilitate access for diverse populations (e.g., age, race/ethnicity, education, non-English speakers) and should also be available to health care workers. |
Scope and range—Anonymity and confidentiality |
|
Scope and range—Voluntary vs. mandatory |
System should be voluntary. |
Levels of operation |
System should be multilevel and integrated from local (health care organization-based) to State, regional, national, and even international. |
Local-level reporting is important for consumer convenience and to provide immediate feedback to health care facility. Higher-level reporting is important for accountability, learning, and quality improvement. |
Organizations suitable to operate a consumer reporting system |
Independent, private, nonprofit organizations were preferred because participants viewed them as independent and less likely to have conflicts of interest. |
Participants' views on government's role were conflicting or ambivalent (pro: has authority; con: too bureaucratic). |
Organization should have consumer involvement, ability to make changes or linkages to organizations that can affect change. |
Operational approach—Staffing |
System should have staff to help consumers report, act as advocates, and provide a "human touch." |
System Infrastructure and design |
System should have multiple reporting modalities (in-person, telephone, paper-based forms, electronic submission) and allow both structured and unstructured reports. |
System should provide meaningful and timely feedback to reporters. |
System should have linkages with providers, provider organization, accrediting organizations, government agencies, educators, and others. |
Purpose and Goals |
Primary goals should be to improve health care quality, patient safety, accountability for providers and provider organizations, and learning (including educating providers and consumers). |
System should empower consumers by providing information to use in selecting sources of care. |
Linkages to quality improvement |
Consumer-reported data should be publicly available. |
System should provide feedback to providers and provider organizations. |
Maximizing reporting |
Need to implement public awareness campaigns about consumer reporting systems and patient safety, generally. |
Need to disseminate information about consumer reporting within health care facilities (e.g., at intake in hospitals). |
Essential to demonstrate that consumer reports of patient safety events are actionable and make a difference in improving patient safety. |
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- MONAHRQ
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Patient Safety
- Patient Safety Research Summaries
- Patient Safety Resources by Setting
- Quality Measures
-
Reports
- Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation
- Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches
- Advancing Patient Safety: A Decade of Evidence, Design, and Implementation
- AHRQ-Funded Patient Safety Research Featured in Health Affairs
- Health Care Safety Hotline
- Medical Liability
- National Academy of Medicine Reports
- National Action Plans
- Papers on Diagnostic Safety Topics
- PSNet
- Engaging Patients and Families
- About AHRQ's Quality & Patient Safety Work
- Patient Safety News and Events
- Education & Training
- Resources
Designing Consumer Reporting Systems for Patient Safety Events
Table 1. Key features of ideal consumer reporting systems from focus groups
Table of Contents
- Designing Consumer Reporting Systems for Patient Safety Events
- Executive Summary
- Chapter 1. Background
- Chapter 2. Conceptual Framework and Design
- Chapter 3. Description of Methods
- Chapter 4. Results and Key Findings
- Chapter 5
- Chapter 6. Discussion and Policy Implications
- Chapter 7. References
- Appendix A. Members of the Technical Expert Panel
- Appendix B. Peer Reviewers
- List of Tables and Exhibits
Publication: 11-0060-EF
Page last reviewed August 2022
Page originally created September 2012
Internet Citation: Table 1. Key features of ideal consumer reporting systems from focus groups. Content last reviewed August 2022. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.
https://www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/patients-families/consumer-exp/reporting/table1.html
